Min's Intro & Essay #1

Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Min's Intro & Essay #1

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 1

Topic:	Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User:	"Daniel Joseph Min"
Date:	25 Jul 2004 02:35:40 PM
Object:	Min's Intro & Essay #1

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01DE_01C4724C.47256310
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The following article is my first in a series of new essays on various =
social and political challenges facing the world today, in which I offer =
their most equitable and constructive solutions. Being a verbose and =
definitive author by nature=97and very frank in my portrayals=97I=92m =
unable to present my theories on such important matters merely in =93a =
1000 words or less=94 (as most publishers prefer namby-pamby essays =
which are by definition short, and speak only in generalities, and =
aren=92t =93offensive=94 to anyone, not even Atheists, E.L.F., the ACLU, =
Usama Bin Laden, or militant homosexual left-wing Democrat-Anarchists). =
So if you should find any of my essays =93offensive=94, then that means =
I=92m doing my job right. Therefore, I=92ve decided to write a whole new =
series of essays (formatted HTML) on definitive and important topics, =
beginning with the family and its survival, which is the foundation of =
civilization (my next essay will be on abortion)=85
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
=20
SURVIVAL OF THE FAMILY
=97by Daniel Joseph Min
(word count 1275)
=20
WITHOUT adequate income to pay for the basic necessities of life, =
families suffer. People suffer. Poverty-driven crime-rates rise along =
with its ever-more impoverished class, and median-class tax-payers are =
left to foot the bill. Taxes rise, disposable incomes drop, and =
government programs to help the poor inevitably end up bankrupting the =
whole economy=97and great depressions ensue, giving rise to civil =
unrest, even civil wars, world wars, and finally global thermonuclear =
holocaust if that=92s what it takes=97ironically followed by world =
peace. Think about it. Prevention has always been and shall always be =
the best medicine, the best remedy for all human ailments. =93A stitch =
in time saves nine=94. So here=92s what we do=85
=20
By federal law, all new-borns should be medically sterilized at =
birth by the attending physician, unless his or her parents have =
previously deposited requisite funds into a federally-insured, =
interest-bearing account reserved exclusively for that child. Account =
access will be electronic-only and highly-secure, and will be constantly =
monitored by the federal government. Significant or blatant misuse of =
these funds will be a serious felony, and, depending upon the =
infraction, the offending parent(s) would most likely serve time in a =
federal penitentiary, several years perhaps. Any monies earned while in =
prison would be reimbursed directly to the aforesaid account until =
restitution is paid in full, and with interest. Perhaps that would be =
the most equitable determination of time served: Let the punishment fit =
the crime. Don=92t put such thieves in prison to rot. Rather, put them =
in there to work! But not for their own profit, mind you, but strictly =
to pay back all monies stolen from their victims. Let us law-abiding =
taxpayers pay for their imprisonment, that=92s fine. But let the =
prisoners themselves make restitution for their own crimes, and pay all =
monies due to their victims=97plus interest. Make their detention as =
profitable as possible for their victims, thereby helping the thieves =
get out of prison as early as possible, hence, giving them real =
incentive to work=97reminding them every day as to exactly why they=92re =
incarcerated, and exactly why they=92re working to make restitution in =
full. That should teach them an unforgettable lesson not to do it again. =
If not, then any serious second offence would be tantamount to a life =
sentence without parole, and they would work six days a week until their =
dying day.
=20
That=92s a far cry from =93imputed income=94 against =
=93dead-beat=94 parents who never had the money in the first place. =
We=92re not torturing the poor merely for being poor in a world where =
thousands of over-qualified applicants per week are applying for =
part-time, minimum-wage, no benefits grunt-worker positions which offer =
absolutely no possibility for advancement, and require an I.Q. of maybe =
70. Much rather, we=92re punishing thieves who=92ve stolen real money =
from the innocent, i.e. thieves who=92ve actually had the stolen money =
in their hands. Do you see the profound difference here? Poor people =
simply don=92t have money. Thieves do, and it=92s stolen!
=20
Any new-born child=92s exclusive account ought to cover an =
estimated half of that child=92s basic expenses like food, clothing & =
shelter from their birth up until his or her 18th birthday, and should =
also provide for an estimated half of the tuition & expenses needed to =
get a 4-year college education at a reputable university (to get a =
bachelor=92s degree with good grades). At today=92s prices, that=92s a =
total of about $300,000 in deposit to cover half of these projected =
expenses, more or less. If that child=92s previously wealthy parents =
aren=92t able to make enough income over the first 22 years of that =
child=92s lifetime in order to cover the other half, then, at least, =
that child will not have been starving for 18 years, and will yet have =
some statistical shot at success=97albeit he or she may never attend =
college, and is therefore likely to struggle from paycheck to paycheck =
