This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BCA5.016F60A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a rational, =
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a myth. =
He also felt the president made many valid points.
-dw
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BCA5.016F60A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Wallace came away impressed. He said =
the man is=20
basically a rational, reasonable, not evil, intelligent man =
who said the=20
Halocaust is a myth. He also felt the president made many valid=20
points.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-dw</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C6BCA5.016F60A0--
.
|
|
| User: "--russ." |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
10 Aug 2006 07:06:32 PM |
|
|
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a rational, reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a myth. He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
11 Aug 2006 01:14:17 AM |
|
|
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
11 Aug 2006 05:00:57 PM |
|
|
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is. Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
11 Aug 2006 07:39:17 PM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bye" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
11 Aug 2006 09:56:53 PM |
|
|
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of land, but
is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three religions Christianity,
Islam and Judaism associate with their beginning.
I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three religions, you would
strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR piece of land where your religion
started. I'm surprised the Christians are not in there fighting for it also.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 01:26:48 AM |
|
|
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of land,
but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three religions
Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their beginning.
I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three religions, you would
strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR piece of land where your
religion started. I'm surprised the Christians are not in there fighting
for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bye" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 03:16:55 AM |
|
|
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is currently
'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture about the coming of a
'messiah' ...
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of land,
but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three religions
Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their beginning.
I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three religions, you would
strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR piece of land where your
religion started. I'm surprised the Christians are not in there fighting
for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 06:05:21 PM |
|
|
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is currently
'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture about the coming
of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of land,
but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three religions
Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their beginning.
I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three religions, you
would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR piece of land where
your religion started. I'm surprised the Christians are not in there
fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think
there would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there
could be a bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe?
Obviously there would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would
gather to destroy it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has
no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is
a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bye" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 06:33:30 PM |
|
|
If it is written in the scriptures and you believe in these scriptures, how
could you say you do not have a plan?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DADD79FA9Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is currently
'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture about the coming
of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of land,
but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three religions
Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their beginning.
I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three religions, you
would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR piece of land where
your religion started. I'm surprised the Christians are not in there
fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think
there would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there
could be a bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe?
Obviously there would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would
gather to destroy it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has
no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is
a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 06:59:31 PM |
|
|
"bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
If it is written in the scriptures and you believe in these scriptures,
how could you say you do not have a plan?
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DADD79FA9Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is
currently 'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture about
the coming of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of
land, but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three
religions Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their
beginning. I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three
religions, you would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR
piece of land where your religion started. I'm surprised the
Christians are not in there fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of
the points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not
have made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's
capital. If the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in
Germany, do you think there would be peace in Europe? Do you
think that perhaps there could be a bit of a rise of so-called
anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there would be no peace, and
the surrounding nations would gather to destroy it. - Destroy
the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has
no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust
is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bye" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 07:45:10 PM |
|
|
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
It does not matter if you believe them or not. I don't believe them either!
The point is that the Jews are supposed to believe them. So, how could you
say they have no intention or plan to following their beliefs and fulfill
their scriptures? They are supposed to have a temple there. That's where
King Solomon's temple used to be. There is suposed to be some sort of
'device' there to communicate with God. At least that's what I gather from
my research....
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DB7062597Drrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
If it is written in the scriptures and you believe in these scriptures,
how could you say you do not have a plan?
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DADD79FA9Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is
currently 'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture about
the coming of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of
land, but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three
religions Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their
beginning. I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three
religions, you would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR
piece of land where your religion started. I'm surprised the
Christians are not in there fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of
the points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not
have made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's
capital. If the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in
Germany, do you think there would be peace in Europe? Do you
think that perhaps there could be a bit of a rise of so-called
anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there would be no peace, and
the surrounding nations would gather to destroy it. - Destroy
the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has
no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust
is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 08:10:58 PM |
|
|
"bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
It does not matter if you believe them or not. I don't believe them
either! The point is that the Jews are supposed to believe them.
Who says they are supposed to believe them ? Much of the old
testament has been altered after hundreds of translations, and
huge numbers of ancients texts never made it into the modern
day bible. You would be a fool to believe every word of the
bible in a literal way.
So,
how could you say they have no intention or plan to following their
beliefs and fulfill their scriptures? They are supposed to have a temple
there. That's where King Solomon's temple used to be. There is suposed
to be some sort of 'device' there to communicate with God. At least
that's what I gather from my research....
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DB7062597Drrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
If it is written in the scriptures and you believe in these
scriptures, how could you say you do not have a plan?
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DADD79FA9Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is
currently 'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture
about the coming of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of
land, but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three
religions Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their
beginning. I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three
religions, you would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR
piece of land where your religion started. I'm surprised the
Christians are not in there fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of
the points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why
not have made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's
capital. If the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in
Germany, do you think there would be peace in Europe? Do you
think that perhaps there could be a bit of a rise of so-called
anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there would be no peace, and
the surrounding nations would gather to destroy it. - Destroy
the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really
has no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust
is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bye" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 08:37:00 PM |
|
|
You would be a fool to believe every word of the
bible in a literal way.
