Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers

Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 3

Topic:	Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User:	"AK"
Date:	30 Sep 2004 12:18:46 PM
Object:	Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers

"Peace loving" illegal squatters (4th Geneva Convention) at it again.
====================================
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3701036.stm
Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers
Aid workers say harassment of Christians in the area is common
Two American Christian volunteers say they were beaten and robbed by masked
Jewish settlers while escorting a group of Palestinian children to school.
Kim Lamberty and Chris Brown say they were kicked, beaten with a chain and had
their possessions stolen close to the Maon settlement, near Hebron.
A settler spokesman said he had no knowledge of the incident and opposed any
violation of the law.
Israeli police said they were investigating the assault.
Ms Lamberty suffered a broken arm and Mr Brown a punctured lung in the attack.
Both have filed a complaint with Israeli police.
'Ambush'
The two are members of Christian Peacemaker Teams - a group that monitors
conflict between Israelis and Palestinians in the Hebron area.
Whilst recovering in an Israeli hospital in Beersheba, Chris Brown told BBC News
Online it had been "was an ambush - a premeditated attack".
"They threw a stone at my head which knocked me over and then whipped me with
chains," Mr Brown said.
He said that Ms Lamberty had her passport, mobile phone and money stolen by the
settlers.
He also said that harassment of Christian volunteers working with Palestinians
in the area is common.
"They normally throw stones at us or fire their guns over our heads - but this
is the most vicious assault so far."
Palestinians also complain of violent intimidation by Jewish settlers in the
Hebron area.
Around 1,200 soldiers guard some 600 Jewish settlers living in an enclave in the
heart of Hebron, home to 120,000 Palestinians - an area that has seen some of
the fiercest fighting of the four-year-old Palestinian intifada or uprising.

.

User: "Woodswun"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	30 Sep 2004 06:48:23 PM

In article <oqfol05eot9oaip554e6q4k630a94b23h1@4ax.com>, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

A puncture lung? Sounds more like "attempted murder" than "assault" to me.
Woods
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	30 Sep 2004 08:11:32 PM

Woodswun a écrit:

In article <oqfol05eot9oaip554e6q4k630a94b23h1@4ax.com>, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

A puncture lung? Sounds more like "attempted murder" than "assault" to me.

Woods

Note that they were masked, how do they know they weren't Palestinians
pretending to be Jews?
The Muslim terrorists are the ones who wear these things.
J.
.

User: "Woodswun"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	01 Oct 2004 04:57:55 PM

In article <8927d.367$j24.319@clgrps12>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Woodswun a écrit:

In article <oqfol05eot9oaip554e6q4k630a94b23h1@4ax.com>, AK

<someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

had

their possessions stolen close to the Maon settlement, near Hebron.

A settler spokesman said he had no knowledge of the incident and opposed any
violation of the law.

Israeli police said they were investigating the assault.

Ms Lamberty suffered a broken arm and Mr Brown a punctured lung in the

attack.

A puncture lung? Sounds more like "attempted murder" than "assault" to me.

Woods

Note that they were masked, how do they know they weren't Palestinians
pretending to be Jews?

We don't.

The Muslim terrorists are the ones who wear these things.

Um .... anyone who wants to avoid being identified wears those things. I don't
think we could leap to the conclusion that all bank robbers are terrorists
because only terrorists wear masks.
Woods
.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	02 Oct 2004 01:26:11 AM

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:57:55 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

We don't.

We sure do:
http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html
"Children from four small Palestinian villages walk to a central school in
the village of al-Tuwani. Because settlers have harassed the children since
school began in September, and the Israeli police would not intervene to
prevent the attacks, the villagers have sought the protection of
international accompaniment. A coalition comprising Christian Peacemaker
Teams, the Israeli group Tayush and members of Operation Dove, (an Italian
Christian organization that undertakes accompaniment work similar to CPT's
work), set up a presence in the village of al-Tuwani beginning on September
12, 2004. The three groups initially committed themselves to six weeks of
accompaniment after members of these organizations witnessed settler attacks
on children each time they made exploratory visits to the area. "
"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an outpost
of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a chain
and bat. All of the children escaped injury by running back to their homes."
The people who were protecting children against Jewish settlers are telling us
that Jewish settlers attacked them.
By what rule of logic can you say we don't know the attackers?
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	09 Oct 2004 12:46:45 AM

AK a écrit:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:57:55 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

We don't.

