| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"The Doctor Is In" |
| Date: |
12 Nov 2004 10:00:50 AM |
| Object: |
Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
November 11, 2004
(CNSNews.com) - An emerging conspiracy theory among some political left
wingers acccuses Republicans of stealing the 2004 presidential election.
While many Americans wonder why Election Day exit polling was so
inaccurate and showed Democrat John Kerry winning, liberal bloggers and
activists insist the exit polls were correct and that Republican forces
used fraud to help President Bush win re-election on Nov. 2.
But the controversy isn't confined to bloggers and activists.
Greg Palast, a contributing editor to Harper's magazine, conducted an
investigation into voter fraud for BBC television's Newsnight.
"I know you don't want to hear it. You can't face one more hung chad. But
I don't have a choice. As a journalist examining that messy sausage called
American democracy, it's my job to tell you who got the most votes in the
deciding states. Tuesday, in Ohio and New Mexico, it was John Kerry,
Palast said in his investigation reprinted at TomPaine.com.
Palast's assessment is echoed by U.S. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), five
other Democratic congressmen and liberal groups such as Common Cause and
People for the American Way. They are demanding action on what they see as
election fraud in key states including Ohio and Florida. Conyers has asked
the General Accounting Office to probe the election results and hopes to
get congressional hearings on the subject. Kerry's brother Cam Kerry has
also weighed in on the allegations of voter fraud, assuring those
concerned that "we are not ignoring it."
Noticeably missing from the accusers is the George Soros-funded group,
MoveOn.org, and liberal film-maker Michael Moore, whose "Fahrenheit 9/11"
alleged voter fraud on the part of Republicans in Florida in 2000. Both
have opted to stay on the sidelines so far in the current dispute.
Palast, the liberal author of the New York Times' best selling book, "The
Best Democracy Money Can Buy," explained that "Although the exit polls
show that most voters in Ohio punched cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands
of these votes were simply not recorded.
"So what's going on here?" Palast asked his readers, before following up
with the answer. "[T]he exit polls are accurate. Pollsters ask, 'Who did
you vote for?' Unfortunately, they don't ask the crucial, question, 'Was
your vote counted?' The voters don't know."
Palast is critical of the Democratic Party for not contesting the 2004
election results.
"So here we go again. Or, here we don't go again. Because unlike last
time, (2000 election) Democrats aren't even asking Ohio to count these
cards with the not-quite-punched holes (called 'undervotes' in the voting
biz). Nor are they demanding we look at the 'overvotes' where voter intent
may be discerned," Palast explained.
"Despite the Democratic Party's pledge, the leadership this time gave in
to racial disenfranchisement once again," he added.
Activists alleging massive Election Day voter fraud, point to Warren
County Ohio, a suburb of Cincinnati, where the vote count was conducted in
secret. Warren County officials reportedly barred the press and other
observers from entering their administration building during the vote
tally, citing concerns about terrorism.
The liberal activists also point to Bush's better than expected vote
tallies in some heavily Democratic precincts in Florida as evidence that
the results were rigged. But behind the flurry of new charges of election
fraud is little or no evidence of irregularities, much less of wrongdoing.
In Lafayette County, Fla., one of the areas cited as having produced a
suspicious level of support for Bush despite the fact that it is
overwhelmingly populated by registered Democrats, it turns out that the
county also voted for Bush in 2000, voted for Republican presidential
nominee Bob Dole in 1996 as well as Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, in
1992, according to ABC News.
As for the alleged voting irregularities in Ohio mentioned by many of
Kerry's supporters, the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections announced that
it was merely a computer glitch that added excessive absentee ballots to
the final tallies in many precincts, without affecting the outcome of the
voting.
Jacqui Maiden, the coordinator for the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections,
said the computer error did not affect the vote tallies for any candidate,
just the turnout totals, according to Wednesday's Akron Beacon Journal.
