Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
Since Monday, when weapons of mass destruction in the form of Sarin gas were
discovered in Iraq, there have been 525 media reports on the development, a
Lexis Nexis search shows.
In the same four day period, however, the Abu Ghraib scandal has been the
subject of 2,342 news reports - despite the fact that the story is three weeks
old with no significant new developments driving the coverage.
Meanwhile, evidence that America is being targeted for an even more deadly
strike than on 9/11 mounts day after day:
* An FBI terror alert issued Thursday warns police to look for obvious signs of
trouble — people wearing heavy, bulky jackets on warm days, smelling of
chemicals, trailing wires from their jackets.
* Five weeks ago Jordanian authorities foiled an al Qaida plot to use three
tanker trucks in a chemical weapons attack in Amman that could have killed
80,000 people, according to experts.
* On April 8 an empty 92,000 gallon tanker truck was stolen from a Pensauken,
N.J. parking lot and has been missing ever since.
* That same week, five empty suitcases were discovered in New York's subway
system in what intelligence experts believe was a dress rehearsal for a
Madrid-style railway attack on the U.S.
* Al Qaida WMD specialist Abu Musab al Zarqawi, ringleader of the Jordan plot,
has grown increasingly deadly in the last few months. He's recently claimed
credit for the Madrid train bombings, the beheading of Daniel Berg and
Tuesday's assassination of the head of the Iraqi Governing Council, Izzadine
Saleem
* Zarqawi is also believed to have been behind an August truck bomb attack on
the U.N.'s headquarters in Baghdad, killing 23 people, a car bombing in Najaf
that killed more than 85, and a truck bombing of Italy's paramilitary police
headquarters in southern city of Nasiriyah that killed more than 30.
.
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 04:39:25 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>...
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
Well they were paid to!
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
No they have just been negoitating a good exclusive for that toxic
cloud!
Since Monday, when weapons of mass destruction in the form of Sarin gas were
discovered in Iraq, there have been 525 media reports on the development, a
Lexis Nexis search shows.
Yes a whole kilo of 1980 vintage, fresh is best
In the same four day period, however, the Abu Ghraib scandal has been the
subject of 2,342 news reports - despite the fact that the story is three weeks
old with no significant new developments driving the coverage.
Meanwhile, evidence that America is being targeted for an even more deadly
strike than on 9/11 mounts day after day:
* An FBI terror alert issued Thursday warns police to look for obvious signs of
trouble — people wearing heavy, bulky jackets on warm days, smelling of
chemicals, trailing wires from their jackets.
Or no doubt flying planes in an erratic manner.
* Five weeks ago Jordanian authorities foiled an al Qaida plot to use three
tanker trucks in a chemical weapons attack in Amman that could have killed
80,000 people, according to experts.
If they were put in a mine shaft and had boiling water poured on them.
* On April 8 an empty 92,000 gallon tanker truck was stolen from a Pensauken,
N.J. parking lot and has been missing ever since.
Is that a BLURP on the horizon or just another Hoolywood blockbuster?
* That same week, five empty suitcases were discovered in New York's subway
system in what intelligence experts believe was a dress rehearsal for a
Madrid-style railway attack on the U.S.
Or just to keep the paranoid barnacles employed?
* Al Qaida WMD specialist Abu Musab al Zarqawi, ringleader of the Jordan plot,
has grown increasingly deadly in the last few months. He's recently claimed
credit for the Madrid train bombings, the beheading of Daniel Berg and
Tuesday's assassination of the head of the Iraqi Governing Council, Izzadine
Saleem
Since Saddam we have seen little of Most demonised media boy.
* Zarqawi is also believed to have been behind an August truck bomb attack on
the U.N.'s headquarters in Baghdad, killing 23 people, a car bombing in Najaf
that killed more than 85, and a truck bombing of Italy's paramilitary police
headquarters in southern city of Nasiriyah that killed more than 30.