for the rest of his or her adult life=97i.e., if they can even find a =
job. The good news is, those poor struggling children will NEVER give =
birth to any children of their own, as they obviously cannot afford to =
take care of them. But the rich won=92t like it, since the poor are =
their slave-class, just like the Hebrew slaves were to Pharaoh in Egypt, =
or like illegal immigrants are to the produce industry, and other =
corporations who similarly enslave their penniless employees=97like a =
company store. And the rich won=92t like the fact that any forfeiture of =
the child=92s account will be transferred in full to a =
federally-mandated charity in order to help cover the other half of said =
deposits nationwide, which monies would be distributed equally among all =
legal citizens in the nation who=92re under the age of 18, again, in =
federally-monitored, interest-bearing electronic accounts. That means no =
lawyers are involved=97a thing which the rich will go absolutely =
ballistic over. But that=92s their problem.=20
=20
Back to the children. Barring said deposit, sterilization at birth =
should be mandatory and wholly uncontestable under federal law. That =
way, any child left unsterilized is guaranteed sufficient monies to =
survive in modest comfort, and to get a college education when they =
reach adulthood. That=92s what this deposit is for. It=92s for the =
child. It=92s his or her personal and inviolable guarantee that they, =
too, may grow into adulthood and get a college education, and have the =
financial opportunities to eventually support their own =
progeny=97perhaps even to deposit such additional funds as would prevent =
their own grandchildren=92s sterilization someday. I.e., from parent to =
child, to grandchild, ad infinitum. That way, everyone=92s a =
winner=97except for the lawyers.
=20
In cases where a sterilized child should eventually inherit or =
otherwise acquire the $300,000-plus fee (i.e., forever accounting for =
inflation), then that person may be unsterilized only if said fee has =
been deposited=97i.e., in order to cover the non-sterilization fee for =
that=92s person=92s potential future son or daughter, which would then =
require an additional deposit in order to cover the cost of inflation =
between the time of initial deposit, up until the actual birth-date of =
that potential parent=92s future child. Less-affluent, yet unsterilized =
citizens are still permitted under federal law to have up to three =
sterilized children, but then the parents must be sterilized upon their =
third child=92s birth. But=85
=20
DNA testing should in all cases determine who the father is. E.g., =
consider a mother of three children, each of whom have had a different =
father. Then each father has only fathered one child, not three, at =
least by that particular mother. If any father has fathered three =
children by any one or several women, then he gets sterilized. The whole =
idea is to be precisely fair and equitable to everyone concerned. As in =
this case, any poor mother who=92s had three children gets sterilized. =
And any poor father who has fathered three children is likewise =
sterilized. That=92s being perfectly fair, and prevents those poor =
mothers & fathers from bringing any more poor children into the world. =
We=92ve already got more than enough poor and suffering children to go =
around as it is. The last thing we need is more poor and suffering =
children. Do you want children to suffer? I don=92t. But neither can we =
prohibit humankind=92s God-given commandment to be fruitful & multiply. =
We can however, and we should, limit just how =93fruitful=94 poor =
parents can be. That=92s being fair.
=20
Will those sterilized children born to poor parents suffer from =
poverty? Most probably they will. But the family lineage ends with them. =
Barring winning the lottery or something, they can bear no more =
children. Wealth tends to run in families. But even the poorest child =
can rise to power, be it financial, political, religious, or otherwise. =
It may be according to their natural-born talents and God-given purpose =
in life. In such cases, no man-made laws will stop the Earth from =
turning.
=96fin=96
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
=20
------=_NextPart_000_01DE_01C4724C.47256310
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; TEXT-ALIGN: center" =
align=3Dleft><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'"><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'"> </DIV><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">The =
following=20
article is my first in a series of new essays on various =
social and=20
political challenges facing the world today, in which I=20
offer their most equitable and constructive solutions. Being a =
verbose=20
and definitive author by nature=97and very frank in my =
portrayals=97I=92m unable=20
to present my theories on such important matters merely in =93a =
1000 words or=20
less=94 (as most publishers prefer namby-pamby essays which =
are by=20
definition short, and speak only in generalities, and aren=92t =
=93offensive=94 to anyone, not even Atheists, E.L.F., the ACLU, Usama =
Bin Laden, or=20
militant homosexual left-wing Democrat-Anarchists). So if you should =
find any of=20
my essays =93offensive=94, then that means I=92m doing my job =
right. Therefore,=20
I=92ve decided to write a whole new series of essays (formatted HTML)=20
on definitive and important topics, beginning with the family =
and its=20
survival, which is the foundation of civilization (my next essay =
will be on=20
abortion)=85
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">
<HR>

