Mag. 7.0 (was thought to be 7.4 at first),
about 90 miles west of Crescent City.
Tsunami warning was issued, now being reduced to watch,
and even cancelled for some areas.
--
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
14 Jun 2005 11:14:57 PM |
|
|
:-O
Somebody quick!!
Toss Michael Jackson another virgin!!
SuZanne
sorry...I just watched Jay do the monologue and it SEEMED like the right
thing to say.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Wally_Lorne=99?=" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
14 Jun 2005 10:58:42 PM |
|
|
Major Earthquake Strikes Off CA Coast
EUREKA, Calif. - June 14, 2005 - A major earthquake struck Tuesday
night about 80 miles off the coast of northern California.
The 7.0-magnitude quake struck at about 7:50 p.m. southwest of the
coastal community of Crescent City, according to the U.S. Geological
Survey Web site.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Trenton" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
15 Jun 2005 12:01:21 AM |
|
|
Who cares!!! What's the use of an earthquake if there are no casualties!!!
Then it's just a minor curiousity.
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:6h8va1lfhkfcnhd3g050qaip0qn69buvao@4ax.com...
Mag. 7.0 (was thought to be 7.4 at first),
about 90 miles west of Crescent City.
Tsunami warning was issued, now being reduced to watch,
and even cancelled for some areas.
--
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
15 Jun 2005 05:23:19 AM |
|
|
The Big One is coming soon as predicted, these are just precursors.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
15 Jun 2005 10:24:01 PM |
|
|
I don't think so, at least not where you may expect it !!!
As I have said before (and this one is 'proof' of that); "Earthquakes, as we know it,
will be seen in a different light regarding the Eastern Side of the Pacific Rim after
this year."
This one hit much farther north than most people expected (although much farther south
than I predicted), but still 'NOT' Southern California as most people have expected
!!!
As I had said 6 months ago, the BIG One will be off the coast of the northern portion
of America within one week of a major quake in the western region of South America.
[Chile saw a 7.9 mag. approx. one week ago, and this quake was a 7.0+ off the coast of
the north western shore of America.]
Although, I later posted that "Life Lost" would be minimal as this will not exceed 8.0
(as originally predicted), it would still "open eyes ... to the possibilities..."
This one may settle the 'plates' around the central portion of the States (for now),
but the north eastern portion of the Pacific Rim is still 'Stressed'!!!
Just A Thought.
:-(]
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
The Big One is coming soon as predicted, these are just precursors.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
15 Jun 2005 10:06:06 PM |
|
|
Tony......your track record as a seer sucks even worse than your luck.
I think it is funny that you follow recent EQ's with predictions like
that!
That's like predicting gas pains are merely a precursor for a big fart.
D'oh!! :)
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
16 Jun 2005 05:08:20 AM |
|
|
Susan the Unfit Mom wrote:
:
Tony......your track record as a seer sucks even worse than your luck.
I think it is funny that you follow recent EQ's with predictions like
that!
That's like predicting gas pains are merely a precursor for a big fart.
D'oh!! :)
SuZanne
Amzing how you mind works.
Anyway, I predicted the quake in advance of the recent onset.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
16 Jun 2005 12:48:54 PM |
|
|
The Amazing Mistic Z wrote:
Amzing how you mind works.
You *should* be amazed since yours doesn't! :)
Anyway, I predicted the quake in
advance of the recent onset.
You and the rest of the seismic activity whores! :)
It's been going on for years much like predictions of an elderly pope's
death.
LMAO!!
You are NO psychic - just some fool in Jersey. You have never had a hit
in all your years of predictions.
SuZanne
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
16 Jun 2005 09:19:26 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:48:54 -0400, (Su Zanadu)
wrote:
The Amazing Mistic Z wrote:
Amzing how you mind works.
You *should* be amazed since yours doesn't! :)
Anyway, I predicted the quake in
advance of the recent onset.
You and the rest of the seismic activity whores! :)
It's been going on for years much like predictions of an elderly pope's
death.
LMAO!!
You are NO psychic - just some fool in Jersey. You have never had a hit
in all your years of predictions.