We sure do:

http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html

"Children from four small Palestinian villages walk to a central school in
the village of al-Tuwani. Because settlers have harassed the children since
school began in September, and the Israeli police would not intervene to
prevent the attacks, the villagers have sought the protection of
international accompaniment. A coalition comprising Christian Peacemaker
Teams, the Israeli group Tayush and members of Operation Dove, (an Italian
Christian organization that undertakes accompaniment work similar to CPT's
work), set up a presence in the village of al-Tuwani beginning on September
12, 2004. The three groups initially committed themselves to six weeks of
accompaniment after members of these organizations witnessed settler attacks
on children each time they made exploratory visits to the area. "

"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an outpost
of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a chain
and bat. All of the children escaped injury by running back to their homes."

The people who were protecting children against Jewish settlers are telling us
that Jewish settlers attacked them.

By what rule of logic can you say we don't know the attackers?

Because if they were in black and masked (Islamist terrorists M.O.) they
cannot know who they are, let alone tell where they come from.
Those who say otherwise are obviously anti-semites.
J.
.

User: "Woodswun"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	09 Oct 2004 01:04:13 PM

In article <9XK9d.1729$663.966@edtnps84>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

AK a écrit:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:57:55 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

We don't.

We sure do:

http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html

"Children from four small Palestinian villages walk to a central school in
the village of al-Tuwani. Because settlers have harassed the children since
school began in September, and the Israeli police would not intervene to
prevent the attacks, the villagers have sought the protection of
international accompaniment. A coalition comprising Christian Peacemaker
Teams, the Israeli group Tayush and members of Operation Dove, (an Italian
Christian organization that undertakes accompaniment work similar to CPT's
work), set up a presence in the village of al-Tuwani beginning on September
12, 2004. The three groups initially committed themselves to six weeks of
accompaniment after members of these organizations witnessed settler attacks
on children each time they made exploratory visits to the area. "

"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an outpost
of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a chain
and bat. All of the children escaped injury by running back to their homes."

The people who were protecting children against Jewish settlers are telling

that Jewish settlers attacked them.

By what rule of logic can you say we don't know the attackers?

Because if they were in black and masked (Islamist terrorists M.O.) they
cannot know who they are, let alone tell where they come from.

Correction ... *we* cannot know, because *we* have no information. They may
have a very good idea - the attackers could have been speaking Hebrew, they
could have been wearing prayer shawls, or any other number of things.
It's ridiculous for you to assume that the attackers were Palestinians just
because they were wearing masks.

Those who say otherwise are obviously anti-semites.

Raising Jews or the State of Israel up on a pedestal and claiming that neither
could ever do anything wrong is just as unbalanced and bigoted as being
anti-Semetic. There is no Master Race.
Woods
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	11 Oct 2004 05:43:34 AM

"Woodswun" <

> wrote in message
news:xKV9d.145030$Kt5.90519@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <9XK9d.1729$663.966@edtnps84>, Jean Guernon

<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

AK a écrit:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:57:55 GMT,

(Woodswun)

wrote:

We don't.

We sure do:

http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html

"Children from four small Palestinian villages walk to a central school

the village of al-Tuwani. Because settlers have harassed the children

since

school began in September, and the Israeli police would not intervene

prevent the attacks, the villagers have sought the protection of
international accompaniment. A coalition comprising Christian

Peacemaker

Teams, the Israeli group Tayush and members of Operation Dove, (an

Italian

Christian organization that undertakes accompaniment work similar to

CPT's

work), set up a presence in the village of al-Tuwani beginning on

September

12, 2004. The three groups initially committed themselves to six weeks

accompaniment after members of these organizations witnessed settler

attacks

on children each time they made exploratory visits to the area. "

"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an

outpost

of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a

chain

and bat. All of the children escaped injury by running back to their

homes."