Also Wednesday, at least one group alleging voter fraud withdrew its
accusations about Cuyahoga County after hearing Maiden's explanation.
'Need someone with Brass Knuckles'
Many others on the left are also venting their anger at the losing
Democratic nominee, John Kerry.
The liberal website Buzzflash.com blasted Kerry in a headline,
discouraging him from even considering another run for President in 2008.
"Why[?] To Let (Bush political advisor Karl) Rove Steal another Election
from the Democrats. John, We Need Someone with Brass Knuckles Next Time,"
read the Wednesday headline.
Angry Kerry supporters are meeting around the country to plot how to
expose what they see as a stolen election by the Bush administration and
the GOP.
"I think we need to protest this election no matter what Kerry does," said
Illinois resident Sue West at a meeting in Madison, Wis., on Nov. 6,
according to the journalistic website, Madison.com. The meeting, titled
"No Stolen Elections," was sponsored by the Madison Area Peace Coalition.
"I think it's fraud, pure and simple," West added.
Austin King, another activist attending the meeting, alleged that
erroneous information on college campuses was "was clearly a coordinated
national effort by Republicans to suppress the college vote," adding that
he would "very much like to see someone put in jail for this, and I'm not
a tough-on-crime guy," according to Madison.com.
Madison.com also quoted John Peck, a recent University of Wisconsin
graduate who expressed a disdain for electronic voting machines.
"The Luddites had an answer to machines," Peck said, referring to the
anti-technology movement in 19th century England that advocated the
destruction of automation technology thought to be taking over
manufacturing jobs.
Another Ohio group, calling itself "The League of ***** Voters," is
calling for public hearings in that state to investigate the election
results. Joining the call to action are such groups as Common Cause Ohio
and People for the American Way Foundation.
Conyers: 'Immediately undertake an investigation'
MSNBC television anchor Keith Olbermann picked up on the election fraud
charges on his program Countdown on Monday. Olbermann interviewed Conyers,
who said the voting "irregularities are sufficient in number, and more and
more members are joining me every day on this ... that we need the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) to document each and every incident
and then investigate it."
Joining Conyers in his request for a GAO investigation are U.S. Reps.
Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Robert Wexler (D-Fla.), Rush Holt (D-N.J.),
Robert C. Scott (D-Va.) and Melvin Watt (D-N.C.). Conyers demanded that
the GAO "immediately undertake an investigation into the efficacy of
voting machines and new technologies used in the 2004 election."
Conyers predicted his election investigation efforts "will probably lead
to congressional hearings."
Kerry's brother, Cam Kerry, issued a statement on the allegations of voter
fraud on Tuesday and acknowledged the groups seeking an investigation of
the matter.
"I am grateful to the many people who have contacted me to express their
deep concern about questions of miscounting, fraud, vote suppression, and
other problems on Election Day, especially in Florida and Ohio," Cam Kerry
wrote in a statement.
"I want to you to know we are not ignoring it. Election protection lawyers
are still on the job in Ohio and Florida and in D.C. making sure all the
votes are counted accurately. I have been conferring with lawyers involved
and have made them aware of the information and concerns people have given
me. Even if the facts don't provide a basis to change the outcome, the
information will inform the continuing effort to protect the integrity of
our elections," Cam Kerry explained.
Bush's 'friends in high places'
Theories abound as to how the president allegedly stole the election from
Kerry. BuzzFlash.com columnist Maureen Farrell wrote a Tuesday editorial
explaining how Bush was able to secure victory in Ohio.
"And luckily for Mr. Bush, he had friends in high places in the Buckeye
State, too. After all, Walden 'Wally' O'Dell, head of the voting machine
company Diebold, had already expressed a commitment 'to helping Ohio
deliver its electoral votes to the President' and Ohio Secretary of State
Ken 'Paper Weight' Blackwell appeared to have Bush's back, as well,"
Farrell wrote.
