Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
.
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
08 Nov 2004 04:06:06 PM |
|
|
Kipper <Kipper@here.com> wrote in message news:<mruuo0t7jq9nrphv0suiqatns31ttem80q@4ax.com>...
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C I-Q68 0 quel horrible et malheureux torment
Troys innocens qu'on viendra à liurer.
Poyson suspecte,mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par bourreaux enyurés.
Oh, [to] what a terrible and dreadful torture Three guiltless men
shall be adjudged;
Poison suspected, badly guarded, treason--Put to horror by drunken
executioners.
Line 1. 'torment' has the special meaning of interrogatory torture.
Lines 2 and 4. Note the unusual rhymes.
Leoni gives this one:
CIQ 68. Many interpretations are in order for this rather general one,
including perhaps the July 16, 1918, murder of whichever three members
of the Romanov family are considered innocent.
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
Le Vert gives this does it help, and what did you have in mind in
relation to these?
C II -Q47 L'ennemi grand viel dueil meurt de poison:
Les souuerains par infinis subiuguez.
Pierres plouuoir, cachés sous la toison:
Par mort articles en vain sont allegués.
The great old enemy [is dead and there is] mourning [for his]
death by poison. Subject rulers without number [gather). Stones rain
[down] land they are) hidden under the Fleece. Because of [his] death,
obligations are claimed in vain.
Line 2. One syllable too long. 'par' might be omitted. Line 4.
'articles' and 'allegue's' are legal terms. The implication is that
claims, accusations, feudal obligations are rendered meaningless by
death.,
At the funeral of the Emperor, the princes of Europe gather in the
Hall of the Golden Fleece in Brussels (where Charles V had just
abdicated as King of Spain to Philip II). The roof collapses, and many
are killed. After the death of the Emperor it is impossible to control
the election of a new Emperor, or enforce treaty obligations.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
08 Nov 2004 04:29:10 PM |
|
|
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
Kipper <Kipper@here.com> wrote in message news:<mruuo0t7jq9nrphv0suiqatns31ttem80q@4ax.com>...
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C I-Q68 0 quel horrible et malheureux torment
Troys innocens qu'on viendra à liurer.
Poyson suspecte,mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par bourreaux enyurés.
Oh, [to] what a terrible and dreadful torture Three guiltless men
shall be adjudged;
Poison suspected, badly guarded, treason--Put to horror by drunken
executioners.
Line 1. 'torment' has the special meaning of interrogatory torture.
Lines 2 and 4. Note the unusual rhymes.
Leoni gives this one:
CIQ 68. Many interpretations are in order for this rather general one,
including perhaps the July 16, 1918, murder of whichever three members
of the Romanov family are considered innocent.
But they were executed, no...
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
Le Vert gives this does it help, and what did you have in mind in
relation to these?
C II -Q47 L'ennemi grand viel dueil meurt de poison:
Les souuerains par infinis subiuguez.
Pierres plouuoir, cachés sous la toison:
Par mort articles en vain sont allegués.
The great old enemy [is dead and there is] mourning [for his]
death by poison. Subject rulers without number [gather). Stones rain
[down] land they are) hidden under the Fleece. Because of [his] death,
obligations are claimed in vain.
Line 2. One syllable too long. 'par' might be omitted. Line 4.
'articles' and 'allegue's' are legal terms. The implication is that
claims, accusations, feudal obligations are rendered meaningless by
death.,
At the funeral of the Emperor, the princes of Europe gather in the
Hall of the Golden Fleece in Brussels (where Charles V had just
abdicated as King of Spain to Philip II). The roof collapses, and many
are killed. After the death of the Emperor it is impossible to control
the election of a new Emperor, or enforce treaty obligations.
LB
Poison?
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
10 Nov 2004 05:24:25 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<WqSjd.4717574$6p.773034@news.easynews.com>...
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
Kipper <Kipper@here.com> wrote in message news:<mruuo0t7jq9nrphv0suiqatns31ttem80q@4ax.com>...
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C I-Q68 0 quel horrible et malheureux torment
Troys innocens qu'on viendra à liurer.