In my opinion much of it is contradictory, irrelevant, boring nonsense. I'm
glad they left some out, because (being a Catholic), I would have hated to
suffer even more boredom in religion classes.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DC323AB4ABrrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
It does not matter if you believe them or not. I don't believe them
either! The point is that the Jews are supposed to believe them.
Who says they are supposed to believe them ? Much of the old
testament has been altered after hundreds of translations, and
huge numbers of ancients texts never made it into the modern
day bible. >
So,
how could you say they have no intention or plan to following their
beliefs and fulfill their scriptures? They are supposed to have a temple
there. That's where King Solomon's temple used to be. There is suposed
to be some sort of 'device' there to communicate with God. At least
that's what I gather from my research....
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DB7062597Drrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
If it is written in the scriptures and you believe in these
scriptures, how could you say you do not have a plan?
Who said I believe in those scriptures ?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DADD79FA9Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is
currently 'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture
about the coming of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of
land, but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three
religions Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their
beginning. I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three
religions, you would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR
piece of land where your religion started. I'm surprised the
Christians are not in there fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of
the points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why
not have made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's
capital. If the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in
Germany, do you think there would be peace in Europe? Do you
think that perhaps there could be a bit of a rise of so-called
anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there would be no peace, and
the surrounding nations would gather to destroy it. - Destroy
the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really
has no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust
is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bye" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 06:49:26 PM |
|
|
In my statement above, instead of the word 'plan', I replace with
'intention'. There is a slight difference.
The Jews DO have the desire and intention to build a temple there!.I believe
so! If they did not, they would not believe in their religion. You say
they don't have a plan. I think the instructions for the temples
construction is already written in the scriptures. I thought I read
something in the Bible about it's dimensions etc...
"bye" <3@4.com> wrote in message news:eztDg.373990$Mn5.353018@pd7tw3no...
If it is written in the scriptures and you believe in these scriptures,
how could you say you do not have a plan?
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981DADD79FA9Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
What sort of 'possession' did you have in mind here ?
I thought the Jews need to build a temple in a space which is currently
'occupied' so they can fulfill some sort of scripture about the coming
of a 'messiah' ...
You shouldn't speculate too much about the future (you'll start
confusing reality with your own speculations like the neocons
do). A rebuilt temple hasn't happened and I haven't heard of
any plans to do so.
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D48BA2303rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Bye" <3@4.com> Spat the Words
So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ?
I disagree with you here on this. This is not just ANY piece of land,
but is a SPECIAL piece of land that I all these three religions
Christianity, Islam and Judaism associate with their beginning.
I suspect if you firmly believer any of those three religions, you
would strongly desire to possess this PARTICULAR piece of land where
your religion started. I'm surprised the Christians are not in there
fighting for it also.
Good point... and Jerusalem is open to Muslims, Christians, and
Jews, for visiting and worshipping. Israel isn't denying access
to the holy places, and half the population of Jerusalem is
Muslim. >
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981CBDC421777rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think
there would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there
could be a bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe?
Obviously there would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would
gather to destroy it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has
no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is
a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
11 Aug 2006 08:02:19 PM |
|
|
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong, and
Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate their
consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay for the
atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people with
light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed most of the
"brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the mideast because
of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is supposed to be anathema
in our civilised world, but the brainwashed believe the mantra - Israel
Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have come
into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing, which was
a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there would be war.
Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica, then probably
they could have avoided endless wars.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 01:17:26 AM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong, and
Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate their
consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay for the
atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people with
light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed most of the
"brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the mideast because
of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is supposed to be anathema
in our civilised world, but the brainwashed believe the mantra - Israel
Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have come
into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing, which was
a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there would be war.
Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica, then probably
they could have avoided endless wars.
And this is how you justify ethnic cleansing of the Jews out
of the middle east ? Sounds kind of weak. We don't put up with
religious intolerance over here... we didn't put up with religious
intolerance in Nazi Germany... so why should we put up with Arab
religious intolerance ? This point is not hard to understand, even
for someone like you.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be
a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to
destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 12:29:37 PM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns981D2F4C636Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong, and
Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate their
consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay for the
atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people with
light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed most of the
"brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the mideast because
of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is supposed to be anathema
in our civilised world, but the brainwashed believe the mantra - Israel
Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have come
into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing, which was
a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there would be war.
Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica, then probably
they could have avoided endless wars.
And this is how you justify ethnic cleansing of the Jews out
of the middle east ? Sounds kind of weak. We don't put up with
religious intolerance over here... we didn't put up with religious
intolerance in Nazi Germany... so why should we put up with Arab
religious intolerance ? This point is not hard to understand, even
for someone like you.