"Pundits have been asking how exit polls, which have historically been
accurate, could have been so wrong. Well, that's easy: There's an elephant
in the voting booth. Now, will someone please alert the media?" Farrell
concluded.
Another article on BuzzFlash.com even accused the Bush administration of
timing the recent offensive in Fallujah to drown out media reports of
voter fraud.
In a Nov. 8 article titled, "Stolen Election. America Hijacked," writer
Chuck Muziani wrote that, "nothing occurred in the day after the election
to elicit the order (to attack Fallujah) at that moment ... except ... the
web bloggers, and blackboxvoting.org, and votergate.tv investigating
reports of vote result discrepancies, and potential fraud in Ohio,
Florida, Pennsylvania, and a (sic) other states.
"In fact, the Fallujah offensive timing was engineered to steal attention
away from voter fraud reports," Muziani wrote.
"Forget planes being hijacked. America, as a whole, has been hijacked. Not
by Islamic-based terrorists. Not by Middle Eastern zealots who 'hate our
freedom,'" Muziani added. "And not by suicidal bomb-packing sycophants
programmed to praise their God by personally delivering their murder
victims to His pearly gate. America has been hijacked by a greedy, power
hungry political machine that could never win an election without stealing
it."
Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway dismissed the election fraud charges.
"To the anti-Bush Left, the so-called 'October Surprise' arrived a few
days late, on November 2. They invested everything they had into defeating
the President. Having lost, they now desperately try to reinvent the
results, revise history and deny reality," Conway wrote CNSNews.com in an
email.
"They are touting a conclusion ('Kerry Won!') hopelessly in search of
evidence. Their bitterness and denial consumes them. Defeated above board,
they have taken to the underground to blog and bloviate. But no serious
people are listening; they are just talk[ing] to themselves, much like
they did for the past year," Conway added.
.
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
12 Nov 2004 08:00:16 PM |
|
|
Subject: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election
From: "The Doctor Is In"
Date: 11/12/2004 8:00 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <cn2mnn010ji@enews1.newsguy.com>
Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
November 11, 2004
(CNSNews.com) - An emerging conspiracy theory among some political left
wingers acccuses Republicans of stealing the 2004 presidential election.
While many Americans wonder why Election Day exit polling was so
inaccurate and showed Democrat John Kerry winning, liberal bloggers and
activists insist the exit polls were correct and that Republican forces
used fraud to help President Bush win re-election on Nov. 2.
But the controversy isn't confined to bloggers and activists.
Greg Palast, a contributing editor to Harper's magazine, conducted an
investigation into voter fraud for BBC television's Newsnight.
"I know you don't want to hear it. You can't face one more hung chad. But
I don't have a choice. As a journalist examining that messy sausage called
American democracy, it's my job to tell you who got the most votes in the
deciding states. Tuesday, in Ohio and New Mexico, it was John Kerry,
Palast said in his investigation reprinted at TomPaine.com.
Palast's assessment is echoed by U.S. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), five
other Democratic congressmen and liberal groups such as Common Cause and
People for the American Way. They are demanding action on what they see as
election fraud in key states including Ohio and Florida. Conyers has asked
the General Accounting Office to probe the election results and hopes to
get congressional hearings on the subject. Kerry's brother Cam Kerry has
also weighed in on the allegations of voter fraud, assuring those
concerned that "we are not ignoring it."
Noticeably missing from the accusers is the George Soros-funded group,
MoveOn.org, and liberal film-maker Michael Moore, whose "Fahrenheit 9/11"
alleged voter fraud on the part of Republicans in Florida in 2000. Both
have opted to stay on the sidelines so far in the current dispute.
Palast, the liberal author of the New York Times' best selling book, "The
Best Democracy Money Can Buy," explained that "Although the exit polls
show that most voters in Ohio punched cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands
of these votes were simply not recorded.