Ah that Arab Pimpernell he is everywhere, Zorro of the desert. Things
that go Whoomp in the night
LB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
21 May 2004 07:52:04 PM |
|
|
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
Yup, Bush has really been missing something - his brain.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
21 May 2004 08:06:15 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns
in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems
have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
Yup, Bush has really been missing something - his brain.
Woods
Ya know, I don't think an attack on the U.S. would do Bush much good in his
hopes for reelection. If it did happen he'd have a tougher time pinning on
the previous Admin.
So would the terrorists wait until after the elections in order to boost
Bush's chances of winning?
-ex
BTW ... sorry for not following the thread proper ... thought just popped
into my head after reading your reply.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 12:40:56 PM |
|
|
"ex" <ex@ex.com> Spat the Words
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President
Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with
yawns
in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu
Ghraib prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent
less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail
systems
have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to
stopping grannies and checking their shoes.
Yup, Bush has really been missing something - his brain.
Woods
Ya know, I don't think an attack on the U.S. would do Bush much good
in his hopes for reelection. If it did happen he'd have a tougher time
pinning on the previous Admin.
I think even the republican congress-people are starting to
realize Bush is suffering from mental incapacity. The economy
is clearly in malaise, there is no exit strategy from iraq, and
now evidence suggests we've been randomly nabbing iraqi people
off the streets and torturing them. If this weren't so serious
it would almost be funny.
So would the terrorists wait until after the elections in order to
boost Bush's chances of winning?
-ex
BTW ... sorry for not following the thread proper ... thought just
popped into my head after reading your reply.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
21 May 2004 09:48:56 PM |
|
|
In article <rIxrc.53217$qJ5.1193098@news20.bellglobal.com>, "ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns
in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems
have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
Yup, Bush has really been missing something - his brain.
Woods
Ya know, I don't think an attack on the U.S. would do Bush much good in his
hopes for reelection. If it did happen he'd have a tougher time pinning on
the previous Admin.
So would the terrorists wait until after the elections in order to boost
Bush's chances of winning?
Beats me what the Terrorists think will be to boost Bush's chances of winning -
they're all brain damaged (or something). All I know is that Bush winning would
be good for Terrorists and bad for the rest of us!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 09:45:57 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
All I know is that Bush winning would
be good for Terrorists and bad for the >rest of us!
I really would like to hear what you think Kerry would do differently.
But I'm sure you're unable to provide any answers.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 10:17:14 AM |
|
|
In article <20040522104557.17668.00000890@mb-m15.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
All I know is that Bush winning would
be good for Terrorists and bad for the >rest of us!
I really would like to hear what you think Kerry would do differently.
Well, I honestly don't know. What I DO know is that he has not failed at every
single business venture he's ever undertaken, and at this point, that's looking
pretty darned good.
But I'm sure you're unable to provide any answers.
The answer is: Bush has run several businesses into the ground and screwed up
in Afghanistan and Iraq. He has no foresight, no ability to plan, no real
ability to "understand" anything that doesn't fit into his preconceived ideas.
This election is not about voting in anyone - it's about getting a screwup out.
A vote for Kerry is akin to voting to "Fire Bush!".
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 11:12:59 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
All I know is that Bush winning would
be good for Terrorists and bad for the >rest of us!
I really would like to hear what you >>think Kerry would do differently.
Well, I honestly don't know.
Gee, such profound though has gone into your Presidential choice. You don't
even have the slightest idea of what you guy would do.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 12:44:49 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
All I know is that Bush winning would
be good for Terrorists and bad for the >rest of us!
I really would like to hear what you >>think Kerry would do
differently.
Well, I honestly don't know.
Gee, such profound though has gone into your Presidential choice. You
don't even have the slightest idea of what you guy would do.
A good start would be a realization that we can't control iraq...
the best we can do is make them our friends. I think Kerry is
smart enough to realize this, but Bush is not.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 11:45:56 AM |
|
|
In article <20040522121259.17730.00001900@mb-m16.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
All I know is that Bush winning would
be good for Terrorists and bad for the >rest of us!
