John Ramsay's Son Did It !!!
Everything else is a 'Cover Up'.
That Is All That I Can Say For NOW !!!
8< |
.
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
18 Aug 2006 07:59:42 AM |
|
|
"kmiller" <miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:1155890434.673504.256390@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
John Ramsay's Son Did It !!!
Everything else is a 'Cover Up'.
That Is All That I Can Say For NOW !!!
8< |
You're just absolutely insistent, determined about being a total *****. No
fact checking, no analysis, no thought whatsoever. Just moving at the
slightest manifestation of whim. Voices in your empty head..
It's people like you that give prophets a bad name. Hehehe.
They've got shoe print evidence, palm print evidence and dna evidence.
They've found no one to match it yet. The male dna taken from the little
girl's body rules out anyone in the Ramsey family.
Probably time to plonk you too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
19 Aug 2006 11:19:28 PM |
|
|
Watch the coming weeks News Releases (as to all those details that have
been hidden from the public, asthey will 'now' finally come to light).
- the killer had to have a full understanding of the whole house (not
just the basement)
- the killer had to have either waited a long time for the right
moment (or was not considered a threat by Jon Bennet)
- the only 'non-family' DNA of this whole case is based on skin
particles found under one fingernail and a 'single' pubic hair
- all family member's DNA matches where 'immediately' discounted by
the local coroner's office [due to "definite close proximity" to the
murder victim]
- original assessment on the footprints (and broken window) was that
they had been reported previously
- broken window was too small for any adult to crawl through
- the handwritting of the note has already been 'closely matched' to
that of Mrs. Ramsey
Everything that KARR has confessed to SO FAR, has already been
'accidentally' leaked by the local police within the first two years of
the murder. [ Any 'psychotic' could have picked-up on these details -
enough to create a semi-credible story. ]
I'm not saying that this is a PREDICTION of any kind, I'm just stating
facts - based on the PROBABLE !!!
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
20 Aug 2006 07:16:43 AM |
|
|
"kmiller" <miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:1156047568.386589.193470@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Watch the coming weeks News Releases (as to all those details that have
been hidden from the public, asthey will 'now' finally come to light).
- the killer had to have a full understanding of the whole house (not
just the basement)
- the killer had to have either waited a long time for the right
moment (or was not considered a threat by Jon Bennet)
- the only 'non-family' DNA of this whole case is based on skin
particles found under one fingernail and a 'single' pubic hair
- all family member's DNA matches where 'immediately' discounted by
the local coroner's office [due to "definite close proximity" to the
murder victim]
- original assessment on the footprints (and broken window) was that
they had been reported previously
- broken window was too small for any adult to crawl through
- the handwritting of the note has already been 'closely matched' to
that of Mrs. Ramsey
All of which, if true, points the finger directly at the Ramsey son.
Fry him too.
Everything that KARR has confessed to SO FAR, has already been
'accidentally' leaked by the local police within the first two years of
the murder. [ Any 'psychotic' could have picked-up on these details -
enough to create a semi-credible story. ]
Cite?
I'm not saying that this is a PREDICTION of any kind, I'm just stating
facts - based on the PROBABLE !!!
I think most of what you post is PRO-BABBLE
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
21 Aug 2006 10:41:48 PM |
|
|
Within the first few weeks (possibly days) of the murder - a picture
was released to the 'Mass Media'. This picture had OUTLINED key items :
the skipping rope, the 14" (plastic-???) tubing, the posture of the
body [and mention was made about an artist's painting brush and soiled
panties].
But, most importantly, was the fact that entry through the broken
window could not have been possible by anyone larger than a 5 year old.
- don't forget the back door being un-locked, but no footprints [in
the snow] to indicate that someone actually came-in (or left) through
that door !!!
Just some evidence (mis-leading OR not) that still needs to be
considered ???
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
22 Aug 2006 01:49:14 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "kmiller" <miller.k@sympatico.ca>
Spat the Words
Within the first few weeks (possibly days) of the murder - a picture
was released to the 'Mass Media'. This picture had OUTLINED key items :
the skipping rope, the 14" (plastic-???) tubing, the posture of the
body [and mention was made about an artist's painting brush and soiled
panties].
But, most importantly, was the fact that entry through the broken
window could not have been possible by anyone larger than a 5 year old.
Perhaps it was one of the son's friends.
Lots of speculation going on here, but I like the Sherlock Holmes
approach of ruling out what can't be possible.
- don't forget the back door being un-locked, but no footprints [in
the snow] to indicate that someone actually came-in (or left) through
that door !!!
Just some evidence (mis-leading OR not) that still needs to be
considered ???