"So what's going on here?" Palast asked his readers, before following up
with the answer. "[T]he exit polls are accurate. Pollsters ask, 'Who did
you vote for?' Unfortunately, they don't ask the crucial, question, 'Was
your vote counted?' The voters don't know."
Palast is critical of the Democratic Party for not contesting the 2004
election results.
"So here we go again. Or, here we don't go again. Because unlike last
time, (2000 election) Democrats aren't even asking Ohio to count these
cards with the not-quite-punched holes (called 'undervotes' in the voting
biz). Nor are they demanding we look at the 'overvotes' where voter intent
may be discerned," Palast explained.
"Despite the Democratic Party's pledge, the leadership this time gave in
to racial disenfranchisement once again," he added.
Activists alleging massive Election Day voter fraud, point to Warren
County Ohio, a suburb of Cincinnati, where the vote count was conducted in
secret. Warren County officials reportedly barred the press and other
observers from entering their administration building during the vote
tally, citing concerns about terrorism.
The liberal activists also point to Bush's better than expected vote
tallies in some heavily Democratic precincts in Florida as evidence that
the results were rigged. But behind the flurry of new charges of election
fraud is little or no evidence of irregularities, much less of wrongdoing.
In Lafayette County, Fla., one of the areas cited as having produced a
suspicious level of support for Bush despite the fact that it is
overwhelmingly populated by registered Democrats, it turns out that the
county also voted for Bush in 2000, voted for Republican presidential
nominee Bob Dole in 1996 as well as Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, in
1992, according to ABC News.
As for the alleged voting irregularities in Ohio mentioned by many of
Kerry's supporters, the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections announced that
it was merely a computer glitch that added excessive absentee ballots to
the final tallies in many precincts, without affecting the outcome of the
voting.
Jacqui Maiden, the coordinator for the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections,
said the computer error did not affect the vote tallies for any candidate,
just the turnout totals, according to Wednesday's Akron Beacon Journal.
Also Wednesday, at least one group alleging voter fraud withdrew its
accusations about Cuyahoga County after hearing Maiden's explanation.
'Need someone with Brass Knuckles'
Many others on the left are also venting their anger at the losing
Democratic nominee, John Kerry.
The liberal website Buzzflash.com blasted Kerry in a headline,
discouraging him from even considering another run for President in 2008.
"Why[?] To Let (Bush political advisor Karl) Rove Steal another Election
from the Democrats. John, We Need Someone with Brass Knuckles Next Time,"
read the Wednesday headline.
Angry Kerry supporters are meeting around the country to plot how to
expose what they see as a stolen election by the Bush administration and
the GOP.
"I think we need to protest this election no matter what Kerry does," said
Illinois resident Sue West at a meeting in Madison, Wis., on Nov. 6,
according to the journalistic website, Madison.com. The meeting, titled
"No Stolen Elections," was sponsored by the Madison Area Peace Coalition.
"I think it's fraud, pure and simple," West added.
Austin King, another activist attending the meeting, alleged that
erroneous information on college campuses was "was clearly a coordinated
national effort by Republicans to suppress the college vote," adding that
he would "very much like to see someone put in jail for this, and I'm not
a tough-on-crime guy," according to Madison.com.
Madison.com also quoted John Peck, a recent University of Wisconsin
graduate who expressed a disdain for electronic voting machines.
"The Luddites had an answer to machines," Peck said, referring to the
anti-technology movement in 19th century England that advocated the
destruction of automation technology thought to be taking over
manufacturing jobs.
Another Ohio group, calling itself "The League of ***** Voters," is
calling for public hearings in that state to investigate the election
results. Joining the call to action are such groups as Common Cause Ohio
and People for the American Way Foundation.
Conyers: 'Immediately undertake an investigation'
MSNBC television anchor Keith Olbermann picked up on the election fraud
charges on his program Countdown on Monday. Olbermann interviewed Conyers,
who said the voting "irregularities are sufficient in number, and more and
more members are joining me every day on this ... that we need the
Government Accountability Office (GAO) to document each and every incident
and then investigate it."
