-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was born in Aradan (52e30 35n15),
Semnan Province, Iran, on yawm al-'ahad, 23 Rabi`al-
Awwal 1376 (Sunday, October 28, 1956 AD), on account
of Uranus souljourn aloft fallen by transit to fifth
house of the horoscope; Mars 1; Venus 7; Mercury Sun
8; Saturn head of the Dragon 9; Moon 6; tail of the
Dragon 11. Mars is nearest ~.55 AU receding malefic.
-adjudicated by Daniel Joseph Min 22 September 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRRMqDJljD7YrHM/nEQK8wACg45enhx76WDIV/5eCrnSZz7oNOOQAoMDQ
QcHi2VhBPOCi5oIjQKzPEVv3
=lMow
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
22 Sep 2006 01:44:22 AM |
|
|
And how does this point to the TRUE "Puppet Master" of Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad ???
This should already be written in the STARs as well.
Are you keeping a 'silent tongue' on this (or just that in-competent
that you can't figure it out YET) ???
Just A Thought (About Your Capabilities).
}:- |
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
22 Sep 2006 03:15:35 AM |
|
|
"kmiller" <miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:1158907462.842629.132660@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
And how does this point to the TRUE "Puppet Master" of Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad ???
This should already be written in the STARs as well.
Are you keeping a 'silent tongue' on this (or just that in-competent
that you can't figure it out YET) ???
Just A Thought (About Your Capabilities).
}:- |
Warholio is also from Uranus, so he and Ahmadyerbootie are probably butt
buddies.
George
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
21 Sep 2006 09:01:54 PM |
|
|
How about this one.
July 1, 1960, United States, Virginia Beach.
What do the stars say?
Thanks,
M
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
22 Sep 2006 08:01:06 AM |
|
|
On 21 Sep 2006 19:01:54 -0700, in alt.astrology,
rbnyc2000@hotmail.com wrote:
How about this one.
July 1, 1960, United States, Virginia Beach.
What do the stars say?
Twinkle, twinkle...
Which really means as much as all the astrology..
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
23 Sep 2006 02:18:14 AM |
|
|
Twinkle Twinkle Little Star
How TRULY F**Ked You Already Are
All The Stars In On Your Flag "So Right"
Will Not Save You From Al-Queda'a Plight !!!
Just A Commentary On YOUR Moronic Thoughts (About Your Self-Righteous
Mind Set).
This Is A Time Of WAR - Dig You Head Out Of The Sands.
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
23 Sep 2006 01:32:56 PM |
|
|
An open letter to the President of Iran.
by Kevin Alfred Strom
DEAR PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD: I have read with great interest your
interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel and your open letter
to President George W. Bush. I am an American of European descent
who wishes to prevent war between our two countries. I also hope-
and work-for the self-determination of my own people; and I
believe that all the peoples who suffer under Jewish/Zionist
domination should stand together for one another's freedom.
I am the publisher of "Inside the 'Axis of Evil'" and I was recently
interviewed by your country's Mehr News Agency. I hope you will find
my thoughts helpful and illuminating in the causes of peace and
freedom.
The most important fact you must understand, as the forces of war
and hate increasingly target your country, is the near-total control
of the media of news and entertainment in the West-and especially
in America-by the Jewish minority. Even though Jews constitute a
tiny fraction-around 2 per cent.-of the population of the
U.S., they dominate the press, the television networks, the radio
networks, and the production and distribution of motion pictures.
I am the author of the research report Who Rules America?, which
documents this control in detail. My report begins with a survey of
the anti-European racial bias of the American media, which may seem
irrelevant to you; but I assure you it is not: Just as the Jews
flooded Palestine with non-Palestinians, they are also flooding
America and Europe with non-Europeans to weaken and divide the
people and make them easier to rule. In any case, I urge you to read
my entire report, since after that brief introduction I show, in
detail, absolute proof of the Jewish control of "American" mass
media. It is this control which ought to be of even more concern to
you than who becomes the next President of the United States or
which party nominally controls the U.S. Congress.
Because the major media in America are controlled by Zionist Jews-
Jewish supremacists-it is almost impossible for anti-Zionist or
even non-Zionist politicians to be elected here, making a sham of
our so-called democracy. If a candidate emerges who opposes the
Jewish/Zionist agenda, he is relentlessly attacked by the media, who
work day and night to slander him and blacken his reputation, so
that he becomes unelectable.
The leading politicians of both parties are well aware of this
Zionist control, and many privately deplore it: Witness Richard
Nixon's private remarks to Christian leader Billy Graham on the
destructive effects of Jewish power, even though in public he did
almost everything the Jews wanted; witness Vice President Spiro
Agnew's opposition to Zionism evident in private remarks and in his
novel The Canfield Decision, published only after he left office;
witness the statements of Jimmy Carter (that to oppose Israel is
"political suicide") and of Senator Ernest Hollings (that "You can't
have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you....") only
after they had decided they were no longer going to run for
political office. Many other political leaders know that Jewish
supremacists control our media and thereby control our foreign
policy-but they do not have the courage to say so because of that
very media control.
This media control has even deformed religion in the United States:
The Christian Zionist organizations, which hardly existed a few
decades ago, have been given tremendous access to the television
airwaves and have, as a consequence, become a dominant force in
American Christianity. They form a very large part of what is called
the Religious Right in this country, and are largely responsible for
George Bush's political success. Even as many old-line Christian
denominations, like the Presbyterians, wake up to the inhuman,
genocidal agenda of Zionism, churches that have come under the sway
of Christian Zionism teach their flocks that "Israel can do no
wrong" and "Israel fulfils prophecy" et cetera-and thereby feed
the bloodlust of the Zionist neocons.
]
As you point out in your letter and your interview, the Jewish
Holocaust story is being used as a political tool to extract
compliance-and billions of dollars-from non-Jews. I deeply
appreciate your bringing the work of the revisionist historians, who
tell us that not every Jewish assertion about World War II is true,
to the attention of millions upon millions of people who otherwise
would never have heard of it.
May I draw your attention to a particularly pernicious Jewish use of
the tragedy of World War II? I'm referring to the demonization, as
"new Hitlers," of men-and nations-who want to have a
government not under the supervision of Zionist Jews.
In February, the Chairman of the Council of Jews in France said in
Paris: "The Iranian President's assertions do not rank behind
Hitler's Mein Kampf."
Paul Spiegel, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany,
was quoted in Die Welt saying that your statements on Israel and
Jewish power "were the worst comment on this subject that he has
ever heard of a statesman since Adolf Hitler."
At the White House, according to Jewish writer Seymour Hersh in The
New Yorker magazine, you are routinely referred to as "Hitler."