I really would like to hear what you >>think Kerry would do differently.
Well, I honestly don't know.
Gee, such profound though has gone into your Presidential choice. You don't
even have the slightest idea of what you guy would do.
He doesn't have a track record of completely screwing up everything he touches.
That's good enough to get my vote in this particular election.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 12:18:06 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
More lies. 2002 saw an increase of $20B in homeland security. 2003 saw another $21B in homeland
security. Total of $42.5B annual increase spent on security. The FBI and CIA also had increases
after their budgets were cut by 40% during the Clinton years. I flew out of O'Hare to California
last summer. Security was a nightmare. I spent 45 minutes in line and another 5 minutes answering
questions and having my bags gone through. For union workers, I thought the security persons did an
excellent job. Again, you're using more Pelosi brand, liberal hysterics.
Oops, forgot to mention the Patriot Act. An excellent law enforcement tool.
Yup, Bush has really been missing something - his brain.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 08:44:13 AM |
|
|
In article <cde4c$40aee291$407626e3$4073@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com>, "dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
More lies. 2002 saw an increase of $20B in homeland security. 2003 saw another
$21B in homeland
security. Total of $42.5B annual increase spent on security. The FBI and CIA
also had increases
after their budgets were cut by 40% during the Clinton years. I flew out of
O'Hare to California
last summer. Security was a nightmare. I spent 45 minutes in line and another 5
minutes answering
questions and having my bags gone through. For union workers, I thought the
security persons did an
excellent job. Again, you're using more Pelosi brand, liberal hysterics.
Where did the money go on homeland security? It has certainly NOT gone to
security for port authorities or railroads - and that's what I'm talking about,
not fatting up payrolls.
Oops, forgot to mention the Patriot Act. An excellent law enforcement tool.
Name one person who's been apprehended, tried, and convicted under the Patriot
Act that could not have also been apprehended, tried and convicted without it.
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a ruse to get you, the sheeple, to give up
your "rights" and start the process to become a police state.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 10:55:58 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:NOIrc.238514$M3.94871@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <cde4c$40aee291$407626e3$4073@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com>, "dreamwalker"
<backfromthe@dead.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
More lies. 2002 saw an increase of $20B in homeland security. 2003 saw another
$21B in homeland
security. Total of $42.5B annual increase spent on security. The FBI and CIA
also had increases
after their budgets were cut by 40% during the Clinton years. I flew out of
O'Hare to California
last summer. Security was a nightmare. I spent 45 minutes in line and another 5
minutes answering
questions and having my bags gone through. For union workers, I thought the
security persons did an
excellent job. Again, you're using more Pelosi brand, liberal hysterics.
Where did the money go on homeland security? It has certainly NOT gone to
security for port authorities or railroads - and that's what I'm talking about,
not fatting up payrolls.
Oops, forgot to mention the Patriot Act. An excellent law enforcement tool.
Name one person who's been apprehended, tried, and convicted under the Patriot
Act that could not have also been apprehended, tried and convicted without it.
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a ruse to get you, the sheeple, to give up
your "rights" and start the process to become a police state.
Name one person who's rights have been trampled under the patriot act. More liberal hysterics.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 11:14:58 AM |
|
|
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:NOIrc.238514$M3.94871@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <cde4c$40aee291$407626e3$4073@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com>,
"dreamwalker"
< > wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with
yawns in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu
Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent
less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems
have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to
stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
More lies. 2002 saw an increase of $20B in homeland security. 2003 saw
another
$21B in homeland
security. Total of $42.5B annual increase spent on security. The FBI and
CIA
also had increases
after their budgets were cut by 40% during the Clinton years. I flew out
of
O'Hare to California
last summer. Security was a nightmare. I spent 45 minutes in line and
another 5
minutes answering
questions and having my bags gone through. For union workers, I thought
the
security persons did an
excellent job. Again, you're using more Pelosi brand, liberal hysterics.