Poyson suspecte,mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par bourreaux enyurés.
Oh, [to] what a terrible and dreadful torture Three guiltless men
shall be adjudged;
Poison suspected, badly guarded, treason--Put to horror by drunken
executioners.
Line 1. 'torment' has the special meaning of interrogatory torture.
Lines 2 and 4. Note the unusual rhymes.
Leoni gives this one:
CIQ 68. Many interpretations are in order for this rather general one,
including perhaps the July 16, 1918, murder of whichever three members
of the Romanov family are considered innocent.
But they were executed, no...
Yes but by drunks, a torture in itself, think Patrice La Mumba!
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
Le Vert gives this does it help, and what did you have in mind in
relation to these?
C II -Q47 L'ennemi grand viel dueil meurt de poison:
Les souuerains par infinis subiuguez.
Pierres plouuoir, cachés sous la toison:
Par mort articles en vain sont allegués.
The great old enemy [is dead and there is] mourning [for his]
death by poison. Subject rulers without number [gather). Stones rain
[down] land they are) hidden under the Fleece. Because of [his] death,
obligations are claimed in vain.
Line 2. One syllable too long. 'par' might be omitted. Line 4.
'articles' and 'allegue's' are legal terms. The implication is that
claims, accusations, feudal obligations are rendered meaningless by
death.,
At the funeral of the Emperor, the princes of Europe gather in the
Hall of the Golden Fleece in Brussels (where Charles V had just
abdicated as King of Spain to Philip II). The roof collapses, and many
are killed. After the death of the Emperor it is impossible to control
the election of a new Emperor, or enforce treaty obligations.
LB
Poison?
J.
It is an odd one, but maybe he suspects being poisoned, or just wants
to end it, and after a big state funeral, a rain of meteorites, and
nobody wants to observe international law.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "The CO" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
10 Nov 2004 06:17:27 PM |
|
|
"Leigh_Bee" <leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:39cd5fe.0411101524.1c55ef4c@posting.google.com...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:<WqSjd.4717574$6p.773034@news.easynews.com>...
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
Kipper <Kipper@here.com> wrote in message
news:<mruuo0t7jq9nrphv0suiqatns31ttem80q@4ax.com>...
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C I-Q68 0 quel horrible et malheureux torment
Troys innocens qu'on viendra à liurer.
Poyson suspecte,mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par bourreaux enyurés.
Oh, [to] what a terrible and dreadful torture Three guiltless men
shall be adjudged;
Poison suspected, badly guarded, treason--Put to horror by drunken
executioners.
Line 1. 'torment' has the special meaning of interrogatory torture.
Lines 2 and 4. Note the unusual rhymes.
Leoni gives this one:
CIQ 68. Many interpretations are in order for this rather general one,
including perhaps the July 16, 1918, murder of whichever three members
of the Romanov family are considered innocent.
But they were executed, no...
Yes but by drunks, a torture in itself, think Patrice La Mumba!
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
Le Vert gives this does it help, and what did you have in mind in
relation to these?
C II -Q47 L'ennemi grand viel dueil meurt de poison:
Les souuerains par infinis subiuguez.
Pierres plouuoir, cachés sous la toison:
Par mort articles en vain sont allegués.
The great old enemy [is dead and there is] mourning [for his]
death by poison. Subject rulers without number [gather). Stones rain
[down] land they are) hidden under the Fleece. Because of [his] death,
obligations are claimed in vain.
Line 2. One syllable too long. 'par' might be omitted. Line 4.
'articles' and 'allegue's' are legal terms. The implication is that
claims, accusations, feudal obligations are rendered meaningless by
death.,
At the funeral of the Emperor, the princes of Europe gather in the
Hall of the Golden Fleece in Brussels (where Charles V had just
abdicated as King of Spain to Philip II). The roof collapses, and many
are killed. After the death of the Emperor it is impossible to control
the election of a new Emperor, or enforce treaty obligations.
LB
Poison?
J.