All this indicates a strong desire for war on the part of those who
have already made it happen twice-in Afghanistan and Iraq-in
just the past few years. Slobodan Milosevic was called a new Hitler
because he resisted internationalist control of his country. The
result was the NATO war against Yugoslavia. Saddam Hussein was
called a new Hitler when he quit taking orders from Washington. What
followed was the war on, and occupation of, Iraq.
And now you are being portrayed by the Jewish establishment as a
"new Hitler." At the latest AIPAC conference, which was attended by
many of the most powerful Jews and powerful politicians in America,
the Ahmadinejad-as-Hitler image was far more than a metaphor or an
implication-it was a larger-than-life in-your-face assertion.
Here's a description of the event by a Jewish student who was there,
Alice Ollstein, as published in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
Angeles:
'The speakers and "informational" videos left no grey area, no
place for dialogue or debate, and certainly no place for dissent. I
especially squirmed at the parallels AIPAC drew between Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hitler. To the tune of more
dramatic classical music, the six enormous screens flashed back and
forth between Hitler giving anti-Jew speeches and Ahmadinejad giving
anti-Israel speeches. The famous post-Holocaust mantra "Never Again"
popped up several times. Everything was geared toward persuading the
audience that another Holocaust is evident ... unless we get them
first.'
And since nearly all Jews and a very large number of non-Jews in the
West have been programmed by the media to turn off all reason and
begin salivating for blood as soon as the name "Hitler" is invoked,
facts will not matter. Whatever "crimes" the Hitler-figure is
accused of will become real and he will become guilty. If the
Hitler-figure obeys every law and every rule, it will not matter. A
good example of this is your country's desire to develop nuclear
energy. As journalist Jörg Pfuhl points out "Virtually none of the
Western states recognize that uranium enrichment is absolutely
legal. There is no restriction by contract or by the law of nations.
Quite the contrary: Actually the Western countries would have the
duty to assist Iran with these activities, according to the
Non-Proliferation Treaty. As long as a state renounces the bomb it
is eligible for technical support by the nuclear powers." (emphasis
added) But you're "the new Hitler," so the facts don't matter.
President Ahmadinejad, right now the American people are weary of
war and even Bush's most ardent supporters don't think we've done
well in occupying Iraq. A new war will be a very hard sell. But the
Jewish supremacists who control the images on Americans' TV screens
and magazine pages want to destroy you. They are masters of the hard
sell. They are not men of honor and morality. They are not men of
truth.
They will use their intelligence agency assets to induce Muslims-
preferably Muslims with an Iranian connection-to attack America
again. They will "guide" a cell within your own government or
military so that it commits some act to harm Americans. They will
try to goad you-using some intolerable new act by Bush, which
they will have caused-into yourself threatening or attacking the
West. They will do any combination of the above, or something
equivalent that no one can anticipate. They will do literally
anything to start a war between our countries. You must guard
vigilantly against such acts of deception and violence. You must
give the warmongers no excuse.
There are signs of hope in this country-hope that the star of the
Jewish supremacists who rule us is now descending.
In the American state of Alabama, a man who openly questioned Jewish
power in this country-a man who called for the shutdown and
prosecution of a powerful Zionist-linked censorship group-was
very nearly nominated for the post of State Attorney General. Larry
Darby, who spoke at a recent meeting of my organization, National
Vanguard, was able to garner 44% of the Democratic primary vote,
carrying many parts of the state-despite the fact that the
Jewish-dominated party bosses opposed him with all their might.
In the American state of Tennessee, a man named James Hart won the
Republican primary for Congress-with 73 per cent. of the vote-
while openly advocating for European-Americans and against the
ferocious opposition of the Jewish-controlled media and Jewish
supremacist organizations. Hart would doubtlessly have gone further
had he not been sabotaged by the bosses of his own Republican party,
who went so far as to have his name removed from the ballot.
Newspapers-and we know who dominates publishing in this country -
refused to run his advertisements, so many voters were prevented
from even hearing about him.
My organization operates a multimedia Web site-V-News.org-
which features news articles, radio programs, and videos in direct
competition with the Jewish-controlled media. We operate with a very
small but very talented staff, who are mostly volunteers. Even
though we feature many original stories, and sometimes exclusive
scoops, every day, the news search engine news.google.com has
refused to carry our stories ever since Jewish organizations
complained about our presence in their index.
Despite these limitations and attacks against us, our readership
ratings are soaring and are now comparable to or higher than those
of the Web sites of many major American media outlets such as the
Tampa Tribune, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and many others. Our
readership ratings are routinely far in excess of those of Jewish
supremacist groups like the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
and the World Jewish Congress. Our pages are read more than a
million times every month.
I say these things to you because I think that the Internet has
provided a wedge for the truth to get out to the American people,
and that my group and others, like Messrs. Darby and Hart, have
shown millions of Americans that there is an alternative view. If we
who believe in freedom from Jewish domination-we who believe in
true self-determination-can continue to expand our media
capabilities, then there is a chance that the Jewish media monopoly
will be seriously challenged and significantly diminished. That, I
believe, is the key to taking away their power to wipe out whole
nations and start wars whenever they choose.
That means more than just news sites and newspapers-it means
movie studios and publishing houses; it means DVDs and music videos;
it means bookstores and family centers. It means replacing the media
and infrastructure of the Jewish supremacists at every level.
Now, President Ahmadinejad, I am not suggesting that Iranians set up
as media barons in Europe and the U.S. (though that would be better
than the Jewish monopoly we have now). What I am suggesting is that
all of us who believe in freedom and self-determination for our own
peoples-all of us who want a government of our own not under
Jewish/internationalist supervision-ought to make breaking the
Jewish media monopoly one of our highest priorities. Whatever our
differences on other issues, we ought to cooperate in every way
possible to achieve that goal. For your part, I suggest a strong
effort to reach out to anti-war Americans of all parties and
affiliations, and making full use of the alternative media-the
"blogosphere" which includes National Vanguard and many other
outlets-that free-thinking Americans have created and which will,
I am sure, be very useful to the cause of peace and understanding
between our two peoples. Your grace in favoring these alternative
media with "scoops" and interviews will also make these alternative
media stronger.
I have devoted my life to the freedom of my people-people of
European descent-and I want you to understand that my desire for
racial and cultural integrity for my people is not an attack on your
people in any way. As my friend and colleague Dr. David Duke said
when he visited Syria recently, surely the Muslim world can
understand European and European-American nationalists' desire to
have their own nations and to end the mass immigration which has
been engineered by Jewish supremacists specifically to dilute and
weaken us as a people.