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
22 Aug 2006 03:13:39 AM |
|
|
I will give you that 'Perseid' .
My second PROBABLE suspect would actually be a friend of John Ramsey's
younger son. (who was living at home, at the time.)
But, I still cannot understand the 'Partial' Cover-Up by the Ramsey
Family (ie: the Ransom Note) ???
8< [
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
18 Aug 2006 04:15:50 AM |
|
|
This "Nut Case" KARR is just trying to avoid a "Be-Heading' (manditory
sentence in Indonesia) for mingling with a Minor !!!
Better to get a "Life Sentence" in the United States (that can later be
disputed) than to loose your HEAD in a Foriegn Land.
I am Totally 'AMAZED" that the North American Media hasn't 'Picked-Up'
on this YET !!!
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
18 Aug 2006 02:07:35 PM |
|
|
kmiller wrote:
This "Nut Case" KARR is just trying to avoid a "Be-Heading' (manditory
sentence in Indonesia) for mingling with a Minor !!!
Better to get a "Life Sentence" in the United States (that can later be
disputed) than to loose your HEAD in a Foriegn Land.
I am Totally 'AMAZED" that the North American Media hasn't 'Picked-Up'
on this YET !!!
He was apprehended in Thailand, idiot! Not sure what the punishment is
for pedophiles there, but I doubt it is beheading!
Jane
8< |
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
18 Aug 2006 01:32:33 PM |
|
|
kmiller wrote:
John Ramsay's Son Did It !!!
You do know that they have DNA evidence, right?
And you are aware that the Ramsay's submitted
DNA to the police, which would not only rule them
out but would rule out any of the children.
I mean, you are intentionally lying. Right? You're
not spewing this malice out of shear ignorance,
right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
20 Aug 2006 01:23:21 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
I mean, you are intentionally lying. Right? You're
not spewing this malice out of shear ignorance,
right?
Pot/kettle/black.
Oh no, not the same really. You demand 'donations'. That's why I can
listen/tolerate Kim, but have an overwhealming desire to smash a spade
across your stupid head.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
22 Aug 2006 03:19:19 AM |
|
|
I'm assuming there 'Wolfy' that I am not the one you are referring to
here.
"Should I be concerned about you Creaping up behind ME ???"
;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
22 Aug 2006 10:26:34 AM |
|
|
kmiller wrote:
I'm assuming there 'Wolfy' that I am not the one you are referring to
here.
"Should I be concerned about you Creaping up behind ME ???"
;-)
You assume correctly, Kim. There 'used to be' an idiot posting here,
one who had his hand held out for donations and was feeding like a
parasite on the antipathy of his co-respondents.
Whilst I...well, rather disbelieve everything you say, I hold no
dislike at all. We are what we are. Sadly, the now deceased poster
(nasty things, shovels) stands outside that cliche.
No Kim, not you. You need have no concern about blunt instruments ;)
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
22 Aug 2006 01:41:03 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
There 'used to be' an idiot posting here,
I'm sorry, puppy, but as long as you're hear they'll
always be an idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
20 Aug 2006 03:38:23 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
JTEM wrote:
I mean, you are intentionally lying. Right? You're
not spewing this malice out of shear ignorance,
right?
Pot/kettle/black.
Well, no, actually.
But far be it from me to expect an intelligent response
from you.
As you clearly are not good at this, why don't you hold
off responding to me until you have something to say.
These displays of your jerking knee might seem like
clever digs to you, but not to anyone with an IQ above
70.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
20 Aug 2006 03:55:11 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
But far be it from me to expect an intelligent response
from you.
I'm not 'responding' to you. I reserve that for human beings. To me,
you are scum.
Oh, I know only too well that you thrive on eliciting replies, the more
contentious the reply, the more you thrive.
The way to hurt you, really hurt you, is to ignore you. Somehow, that
doesn't seem as satisfactory as using a spade on your head.
You insist on posting inane 'insults', weak jibes. You not only want,
you need, 'feeding' with some reply or another.
Well, as I can't get at you with a spade, I'll starve you of your
'food'.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
20 Aug 2006 06:35:01 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
I'm not 'responding' to you. I reserve that for human beings.
<Snicker>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: John Ramsay's Son Did It. |
18 Aug 2006 02:09:15 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
kmiller wrote:
John Ramsay's Son Did It !!!
You do know that they have DNA evidence, right?
And you are aware that the Ramsay's submitted
DNA to the police, which would not only rule them
out but would rule out any of the children.
I mean, you are intentionally lying. Right? You're
not spewing this malice out of shear ignorance,
right?
Kimberly has a habit of f**king up like this!
Jane
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