It is an odd one, but maybe he suspects being poisoned, or just wants
to end it, and after a big state funeral, a rain of meteorites, and
nobody wants to observe international law.
Yasser Arafat?
Just a thought...
The CO
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
11 Nov 2004 02:35:57 AM |
|
|
"The CO" <the_xo@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:2vfpcuF2kip7jU1@uni-berlin.de...
"Leigh_Bee" <leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:39cd5fe.0411101524.1c55ef4c@posting.google.com...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:<WqSjd.4717574$6p.773034@news.easynews.com>...
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
Kipper <Kipper@here.com> wrote in message
news:<mruuo0t7jq9nrphv0suiqatns31ttem80q@4ax.com>...
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C I-Q68 0 quel horrible et malheureux torment
Troys innocens qu'on viendra à liurer.
Poyson suspecte,mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par bourreaux enyurés.
Oh, [to] what a terrible and dreadful torture Three guiltless men
shall be adjudged;
Poison suspected, badly guarded, treason--Put to horror by drunken
executioners.
Line 1. 'torment' has the special meaning of interrogatory torture.
Lines 2 and 4. Note the unusual rhymes.
Leoni gives this one:
CIQ 68. Many interpretations are in order for this rather general
one,
including perhaps the July 16, 1918, murder of whichever three
members
of the Romanov family are considered innocent.
But they were executed, no...
Yes but by drunks, a torture in itself, think Patrice La Mumba!
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
Le Vert gives this does it help, and what did you have in mind in
relation to these?
C II -Q47 L'ennemi grand viel dueil meurt de poison:
Les souuerains par infinis subiuguez.
Pierres plouuoir, cachés sous la toison:
Par mort articles en vain sont allegués.
The great old enemy [is dead and there is] mourning [for his]
death by poison. Subject rulers without number [gather). Stones rain
[down] land they are) hidden under the Fleece. Because of [his]
death,
obligations are claimed in vain.
Line 2. One syllable too long. 'par' might be omitted. Line 4.
'articles' and 'allegue's' are legal terms. The implication is that
claims, accusations, feudal obligations are rendered meaningless by
death.,
At the funeral of the Emperor, the princes of Europe gather in the
Hall of the Golden Fleece in Brussels (where Charles V had just
abdicated as King of Spain to Philip II). The roof collapses, and
many
are killed. After the death of the Emperor it is impossible to
control
the election of a new Emperor, or enforce treaty obligations.
LB
Poison?
J.
It is an odd one, but maybe he suspects being poisoned, or just wants
to end it, and after a big state funeral, a rain of meteorites, and
nobody wants to observe international law.
Yasser Arafat?
Don't encourage them. Why not John Peel or Fred Dibnah?
Just a thought...
The CO
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
11 Nov 2004 01:47:13 AM |
|
|
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<WqSjd.4717574$6p.773034@news.easynews.com>...
Leigh_Bee a écrit:
Kipper <Kipper@here.com> wrote in message news:<mruuo0t7jq9nrphv0suiqatns31ttem80q@4ax.com>...
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
C I-Q68 0 quel horrible et malheureux torment
Troys innocens qu'on viendra à liurer.
Poyson suspecte,mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par bourreaux enyurés.
Oh, [to] what a terrible and dreadful torture Three guiltless men
shall be adjudged;
Poison suspected, badly guarded, treason--Put to horror by drunken
executioners.
Line 1. 'torment' has the special meaning of interrogatory torture.
Lines 2 and 4. Note the unusual rhymes.
Leoni gives this one:
CIQ 68. Many interpretations are in order for this rather general one,
including perhaps the July 16, 1918, murder of whichever three members
of the Romanov family are considered innocent.
But they were executed, no...
Yes but by drunks, a torture in itself, think Patrice La Mumba!
Patrice Lumumba you mean (I lived in the ex-Belgian Congo the year after
that, so I know the name by heart). Anyway, the poison (in the tooth
brush) was never used (during this sad episode of the cold war), but he
was shot, indeed by drunken thugs apparently. Interesting story:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/974745.stm
As for the Romanov, they were 11, they weren't killed because of their
guilt although it IS interesting that they HAD used poison themselves
against opponents, against Rasputin to name one. In that sense they were
guilty. But they were themselves shot, bayoneted, and beaten until all
eleven were dead, because of politics (revolution) by Lenin's thugs.