[
You would not countenance open borders in Iran. You would not
tolerate mass immigration of tens of millions of people culturally
and racially distinct from you-Europeans or Chinese, for example
-- whatever your high regard for those peoples. We have both seen
what massive Jewish immigration did to Palestine in the last
century. Something similar happened to America a few years earlier,
which allowed the Jewish supremacists to make my country their power
base. Without that power base, there would be no Israel today, and
no conflict between the Muslim world and the West.
The Jewish supremacists have a vision of the world as one nominally
"democratic," but with multiple races and cultures within each
country, and with their media always holding the balance of power
over elections, so that no one people can have its own government
and no leader can ever emerge to challenge their rule or the power
of their money. They want a world in which no people is allowed to
have its own leaders or its own government any more-except Jews,
except Israel. All other nations, as they see it, must become
"multi-ethnic" states, effectively ruled by their international
capital and their international media.
We who believe otherwise must prevent that world from coming into
being. It will be a slave world, a world without freedom, a world
without distinctive cultures, and world system from which no
dissident or free thinker can escape.
To that end, I hope you will think about National Vanguard's vision
of an alternative world, a world which can be summed up simply in
what I call the Maxim of Self-Determination: "Each people which
considers itself to be a people should, to the maximum extent
possible, live under its own government."
In closing, let me reiterate my thanks for your time and for your
frank, courageous, and truthful statements on some of the most
important issues of our age, and let me repeat my earnest wish that
our peoples will never make war on each other.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "National Alliance Terrorism" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
24 Sep 2006 04:37:59 PM |
|
|
------------- BACKGROUND ON KEVIN ALFRED STROM ------------
Read the story of Kevin's ex-wife who was abused by this
overcontrolling psychopath and the neo-nazi movement
http://www.rickross.com/reference/alliance/alliance26.html
------------- BACKGROUND ON NATIONAL VANGUARD ------------
National Alliance and its splinter group National Vanguard form the
most dangerous domestic terrorist
organization in the United States. With dozens of cells and ranks of
1000+ members,
hundreds have been charged and convicted of violent crimes over the the
past decade.
In fact the National Alliance/National Vanguard are the subject of 52
FBI investigations related to domestic terrorism and
ties with Islamic terrorists.
http://www.abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation/story?id=681288&page=1
William Pierce the founder of the National Alliance
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Luther_Pierce)
advocated for herding Jews, homosexuals and "racemixers" into cattle
cars and sending them to abandoned coal mines. Timothy Mcveigh admitted
his bombing of the Murrah federal building was inspired by William
Pierces' book the Turner Diaries. The book incites the overthrow of the
government and the genocide of non-aryans and jews.
National Alliance also owns Resistance Records which sells music titles
such as "6 million more" and "Kremator - A Replay of the Final
Solution" advocating the repeat of Hitler's extermination of Jews and
southern europeans.
The National Alliance has strenghtened its ties with Arab World
terrorists and
dangerous Islamic extremists and even praised the 9/11 attacks!
"Neo-Nazi websites, including the largest umbrella organisation, the
National Alliance, show support for al-Qaeda. Billy Roper, the
alliance's membership coordinator posted a message within hours of the
11 September attacks, reading: 'Anyone who is willing to drive a plane
into a building to kill Jews is all right by me. I wish our members
had half as much testicular fortitude.'
http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,582222,00.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
24 Sep 2006 09:00:26 PM |
|
|
"Let me tell you something. White Americans are among the most
law-abiding people on Earth. White nationalists and the National
Alliance in particular are upholders of the law and traditions as set
down by the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, who were
racial separatists as are we. It is the Michael Chertoffs and his
friends at the ADL who are the law violators. It is George Bush and
his Jewish handlers who make a mockery of the Constitution and the
rights of Americans. They break the laws. We do not. And we put you
lawbreakers on notice: we are not afraid. We are right. Our actions
are moral and our actions are lawful. We act in the best traditions of
America and of Western Civilization. And we will not back down. And it
is not White separatists who are the violent threat to the non-White
races. It is the Jewish establishment which ordered the burning alive
of 100,000 non-Whites who were peacefully retreating from Kuwait after
their surrender in 1991. It is the Jewish power structure, not White
separatists, which routinely pumps Palestinian children full of
bullets, tortures them and keeps them behind barbed wire in what ought
to be called concentration camps. It isn't White people who commit the
drive-by shootings and drug murders on our streets, but the Jewish
establishment which has supported the browning of America has a lot to
answer for in that regard. And it isn't White people that have opened
the floodgates of immigration in every country in Europe, either. It's
the Jewish establishment that insists that no White nation on Earth
can keep itself White. That's genocide. Palestinians and Whites are in
the
same boat; it's just that many Whites don't know it yet.
We're not afraid of you, Michael Chertoff. But we are concerned that
if we do nothing, you and your kind will exterminate our children - so
we're going to do something. We're going to do what the previous
generation of White people failed to do. We're going to have racial
solidarity. We're going to build a new sense of community among our
kind, even stronger than what our Founding Fathers had, and we now
know that our kind does not include you. And we're going to do it
honorably and legally and non-violently, so that everyone will be able
to see that any charges you lay against us will be false. The Jewish
establishment tried the false-charges game in 1988 in the Fort Smith
Sedition Trial, and a jury saw through your lies and found every White
separatist innocent. I predict that's going to happen again.
I predict that more and more White people are going to speak out. I
predict that the courage of the pro-White pioneers who speak out now
will embolden others to be equally brave in the near future. Let me
give you an example of one man who isn't afraid.
Chester Doles is a regional coordinator for the National Alliance. He
is 42, a father of eleven, a political science student at university
and a professional carpenter. Mr. Doles has built a beautiful
mountaintop meeting hall for the Georgia National Alliance near his
home. I've spoken there myself. Mr. Doles is not afraid -- even though
he was the subject of pseudo-legal intimidation just a few months ago.
A whistle-blower in a local sheriff's department revealed that Mr.
Doles and other members were being targeted for harassment by that
department, and the usual buzz-words of "neo-Nazi," "hater," and
references to Mr. Dole's Alliance meeting hall as a "compound" were
evident in the documents publicized by the patriotic whistle-blower.
It was clear that the stage was being set for turning that department
against Mr. Doles and his legal and honorable local Alliance unit,
though no false charges had yet been filed. It is not known if any
payoffs were actually made to corrupt officials in this case. What was
Mr. Doles' response? After consulting with National Alliance
leadership, he issued a bold answer in the form of a press release,
from which I quote:
Offering absolutely no evidence to support its claims, the Sheriff's
Department recently issued an internal memo falsely accusing a local
citizen of several offenses.
