"jackeroo" <jackeroo@rnospamock.com> wrote in message
news:aU8sd.57755$K7.25795@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

"Daylight" <daylight80231@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:70ceae71.0412031239.7ab23c1f@posting.google.com...

Is it the first time Jews caught spying on the US? certainly not.
Have they ever been punished for doing so? Not even once!
So what is the big deal about it.



FBI searches offices of Israel lobbying group as part of spy probe

Thu Dec 2, 7:19 AM ET Top Stories - USATODAY.com

By Barbara Slavin and Toni Locy, USA TODAY

The FBI searched the offices of the premier pro-Israel advocacy

group

in the United States for more than six hours Wednesday, took away
computer files and issued subpoenas to four senior staffers in a
continuing probe of whether a midlevel Pentagon analyst passed
classified information to Israel.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Now let's hope America fails in Iraq and the whole Jewish plan goes
down in defeat. Wasn't this war launched for jews and under the

Jewish

pressure? If America wins, Jews will dominate the world economy
through their underground government in the USA. I cannot imagine a
world being controlled by Jews. What a messy world it is going to

be.

There was once a scorpion living near a river. The scorpion asked

all

birds around her to take her to the other bank of the river. All

birds

refused to help her. In one day a foreign bird arrived at the site.
The scorpion asked this bird, would you please help me to cross the
river? The bird said, why don't you ask your neighbors? The scorpion
said, they don't trust me. All of them think that I will bite them

and

kill them. The foreign bird said, if your neighbors do not trust,

how

do you want me to trust you? The scorpion said, if I bite you, we

both

will fall and die together? The bird believed her and allowed her to
come and set on his back. They flew together. When they were at the
middle of the river, the scorpion bit the bird. The bird said,
scorpion, you promised me you will not do it. What happened? The
scorpion said I couldn't resist my nature! The bird died and fell in
the river. And the scorpion died.

Now look at Jews throughout history, they always hurt the ones who
want to help them most. It is a nature and they cannot change it,

even

if that nature leads to their END!

And they say why people hate Jews.

Is it the people's fault or the jews are doing something wrong?


"If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for
this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this," - US Congressman
James P. Moran Jr.

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2003/ALLPOLITICS/03/11/moran.jews/story.moran.file.
ap.j

pg

AMERICA A STATE OF ISRAEL?

Re: Has Bush Lost His Mind??

Jews have double citizenship.

My family started the US military with George Washington in 1775.

I am not free. I can only hope for a civil war to legally kill those
that seek to undermine my empowerment.

Gab wrote:

"Daylight" <daylight80231@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:70ceae71.0412031239.7ab23c1f@posting.google.com...

Is it the first time Jews caught spying on the US? certainly not.
Have they ever been punished for doing so? Not even once!
So what is the big deal about it.
OFOURSE YOU ARE WRONG.

THERE IS ONE SPY FOR ISRAEL WHO HAS BEEN SENTENCED TO LIFE IN PRISON IN

USA, HIS NAME IS POLLARD.
BUT, WAIT A MINUTE. EXCEPT FOR THE YELLS AND SCREAMS OF ANTISEMITES, HAS
ANYTHING BEEN PROVEN OR CONCLUDED REGARDING THAT SEARCH AND SUBPOENA.
IN ANY CASE, JEWS DO NOT FLY AIRCRAFT INTO TALL BUILDINGS IN AMERICA.

Neither did Iraq..........whats with the ***** switch from "Israeli"
to "Jew"?? You a rascist?
YOU ARE AN IDIOT: POLARD IS AN AMERICAN JEW WHO TRIED TO SPY FOR ISRAEL.

Relivance to Israeli Nazism?




--
The courts have unanimously (and erroneously) refused to let defense
attorneys argue for nullification, typically by insisting that the jury
has no power to consider what the law should be, and that juries have no
lawful task but to decide whether the defendant broke the law. Yet, in a
fit of sheer inconsistency, the same federal courts of appeals are also
unanimous that it is permissible for prosecutors to urge juries to act
as the "conscience of the community" and use their verdict to "send a
message" about whether society should be willing to tolerate the
defendant's alleged conduct. James J. Duane, "What Message Are We
Sending to Criminal Jurors When We Ask Them to 'Send a Message' With
Their Verdict?," 22 Am. J. Crim. Law 565, 576-79 (1995).
The Sixth Amendment creates a right for the defendant to insist on a
jury to act as a community conscience and protect him from government
oppression, and yet only the State is allowed, when it chooses, to ask
the jury to consider matters of morality and conscience. Id. at 590-602.
Thus have we witnessed a complete perversion of the constitutional
priorities and structure.
One might fairly summarize the case law this way: "You may hope that the
jury will refuse to apply a harsh, unfair, or inequitable law, but you
may not urge them to do so." Steven Lubet, Modern Trial Advocacy 436

If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize the undisputed power
of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as
given by a judge, and contrary to the evidence...If the jury feels that
the law under which the defendant is accused is unjust, or that exigent
circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason
which appeals to their logic or passion, the jury has the power to
acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.

4th Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Moylan, 1969


[The jury has an] unreviewable and irreversible power...to acquit in
disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge...The
pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its
prerogative to disregard uncontradicted evidence and instructions of the
judge; for example, acquittals under the fugitive slave law.

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Unites States v. Dougherty, 1972


It is not only [the juror's] right, but his duty...to find the verdict
according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience,
though in direct opposition to the directionof the court.