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
Le Vert gives this does it help, and what did you have in mind in
relation to these?
C II -Q47 L'ennemi grand viel dueil meurt de poison:
Les souuerains par infinis subiuguez.
Pierres plouuoir, cachés sous la toison:
Par mort articles en vain sont allegués.
The great old enemy [is dead and there is] mourning [for his]
death by poison. Subject rulers without number [gather). Stones rain
[down] land they are) hidden under the Fleece. Because of [his] death,
obligations are claimed in vain.
Line 2. One syllable too long. 'par' might be omitted. Line 4.
'articles' and 'allegue's' are legal terms. The implication is that
claims, accusations, feudal obligations are rendered meaningless by
death.,
At the funeral of the Emperor, the princes of Europe gather in the
Hall of the Golden Fleece in Brussels (where Charles V had just
abdicated as King of Spain to Philip II). The roof collapses, and many
are killed. After the death of the Emperor it is impossible to control
the election of a new Emperor, or enforce treaty obligations.
LB
Poison?
J.
It is an odd one, but maybe he suspects being poisoned, or just wants
to end it, and after a big state funeral, a rain of meteorites, and
nobody wants to observe international law.
LB
Maybe he (Le Vert?) suspects it, but it doesn't seem like it is what
happened. A Columbia Encyclopedia link indicates that "in 1558 he
formally abdicated as emperor. Although he retired (1556) to the
monastery of Yuste, he took an active interest in politics until his
death."
http://www.bartleby.com/65/ch/Charles5HRE.html
Doesn't sound like a tragic death, does it.
Thanks.
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
08 Nov 2004 01:10:57 PM |
|
|
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
12 Nov 2004 08:11:08 PM |
|
|
I still don't understand why Ralph Nadar
condemmed the Corvair. I bought mine
in 1963 and it still runs great.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "rino" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
08 Nov 2004 10:28:38 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
.
|
|
|
| User: "rino" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
10 Nov 2004 07:46:15 AM |
|
|
(rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
10 Nov 2004 02:50:02 PM |
|
|
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rino" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
10 Nov 2004 10:05:30 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
She killed her father and her two brothers. This makes three persons.
As per the Encyclopedia, the Poison Affair began with her trial. With
Nostradamus the origin must prevail.
Rino
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
11 Nov 2004 02:21:27 AM |
|
|
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
She killed her father and her two brothers. This makes three persons.
As per the Encyclopedia, the Poison Affair began with her trial. With
Nostradamus the origin must prevail.
Rino, the quatrain says trois innocents qu'on viendra à "livrer". Then
it speaks of the suspected poison and the badly guarded victim (no s to
guardé). There were no guard to be even considered for the three you
name. Anyway.
J.
Anyway.
Rino
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rino" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
11 Nov 2004 09:40:11 AM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<biFkd.4858018$6p.794745@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
She killed her father and her two brothers. This makes three persons.
As per the Encyclopedia, the Poison Affair began with her trial. With
Nostradamus the origin must prevail.
Rino, the quatrain says trois innocents qu'on viendra à "livrer". Then
it speaks of the suspected poison and the badly guarded victim (no s to
guardé). There were no guard to be even considered for the three you
name. Anyway.
J.
Ok! with the first line - Second line. The three were innocents. They
will be delivered of what? Is there a word that seggests they were
captive other than GARDÉ? What is badly kept, the TRADIMENT; not any
prisoner.
TRADIMENT is from the word TRADITEUR. See Q. 3.88 and Q.2,77
Rino
Anyway.
Rino
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
11 Nov 2004 12:01:26 PM |
|
|
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<biFkd.4858018$6p.794745@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
She killed her father and her two brothers. This makes three persons.
As per the Encyclopedia, the Poison Affair began with her trial. With
Nostradamus the origin must prevail.