The Sheriff's Department memo called the National Alliance "a racially
motivated hate group" and stated that it "has a compound in the north
Lumpkin County area." The Regional Coordinator for the National
Alliance, Mr. Chester J. Doles, Jr., responded to these accusations by
saying:
"We are a group of law-abiding citizens who support the efforts of the
police in controlling gangs and crime and wish them all success in
their efforts. In fact, we wish the laws were enforced more
vigorously."
He also said that the "compound" referred to was actually his own home
and that:
"our meeting hall and my house are not compounds any more than are the
American Legion or the YMCA."
He continued:
"The National Alliance is not a secret group or a gang. Its members
are upright concerned citizens, who use their real names and who have
excellent reputations. Members are out in the open in everything they
do, and remain completely legal at all times. The Lumpkin County Unit
of the National Alliance is comprised of local people who are
concerned with local issues that affect this area of Georgia - not
outsiders trying to cause trouble in the community. No one in the
National Alliance is assigned to the job of causing - or wants to
cause - confrontations with the police. The inference that this is
true is a clear attempt to blacken the Alliance in the eyes of law
enforcement officers, and create an atmosphere of distrust in which
misunderstandings and 'incidents' may occur."
The result was a retraction of the false charges and a friendly
meeting with the sheriff whose department was being manipulated by
outside forces into a confrontation with the Alliance. And as I speak
to you today Mr. Doles is continuing his activism full force.
What is terrorism? Webster's dictionary defines terrorism as "the act
of terrorizing, or state of being terrorized; a mode of government by
terror or intimidation." Terror is extreme fear or fright. The
prosecutors in the Christine Greenwood case have already admitted to
the press that she and her friends are being prosecuted to send a
"chilling effect" through the White community. [Los Angeles Times,
November 20th, 2002] That, by definition is terrorism, aided and
abetted by the "Joint Terrorism Task Force." Pro-White groups operate
by discussion, by persuasion, by printing magazines, by writing books,
by producing videotapes and CDs and radio programs, by holding
community events like speeches and discussion groups and dances. It is
not we who engage in "a
mode of government by terror or intimidation." It is not we who
attempt to induce extreme fear or fright in anyone. It is not we who
lay false charges against the innocent.
We stand guarded by our innocence. We stand firm for the truth. We
will liberate our people from Jewish lies and domination. And we will
win in the end."
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morris" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
25 Sep 2006 12:12:46 AM |
|
|
In article <p0eeh2d087orblscsidb94f36m3ldof1lb@4ax.com>
Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Let me tell you something.
Flush racist post!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
25 Sep 2006 07:28:01 PM |
|
|
"The modern definition of a racist: someone who is winning an
argument with a liberal."
Peter Brimelow, Alien Nation (1996)
by Thomas Jackson
There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater
horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of
offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press
and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and
arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as
part of the inevitable texture of American life. "Racism" is never
shrugged off. For example, when a White Georgetown Law School student
reported earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as
White students, it set off a booming, national controversy about
"racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would have
attracted far less attention and criticism.
Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full
alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach
against it, America is said to be racked with it, but just what is
racism?
Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the
word. They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock
is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are
rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal
more than this. Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a
clue to understanding what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American
meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are
equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have been
declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and anyone who
questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil.
The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If
blacks, for example, are equal to Whites in every way, what accounts
for their poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of
racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation
for black failure is White racism. And since blacks are markedly poor,
crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive
racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.
All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic.
Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on White
wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of
racial differences. Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their
hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's Whites must have
oppressed them. If Whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must
oppress them Unconsciously. If no obviously racist individuals can be
identified, then societal institutions must be racist. Or, since
blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply must be
millions of White people we do not know about, who are working day and
night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no
room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion,
an indictment of White people.
The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to
believe that the only explanation for non-White failure is White
racism, every time a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on
welfare, or takes drugs, White society stands accused of yet another
act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-Whites is standing
proof that White society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For
precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the
same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition, thwarting and
oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange
conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be
committed almost exclusively by White people. Indeed, a black
congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black
mayor of Detroit, have argued that only White people can be racist.
Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State
Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she
explained that all Whites are racist and that only Whites can be
racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without
flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?
Although some blacks and liberal Whites concede that non-Whites can,
perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-Whites have been
forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of White
oppression. What appears to be non-White racism is so understandable
and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not
an act is called racism depends on the race of the racist. What would
surely be called racism when done by Whites is thought to be normal
when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true.
Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost
tedious to list them: When a White man kills a black man and uses the
word "*****" while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and
the nation beats its collective breast; when members of the black
Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of random Whites, the media are
silent (see AR of March, 1991). College campuses forbid pejorative
statements about non-Whites as "racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks
on Whites.
At election time, if 60 percent of the White voters vote for a White
candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black
opponent, it is Whites who are accused of racial bias. There are 107
"historically black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be
preserved in the name of diversity, but all historically White
colleges must be forcibly integrated in the name of... the same thing.
To resist would be racist.
"Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything
that could be construed as an expression of White pride is a form of
hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect
school instruction and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas
for native Americans to ask them to learn English is racist.
Blatant anti-White prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is
now the law of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if
practiced in favor of Whites, would be attacked as despicable
favoritism.
All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses
are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club
or association expressly for Whites is by definition racist. The
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
campaigns openly for black advantage but is a respected "civil rights"
organization. The National Association for the Advancement of White
People (NAAWP) campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but
is said to be viciously racist.
At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have
set up student unions for Whites, analogous to those for blacks,
Hispanics, etc, and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently,
when the White students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found
themselves to be a minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club
like the ones that non-Whites have. They were turned down in horror.
Indeed, in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a
White enclave but whose members simply happen all to be White is
branded as racist.
Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality
of American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn
on a few people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of
Whites (and sometimes men), and never the other way around. No one
proposes that Howard University be made more diverse by admitting
Whites, Hispanics, or Asians. No one ever suggests that National
Hispanic University in San Jose (CA) would benefit from the diversity
of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black
Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the
Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a lack
of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to
celebrate homogeneity. And yet any all-White group - a company, a
town, a school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a
crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as
possible. Only when Whites have been reduced to a minority has
"diversity" been achieved.
Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we
are so often asked to do, is no different from deploring an excess of
Whites. In fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess
of Whites. Our current immigration policies are structured so that
approximately 90 percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are
non-White. The several million illegal immigrants that enter the
country every year are virtually all non-White. It would be racist not
to be grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity." It is,
of course, only White nations that are called upon to practice this
kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to imagine a nation of any
other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind.
What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated
citizens across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into
thinking that Mexico was being "culturally enriched?" What if the
state of Chihuahua were losing its majority population to poor Whites
who demanded that schools be taught in English, who insisted on
celebrating the Fourth of July, who demanded the right to vote even if
they weren't citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs
and schooling?