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
Dani
SuZanne
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
17 Jun 2005 10:28:12 AM |
|
|
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
He's just a BIG HAIRY *****-tittied sollog! ;)
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
18 Jun 2005 09:02:25 AM |
|
|
Susan the Unfit Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
SuZanne
And you say what exactly when it happens?
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
18 Jun 2005 09:34:37 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Susan the Unfit Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
8<
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
SuZanne
And you say what exactly when it happens?
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
That'll be this year, right Tone?
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
18 Jun 2005 10:27:36 AM |
|
|
Amy wrote:
TheSilver@Bullet.com wrote:
Susan the Unfit Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
8<
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
SuZanne
And you say what exactly when it happens?
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
That'll be this year, right Tone?
-A
You really do need to get a better memory.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
18 Jun 2005 11:23:24 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Amy wrote:
wrote:
Susan the Unfit Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
8<
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
SuZanne
And you say what exactly when it happens?
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
That'll be this year, right Tone?
-A
You really do need to get a better memory.
LOL!!!
You claimed to have not read a post of tw's you had replied to.
By my usually reliable memory, you said it either just before or just
after last Xmas.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
18 Jun 2005 11:39:41 AM |
|
|
Amy wrote:
TheSilver@Bullet.com wrote:
Amy wrote:
TheSilver@Bullet.com wrote:
Susan the Unfit Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
8<
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
SuZanne
And you say what exactly when it happens?
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
That'll be this year, right Tone?
-A
You really do need to get a better memory.
LOL!!!
You claimed to have not read a post of tw's you had replied to.
By my usually reliable memory, you said it either just before or just
after last Xmas.
-A
Uh, wrong again, try next Christmas AFTER the December elections you
weirdo.
Even people in the US Congress are talking about withdrawl sometime in
2006, that's 7 years BEFORE your pathetic prediction. So who'll be
closer? Obviously not you.
Care to try again, loser?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 02:31:53 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
Yes! That was during his era when he believed his dreams to be
*real* .. LOLOLOLOLOL!
I did get a kick outta that.
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
Oh yeah.. complete with: "I'm right AGAIN!!!!" "Look group, look, as
I've been saying for years!!!"
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point. You claimed you had a dream - believed it was real - then try
to come off as something happening in the future; which, in turn would
allow you to scream: "LOOK GROUP I WAS RIGHT (again!)"
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
...and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie; we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You - you're just a sheep; an armchair warrior who says: "we we we"
when it is NOT you out there risking it all.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 11:42:50 AM |
|
|
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
There was no lie.
Then the Liberals made sure that Saddam had over 7 months to hide or
move those WMD out of the country. The fact that there are new
weapons caches and new underground bunkers still being found in Iraq
proves that not everything has been uncovered.
I don't expect you to graspthis you have the intelligence of an 11
year old.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 11:54:15 AM |
|
|
<> wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Jane
There was no lie.
Then the Liberals made sure that Saddam had over 7 months to hide or
move those WMD out of the country. The fact that there are new
weapons caches and new underground bunkers still being found in Iraq
proves that not everything has been uncovered.
I don't expect you to graspthis you have the intelligence of an 11
year old.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 12:20:23 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Jane
Yep, but Liberals are disingenious bastards and will NEVER admit to
the truth.
Tony
There was no lie.
Then the Liberals made sure that Saddam had over 7 months to hide or
move those WMD out of the country. The fact that there are new
weapons caches and new underground bunkers still being found in Iraq
proves that not everything has been uncovered.
I don't expect you to graspthis you have the intelligence of an 11
year old.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 12:19:55 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Yes, Iraq had WMDs during the Iran war, when we were still supporting
them. The issue was whether or not there was (1)an ongoing WMD program
to manufacture more and (2)whether said WMDs were in a position to
inflict immediate damage on the US.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 12:22:41 PM |
|
|
Sandy wrote:
Jane wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Yes, Iraq had WMDs during the Iran war, when we were still supporting
them. The issue was whether or not there was (1)an ongoing WMD program
to manufacture more and (2)whether said WMDs were in a position to
inflict immediate damage on the US.
Woods
And all intellgence services said that they did.