Rino, the quatrain says trois innocents qu'on viendra à "livrer". Then
it speaks of the suspected poison and the badly guarded victim (no s to
guardé). There were no guard to be even considered for the three you
name. Anyway.
J.
Ok! with the first line - Second line. The three were innocents. They
will be delivered of what?
<
From Fr/En Harraps:
livrer quelqu'un, à la justice, to deliver or hand over someone to
justice or to the authorities.
Is there a word that seggests they were
captive other than GARDÉ? What is badly kept, the TRADIMENT; not any
prisoner.
Tradiment comes from the latin traditio, trahison, betrayal, implying
the guards betrayed.
("Betrayal", like those guards of the foreign workers in Iraq who were
kidnapped by terrorists and beheaded afterwards because their Iraqi
guards defected at the right moment. Not that it is the same type of
story. Just the word as an example.)
TRADIMENT is from the word TRADITEUR. See Q. 3.88 and Q.2,77
Yes, right. Betrayers in both cases.
And here, "tradiment" is betrayal.
You don't guard a betrayal. This quatrain speak of how the poison was
slipped, it does indeed tell of the story afterwards, as it was
discovered to be. The innocents here still are those delivered to the
executioners, suspected of being the 'poisoners', not those poisoned.
Anyway, there seems to be something I don't follow, they can't very well
guard a "betrayal". What else can tradiment (or traditeur) be for you?
Maybe it is what poses problem?
J.
Rino
Anyway.
Rino
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rino" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
11 Nov 2004 10:48:36 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<WNNkd.4287443$ic1.414839@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<biFkd.4858018$6p.794745@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
She killed her father and her two brothers. This makes three persons.
As per the Encyclopedia, the Poison Affair began with her trial. With
Nostradamus the origin must prevail.
Rino, the quatrain says trois innocents qu'on viendra à "livrer". Then
it speaks of the suspected poison and the badly guarded victim (no s to
guardé). There were no guard to be even considered for the three you
name. Anyway.
J.
Ok! with the first line - Second line. The three were innocents. They
will be delivered of what?
<
From Fr/En Harraps:
livrer quelqu'un, à la justice, to deliver or hand over someone to
justice or to the authorities.
Is there a word that seggests they were
captive other than GARDÉ? What is badly kept, the TRADIMENT; not any
prisoner.
Tradiment comes from the latin traditio, trahison, betrayal, implying
the guards betrayed.
("Betrayal", like those guards of the foreign workers in Iraq who were
kidnapped by terrorists and beheaded afterwards because their Iraqi
guards defected at the right moment. Not that it is the same type of
story. Just the word as an example.)
TRADIMENT is from the word TRADITEUR. See Q. 3.88 and Q.2,77
Yes, right. Betrayers in both cases.
And here, "tradiment" is betrayal.
You don't guard a betrayal. This quatrain speak of how the poison was
slipped, it does indeed tell of the story afterwards, as it was
discovered to be. The innocents here still are those delivered to the
executioners, suspected of being the 'poisoners', not those poisoned.
Anyway, there seems to be something I don't follow, they can't very well
guard a "betrayal". What else can tradiment (or traditeur) be for you?
Maybe it is what poses problem?
J.
Traditio is a given word from Le Pelletier and it has nothing to do
with TRADIMENT.
Voyez le dictionnaire Quillet de la langue française. In the present
case, it is about the general confession of the marquise, which was
found by the police (badly kept)..
The marquise was a devout Catholic. The innocent persons were
delivered from the burden of this earth. They were killed with poison.
What you say about the foreign workers in Iraq, is not either
appropriated to the word tradiment. No matter what they say, they
would not save their life.
Rino
Rino
Anyway.
Rino
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
12 Nov 2004 03:45:20 AM |
|
|
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<WNNkd.4287443$ic1.414839@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<biFkd.4858018$6p.794745@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
arrested and tortured.
Under the "question" (torture) Châtel denounced the complicity of his
professor of Theology, father Gueret, as well as another one of his
mentor, father Guinard. December 29th 1594, Châtel was executed in Place
de la Grêve. His wrist was first cut, as was the custom to do to
regicides. Afterwards he was quartered. He was then incinerated and his
ashes were thrown to the wind.