Would Mexico - or any other non-White nation - tolerate this kind of
cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet White
Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians
entering their country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed
to "celebrate" their own loss of influence, their own dwindling
numbers, their own dispossession, for to do otherwise would be
hopelessly racist.
There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non-
Whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of
"hating" another group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and
Hispanics can be activists without fear of being branded as bigots and
hate mongers. They can agitate openly for racial preferences that can
come only at the expense of whites. They can demand preferential
treatment of all kinds without anyone ever suggesting that they are
"anti-white."
Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to
affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject racial
policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called
racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that they prefer the
company of their own kind, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy
the fruits of their European heritage, they are irredeemably wicked
and hateful.
Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race
relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their
own kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct
from those of the whole, and to work openly for group advantage. None
of this is thought to be racist. At the same time, whites must also
champion the racial interests of non-whites. They must sacrifice their
own future on the altar of "diversity" and cooperate in their own
dispossession. They are to encourage, even to subsidize, the
displacement of a European people and culture by alien peoples and
cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, White people are
cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and
cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is
perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to
love one's people and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and
El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished to discover that simply by
setting foot in the United States they are entitled to affirmative
action preferences over native-born whites, but can they be blamed for
accepting them? Is it surprising that they should want their
languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take
possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the once-great
people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is
prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for
it, why should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?
No, it is the White enterprise in the United States that is unnatural,
unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let
themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to object to
dispossession, much less to work for their own interests. Never in the
history of the world has a dominant people thrown open the gates to
strangers, and poured out its wealth to aliens. Never before has a
people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in
surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in
history. Of all the races in America, only whites have been tricked
into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only
whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow
"hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own
kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their
families more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they
hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no
ill will towards non-whites. They only wish to be left alone to
participate in the unfolding of their racial and cultural destinies.
What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly
unnatural. They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests
of other races and to ignore the interests of their own. This is like
asking a man to forsake his own children and love the children of his
neighbors, since to do otherwise would be "racist."
What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is
likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to official policies of
racial preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for
their own people and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the
idea of becoming a minority people. It is any unwillingness to be
pushed aside. It is, in short, any of the normal aspirations of
people-hood that have defined nations since the beginning of history -
but only so long as the aspirations are those of whites.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Data" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
25 Sep 2006 08:42:02 PM |
|
|
In article <kvsgh2l1fsvn7idjdnba11de7mjqcmio9f@4ax.com>
Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote:
"The modern definition of a racist:
Yawn.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
26 Sep 2006 07:46:50 PM |
|
|
"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE
problem.
Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world
pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."
"The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan,
but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by
bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote
with them."
"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY
white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e.,
intermarry, with all those non-whites."
"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem
would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were
brought
into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"
"How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a
RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK
problem?"
"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and
what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?"
"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of
genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable
conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kope2" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
25 Sep 2006 07:10:17 AM |
|
|
i am a radical muslim please read my blog.
http://www.xanga.com/hfghj23458654fgha
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Admin" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
25 Sep 2006 05:10:16 PM |
|
|
In article <1159133879.072994.145610@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
"National Alliance Terrorism" <natall_terror@yahoo.com> wrote:
Flush!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
25 Sep 2006 07:28:53 PM |
|
|
An open letter to the President of Iran.
by Kevin Alfred Strom
DEAR PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD: I have read with great interest your
interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel and your open letter
to President George W. Bush. I am an American of European descent
who wishes to prevent war between our two countries. I also hope-
and work-for the self-determination of my own people; and I
believe that all the peoples who suffer under Jewish/Zionist
domination should stand together for one another's freedom.
I am the publisher of "Inside the 'Axis of Evil'" and I was recently
interviewed by your country's Mehr News Agency. I hope you will find
my thoughts helpful and illuminating in the causes of peace and
freedom.
The most important fact you must understand, as the forces of war
and hate increasingly target your country, is the near-total control
of the media of news and entertainment in the West-and especially
in America-by the Jewish minority. Even though Jews constitute a
tiny fraction-around 2 per cent.-of the population of the
U.S., they dominate the press, the television networks, the radio
networks, and the production and distribution of motion pictures.
I am the author of the research report Who Rules America?, which
documents this control in detail. My report begins with a survey of
the anti-European racial bias of the American media, which may seem
irrelevant to you; but I assure you it is not: Just as the Jews
flooded Palestine with non-Palestinians, they are also flooding
America and Europe with non-Europeans to weaken and divide the
people and make them easier to rule. In any case, I urge you to read
my entire report, since after that brief introduction I show, in
detail, absolute proof of the Jewish control of "American" mass
media. It is this control which ought to be of even more concern to
you than who becomes the next President of the United States or
which party nominally controls the U.S. Congress.
Because the major media in America are controlled by Zionist Jews-
Jewish supremacists-it is almost impossible for anti-Zionist or
even non-Zionist politicians to be elected here, making a sham of
our so-called democracy. If a candidate emerges who opposes the
Jewish/Zionist agenda, he is relentlessly attacked by the media, who
work day and night to slander him and blacken his reputation, so
that he becomes unelectable.
The leading politicians of both parties are well aware of this
Zionist control, and many privately deplore it: Witness Richard
Nixon's private remarks to Christian leader Billy Graham on the
destructive effects of Jewish power, even though in public he did
almost everything the Jews wanted; witness Vice President Spiro
Agnew's opposition to Zionism evident in private remarks and in his
novel The Canfield Decision, published only after he left office;
witness the statements of Jimmy Carter (that to oppose Israel is
"political suicide") and of Senator Ernest Hollings (that "You can't
have an Israel policy other than what AIPAC gives you....") only
after they had decided they were no longer going to run for
political office. Many other political leaders know that Jewish
supremacists control our media and thereby control our foreign
policy-but they do not have the courage to say so because of that
very media control.
This media control has even deformed religion in the United States:
The Christian Zionist organizations, which hardly existed a few
decades ago, have been given tremendous access to the television
airwaves and have, as a consequence, become a dominant force in
American Christianity. They form a very large part of what is called
the Religious Right in this country, and are largely responsible for
George Bush's political success. Even as many old-line Christian
denominations, like the Presbyterians, wake up to the inhuman,
genocidal agenda of Zionism, churches that have come under the sway
of Christian Zionism teach their flocks that "Israel can do no
wrong" and "Israel fulfils prophecy" et cetera-and thereby feed
the bloodlust of the Zionist neocons.
]
As you point out in your letter and your interview, the Jewish
Holocaust story is being used as a political tool to extract
compliance-and billions of dollars-from non-Jews. I deeply
appreciate your bringing the work of the revisionist historians, who
tell us that not every Jewish assertion about World War II is true,
to the attention of millions upon millions of people who otherwise
would never have heard of it.