Where did the money go on homeland security? It has certainly NOT gone to
security for port authorities or railroads - and that's what I'm talking
about,
not fatting up payrolls.
Oops, forgot to mention the Patriot Act. An excellent law enforcement
tool.
Name one person who's been apprehended, tried, and convicted under the
Patriot
Act that could not have also been apprehended, tried and convicted without
it.
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a ruse to get you, the sheeple, to
give up
your "rights" and start the process to become a police state.
Name one person who's rights have been >trampled under the patriot act. More
liberal hysterics.
She can't, neither can any of the other Liberals in this group.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 11:17:25 AM |
|
|
In article <7720$40af7816$4076268b$7313@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com>, "dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:NOIrc.238514$M3.94871@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <cde4c$40aee291$407626e3$4073@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com>,
"dreamwalker"
<backfromthe@dead.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uuxrc.300267$e17.258504@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040521090044.17253.00001594@mb-m03.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:49 p.m. EDT
Focus on Abu Ghraib Obscuring New Terror Threat
Reporters have spent the last six months suggesting that President Bush
missed
clear evidence that the 9/11 attacks were coming.
But now that new evidence is mounting that al Qaida is preparing a
spectacular
chemical weapons strike on the U.S., the news is being greeted with yawns
in
newsrooms across America, with reporters obsessing instead the Abu Ghraib
prison scandal.
While Bush has spent over $100 Billion on the war on Iraq, he's spent less
than
1% that much on improving security at home. Our ports and rail systems
have
essentially no security at all. Our airport security amounts to stopping
grannies and checking their shoes.
More lies. 2002 saw an increase of $20B in homeland security. 2003 saw
another
$21B in homeland
security. Total of $42.5B annual increase spent on security. The FBI and CIA
also had increases
after their budgets were cut by 40% during the Clinton years. I flew out of
O'Hare to California
last summer. Security was a nightmare. I spent 45 minutes in line and
another 5
minutes answering
questions and having my bags gone through. For union workers, I thought the
security persons did an
excellent job. Again, you're using more Pelosi brand, liberal hysterics.
Where did the money go on homeland security? It has certainly NOT gone to
security for port authorities or railroads - and that's what I'm talking
about,
not fatting up payrolls.
Oops, forgot to mention the Patriot Act. An excellent law enforcement tool.
Name one person who's been apprehended, tried, and convicted under the
Patriot
Act that could not have also been apprehended, tried and convicted without
it.
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a ruse to get you, the sheeple, to give
up
your "rights" and start the process to become a police state.
Name one person who's rights have been trampled under the patriot act. More
liberal hysterics.
There are nearly 300 million people whose rights have been trampled on by the
mere existence of the Patriot Act.
Our government should not have the right to spy on its citizens. Period.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 09:47:20 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a >ruse to get you, the sheeple, to give
up your "rights" and start the process to >become a police state.
"Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep."
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 01:29:33 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040522104720.17668.00000891@mb-m15.aol.com>...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a >ruse to get you, the sheeple, to give
up your "rights" and start the process to >become a police state.
"Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep."
Chinese History of one such period of Paranoia:
Woods, I guess when Chairman Mao was not told of the, at least 27
million dead peasants, some estimate as high as 55-60 million, dead
people in China because his PLA and administration were scared to tell
him that his policy was killing off the Chinese civilization; because
basically they all had feared (Paranoia) he would execute them (For
bad news) - then you have a paranoid Man which results in a paranoid
group which results in death of many. Today you have the lefties who
are paranoid to speak up about certain things in society not to upset
their own 'Mao's' in office, which are paranoia, which in the end can
cause millions of deaths in the U.S. Bush should have titled the ACT
as "Lets not make the same mistakes Chairman Mao did and have the
people paranoid not to speak up for fear of media and political
pressure of not being politically correct ACT."