Now if "poison suggested" really means the use of it, of course, and not
the call for it, it would be something else. one could think of the
affair of the poisons (La Voisin, April 1679) but although many were
also suspected, there were no innocent nobles put to the question
(torture) for complicity. IMO, it is the first hypothesis here (Henri
IV) that has a real correlation.
(Either way, this can't be about Arafat.)
C2:Q47
The great old enemy mourning dies of poison,
The sovereigns subjugated in infinite numbers:
Stones raining, hidden under the fleece,
Through death articles are cited in vain.
http://www.propheties.it/no/seconda%20centuria/c2q47.htm
This one is interesting for the present times and Arafat... We have a
different take (Donne), but the poison part is more abstract. And so I
will not elaborate on this event that happened at the eruption of the
Vesuvius in (Dec) 1631, since the actual context of Arafat, Fellujah,
and the total weaseling of most of the Europeans leaders of Old Europe,
overwhelmed to be weasels by their anti-US propaganda brainwashed
population (I mean from Nostradamus point of view albeit this has to be
reworded), could also have some correlation, although this is merely a
totally spontaneous appraisal, made by the inspiration of the moment,
and thus it needs to be considered much more seriously before it becomes
even an hypothesis. Which can't even begin to be considered, really,
until there is some possible credibility to the poison theory, and so,
only time could tell us if this have any correlation, but it is an
interesting hypothesis that you suggest here. But anyway, as I say, I
won't comment further on that one. Will merely think about it for now
and keep in mind the Donne hypothesis. May come back on it later though.
Interesting...
J.
What I have on this quatrain had not yet been translated
Les trois meurtres de Mme de Brinvilliers (1676)
Q.1,68___ O quel horrible et mal heureux tourment
Trois innocens qu'on viendra à livrer
Poison suspecte, mal garde tradiment
Mis en horreur par borreaux enyvrés
Part of this story is found in Q.5,36
One father and his two sons were poisoned with arsenic. The dauther of
the father and sister of the sons did that monstrous act.
See the Poison Affair from the Columbia Encyclopedia for a better
story
Rino
Here is part of what is found in this Encyclopedia:
POISON AFFAIR - "scandal implicating a number of prominent persons at
the court of Louis XIV. It began with the trial of Marie Madeleine
d'Aubray, marquise de Brinvilliers (1630-1676). She conspired with her
lover Godin de Saint-Croix, an army captain, to poison her father and
two brother in order to secure the family fortune and to end
interference in her adulterous relationship".
Her lover, Godin de Sainte-Croix was a handsome young cavalry officer
of extravagant tastes and bad reputation. For a year Saint-Croix
remained a prisoner in the Bastille, where he is popularly supposed to
have acquired a knowledge of poison from his fellow prisoner, the
Italian Exili. Godin de Sainte-Croix is said to be of evil practices
such as the Black Mass, and other assemblies of invocations to the
devil. Some historians are telling that he was a brother knight in he
Order of Orient, an occult branch of the Templars founded by Michael
Psellus in the 11th Cent. Evidences of the passage of this Order are
found in the Temple of Saint-Croix at Plérin, in France.
As for the executioners, it was a commun practice to dance and drink
when someone was burned on an open fire. The Marquise of Brinvilliers
was beheaded and burned.
Rino
So these two (not three) weren't innocent. Can you rationalize that part?
She killed her father and her two brothers. This makes three persons.
As per the Encyclopedia, the Poison Affair began with her trial. With
Nostradamus the origin must prevail.
Rino, the quatrain says trois innocents qu'on viendra à "livrer". Then
it speaks of the suspected poison and the badly guarded victim (no s to
guardé). There were no guard to be even considered for the three you
name. Anyway.
J.
Ok! with the first line - Second line. The three were innocents. They
will be delivered of what?
<
From Fr/En Harraps:
livrer quelqu'un, à la justice, to deliver or hand over someone to
justice or to the authorities.