Joining Conyers in his request for a GAO investigation are U.S. Reps.
Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Robert Wexler (D-Fla.), Rush Holt (D-N.J.),
Robert C. Scott (D-Va.) and Melvin Watt (D-N.C.). Conyers demanded that
the GAO "immediately undertake an investigation into the efficacy of
voting machines and new technologies used in the 2004 election."
Conyers predicted his election investigation efforts "will probably lead
to congressional hearings."
Kerry's brother, Cam Kerry, issued a statement on the allegations of voter
fraud on Tuesday and acknowledged the groups seeking an investigation of
the matter.
"I am grateful to the many people who have contacted me to express their
deep concern about questions of miscounting, fraud, vote suppression, and
other problems on Election Day, especially in Florida and Ohio," Cam Kerry
wrote in a statement.
"I want to you to know we are not ignoring it. Election protection lawyers
are still on the job in Ohio and Florida and in D.C. making sure all the
votes are counted accurately. I have been conferring with lawyers involved
and have made them aware of the information and concerns people have given
me. Even if the facts don't provide a basis to change the outcome, the
information will inform the continuing effort to protect the integrity of
our elections," Cam Kerry explained.
Bush's 'friends in high places'
Theories abound as to how the president allegedly stole the election from
Kerry. BuzzFlash.com columnist Maureen Farrell wrote a Tuesday editorial
explaining how Bush was able to secure victory in Ohio.
"And luckily for Mr. Bush, he had friends in high places in the Buckeye
State, too. After all, Walden 'Wally' O'Dell, head of the voting machine
company Diebold, had already expressed a commitment 'to helping Ohio
deliver its electoral votes to the President' and Ohio Secretary of State
Ken 'Paper Weight' Blackwell appeared to have Bush's back, as well,"
Farrell wrote.
"Pundits have been asking how exit polls, which have historically been
accurate, could have been so wrong. Well, that's easy: There's an elephant
in the voting booth. Now, will someone please alert the media?" Farrell
concluded.
Another article on BuzzFlash.com even accused the Bush administration of
timing the recent offensive in Fallujah to drown out media reports of
voter fraud.
In a Nov. 8 article titled, "Stolen Election. America Hijacked," writer
Chuck Muziani wrote that, "nothing occurred in the day after the election
to elicit the order (to attack Fallujah) at that moment ... except ... the
web bloggers, and blackboxvoting.org, and votergate.tv investigating
reports of vote result discrepancies, and potential fraud in Ohio,
Florida, Pennsylvania, and a (sic) other states.
"In fact, the Fallujah offensive timing was engineered to steal attention
away from voter fraud reports," Muziani wrote.
"Forget planes being hijacked. America, as a whole, has been hijacked. Not
by Islamic-based terrorists. Not by Middle Eastern zealots who 'hate our
freedom,'" Muziani added. "And not by suicidal bomb-packing sycophants
programmed to praise their God by personally delivering their murder
victims to His pearly gate. America has been hijacked by a greedy, power
hungry political machine that could never win an election without stealing
it."
Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway dismissed the election fraud charges.
"To the anti-Bush Left, the so-called 'October Surprise' arrived a few
days late, on November 2. They invested everything they had into defeating
the President. Having lost, they now desperately try to reinvent the
results, revise history and deny reality," Conway wrote CNSNews.com in an
email.
"They are touting a conclusion ('Kerry Won!') hopelessly in search of
evidence. Their bitterness and denial consumes them. Defeated above board,
they have taken to the underground to blog and bloviate. But no serious
people are listening; they are just talk[ing] to themselves, much like
they did for the past year," Conway added.
Their all right!
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
12 Nov 2004 07:49:50 PM |
|
|
Actually he was not elected before.
He was appointed.