Well said.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be
a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to
destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 10:19:21 PM |
|
|
How do you justify Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Arabs?
eric.
P.S. In case you haven't realized...Jews have not been ethnically
cleansed from Israel. They were Ethnically cleansed from Europe, and
the ones that were left, Europe was happy to help ship off to a foreign
land, kick the indigenous people from their land, and thus Europe
self-absolved their consciences, by doing the "right" thing.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong, and
Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate their
consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay for the
atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people with
light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed most of the
"brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the mideast because
of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is supposed to be anathema
in our civilised world, but the brainwashed believe the mantra - Israel
Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have come
into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing, which was
a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there would be war.
Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica, then probably
they could have avoided endless wars.
And this is how you justify ethnic cleansing of the Jews out
of the middle east ? Sounds kind of weak. We don't put up with
religious intolerance over here... we didn't put up with religious
intolerance in Nazi Germany... so why should we put up with Arab
religious intolerance ? This point is not hard to understand, even
for someone like you.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be
a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to
destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
12 Aug 2006 10:47:56 PM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
How do you justify Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Arabs?
Israel is a model of restraint. They should have kicked the
palestinian terrorists out of their country years ago.
eric.
P.S. In case you haven't realized...Jews have not been ethnically
cleansed from Israel. They were Ethnically cleansed from Europe, and
the ones that were left, Europe was happy to help ship off to a foreign
land, kick the indigenous people from their land, and thus Europe
self-absolved their consciences, by doing the "right" thing.
With your support of hezbolla, you're saying the Jews should
be ethnically cleansed from Israel. You're a terrorist supporter.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong, and
Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate their
consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay for the
atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people
with
light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed most of the
"brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the mideast
because
of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is supposed to be
anathema
in our civilised world, but the brainwashed believe the mantra -
Israel
Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have
come
into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing, which
was
a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there would be war.
Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica, then probably
they could have avoided endless wars.
And this is how you justify ethnic cleansing of the Jews out
of the middle east ? Sounds kind of weak. We don't put up with
religious intolerance over here... we didn't put up with religious
intolerance in Nazi Germany... so why should we put up with Arab
religious intolerance ? This point is not hard to understand, even
for someone like you.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of
the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not
have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think
there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could
be
a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously
there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to
destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has
no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust
is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
13 Aug 2006 12:10:30 AM |
|
|
Israel ethnically cleansed the Arabs in Palestine in order to establish
a State based on religious discrimination. This has caused endless
wars in the Mideast. That's the fact.
That's the point. It's morally reprehensible. When you kick someone
out of their home, and make them live on the street, don't expect to
sleep well at night.
eric.
P.S. Still haven't smelled the coffee, eh? Loser.
eric wrote:
How do you justify Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Arabs?
eric.
P.S. In case you haven't realized...Jews have not been ethnically
cleansed from Israel. They were Ethnically cleansed from Europe, and
the ones that were left, Europe was happy to help ship off to a foreign
land, kick the indigenous people from their land, and thus Europe
self-absolved their consciences, by doing the "right" thing.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong, and
Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate their
consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay for the
atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people with
light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed most of the
"brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the mideast because
of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is supposed to be anathema
in our civilised world, but the brainwashed believe the mantra - Israel
Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have come
into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing, which was
a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there would be war.
Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica, then probably
they could have avoided endless wars.
And this is how you justify ethnic cleansing of the Jews out
of the middle east ? Sounds kind of weak. We don't put up with
religious intolerance over here... we didn't put up with religious
intolerance in Nazi Germany... so why should we put up with Arab
religious intolerance ? This point is not hard to understand, even
for someone like you.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of the
points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why not have
made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's capital. If
the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think there
would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps there could be
a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously there
would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would gather to
destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really has no
right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
13 Aug 2006 02:08:10 AM |
|
|
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Israel ethnically cleansed the Arabs in Palestine in order to establish
a State based on religious discrimination. This has caused endless
wars in the Mideast. That's the fact.
That's the point. It's morally reprehensible. When you kick someone
out of their home, and make them live on the street, don't expect to
sleep well at night.
Nothing reprehensible about the Jews wanting security for
their country. You are talking about known palestinians
who were engaging in acts of terror, correct ? The Israelis
should kill each and every one of those guys.
What is morally reprehensible is the other arab states being
unwilling to take the palestinians into their country, and
yet sending money to the palestinians to encourage them to
blow their kids up in Israel's streets. THAT'S morally reprehensible.
eric.
P.S. Still haven't smelled the coffee, eh? Loser.
Ah, you're just morally challenged. You'll figure it out
some day.
eric wrote:
How do you justify Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Arabs?
eric.