Point: The leftwing are making bad policy points about the Patriot Act
and the war on Terrorism...Don't be paranoid like the Mao policy it
will only lead to destruction.
NOTE: The period I just describe was the period of the Great Leap
Forward and does not reflect the countless millions more who died in
other 'policy periods' of the Chairman Mao who hated intellectuals and
hated the rightwing (See: Red Book).
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 06:50:10 PM |
|
|
In article <dd3256f0.0405221029.2d249dce@posting.google.com>, (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040522104720.17668.00000891@mb-m15.aol.com>...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a >ruse to get you, the sheeple, to
give
up your "rights" and start the process to >become a police state.
"Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep."
Chinese History of one such period of Paranoia:
Woods, I guess when Chairman Mao was not told of the, at least 27
million dead peasants, some estimate as high as 55-60 million, dead
people in China because his PLA and administration were scared to tell
him that his policy was killing off the Chinese civilization; because
basically they all had feared (Paranoia) he would execute them (For
bad news) - then you have a paranoid Man which results in a paranoid
group which results in death of many. Today you have the lefties who
are paranoid to speak up about certain things in society not to upset
their own 'Mao's' in office, which are paranoia, which in the end can
cause millions of deaths in the U.S. Bush should have titled the ACT
as "Lets not make the same mistakes Chairman Mao did and have the
people paranoid not to speak up for fear of media and political
pressure of not being politically correct ACT."
Which dead peasants are you referring to? The ones who died during the '76
earthquake? They all knew about that. Or people who died during his stupid
"return to the land" nonsense - I actually didn't know that many died because of
that.
Point: The leftwing are making bad policy points about the Patriot Act
and the war on Terrorism...Don't be paranoid like the Mao policy it
will only lead to destruction.
I'm not paranoid so much as watching to make sure that the government's rights
are as limited as intended by the writers of the Constitution. People seem to
be forgetting that the government works for us, we aren't here for the
government. We can scrutinize them freely, the converse is not, and should not,
be true.
NOTE: The period I just describe was the period of the Great Leap
Forward and does not reflect the countless millions more who died in
other 'policy periods' of the Chairman Mao who hated intellectuals and
hated the rightwing (See: Red Book).
Mao was a major you-know-what, that's for sure. I went to grad school with
someone who spent 10 years of his life in rice paddies because of Mao's
stupid/insane ideas.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 10:13:48 AM |
|
|
In article <20040522104720.17668.00000891@mb-m15.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a >ruse to get you, the sheeple, to give
up your "rights" and start the process to >become a police state.
"Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep."
LOL!
You obviously don't even know what the term "paranoia" means!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 11:14:14 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
The Patriot Act is nothing more than a >ruse to get you, the sheeple, to
give
up your "rights" and start the process to >become a police state.
"Paranoia strikes deep, into your heart it will creep."
LOL!
You obviously don't even know what the >term "paranoia" means!
Woods
I do, and you are a perfect example of Left Wing paranoia.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tadapope" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 02:22:41 AM |
|
|
Rumor has it that Bill Gates and Microsoft are JOINTLY donating 2 billion
dollars to
the Kerry Election Democratic party
coop.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 08:45:07 AM |
|
|
In article <20040522032241.20472.00001228@mb-m21.aol.com>, (Tadapope) wrote:
Rumor has it that Bill Gates and Microsoft are JOINTLY donating 2 billion
dollars to
the Kerry Election Democratic party
coop.
That would have to go to the Democratic party, since that's well above the
limits for donations to election campaigns.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 09:44:23 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Yup, Bush has really been missing >something - his brain.
You've got Bush on the brain.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Media ignores the real threats |
22 May 2004 12:41:27 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040522104423.17668.00000889@mb-m15.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Yup, Bush has really been missing >something - his brain.
You've got Bush on the brain.
Tony
Like a bad, malignant tumour.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