Is there a word that seggests they were
captive other than GARDÉ? What is badly kept, the TRADIMENT; not any
prisoner.
Tradiment comes from the latin traditio, trahison, betrayal, implying
the guards betrayed.
("Betrayal", like those guards of the foreign workers in Iraq who were
kidnapped by terrorists and beheaded afterwards because their Iraqi
guards defected at the right moment. Not that it is the same type of
story. Just the word as an example.)
TRADIMENT is from the word TRADITEUR. See Q. 3.88 and Q.2,77
Yes, right. Betrayers in both cases.
And here, "tradiment" is betrayal.
You don't guard a betrayal. This quatrain speak of how the poison was
slipped, it does indeed tell of the story afterwards, as it was
discovered to be. The innocents here still are those delivered to the
executioners, suspected of being the 'poisoners', not those poisoned.
Anyway, there seems to be something I don't follow, they can't very well
guard a "betrayal". What else can tradiment (or traditeur) be for you?
Maybe it is what poses problem?
J.
Traditio is a given word from Le Pelletier and it has nothing to do
with TRADIMENT.
Voyez le dictionnaire Quillet de la langue française.
Please Rino, YOU look in Old French dictionaries. Take Godefroy for
instance. There is NO other meaning for the word, never has been.
Where do you think LePelletier got his definitions, out of thin air?
Check it out:
Traditeur: http://www.michelnostradamus.org/tradiment.jpg
(contains the reference to tradiment which follows):
Tradiment: http://www.michelnostradamus.org/tradement.jpg
Come on!
In the present
case, it is about the general confession of the marquise, which was
found by the police (badly kept)..
The marquise was a devout Catholic. The innocent persons were
delivered from the burden of this earth.
This is based on tradiment or traditeur being something else, what I
still don't know. But the sense of the quatrain is as I tell you.
They were killed with poison.
What you say about the foreign workers in Iraq, is not either
appropriated to the word tradiment. No matter what they say, they
would not save their life.
You don't know the story obviously. I am talking about the guards from
the Iraqis police who before they were kidnapped, defected the same day
they were going to be abducted, because they betrayed, and were in
cahoots with the killers. Nothing to do with the terrorists who guarded
them in captivity.
J.
Rino
Rino
Anyway.
Rino
At least it relates to the actual custom of the executioners...
(What would be interesting to find is three nobles, or others, that were
put under torture but were innocents, indeed even more if not merely a
sordid ordinary criminal family affair, although here one of people of
noble origin, but one associated with la Voisin to decimate the royals
themselves, even though it would indeed work with a lesser affair, if
the suspected culprits were innocents and found to have been tortured
and put to death.)
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rino" |
|
| Title: Re: Looking for opinions |
12 Nov 2004 07:22:30 PM |
|
|
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<QC%kd.2811744$yk.442291@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<WNNkd.4287443$ic1.414839@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<biFkd.4858018$6p.794745@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<_9vkd.4232856$ic1.409423@news.easynews.com>...
rino a écrit:
rinomalloux@hotmail.com (rino) wrote in message news:<cf441a5d.0411082028.74fd0997@posting.google.com>...
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message news:<5xPjd.2614400$yk.414007@news.easynews.com>...
Kipper a écrit:
Just looking for a few ideas on these two.
C1:Q68
O to what a dreadful and wretched torment
are three innocent people going to be delivered.
Poison suggested, badly guarded, betrayal.
Delivered up to horror by drunken executioners.
http://www.propheties.it/no/prima%20centuria/c1q68.htm
This one could be about the assassination attempt of Henri IV.
One must remember that it was a former student of the college of
Clermont, jean Châtel, who tried to kill the monarch. History tells us
that the jesuits were those who inspired Châtel to commit his crime.
Hence we learn that Jesuits were proclaiming against this tyrant that he
"should be eliminated by by the use of treacherous poison or at the very
least by the heroic dagger".
Thus encouraged, Châtel would have taken a dagger and waited for the
king at Shomberg Hotel. He missed the "coup" though, and was immediately
| | | | | | | | | | | |