The people who were protecting children against Jewish settlers are

telling

that Jewish settlers attacked them.

By what rule of logic can you say we don't know the attackers?

Because if they were in black and masked (Islamist terrorists M.O.) they
cannot know who they are, let alone tell where they come from.

...and yet YOU are still prepared to try and blame it on Palestinians eh,
Jean? By the way, dressed in black and masked is the M.O. of the SAS, the
IRA, Ninja assassins, rapists, cat burglars, Batman etc ... perhaps it was
Bruce Wayne?

Correction ... *we* cannot know, because *we* have no information. They

may

have a very good idea - the attackers could have been speaking Hebrew,

they

could have been wearing prayer shawls, or any other number of things.

It's ridiculous for you to assume that the attackers were Palestinians

just

because they were wearing masks.

Glue-non's hypocrisy has reached new levels..

Those who say otherwise are obviously anti-semites.

Raising Jews or the State of Israel up on a pedestal and claiming that

neither

could ever do anything wrong is just as unbalanced and bigoted as being
anti-Semetic. There is no Master Race.

Once again, Woods proves herself the most even-handed and sensible poster in
this newsgroup by a country mile..
.

User: "Woodswun"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	02 Oct 2004 01:01:17 PM

In article <saisl0lf09j45bv5utp6kn6q6g22cqan51@4ax.com>, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:57:55 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

We don't.

We sure do:

http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html

"Children from four small Palestinian villages walk to a central school in
the village of al-Tuwani. Because settlers have harassed the children since
school began in September, and the Israeli police would not intervene to
prevent the attacks, the villagers have sought the protection of
international accompaniment. A coalition comprising Christian Peacemaker
Teams, the Israeli group Tayush and members of Operation Dove, (an Italian
Christian organization that undertakes accompaniment work similar to CPT's
work), set up a presence in the village of al-Tuwani beginning on September
12, 2004. The three groups initially committed themselves to six weeks of
accompaniment after members of these organizations witnessed settler attacks
on children each time they made exploratory visits to the area. "

"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an outpost
of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a chain
and bat. All of the children escaped injury by running back to their homes."

The people who were protecting children against Jewish settlers are telling us
that Jewish settlers attacked them.

By what rule of logic can you say we don't know the attackers?

Um ... because they haven't been positively identified yet. The attackers are
*alleged* to be Jewish settlers until the perps are caught, tried, and found
guilty. Until then, WE can't possibly "know" anything about the perps - we can
only assume.
People mess up on stuff like this all the time - we've got dozens of cases of
rapes, assaults and murders who were released from prison after DNA results
proved that the victim was wrong in the ID of the perps. Therefore, until it's
proven, it's an open book - likely to be a Jewish settler, but we don't know
that for a fact, yet.
Woods
.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 01:15:14 AM

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:01:17 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

The people who were attacked say they were attacked by Jewish settlers, but you
still think we don't know if they were?
If absolute certainty is required before we believe anything, do we really know
if 9/11 hijackers were Muslims?
.

User: "Piester"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 04:46:14 AM

"AK" <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote in message
news:k26vl05nr4t80eq6evpbs4kf5n7glerb9l@4ax.com...

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:01:17 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

Um ... because they haven't been positively identified yet. The

attackers are

*alleged* to be Jewish settlers until the perps are caught, tried, and

found

guilty. Until then, WE can't possibly "know" anything about the perps -

we can

only assume.

The people who were attacked say they were attacked by Jewish settlers,

but you

still think we don't know if they were?

You have just lost any argument you have made in this group.... which have
the words ...
"Proof " or "Prove it" included.
Which would take care of most of them.
Linda

If absolute certainty is required before we believe anything, do we

really know

if 9/11 hijackers were Muslims?