May I draw your attention to a particularly pernicious Jewish use of
the tragedy of World War II? I'm referring to the demonization, as
"new Hitlers," of men-and nations-who want to have a
government not under the supervision of Zionist Jews.
In February, the Chairman of the Council of Jews in France said in
Paris: "The Iranian President's assertions do not rank behind
Hitler's Mein Kampf."
Paul Spiegel, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany,
was quoted in Die Welt saying that your statements on Israel and
Jewish power "were the worst comment on this subject that he has
ever heard of a statesman since Adolf Hitler."
At the White House, according to Jewish writer Seymour Hersh in The
New Yorker magazine, you are routinely referred to as "Hitler."
All this indicates a strong desire for war on the part of those who
have already made it happen twice-in Afghanistan and Iraq-in
just the past few years. Slobodan Milosevic was called a new Hitler
because he resisted internationalist control of his country. The
result was the NATO war against Yugoslavia. Saddam Hussein was
called a new Hitler when he quit taking orders from Washington. What
followed was the war on, and occupation of, Iraq.
And now you are being portrayed by the Jewish establishment as a
"new Hitler." At the latest AIPAC conference, which was attended by
many of the most powerful Jews and powerful politicians in America,
the Ahmadinejad-as-Hitler image was far more than a metaphor or an
implication-it was a larger-than-life in-your-face assertion.
Here's a description of the event by a Jewish student who was there,
Alice Ollstein, as published in the Jewish Journal of Greater Los
Angeles:
'The speakers and "informational" videos left no grey area, no
place for dialogue or debate, and certainly no place for dissent. I
especially squirmed at the parallels AIPAC drew between Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hitler. To the tune of more
dramatic classical music, the six enormous screens flashed back and
forth between Hitler giving anti-Jew speeches and Ahmadinejad giving
anti-Israel speeches. The famous post-Holocaust mantra "Never Again"
popped up several times. Everything was geared toward persuading the
audience that another Holocaust is evident ... unless we get them
first.'
And since nearly all Jews and a very large number of non-Jews in the
West have been programmed by the media to turn off all reason and
begin salivating for blood as soon as the name "Hitler" is invoked,
facts will not matter. Whatever "crimes" the Hitler-figure is
accused of will become real and he will become guilty. If the
Hitler-figure obeys every law and every rule, it will not matter. A
good example of this is your country's desire to develop nuclear
energy. As journalist Jörg Pfuhl points out "Virtually none of the
Western states recognize that uranium enrichment is absolutely
legal. There is no restriction by contract or by the law of nations.
Quite the contrary: Actually the Western countries would have the
duty to assist Iran with these activities, according to the
Non-Proliferation Treaty. As long as a state renounces the bomb it
is eligible for technical support by the nuclear powers." (emphasis
added) But you're "the new Hitler," so the facts don't matter.
President Ahmadinejad, right now the American people are weary of
war and even Bush's most ardent supporters don't think we've done
well in occupying Iraq. A new war will be a very hard sell. But the
Jewish supremacists who control the images on Americans' TV screens
and magazine pages want to destroy you. They are masters of the hard
sell. They are not men of honor and morality. They are not men of
truth.
They will use their intelligence agency assets to induce Muslims-
preferably Muslims with an Iranian connection-to attack America
again. They will "guide" a cell within your own government or
military so that it commits some act to harm Americans. They will
try to goad you-using some intolerable new act by Bush, which
they will have caused-into yourself threatening or attacking the
West. They will do any combination of the above, or something
equivalent that no one can anticipate. They will do literally
anything to start a war between our countries. You must guard
vigilantly against such acts of deception and violence. You must
give the warmongers no excuse.
There are signs of hope in this country-hope that the star of the
Jewish supremacists who rule us is now descending.
In the American state of Alabama, a man who openly questioned Jewish
power in this country-a man who called for the shutdown and
prosecution of a powerful Zionist-linked censorship group-was
very nearly nominated for the post of State Attorney General. Larry
Darby, who spoke at a recent meeting of my organization, National
Vanguard, was able to garner 44% of the Democratic primary vote,
carrying many parts of the state-despite the fact that the
Jewish-dominated party bosses opposed him with all their might.
In the American state of Tennessee, a man named James Hart won the
Republican primary for Congress-with 73 per cent. of the vote-
while openly advocating for European-Americans and against the
ferocious opposition of the Jewish-controlled media and Jewish
supremacist organizations. Hart would doubtlessly have gone further
had he not been sabotaged by the bosses of his own Republican party,
who went so far as to have his name removed from the ballot.
Newspapers-and we know who dominates publishing in this country -
refused to run his advertisements, so many voters were prevented
from even hearing about him.
My organization operates a multimedia Web site-V-News.org-
which features news articles, radio programs, and videos in direct
competition with the Jewish-controlled media. We operate with a very
small but very talented staff, who are mostly volunteers. Even
though we feature many original stories, and sometimes exclusive
scoops, every day, the news search engine news.google.com has
refused to carry our stories ever since Jewish organizations
complained about our presence in their index.
Despite these limitations and attacks against us, our readership
ratings are soaring and are now comparable to or higher than those
of the Web sites of many major American media outlets such as the
Tampa Tribune, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and many others. Our
readership ratings are routinely far in excess of those of Jewish
supremacist groups like the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
and the World Jewish Congress. Our pages are read more than a
million times every month.
I say these things to you because I think that the Internet has
provided a wedge for the truth to get out to the American people,
and that my group and others, like Messrs. Darby and Hart, have
shown millions of Americans that there is an alternative view. If we
who believe in freedom from Jewish domination-we who believe in
true self-determination-can continue to expand our media
capabilities, then there is a chance that the Jewish media monopoly
will be seriously challenged and significantly diminished. That, I
believe, is the key to taking away their power to wipe out whole
nations and start wars whenever they choose.
That means more than just news sites and newspapers-it means
movie studios and publishing houses; it means DVDs and music videos;
it means bookstores and family centers. It means replacing the media
and infrastructure of the Jewish supremacists at every level.
Now, President Ahmadinejad, I am not suggesting that Iranians set up
as media barons in Europe and the U.S. (though that would be better
than the Jewish monopoly we have now). What I am suggesting is that
all of us who believe in freedom and self-determination for our own
peoples-all of us who want a government of our own not under
Jewish/internationalist supervision-ought to make breaking the
Jewish media monopoly one of our highest priorities. Whatever our
differences on other issues, we ought to cooperate in every way
possible to achieve that goal. For your part, I suggest a strong
effort to reach out to anti-war Americans of all parties and
affiliations, and making full use of the alternative media-the
"blogosphere" which includes National Vanguard and many other
outlets-that free-thinking Americans have created and which will,
I am sure, be very useful to the cause of peace and understanding
between our two peoples. Your grace in favoring these alternative
media with "scoops" and interviews will also make these alternative
media stronger.