<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">  =20
<?xml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"=20
/><o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 24pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">SURVIVAL OF =
THE=20
FAMILY<o:p></o:p>
=97by =
Daniel Joseph=20
Min
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 13.5pt"> (word count <SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 13.5pt"><SPAN=20
style=3D"mso-no-proof: yes">1275<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 13.5pt">)<o:p></o:p>
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">WITHOUT adequate income=20
to pay for the basic necessities of life, families suffer. People =
suffer.=20
Poverty-driven crime-rates rise along with its ever-more =
impoverished=20
class, and median-class tax-payers are left to foot the bill. Taxes =
rise,=20
disposable incomes drop, and government programs to help the poor =
inevitably end=20
up bankrupting the whole economy=97and great depressions =
ensue, giving=20
rise to civil unrest, even civil wars, world wars, and =
finally=20
global thermonuclear holocaust if that=92s what it takes=97ironically =
followed by=20
world peace. Think about it. Prevention has always been and shall =
always be=20
the best medicine, the best remedy for all human ailments. =93A stitch =
in time=20
saves nine=94. So here=92s what we do=85
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">   =20
 By federal law, all new-borns should be medically =
sterilized at=20
birth by the attending physician, unless his or =
her parents have=20
previously deposited requisite funds into a federally-insured,=20
interest-bearing account reserved exclusively for that child. Account =
access=20
will be electronic-only and highly-secure, and will be constantly =
monitored by=20
the federal government. Significant or blatant misuse of these funds =
will be a=20
serious felony, and, depending upon the infraction, the offending =
parent(s)=20
would most likely serve time in a federal penitentiary, several years =
perhaps.=20
Any monies earned while in prison would be reimbursed directly to the =
aforesaid=20
account until restitution is paid in full, and with interest. =
Perhaps that=20
would be the most equitable determination of time served: Let the=20
punishment fit the crime. Don=92t put such thieves in prison to rot. =
Rather, put=20
them in there to work! But not for their own profit, mind you, =
but strictly=20
to pay back all monies stolen from their victims. Let us=20
law-abiding taxpayers pay for their imprisonment, that=92s fine. But let =
the=20
prisoners themselves make restitution for their own crimes, and pay=20
all monies due to their victims=97plus interest. Make their =
detention as=20
profitable as possible for their victims, thereby helping the thieves =
get out of=20
prison as early as possible, hence, giving them real incentive to =
work=97reminding=20
them every day as to exactly why they=92re incarcerated, and exactly why =
they=92re=20
working to make restitution in full. That should teach them an =
unforgettable=20
lesson not to do it again. If not, then any serious second offence would =
be=20
tantamount to a life sentence without parole, and they would work six =
days a=20
week until their dying day.<o:p></o:p>
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">    =20
That=92s a far cry from =93imputed income=94 against =93dead-beat=94 =
parents who never had=20
the money in the first place. We=92re not torturing the poor merely =
for being=20
poor in a world where thousands of over-qualified applicants per week =
are=20
applying for part-time, minimum-wage, no benefits grunt-worker =
positions which offer absolutely no possibility for advancement, =
and=20
require an I.Q. of maybe 70. Much rather, we=92re =
punishing thieves=20
who=92ve stolen <SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">real money from =
the=20
innocent, i.e. thieves who=92ve actually had the stolen money =
in=20
their hands. Do you see the profound difference here? Poor =
people=20
simply don=92t have money. Thieves do, and it=92s stolen!
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'"> <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">     Any=20
new-born child=92s exclusive account ought to cover an =
estimated=20
half of that child=92s basic expenses like food, clothing & shelter =
from their=20
birth up until his or her 18th birthday, and should also =
provide for=20
an estimated half of the tuition & expenses needed to get a=20
4-year college education at a reputable university (to =
get a=20
bachelor=92s degree with good grades). At today=92s prices, =
that=92s a total of=20
about $300,000 in deposit to cover half of these projected expenses, =
more or=20
less. If that child=92s previously wealthy parents aren=92t able to =
make enough=20
income over the first 22 years of that child=92s lifetime in =
order=20
to cover the other half, then, at least, that child will =
not have=20
been starving for 18 years, and will yet =
have some statistical=20
shot at success=97albeit he or she may never attend college, and is =
therefore=20
likely to struggle from paycheck to paycheck for the rest of his or =
her adult life=97i.e., if they can even find a job. The good =