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 07:53:25 AM

On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:46:14 +1000, "Piester" <pies@gopies.com> wrote:

You have just lost any argument you have made in this group.... which have
the words ...
"Proof " or "Prove it" included.

Give a specific example. Pick a post where I used the word "prove it" and
explain exactly how and where I lost the argument. Go ahead, try it.
Until then, your claim that I "lost" the argument means nothing.
.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 08:40:07 AM

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 12:53:25 GMT, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

You have just lost any argument you have made in this group.... which have
the words ...

"Proof " or "Prove it" included.

Give a specific example. Pick a post where I used the word "prove it" and
explain exactly how and where I lost the argument. Go ahead, try it.

Until then, your claim that I "lost" the argument means nothing.

By the way, to add something, I did post proof that shows attackers were Jewish
settlers.
http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html
"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an outpost
of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a chain
and bat"
The quote above CLEARLY states SETTLERS. Why is that not a proof?
If you say this is not a proof because the attackers were wearing masks, how is
that relevant? You identify them by their VOICE. The settlers speak Hebrew. You
identify them by their dress, by the fact that they came out of Ma'on
settlement, by the fact they beat Palestinian children and anyone who is trying
to help them. You identify them by their history. No Palestinian has ever
attacked CPT worker in Hebron. The settlers have attacked them many times
before.
The "mask" part is irrelevant You cannot identify them by their faces. Many Jews
look like Arabs, and vice versa.
The victims confirmed and identified the attackers as settlers.
How the hell is that not a proof?
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 10:58:01 PM

AK a écrit:

On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 12:53:25 GMT, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

You have just lost any argument you have made in this group.... which have
the words ...

"Proof " or "Prove it" included.

Give a specific example. Pick a post where I used the word "prove it" and
explain exactly how and where I lost the argument. Go ahead, try it.

Until then, your claim that I "lost" the argument means nothing.

By the way, to add something, I did post proof that shows attackers were Jewish
settlers.

This proves nothing from this anti-semite site.
How can they say they were from a specific place? Because they make it
up. They don't know, especially that they were dressed in black and
masked, the muslim terrorists M.O.
This ONLY shows you have found yet another anti-semite site to shower us
with lies.
J.

http://www.cpt.org/archives/2004/sep04/0034.html

"The five settlers, dressed in black and wearing masks, came from an outpost
of the nearby Ma'on settlement and attacked Brown and Lamberty with a chain
and bat"

The quote above CLEARLY states SETTLERS. Why is that not a proof?

If you say this is not a proof because the attackers were wearing masks, how is
that relevant? You identify them by their VOICE. The settlers speak Hebrew. You
identify them by their dress, by the fact that they came out of Ma'on
settlement, by the fact they beat Palestinian children and anyone who is trying
to help them. You identify them by their history. No Palestinian has ever
attacked CPT worker in Hebron. The settlers have attacked them many times
before.

The "mask" part is irrelevant You cannot identify them by their faces. Many Jews
look like Arabs, and vice versa.

The victims confirmed and identified the attackers as settlers.

How the hell is that not a proof?

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 11:06:56 PM

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:58:01 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

By the way, to add something, I did post proof that shows attackers were Jewish
settlers.

This proves nothing from this anti-semite site.

The workers worked for CPT. I will take the words of victims over yours.
By the way, prove that it's anti-semite site.
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 11:26:15 PM

AK a écrit:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:58:01 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

By the way, to add something, I did post proof that shows attackers were Jewish
settlers.

This proves nothing from this anti-semite site.

The workers worked for CPT. I will take the words of victims over yours.

So it proves they are liars. Masked gunmen all in black, the Muslim
M.O., how can they say they are Jews from a specific settlement. It is
impossible.
It is obvious. They make up *****.

By the way, prove that it's anti-semite site.