I have devoted my life to the freedom of my people-people of
European descent-and I want you to understand that my desire for
racial and cultural integrity for my people is not an attack on your
people in any way. As my friend and colleague Dr. David Duke said
when he visited Syria recently, surely the Muslim world can
understand European and European-American nationalists' desire to
have their own nations and to end the mass immigration which has
been engineered by Jewish supremacists specifically to dilute and
weaken us as a people.
[
You would not countenance open borders in Iran. You would not
tolerate mass immigration of tens of millions of people culturally
and racially distinct from you-Europeans or Chinese, for example
-- whatever your high regard for those peoples. We have both seen
what massive Jewish immigration did to Palestine in the last
century. Something similar happened to America a few years earlier,
which allowed the Jewish supremacists to make my country their power
base. Without that power base, there would be no Israel today, and
no conflict between the Muslim world and the West.
The Jewish supremacists have a vision of the world as one nominally
"democratic," but with multiple races and cultures within each
country, and with their media always holding the balance of power
over elections, so that no one people can have its own government
and no leader can ever emerge to challenge their rule or the power
of their money. They want a world in which no people is allowed to
have its own leaders or its own government any more-except Jews,
except Israel. All other nations, as they see it, must become
"multi-ethnic" states, effectively ruled by their international
capital and their international media.
We who believe otherwise must prevent that world from coming into
being. It will be a slave world, a world without freedom, a world
without distinctive cultures, and world system from which no
dissident or free thinker can escape.
To that end, I hope you will think about National Vanguard's vision
of an alternative world, a world which can be summed up simply in
what I call the Maxim of Self-Determination: "Each people which
considers itself to be a people should, to the maximum extent
possible, live under its own government."
In closing, let me reiterate my thanks for your time and for your
frank, courageous, and truthful statements on some of the most
important issues of our age, and let me repeat my earnest wish that
our peoples will never make war on each other.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
23 Sep 2006 05:26:47 PM |
|
|
Topaz wrote:
An open letter to the President of Iran.
by Kevin Alfred Strom
DEAR PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD: I have read with great interest your
interview with....
Waste of time.
Bet you 100 million pounds Sterling that he doesn't pop into this forum
and read it.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Remember this one Mondo? |
23 Sep 2006 02:57:29 AM |
|
|
kmiller wrote:
Twinkle Twinkle Little Star
How TRULY F**Ked You Already Are
All The Stars In On Your Flag "So Right"
Will Not Save You From Al-Queda'a Plight !!!
Just A Commentary On YOUR Moronic Thoughts (About Your Self-Righteous
Mind Set).
This Is A Time Of WAR - Dig You Head Out Of The Sands.
8< |
Thought I should change the title to be sure of attracting your
attention, Mondo.
As a youth I read, and still remember the more scientific version of
this verse.
"Twinkle twinkle, little star,
Now we find out what you are.
When unto the midnight sky,
We the interferometer apply"
Funny how things remain fixed in the mind after years and years have
passed!
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
23 Sep 2006 07:47:00 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1158998249.372448.44330@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
kmiller wrote:
Twinkle Twinkle Little Star
How TRULY F**Ked You Already Are
All The Stars In On Your Flag "So Right"
Will Not Save You From Al-Queda'a Plight !!!
Just A Commentary On YOUR Moronic Thoughts (About Your Self-Righteous
Mind Set).
This Is A Time Of WAR - Dig You Head Out Of The Sands.
8< |
Thought I should change the title to be sure of attracting your
attention, Mondo.
As a youth I read, and still remember the more scientific version of
this verse.
"Twinkle twinkle, little star,
Now we find out what you are.
When unto the midnight sky,
We the interferometer apply"
Funny how things remain fixed in the mind after years and years have
passed!
Werewolfy
We Americans have something quite a bit more refined than that little ditty.
"Twinkle, twinkle, little star,
what the hell do you think you are?
A flashlight?"
What the hell is an interferometer?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
23 Sep 2006 08:33:43 AM |
|
|
John Lemke wrote:
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1158998249.372448.44330@d34g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
kmiller wrote:
Twinkle Twinkle Little Star
How TRULY F**Ked You Already Are
All The Stars In On Your Flag "So Right"
Will Not Save You From Al-Queda'a Plight !!!
Just A Commentary On YOUR Moronic Thoughts (About Your Self-Righteous
Mind Set).
This Is A Time Of WAR - Dig You Head Out Of The Sands.
8< |
Thought I should change the title to be sure of attracting your
attention, Mondo.
As a youth I read, and still remember the more scientific version of
this verse.
"Twinkle twinkle, little star,
Now we find out what you are.
When unto the midnight sky,
We the interferometer apply"
Funny how things remain fixed in the mind after years and years have
passed!
Werewolfy
We Americans have something quite a bit more refined than that little ditty.
"Twinkle, twinkle, little star,
what the hell do you think you are?
A flashlight?"
What the hell is an interferometer?
Good morning John Lemke! How are you this fine morning?
It's dark, dreery and wet where I am, but it's a change from the
sunshine and I'm sure something or someone around here enjoys it. It
certainly adds some atmosphere to the day.
I believe an interferometer, if I remember correctly from college
physics, is a device that uses the constructive and destructive pattern
produced by light passing through closely spaced slits. The distance
between the constructive peaks is used to calculate the wavelength of
the light. Once you've found the wavelength, you can calculate the
frequency (f=c/wavelength where c is he speed of light). Using
Plancik's constant(h) and a simple relationship of Energy = hf where f
is the frequency of the light, you can calculate the energy required to
produce the light, ie it's source.
Stars, I'm supposing, are made up of gases that are ionized. When a gas
is ionized, it produceds light. The 'colour' or frequency of that light
is dependent on the energy level that produced it (see Planck's
constant above). The energy that produced it was an electron around an
atom going from an excited state (ionized) to it's rest state. These
excited states are unique to each atom -- sort of like a signature. The
energy levels, or electron bands, for each atom are basicly in a lookup
table. I guess you have to filter out through multiple frequencies to
'find' each signature, since you'll not likely find a single star made
up of only a single element. The intensity of the light would also
likely indicate the amount of each atom in a star.
Hope that helps! Science is fun. And I'm open to corrections, as
always.
Cheers!
-- Marvie
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 11:51:46 AM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:1159018423.348611.118380@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
John Lemke wrote:
What the hell is an interferometer?