He wasn't elected this time either.
He CHEATED!
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
12 Nov 2004 09:13:45 PM |
|
|
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Doctor Is In" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
13 Nov 2004 07:19:53 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JZeld.58241$km5.2340283@news20.bellglobal.com...
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Sore winners. Pathetic.
Doc ;)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
13 Nov 2004 07:25:07 AM |
|
|
Jane"
wrote:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Yep, and I hope they continue to be so, as this will only lead to an even worse
beating in 2008.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Doctor Is In" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
13 Nov 2004 07:52:03 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113082507.12009.00000542@mb-m16.aol.com...
Jane"
wrote:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Yep, and I hope they continue to be so, as this will only lead to an
even worse
beating in 2008.
Tony
Will you be hiding in other IDs then, too, and then come out after the
election (IF it's in your favor?)
Will you be exaggerating the election results then, too?
Will you be swaggering through this newsgroup, presumably in your present
persona, and making an utter fool of yourself by gloating over a narrow
win (and the fact you had no guts to support your candidate in your
present moniker)??
Will you be denying that nearly half the nation doesn't like your chosen
candidate, like you are now?
Will you be fantasizing about large portions of your opposition leaving
America?
Will you....oh, forget it, you stupid psycho! We're staying. And you'll
just have to endure it. LOL...sore winner!
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
13 Nov 2004 07:41:34 PM |
|
|
"The Doctor Is In" <goblowmoreshit@baboons.com> wrote in message news:<cn53i50lon@enews1.newsguy.com>...
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113082507.12009.00000542@mb-m16.aol.com...
Jane"
wrote:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Yep, and I hope they continue to be so, as this will only lead to an
even worse
beating in 2008.
Tony
Will you be fantasizing about large portions of your opposition leaving
America?
Actually tard, the opposition forces come to America and take money
out of it – that means they want to stay [for now], but you are too
stupid to realize this because you are a tard, eh Chump? ;)
Will you....oh, forget it, you
stupid psycho!
you sure are Dr. Chump ;)
We're staying.
Lies ;)
More like (unamericans) stealing the money and sending it out of the
country to where you (they) want to live later ;)
And you'll
just have to endure it.
Too bad laws are specific to leeches heah, tard? I think EU have some
of these laws set up - you just cannot go a economically rape a
country there and no have some type of consequence, heah, puke-breath?
;)
LOL...sore winner!
What so sore about winning, kinda makes the winner feel good, or is
this more of your usual screwed up logic, eh freak? ;)
Doc
Dumb, you misspelled your name, eh tard - its Dumb ;)
Clinton election 1: 46% of the vote
Clinton reelection 2: 49% of the vote
Bush Jr. reelection 2: 53% of the vote
Feel better turd slurper? ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Doctor Is In" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
16 Nov 2004 08:00:07 AM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0411131741.412052b2@posting.google.com...
"The Doctor Is In" <goblowmoreshit@baboons.com> wrote in message
news:<cn53i50lon@enews1.newsguy.com>...
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113082507.12009.00000542@mb-m16.aol.com...
Jane"
wrote:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Yep, and I hope they continue to be so, as this will only lead to an
even worse
beating in 2008.
Tony
Will you be fantasizing about large portions of your opposition
leaving
America?
Actually tard, the opposition forces come to America and take money
out of it - that means they want to stay [for now], but you are too
stupid to realize this because you are a tard, eh Chump? ;)
Will you....oh, forget it, you
stupid psycho!
you sure are Dr. Chump ;)
We're staying.
Lies ;)
More like (unamericans) stealing the money and sending it out of the
country to where you (they) want to live later ;)
And you'll
just have to endure it.
Too bad laws are specific to leeches heah, tard? I think EU have some
of these laws set up - you just cannot go a economically rape a
country there and no have some type of consequence, heah, puke-breath?
;)
LOL...sore winner!