The proof is in the pudding.
J.
.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 11:59:20 PM

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 04:26:15 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

So it proves they are liars. Masked gunmen all in black, the Muslim
M.O., how can they say they are Jews from a specific settlement. It is
impossible.

I already refuted that argument. The "mask" part is irrelevant. You cannot
identify if someone is Jewish or Arab by their faces. Many Jews look like Arabs,
and vice versa.
They identified them by their voice. The settlers speak Hebrew. Or by their
dress, by the fact that they came out of Ma'on settlement, by the fact they beat
Palestinian children and anyone who is trying to help them.
No Palestinian has ever attacked CPT worker in Hebron. The settlers have
attacked them many times before.
That proves the attackers were Jewish settlers.
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	04 Oct 2004 02:02:14 AM

AK a écrit:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 04:26:15 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

So it proves they are liars. Masked gunmen all in black, the Muslim
M.O., how can they say they are Jews from a specific settlement. It is
impossible.

Impossible. In other words they cannot know and make up that *****.
J.

by the fact they beat
Palestinian children and anyone who is trying to help them.

No Palestinian has ever attacked CPT worker in Hebron. The settlers have
attacked them many times before.

That proves the attackers were Jewish settlers.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	04 Oct 2004 03:10:11 AM

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:02:14 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

Impossible. In other words they cannot know and make up that *****.

It sure is possible, as I already explained. I will take the words of victims
over a bigot like you.
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	04 Oct 2004 11:40:22 AM

Yeah you would dump the guilt of terrorists onto the victims. Just like
these anti-semites.
J.
AK a écrit:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:02:14 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

Impossible. In other words they cannot know and make up that *****.

It sure is possible, as I already explained. I will take the words of victims
over a bigot like you.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	04 Oct 2004 05:54:14 PM

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:40:22 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

Yeah you would dump the guilt of terrorists onto the victims. Just like
these anti-semites.

Just like you would dumb the guilt of illegal Jewish squatters who beat
children.
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	10 Oct 2004 10:40:54 PM

You can always only find single examples that cannot be sustained. While
there are thousands of examples that are proven facts from Muslim
terrorists.
Why is that you think?
J.
AK a écrit:

On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:40:22 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

Yeah you would dump the guilt of terrorists onto the victims. Just like
these anti-semites.

Just like you would dumb the guilt of illegal Jewish squatters who beat
children.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	11 Oct 2004 03:39:31 AM

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 03:40:54 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

You can always only find single examples that cannot be sustained.

Oh .. there are more than single .. there are thousands of attacks by settlers.
http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ArticlePage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=Article^l2788&enZone=Security&enVersion=0&
http://www.jewishsf.com/bk020517/i18.shtml
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/10/23/MN10812.DTL
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/140071_mideast18.html
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=102
http://www.pengon.org/new/new18.html
http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=3348
http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/10-13-2002-28116.asp
http://www.hoffman-info.com/palestine8.html
And I can go on and on and on ...
thousands of attacks
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Antisemite * Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	11 Oct 2004 04:07:17 PM

AK a écrit:

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 03:40:54 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net>
wrote:

You can always only find single examples that cannot be sustained.

No killing, only suspicion... And we see that it is probably *****.
Like everything you post here...
"But as they proceeded with the investigation, discrepancies were
discovered in Dvir-Zeliger's report. The other suspects also refused to
answer questions directed at them, and they were eventually released. In
the past few days, Dvir-Zeliger has recanted his earlier testimony,
Maariv added. His attorney, Ariel Atari, said that Dvir-Zeliger and the
others are innocent, and that the confessions and testimony were forced
out of him under pressure. "

http://www.jewishsf.com/bk020517/i18.shtml

No killing here, only suspicion (probably unfounded).
Well you have to try better. And no, propaganda links do not count. Only
links like the above.
Can't?
J.
.

User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
Title: Re: Antisemite * Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	11 Oct 2004 10:11:13 PM

Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<9CCad.17486$663.15868@edtnps84>...