That has been spelled out for you dozens of times, yet there is some
sort of block in your brain that is preventing the info from getting
through.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 12:27:28 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Sandy wrote:
Jane wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Yes, Iraq had WMDs during the Iran war, when we were still supporting
them. The issue was whether or not there was (1)an ongoing WMD program
to manufacture more and (2)whether said WMDs were in a position to
inflict immediate damage on the US.
Woods
And all intellgence services said that they did.
The info that Iraq had had WMDs was known well before the US, under
Reagan, elected to support Iraq in the Iran-Iraq conflict. Yes.
That has been spelled out for you dozens of times, yet there is some
sort of block in your brain that is preventing the info from getting
through.
The issue was not whether Iraq had ever had WMDs, it was whether they
were an immenet threat to the US. Obviously, Bush didn't know where
they were like he claimed, so he lied. Americancs died because of his
lies. He should be impeached and sentenced to life in prison for treason.
Woods
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 12:39:25 PM |
|
|
Sandy wrote:
wrote:
Sandy wrote:
Jane wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Yes, Iraq had WMDs during the Iran war, when we were still supporting
them. The issue was whether or not there was (1)an ongoing WMD program
to manufacture more and (2)whether said WMDs were in a position to
inflict immediate damage on the US.
Woods
And all intellgence services said that they did.
The info that Iraq had had WMDs was known
Exactly.
That has been spelled out for you dozens of times, yet there is some
sort of block in your brain that is preventing the info from getting
through.
The issue was not whether Iraq had ever had WMDs, it was whether they
were an immenet threat to the US. Obviously, Bush didn't know where
they were like he claimed, so he lied. Americancs died because of his
lies. He should be impeached and sentenced to life in prison for treason.
Woods
Why do you insist on repeating this lie?
Saddam was given over 7 months to hide or move out of the country any
WMD he did have; how the hell was anyone supposed to know where they
were after that?
Your hatred for the President is well known.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 12:55:17 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Sandy wrote:
wrote:
Sandy wrote:
Jane wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1119199362.fcc594969f1d85029050c2e0af619d0a@teranews...
Dani The Dense ***** wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:02:25 -0400, wrote:
Susan the GREAT Mom wrote:
Dani wrote:
Remember his "watch the ports"? :)
You mean his NO HIT dream that he posted?
If there ever is an explosion at a port somewhere in the world.......god
help us - he will claim he predicted it!
The two least intelligent people to ever post to this group obviously
haven't a clue.
As I've said.. you, my friend, are without a doubt THE least
intelligent poster on the group.. and *everyone* knows it!
Dani, if I were as stupid as you, I'd take a bottle of those pills on
my counter and end it.
Yes, the ports are very vunerable to Terrorists and the government has
said so many times, but I understand that you two have more important
things on your mind, like lizard watching and working on yout tan.
Ahhh.. the ports may have been very vulnerable - but that is not the
point.
That is exactly the point you lying little *****.
Real fucking Einsteins these two.
Compared to you - no doubt.
So Dani, how that job at WalMart going?
Oh and the poor sod *still* thinks
Saddam is the anti-Christ! LOL!
and don't forget "will come back into power" ! ;)
..and "uproot 3 nations" - LOL!
And you say what exactly when it happens?
It WON'T!
It won't be long, and then you will sit there with your mouth open and
contemplate those pills.
Do you you have a clue as to what is going to happen over there when
the US leaves Iraq?
What does that have to do with your idiotic claim that Saddam is the
anti-Christ? Trying to divert again seeing as your "prediction" is
utterly ridiculous and will never happen?
Sheesh, your stupidity never ceases to amaze.
Not that I expect you to be able to follow this, but when the US
leaves Iraq too soon because of Liberal pressure, the country will
fall into civil war and the Sunni's will win. The Sunni's will put
Saddam back in charge because the very mention of his name instills
fear in the Kurds and Shiites.
Of course you don't, you're a brainless twit.
Oh we know plenty. We know the war was based on an utter and complete
lie;
Which lie was this Dimbo?
we know Bush used our Military as pawns who he sent to die over a
farce. We know the troops should've never gone there in the first
place. We know that all the bloodshed (including the Iraqis) are on
Bush and Co's hands.
You're a scik little lying ***** who doesn't have a clue and merely
regurgitates what she hears from Liberal commentators.