What so sore about winning, kinda makes the winner feel good, or is
this more of your usual screwed up logic, eh freak? ;)
Doc
Dumb, you misspelled your name, eh tard - its Dumb ;)
Clinton election 1: 46% of the vote
Clinton reelection 2: 49% of the vote
Bush Jr. reelection 2: 53% of the vote
Feel better turd slurper? ;)
Sociopaths such as yourself never get through hating and fearing what they
can't defeat.
Liberalism has never been defeated. Politicians and majority parties come
and go in a neverending cycle of social-economic-ideological changes.
That's why I say your side are sore losers. You're "sore" you can't get
rid of half the nation which strongly opposes your viewpoints. The
political win won't stop your pathological lying, hating, paranoia
fantasizing.
And that's why you're also pathetic and stupid. Learn to endure it, psycho
boy, and go suck on your silly surreal world of your little web site.
It's like Jacko's NeverNeverLand...where you can entertain your fantasies
of domination and control of all that your fear and hate. (And that's a
LOT! LOL...)
Now, put your little sore furry head up your red *****, you baboon...LOL...
Doc ;p
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
13 Nov 2004 09:52:28 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 05:52:03 -0800, "The Doctor Is In"
<goblowmoreshit@baboons.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113082507.12009.00000542@mb-m16.aol.com...
Jane"
wrote:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Yep, and I hope they continue to be so, as this will only lead to an
even worse
beating in 2008.
Tony
Will you be hiding in other IDs then, too, and then come out after the
election (IF it's in your favor?)
Will you be exaggerating the election results then, too?
Will you be swaggering through this newsgroup, presumably in your present
persona, and making an utter fool of yourself by gloating over a narrow
win (and the fact you had no guts to support your candidate in your
present moniker)??
Will you be denying that nearly half the nation doesn't like your chosen
candidate, like you are now?
Will you be fantasizing about large portions of your opposition leaving
America?
Will you....oh, forget it, you stupid psycho! We're staying. And you'll
just have to endure it. LOL...sore winner!
HaHa! Good one, Doc.. good. "sore winner" .. :)
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Doctor Is In" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
16 Nov 2004 08:06:53 AM |
|
|
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d9bcp017oli5uc9cceg6gi67s1usgvcu7e@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 05:52:03 -0800, "The Doctor Is In"
<goblowmoreshit@baboons.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041113082507.12009.00000542@mb-m16.aol.com...
Jane"
wrote:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
Yep, and I hope they continue to be so, as this will only lead to an
even worse
beating in 2008.
Tony
Will you be hiding in other IDs then, too, and then come out after the
election (IF it's in your favor?)
Will you be exaggerating the election results then, too?
Will you be swaggering through this newsgroup, presumably in your
present
persona, and making an utter fool of yourself by gloating over a narrow
win (and the fact you had no guts to support your candidate in your
present moniker)??
Will you be denying that nearly half the nation doesn't like your
chosen
candidate, like you are now?
Will you be fantasizing about large portions of your opposition leaving
America?
Will you....oh, forget it, you stupid psycho! We're staying. And you'll
just have to endure it. LOL...sore winner!
HaHa! Good one, Doc.. good. "sore winner" .. :)
It really applies to them...and thank you, Dani. McDonald refers to the
"53%" who voted for the Head Dummy, yet no credible mainstream source has
it at more than 51%.
Why do they feel compelled to lie about the results?
They probably wish they could say 93%...LOL...they'll always be
sore-headed about any opposition. And there will be (and is) PLENTY of
opposition.
I'm now satisfied their leadership will destroy itself but, unfortunately,
many of us here and elsewhere in the world will have to suffer before it
happens.
Doc ;p
Doc
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Left Wing Claims Exit Polls Were Accurate, Bush Stole Election |
13 Nov 2004 04:57:09 PM |
|
|
Jane a écrit:
Sore losers. Pathetic.
Jane
LOL
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