John Adams, 1771


.....it is usual for the jurors to decide the fact, and to refer the law
arising on it to the decision of the judges. But this division of the
subject lies with their discretion only. And if the question relate to
any point of public liberty, or if it be one of those in which the
judges may be suspected of bias, the jury undertake to decide both law
and fact.

Thomas Jefferson, "Notes on Virginia," 1782


It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the
other hand,presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still
both objects are within your power of decision.....you have a right to
take it upon yourselves to judge of both,and to determine the law as
well as the fact in controversy.

Chief Justice John Jay, Georgia v. Brailsford, 1794


Jurors should acquit, even against the judge's instruction...if
exercising their judgement with discretion and honesty they have a clear
conviction that the charge of the court is wrong.

Alexander Hamilton, 1804


The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both the law
and the facts.

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Horning v. District of Columbia, 1920

Gab wrote:

"Daylight" <daylight80231@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:70ceae71.0412031239.7ab23c1f@posting.google.com...

Is it the first time Jews caught spying on the US? certainly not.
Have they ever been punished for doing so? Not even once!
So what is the big deal about it.
OFOURSE YOU ARE WRONG.

THERE IS ONE SPY FOR ISRAEL WHO HAS BEEN SENTENCED TO LIFE IN PRISON IN

USA, HIS NAME IS POLLARD.
BUT, WAIT A MINUTE. EXCEPT FOR THE YELLS AND SCREAMS OF ANTISEMITES, HAS
ANYTHING BEEN PROVEN OR CONCLUDED REGARDING THAT SEARCH AND SUBPOENA.
IN ANY CASE, JEWS DO NOT FLY AIRCRAFT INTO TALL BUILDINGS IN AMERICA.

Neither did Iraq..........whats with the ***** switch from "Israeli"
to "Jew"?? You a rascist?

Relivance to Israeli Nazism?




--
The courts have unanimously (and erroneously) refused to let defense
attorneys argue for nullification, typically by insisting that the jury
has no power to consider what the law should be, and that juries have no
lawful task but to decide whether the defendant broke the law. Yet, in a
fit of sheer inconsistency, the same federal courts of appeals are also
unanimous that it is permissible for prosecutors to urge juries to act
as the "conscience of the community" and use their verdict to "send a
message" about whether society should be willing to tolerate the
defendant's alleged conduct. James J. Duane, "What Message Are We
Sending to Criminal Jurors When We Ask Them to 'Send a Message' With
Their Verdict?," 22 Am. J. Crim. Law 565, 576-79 (1995).
The Sixth Amendment creates a right for the defendant to insist on a
jury to act as a community conscience and protect him from government
oppression, and yet only the State is allowed, when it chooses, to ask
the jury to consider matters of morality and conscience. Id. at 590-602.
Thus have we witnessed a complete perversion of the constitutional
priorities and structure.
One might fairly summarize the case law this way: "You may hope that the
jury will refuse to apply a harsh, unfair, or inequitable law, but you
may not urge them to do so." Steven Lubet, Modern Trial Advocacy 436

If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize the undisputed power
of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as
given by a judge, and contrary to the evidence...If the jury feels that
the law under which the defendant is accused is unjust, or that exigent
circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason
which appeals to their logic or passion, the jury has the power to
acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.

4th Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Moylan, 1969


[The jury has an] unreviewable and irreversible power...to acquit in
disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge...The
pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its
prerogative to disregard uncontradicted evidence and instructions of the
judge; for example, acquittals under the fugitive slave law.

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Unites States v. Dougherty, 1972


It is not only [the juror's] right, but his duty...to find the verdict
according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience,
though in direct opposition to the directionof the court.

John Adams, 1771


.....it is usual for the jurors to decide the fact, and to refer the law
arising on it to the decision of the judges. But this division of the
subject lies with their discretion only. And if the question relate to
any point of public liberty, or if it be one of those in which the
judges may be suspected of bias, the jury undertake to decide both law
and fact.

Thomas Jefferson, "Notes on Virginia," 1782


It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the
other hand,presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still
both objects are within your power of decision.....you have a right to
take it upon yourselves to judge of both,and to determine the law as
well as the fact in controversy.

Chief Justice John Jay, Georgia v. Brailsford, 1794


Jurors should acquit, even against the judge's instruction...if
exercising their judgement with discretion and honesty they have a clear
conviction that the charge of the court is wrong.

Alexander Hamilton, 1804


The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both the law
and the facts.

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Horning v. District of Columbia, 1920

"Ed" <do_not_spam_me@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:<oZydnSFTuvcrdy3cRVn-pw@comcast.com>...

"Daylight" <daylight80231@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:70ceae71.0412031239.7ab23c1f@posting.google.com...

Is it the first time Jews caught spying on the US? certainly not.
Have they ever been punished for doing so? Not even once!
So what is the big deal about it.

Especially given the fact that the USA spies on everyone else. It's
routine.

--- Jews 101 ---

Q. How many American spies caught in Israel?
A. None

Q. Why?
A. Because Jews do not trust any non jew.

Q. Why the USA doesn't send an America jew to spy on Israel?
A. Because Jews all over the world are loyal to Israel more than their
loyalty to the country they are living in.

Q.With all of the dirty activities Jews do in America, can America
punish Israel?
A. No, because America is controlled by Jews. And through America Jews
want to control the World. A dream that will never become true...

"Daylight" <daylight80231@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:70ceae71.0412041112.f304e7b@posting.google.com...

"Ed" <do_not_spam_me@nospam.com> wrote in message

news:<oZydnSFTuvcrdy3cRVn-pw@comcast.com>...

It's a really bad idea to attack the United States.