Maybe if you had a loved one who was killed over there when in fact
there was NEVER any WMD (which is the lie we were told for invading)
you feel a bit differently.
Dani
Stop with your lie that your brother died over in Iraq, ok?
As for anyone lying about WMD, you are wrong. Every respectable
intelligence service in the world said that Iraq had massive amount
sof WMD, The German, French, Russian, Israeli and UK and USA
intelligence services all said that Iraq possed and sought to make
more WMD.
Even the Canadian Prime Minister stated that they HAD been in Iraq and HAD
been moved somewhere! It's somewhere in the archives; I remember because I
posted it for Jean way back when.
Yes, Iraq had WMDs during the Iran war, when we were still supporting
them. The issue was whether or not there was (1)an ongoing WMD program
to manufacture more and (2)whether said WMDs were in a position to
inflict immediate damage on the US.
Woods
And all intellgence services said that they did.
The info that Iraq had had WMDs was known
Exactly.
That has been spelled out for you dozens of times, yet there is some
sort of block in your brain that is preventing the info from getting
through.
The issue was not whether Iraq had ever had WMDs, it was whether they
were an immenet threat to the US. Obviously, Bush didn't know where
they were like he claimed, so he lied. Americancs died because of his
lies. He should be impeached and sentenced to life in prison for treason.
Woods
Why do you insist on repeating this lie?
Saddam was given over 7 months to hide or move out of the country any
WMD he did have; how the hell was anyone supposed to know where they
were after that?
Your hatred for the President is well known.
It's contempt, not hatred. He belongs in prison for treason.
Woods
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shirley" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 02:12:53 PM |
|
|
Your hatred for the President is well known.
It's contempt, not hatred. He belongs in prison for treason.
Woods
Tony
It should be a prison with a secure psychiatric unit. He should be detained
for life on the basis that he is a danger to the planet.
Shirley
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 02:13:15 PM |
|
|
Shirley
Your hatred for the President is well known.
It's contempt, not hatred. He belongs in prison for treason.
Woods
Tony
It should be a prison with a secure psychiatric unit. He should be detained
for life on the basis that he is a danger to the planet.
Shirley
Sheesh, another moron.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Master" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 04:50:24 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Shirley
Your hatred for the President is well known.
It's contempt, not hatred. He belongs in prison for treason.
Woods
Tony
It should be a prison with a secure psychiatric unit. He should be detained
for life on the basis that he is a danger to the planet.
Shirley
Sheesh, another moron.
Tony
Yep, the President is most certainly that too.
The Master
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Wally_Lorne=99?=" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 02:33:44 AM |
|
|
Hi Dani !!! '-)
Can U pleass tell me what's up with Ol' Misery Guts Sour Puss lately
?!?!?
Does it have a 'persecution complex' or something ?!?!
What's with all its temper tantrums of late or is it just trying to
seek attention from us other APNers ?!?!
HOOROO ;-)
UNCLE WALLY ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Wally_Lorne=99?=" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 02:36:16 AM |
|
|
PS -- What started this round of Faceache's Hissy Fits ?!?!?
HOOROO ;-)
UNCLE WALLY ;-)
--------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: LARGE quake off California... |
19 Jun 2005 02:53:13 AM |
|
|
On 19 Jun 2005 00:36:16 -0700, "Wally Lorne™" <wallylorne@yahoo.ca>
wrote:
PS -- What started this round of Faceache's Hissy Fits ?!?!?
Quite the show, ha! .. :)
He made a public offer for all the "fags" here to meet him in Jersey
to fight him - for *charity* ..lol (because he wanted to prove that he
wasn't afraid of Ricky when he went on that oh-so-convenient trip to
Aruba the day *after* Ricky challenged him).
Oh and shortly before he claimed he was going to Aruba - he stated
here that he has no need nor desire to ever travel outside of America!
How quick one changes his mind .. :)
I don't buy it though - he'll run off again as soon as fantasy is
about to turn into reality (ie: one of the guys here agrees to his
offer and sets a time and place).
HOOROO ;-)
And a big HOOROO to you too!
UNCLE WALLY ;-)
Niece Dani
--------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