AK a écrit:

Oh .. there are more than single .. there are thousands of attacks by settlers.

http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ArticlePage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=Article^l2788&enZone=Security&enVersion=0&

No killing, only suspicion... And we see that it is probably *****.

Like everything you post here...

lol. ;)
.

User: "AK"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	11 Oct 2004 03:52:47 AM

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:39:31 GMT, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

Oh .. there are more than single .. there are thousands of attacks by settlers.

http://web.israelinsider.com/bin/en.jsp?enPage=ArticlePage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=Article^l2788&enZone=Security&enVersion=0&

http://www.jewishsf.com/bk020517/i18.shtml

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/10/23/MN10812.DTL

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/140071_mideast18.html

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=102

http://www.pengon.org/new/new18.html

http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=3348

http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/10-13-2002-28116.asp

http://www.hoffman-info.com/palestine8.html

And I can go on and on and on ...

I could go on posting links .. But here is just one quote from the State
Department:
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2000/nea/index.cfm?docid=882
"Israeli civilians, especially settlers, harassed, attacked, and occasionally
killed Palestinians in the occupied territories. There were credible reports
that settlers killed at least 14 Palestinians during the year. In one case, an
Israeli civilian killed a Palestinian who previously had attacked a settlement
and killed an IDF soldier. Settlers also caused economic damage to Palestinians
by attacking and damaging greenhouses and agricultural equipment, uprooting
olive trees, and damaging other valuable crops. The settlers did not act under
government orders in the attacks; however, the Israeli Government did not
prosecute the settlers for their acts of violence. In general settlers rarely
serve prison sentences if convicted of a crime against Palestinians. "
You will be debunked every time you open your mouth.
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Only in your anti-semite dreams Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	11 Oct 2004 04:12:01 PM

AK a écrit:

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:39:31 GMT, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

Oh .. there are more than single .. there are thousands of attacks by settlers.

lies
Snipped debunked stuff about one supposed act of terrorism that turned
out to be unfounded suspicions.

And I can go on and on and on ...

Ha, they kill the dogs who try to kill them. I see. that is not
terrorism. terrorism is attacking them in the first place, dumbo.
Thousands and thousands? LOL, they get those who try to kill their
children and they got 14 only. thousands and thousands, that is typical
of your lies, you are confusing what the Palies do with what the jews do.
Again debunked to the bone by your own *****. LOL
J.
.

User: "tw"
Title: Re: Only in your anti-semite dreams Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	12 Oct 2004 03:51:31 AM

"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:BGCad.17487$663.1895@edtnps84...

AK a écrit:

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:39:31 GMT, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

Oh .. there are more than single .. there are thousands of attacks by

settlers.

lies

Snipped debunked stuff about one supposed act of terrorism that turned
out to be unfounded suspicions.

And I can go on and on and on ...

occasionally

killed Palestinians in the occupied territories. There were credible

reports

that settlers killed at least 14 Palestinians during the year. In one

case, an

Israeli civilian killed a Palestinian who previously had attacked a

settlement

and killed an IDF soldier.

Ha, they kill the dogs who try to kill them. I see.

No, you see what you want to see as usual. In only one incident of the 14
murders mentioned was the victim a Palestinian who had killed a soldier
(which you said was excusable when taling about the King David Hotel
bombing!!)

that is not terrorism. terrorism is attacking them in the first place,

dumbo.
Which in 13 out of the 14 reported cases of murder appears to be what
happened.

Thousands and thousands? LOL, they get those who try to kill their
children and they got 14 only.

They got one only, and he had killed a soldier (which you said was excusable
when taling about the King David Hotel bombing!!)

thousands and thousands, that is typical
of your lies, you are confusing what the Palies do with what the jews do.

Again debunked to the bone by your own *****. LOL

Again, you are debunked to teh bone by your own *****.
.