news is,=20
those poor struggling children will NEVER give birth =
to any=20
children of their own, as they obviously cannot afford to take care of =
them. But=20
the rich won=92t like it, since the poor are their slave-class,=20
just like the Hebrew slaves were to Pharaoh in <?xml:namespace =
prefix=20
=3D st1 ns =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on"><st1:country-region =
w:st=3D"on">Egypt</st1:country-region></st1:place>,=20
or like illegal immigrants are to the produce industry, and=20
other corporations who similarly enslave their penniless=20
employees=97like a company store. And the rich won=92t like =
the fact that=20
any forfeiture of the child=92s account will be transferred in =
full to a=20
federally-mandated charity in order to help cover the other half of said =
deposits nationwide, which monies would be distributed equally =
among all=20
legal citizens in the nation who=92re under the age of 18, again, in=20
federally-monitored, interest-bearing electronic accounts. That means no =
lawyers=20
are involved=97a thing which the rich will go absolutely ballistic over. =
But=20
that=92s their problem. <o:p></o:p>
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">     Back=20
to the children. Barring said deposit, sterilization at=20
birth should be mandatory and wholly uncontestable under =
federal=20
law. That way, any child left unsterilized is guaranteed=20
sufficient monies to survive in modest comfort, and to get a =
college=20
education when they reach adulthood. That=92s what this deposit is for. =
It=92s for=20
the child. It=92s his or her personal and inviolable guarantee that =
they,=20
too, may grow into adulthood and get a college education, and =
have the=20
financial opportunities to eventually support their own=20
progeny=97perhaps even to deposit such additional=20
funds as would prevent their own grandchildren=92s=20
sterilization someday. I.e., from parent to child, to grandchild, =
ad=20
infinitum. That way, everyone=92s a winner=97except for the=20
lawyers.<o:p></o:p>
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">   =20
 In cases where a sterilized child should eventually inherit =
or=20
otherwise acquire the $300,000-plus fee (i.e., forever accounting =
for=20
inflation), then that person may be unsterilized <SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">only if said =
fee has=20
been deposited=97i.e., in order to cover the non-sterilization fee =
for that=92s=20
person=92s potential future son or daughter,=20
which would then require an additional deposit in order =
to cover=20
the cost of inflation between the time of initial deposit, up until =
the=20
actual birth-date of that potential parent=92s future =
child. Less-affluent,=20
yet unsterilized citizens are still permitted under federal =
law to=20
have up to three sterilized children, but then the parents =
must be=20
sterilized upon their third child=92s birth. But=85
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">    =20
DNA testing should in all cases determine who the father is. E.g., =
consider a=20
mother of three children, each of whom have had a =
different father.=20
Then each father has only fathered one child, not three, at least by =
that=20
particular mother. If any father has fathered three children by any one =
or=20
several women, then he gets sterilized. The whole idea is to be =
precisely=20
fair and equitable to everyone concerned. As in this case, any poor =
mother=20
who=92s had three children gets sterilized. And any poor father who =
has=20
fathered three children is likewise sterilized. That=92s being perfectly =
fair, and=20
prevents those poor mothers & fathers from bringing any more =
poor=20
children into the world. We=92ve already got more than enough poor and =
suffering=20
children to go around as it is. The last thing we need is more poor and=20
suffering children. Do you want children to suffer? I don=92t. But =
neither can we=20
prohibit humankind=92s God-given commandment to be fruitful & =
multiply. We can=20
however, and we should, limit just how =93fruitful=94 poor parents can =
be.=20
That=92s being fair.<o:p></o:p>
 <o:p></o:p>
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">    =20
Will those sterilized children born to poor parents suffer from poverty? =
Most=20
probably they will. But the family lineage ends with them. Barring =
winning the=20
lottery or something, they can bear no more children. Wealth tends =
to run=20
in families. But even the poorest child <SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">can rise to power, be it =
financial, political, religious, or otherwise. It may be according =
to their=20
natural-born talents and God-given purpose in life. In such cases, =
no=20
man-made laws will stop the Earth from turning.
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'"> 
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'"> 
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">=96fi<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old =
Style'">n=96
<SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'"><FONT=20
size=3D4> <SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 18pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Goudy Old Style'">
 