Good morning John Lemke! How are you this fine morning?
Good Sunday afternoon, Marv. Feeling better today than yesterday, thanks.
I can see you're a happy, chipper dude. Hope life is very good on your end.
It's dark, dreery and wet where I am, but it's a change from the
sunshine and I'm sure something or someone around here enjoys it. It
certainly adds some atmosphere to the day.
Same here but I'm guessing we both like diversity in our weather. Couldn't
stand living somewhere that was sunny and warm all the time. Love the
change in seasons in our area of the world and Fall is coming on!!!!!!!!!
I believe an interferometer, if I remember correctly from college
physics, is a device that uses the constructive and destructive pattern
produced by light passing through closely spaced slits. The distance
between the constructive peaks is used to calculate the wavelength of
the light. Once you've found the wavelength, you can calculate the
frequency (f=c/wavelength where c is he speed of light). Using
Plancik's constant(h) and a simple relationship of Energy = hf where f
is the frequency of the light, you can calculate the energy required to
produce the light, ie it's source.
Stars, I'm supposing, are made up of gases that are ionized. When a gas
is ionized, it produceds light. The 'colour' or frequency of that light
is dependent on the energy level that produced it (see Planck's
constant above). The energy that produced it was an electron around an
atom going from an excited state (ionized) to it's rest state. These
excited states are unique to each atom -- sort of like a signature. The
energy levels, or electron bands, for each atom are basicly in a lookup
table. I guess you have to filter out through multiple frequencies to
'find' each signature, since you'll not likely find a single star made
up of only a single element. The intensity of the light would also
likely indicate the amount of each atom in a star.
Hmmm. I'm glad there are people out there that love this sort of thing,
have a passion for it. Thanks for the time and the effort here, Marv. My
heart is warmed.
Hope that helps! Science is fun. And I'm open to corrections, as
always.
You're not likely to get many corrections from me.
I wonder if science will ever be able to tell us for sure why Anna Nicole's
son really died. :-) That seems to be a burning issue here in the States.
Imagine.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
23 Sep 2006 09:52:34 AM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
"I believe an interferometer, if I remember correctly from college
physics, "
Marvie! Your memory is faultless. Your precis exact and of the highest
quality.
I award you a week's telescope time at Palomar for that. ;)
Now, Mr John Lemke. I really must call you to task over using this
strange word, 'flashlight'.
I fancy you really mean a 'torch', but you insist on describing the
device as being used to produce sequential bursts of photons, rather
than a single issue.
It should be easy to remember. After all, a torch does not contain the
letter, 'U'.
;)
Ricky
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 10:19:05 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1159023154.393720.89910@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now, Mr John Lemke. I really must call you to task over using this
strange word, 'flashlight'.
I fancy you really mean a 'torch', but you insist on describing the
device as being used to produce sequential bursts of photons, rather
than a single issue.
I'll make the switch, Ricky, but all my tobacco chewing huntin' buddies are
going to start calling me an Anglophile.
"Really, John, would the Queen gut her own buck?"
I'll bet she would. Sassy little wench.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
23 Sep 2006 09:06:34 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10
@lycos.com> Spat the Words
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
"I believe an interferometer, if I remember correctly from college
physics, "
Marvie! Your memory is faultless. Your precis exact and of the highest
quality.
I award you a week's telescope time at Palomar for that. ;)
Now, Mr John Lemke. I really must call you to task over using this
strange word, 'flashlight'.
I fancy you really mean a 'torch', but you insist on describing the
device as being used to produce sequential bursts of photons, rather
than a single issue.
I thought a 'torch' was a stick with a rag wrapped around the
end, dipped in kerosine and lit on fire (don't you Brits ever
play video games ?)
And what exactly do you call those things used by the Jedi Knights
in the Star Wars movies, flash-lights ?? :-)
It should be easy to remember. After all, a torch does not contain the
letter, 'U'.
;)
Ricky
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 07:30:56 AM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
"After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Werewolfy"
<thegrimreaper10."
......Was induced by Perseid to reply, and to watch helplessly, whilst
the message was diverted to alt. security terrorism forum only.
Naughty Perseid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 07:41:36 AM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
Perseid wrote:
"After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Werewolfy"
<thegrimreaper10."
.....Was induced by Perseid to reply, and to watch helplessly, whilst
the message was diverted to alt. security terrorism forum only.
Naughty Perseid.
So, having wandered into the madhouse that calls itself alt. terrorism
or something, I've retrieved the stolen post.
Ah.. Mediaeval ideas. No Pers. , we've moved along a touch since we
illuminated our castles by this method.When the torch was made more
practical, the language retained the word to encompass the improved
version.
Americans seemed unhappy with that, as with so many other words, and
substituted their own preference.
I have vaguely heard of 'Jedi Knights'..something from 'Star wars?'
Sorry, but I never watch those sort of television things. I did once,
and found that all of the strange looking creatures from far flung
Galactic Empires, spoke with an American accent.
Oh..we call those things used by these 'knight's', fantasy.
;)
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 12:07:27 AM |
|
|
That "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star ..".was meant as a WARNING, not a
threat.
And NO, I am not Mondo !!! - [we live on different sides of the
continent.]
8< []
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 01:45:55 AM |
|
|
Every attempt that I have made here to point out the TRUE Third
Anti-Christ has been [BLOCKED] by the Powers That Be !!!
So people, you are going to have to figure it out on your OWN.
I will (try) give you a hint. - The President of Iran is the 'frontman'
for what Religious Person !!!
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Remember this one Mondo? |
24 Sep 2006 01:48:14 AM |
|
|
Finally - I got one through.
:-()
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SkyMaster" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
21 Sep 2006 09:51:21 PM |
|
|
On 21 Sep 2006, wrote:
How about this one.
July 1, 1960, United States, Virginia Beach.
What do the stars say?
Thanks,
M
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mars 1; Jupiter 9; Saturn 10; Sun & Venus 3 Lilith; Mercury 4;
Uranus S. 5F; Moon Node 6. --adjudicated by DJM 21 Sept 2006
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRRNOX5ljD7YrHM/nEQK9swCfdJq097xeUac9iGpkJihZRzyN/dsAn20Y
+z2e7+yuKAE5d4csX3+Foo6Q
=Kcz1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Admin" |
|
| Title: Re: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Uranus |
22 Sep 2006 01:28:08 AM |
|
|
In article <8OOK2JCG38981.8502893519@twistycreek.com>
SkyMaster AKA morphing phukwit Min <anon@comments.header> wrote:
-adjudicated by Daniel Joseph Min 22 September 2006
Morphing phukwit!
alt.*****.daniel-joseph-min
.
|
|
|
|