P.S. In case you haven't realized...Jews have not been ethnically
cleansed from Israel. They were Ethnically cleansed from Europe, and
the ones that were left, Europe was happy to help ship off to a foreign
land, kick the indigenous people from their land, and thus Europe
self-absolved their consciences, by doing the "right" thing.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong,
and Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate
their consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay
for the atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of
people with light coloured skin, light eyes, appeared, and cleansed
most of the "brown" people. Sound familiar? Israel exists in the
mideast because of one Solid Fact - Ethnic Cleansing - This is
supposed to be anathema in our civilised world, but the brainwashed
believe the mantra - Israel Good, Israel can do no wrong, Arabs
evil....blah, blah, blah.
As I said, the point isn't hard to understand. If Israel had been
created anywhere on earth, and remember this - it could only have
come into existence, and be the majority through ethnic cleansing,
which was a stated purpose of the creation of Israel - then there
would be war. Perhaps if they put the state of Israel in Antartica,
then probably they could have avoided endless wars.
And this is how you justify ethnic cleansing of the Jews out
of the middle east ? Sounds kind of weak. We don't put up with
religious intolerance over here... we didn't put up with religious
intolerance in Nazi Germany... so why should we put up with Arab
religious intolerance ? This point is not hard to understand, even
for someone like you.
I repeat myself, because this simple concept is beyond brainwashed
people like you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Wiping out Israel is different from wiping out the Jews. One of
the points is, if the Germans were guilty of the Holocaust why
not have made the Jewish state in Germany, with Berlin as it's
capital. If
the
U.N. did decide to make a Jewish state in Germany, do you think
there would be peace in Europe? Do you think that perhaps
there could be
a
bit of a rise of so-called anti-semitism in Europe? Obviously
there would be no peace, and the surrounding nations would
gather to
destroy
it. - Destroy the nation, that is.
You remind me of some neocons around here... lots of hypothetical
situations. The Jews had a say in where they formed their country
and they chose their ancestral homeland. The arabs also got to
form several countries out of the ashes of the former Ottoman
Empire. So what's your complaint again, the arabs want ALL the
land instead of just MOST of the land ? Seems a bit selfish.
Israel, a state that exists on
religious discrimination in order to be a full citizen, really
has no right to exist. That's not radical.
Perseid wrote:
"--russ." <russ.boykin@gmail.com> Spat the Words
dreamwalker wrote:
Wallace came away impressed. He said the man is basically a
rational,
reasonable, not evil, intelligent man who said the Halocaust
is a
myth.
He also felt the president made many valid points.
Yeah, he sounds terribly reasonable.
Wishing to exterminate all the Jews in Israel sounds so normal.
And all those holocaust pictures... they were all made-up, with
Jews in those pictures going on a 200 day fast to get that
skin-and-bones look.
--russ.
.
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: Mike Wallace interviews the Iranian president. |
13 Aug 2006 08:25:20 AM |
|
|
I never said there was anything reprehensible about anyone wanting
security for their country. Because of Israel's ethnic cleansing none
of the countries of the region has security. The Palestinian diaspora
living in filthy refugee camps want to come home. There's nothing
immoral in that. Obviously, ethnic cleansing IS immoral, and that's a
fact Israel can't face, and neither can you.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Israel ethnically cleansed the Arabs in Palestine in order to establish
a State based on religious discrimination. This has caused endless
wars in the Mideast. That's the fact.
That's the point. It's morally reprehensible. When you kick someone
out of their home, and make them live on the street, don't expect to
sleep well at night.
Nothing reprehensible about the Jews wanting security for
their country. You are talking about known palestinians
who were engaging in acts of terror, correct ? The Israelis
should kill each and every one of those guys.
What is morally reprehensible is the other arab states being
unwilling to take the palestinians into their country, and
yet sending money to the palestinians to encourage them to
blow their kids up in Israel's streets. THAT'S morally reprehensible.
eric.
P.S. Still haven't smelled the coffee, eh? Loser.
Ah, you're just morally challenged. You'll figure it out
some day.
eric wrote:
How do you justify Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Arabs?
eric.
P.S. In case you haven't realized...Jews have not been ethnically
cleansed from Israel. They were Ethnically cleansed from Europe, and
the ones that were left, Europe was happy to help ship off to a foreign
land, kick the indigenous people from their land, and thus Europe
self-absolved their consciences, by doing the "right" thing.
Perseid wrote:
"eric" <ericdavis500@gmail.com> Spat the Words
Ima Neocon. Lol! That's a new one.
Neocons have no conscience. For Neocons Israel can do no wrong,
and Arabs/Muslims can do no right.
The point isn't hard to understand. The mideast just threw off
hundreds of years of occupation, only to have the occupying powers
place an artificial state within their midst,
and without their permission. How nice of the West to placate
their consciences for the holocaust by making another people pay
for the atrocities of WWII. So suddenly, hundreds of thousands of
people with light co | | | | | | | | | | |