<HR>
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
<FONT=20
size=3D3></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_01DE_01C4724C.47256310--
.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: Min's Intro & Essay #1	26 Jul 2004 09:33:57 PM

Daniel Joseph Min <Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

Which is pretty stupid for text-only newsgroups.

The following article is my first in a series of new essays on various =
social and political challenges facing the world today, in which I offer =
their most equitable and constructive solutions.

In other words, you've got more ego than brains.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "T.A. Martin"
Title: Re: Min's Intro & Essay #1	24 Jul 2004 03:08:53 PM

Or we could just make a college education really cheap or free.
But then again, you might be onto something, Daniel. Why not take it a few
steps further. Swift did say in "A Modest Proposal" that babies are good
eating.
I can hear the ads:
"I want my babyback babyback babyback,
I want my babyback babyback babyback,
Po'folks babyback ribs,
Po'folks babyback ribs,
In barbeque sauce..."
.

Page 1 of 1

Post reply

Min's Apocalypse Commentary - Intro & Chapter 1
Articles of Impleachment to be intro'd by Ohio Congressman
Intro & Chapter 1 Parts 1-3.
Intro & Chapter 1
Intro & Chapter 1 Parts 1 thru 8
Get ready for the intro of Stankervision on MTV
Min's Essay #4 - Nostradamus Quatrain X72
Min's Essay #3 - Violent Crime & Capital Punishment

Min's Essay - Devils & Demons (many in this group)
Min's Essay #2 - Abortion
Re: Min's Planetary-Awareness Technique - Chapter 3 Part 3
Min's Planetary-Awareness Technique - Chapter 4 Part 4
Min's Planetary-Awareness Technique - Chapter 5 Part 1
Re: Min's Planetary-Awareness Technique - Chapter 5 Part 4
Min's Planetary-Awareness Technique - Chapter 6 Part 4

NEWER

pg.716 pg.544 pg.412 pg.311 pg.234 pg.175 pg.130 pg.96 pg.70 pg.50 pg.35 pg.24 pg.16 pg.10 pg.6 pg.3 pg.1

OLDER