User: "Woodswun"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 09:33:14 AM

In article <k26vl05nr4t80eq6evpbs4kf5n7glerb9l@4ax.com>, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:01:17 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

Um ... because they haven't been positively identified yet. The attackers are

*alleged* to be Jewish settlers until the perps are caught, tried, and found
guilty. Until then, WE can't possibly "know" anything about the perps - we

can

only assume.

The people who were attacked say they were attacked by Jewish settlers, but you
still think we don't know if they were?

If absolute certainty is required before we believe anything, do we really
know
if 9/11 hijackers were Muslims?

You seem to be having a real problem with this. The victims said the attackers
were Jewish settlers. Fine, they probably were - but we don't KNOW that until
the crime is investigated and they've been found guilty. (And if they're never
tracked down, we can have a pretty good idea that the victims were accurate).
So, the attackers are *probably*, or even LIKELY to be Jewish settlers, but WE
don't KNOW that for a fact. There is a remote possibility that someone feigned
being a Jewish settler to instill more trouble, and that should be kept on the
table until the facts determine otherwise.
Capiche?
Sheesh!
Woods
.

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 10:54:45 PM

Exactly.
J.
Woodswun a écrit:

In article <k26vl05nr4t80eq6evpbs4kf5n7glerb9l@4ax.com>, AK <someoneNasty@hotmails.com> wrote:

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:01:17 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

Um ... because they haven't been positively identified yet. The attackers are

*alleged* to be Jewish settlers until the perps are caught, tried, and found
guilty. Until then, WE can't possibly "know" anything about the perps - we

can

only assume.

The people who were attacked say they were attacked by Jewish settlers, but you
still think we don't know if they were?

If absolute certainty is required before we believe anything, do we really
know
if 9/11 hijackers were Muslims?

You seem to be having a real problem with this. The victims said the attackers
were Jewish settlers. Fine, they probably were - but we don't KNOW that until
the crime is investigated and they've been found guilty. (And if they're never
tracked down, we can have a pretty good idea that the victims were accurate).

So, the attackers are *probably*, or even LIKELY to be Jewish settlers, but WE
don't KNOW that for a fact. There is a remote possibility that someone feigned
being a Jewish settler to instill more trouble, and that should be kept on the
table until the facts determine otherwise.

Capiche?

Sheesh!

Woods

User: "Jean Guernon"
Title: Re: Jewish settlers 'attack' US workers	03 Oct 2004 10:58:59 PM

They didn't wear their mask that time, dumbo.
J.
AK a écrit:

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:01:17 GMT,

(Woodswun) wrote:

The people who were attacked say they were attacked by Jewish settlers, but you
still think we don't know if they were?

If absolute certainty is required before we believe anything, do we really know
if 9/11 hijackers were Muslims?

Page 1 of 3

Post reply

Jewish Democracy by Dr. William Pierce
The Soviet UNION was a crypto Jewish dictatorship. The European UNIONis a crypto Jewish dictatorship. Can we stop this nuisance once and for all?
FBI probes death of Jewish terrorism expert
From the Messiah to the 144,000 and the 200 million of the 12 tribes of Israel. On Jewish science.On the Global Holocaust of the Gentiles (Idolaters / Usuryists / Christians). The secrets of dephypotising humanity (Jewish science). To the Seven Serva
" It'z World War III already" , says Jewish spy
The U.S. Jewish Federation against Markku J. Saarelainen -.-----
Jewish Groups Concerned Over Google Results
More Idiot Propaganda from the American Jewish Committee

Syrian Paper Says US Silence Over Israeli Overflight Encourages Jewish State
Nativity banned but Muslim, Jewish symbols allowed
Jewish Supremacism
Nobody expects the Jewish Inquisition!
Jewish believer in the Shroud
Jewish Washington Post writer says he's had enough
Jewish Organised Crime in Amerika

NEWER

pg.716 pg.544 pg.412 pg.311 pg.234 pg.175 pg.130 pg.96 pg.70 pg.50 pg.35 pg.24 pg.16 pg.10 pg.6 pg.3 pg.1

OLDER