SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now begin,
after the final agreement was signed today. The U.S. government gas been
planning the pipeline since the 1980s, but a regime change was needed before
construction could begin.
None of the declared objectives of the American-led conquest of Afghanistan
were achieved. The military campaign in Afghanistan did not capture or
defeat Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda was not found or destroyed, and no peace
has been established to date. The one success of the American-led Afghan war
was to clear the route for the American-led oil and gas pipe-line through
the country.
Despite the failures of the previous war, the U.S. government is now
planning a new crusade against Iraq, the world's second greatest source of
oil.
[ BBC News, "Central Asia pipeline deal signed", 27 December 2002. ]
WHY INVADE IRAQ OR AFGHANISTAN WHEN AL-QAEDA ARE FUNDED BY SAUDI ARABIA?
The American government can no longer justify attacking Iraq or Afghanistan
by claiming that these countries have supported al-Qaeda, because the world
now knows that the main source of support for al-Qaeda is Saudi Arabia. We
must therefore look for other reasons why America wants to conquer
Afghanistan and Iraq, and there is substantial evidence that the true motive
for the "war on terrorism" is oil.
America has justified their conquest of Afghanistan and their planned
conquest of Iraq by claiming that these countries support al-Qaeda. But why
were Afghanistan and Iraq singled-out for attack when there is a more
convincing case against Saudi Arabia? The U.S. government has now been
accused by their own advisors of lying to hide the true supporters of
al-Qaeda.
U.S. government advisors have yet again accused Saudi Arabia of supporting
terrorism, making Saudi an obvious target for the "war on terror". The
Council on Foreign Relations, which advises the White House on foreign
policy, has accused Saudi of supporting al-Qaida and Osama Bin Laden. In a
press-release on 17 October, CFR called Saudi Arabia "the most important
source of funds for Al-Qaeda". The press-release quoted a new report which
repeats this accusation in two separate paragraphs, word for word.
"...it is worth stating clearly and unambiguously what official U.S.
government spokespersons have not: For years, individuals and charities
based in Saudi Arabia have been the most important source of funds for
al-Qaeda; and for years, Saudi officials have turned a blind eye to this
problem.
"This is hardly surprising since Saudi Arabia possesses the greatest
concentration of wealth in the region; Saudi nationals and charities were
previously the most important sources of funds for the mujahideen; Saudi
nationals have always constituted a disproportionate percentage of
al-Qaeda's own membership; and al-Qaeda's political message has long focused
on issues of particular interest to Saudi nationals..."
[ CFR Report on Terrorist Financing, 'Nature of the Problem' section,
paragraph 8. ]
The new CFR report accuses the U.S. government of deliberately lying to
cover-up the fact that al-Qaida is supported by Saudi Arabia, not
Afghanistan or Iraq.
"...when U.S. spokespersons are only willing to say that "Saudi Arabia is
being cooperative" when they know very well all the ways in which it is not,
both our allies and adversaries can be forgiven for believing that the
United States does not place a high priority on this issue."
[ CFR Report on Terrorist Financing, 'Strategic Recommendations Applicable
to the U.S.', paragraph 1. ]
[ SOURCE: Terrorist Financing: Report of Independent Task Force Sponsored by
CFR, October 2002. ]
In August 2002 the RAND Corporation, which officially advises the U.S.
government on military strategy, "recommended" that America should invade
and capture Saudi Arabian oil-fields if the Saudis continue supporting
al-Qaeda. The White House attempted to disown this plan when it was
accidentally leaked to the press, but RAND was set-up by the U.S. military,
is run by senior U.S. ex-military and ex-political personnel, and funded by
American tax-payers.
The CFR was founded by an elite group of business-men, is run by senior U.S.
ex-military personnel and top U.S. business executives, and funded by
donations from sources which cannot be identified because the relevant pages
are mysteriously missing from the annual reports on CFR's internet website.
The section on CFR's financing on their FAQs web page boldly claims that the
sources of their funding are not secret and: "A list of donors appears in
the annual report." However, on CFR's Annual Reports web page the
information about their funding is not available. CFR's Annual Reports from
1998 to 2002 are all available on their website, but the pages about their
funding have all been removed. For example, the contents page of CFR's
Annual Report for 2002 lists 'Budget and Finance' on pages 93 to 100.
Unfortunately the entire finance section of CFR's 2002 Annual Report is
missing from the website and the file for pages 93-100 does not exist.
WHY DID THE FBI AND THE CIA ALLOW THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS?
The U.S. security services did not simply fail to stop the terrorist attacks
on September 11 - they are being accused of deliberately interfering with
attempts to prevent the 9/11 disasters. This is extremely disturbing,
especially when senior politicians and their supporters are guaranteed to
profit substantially as a direct result of the 'war on terror' that has been
justified by the attacks.
There were "serious failings" by the American intelligence agencies before
last September's terrorist tragedy, and attempts to stop the attacks were
obstructed at high levels.
According to the latest reports "the CIA had failed to share crucial
information with the FBI. Early in 2000, the reports said, the CIA knew that
two of the future hijackers ... had met suspected members of al-Qaeda." FBI
headquarters has been accused of setting up a "roadblock" to the
investigation ahead of the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.
An official congressional inquiry investigating intelligence failures
leading to the 11 September attacks heard that the FBI deliberately
"hindered an investigation of a terrorism suspect." In the July before the
September 11 attacks an FBI agent "issued a memo calling for an
investigation into the large number of Middle Eastern men enrolled in pilot
training programmes." Complaints were made by an FBI agent, about "lack of
co-ordination, mix-ups and even obstacles put in the way of her office's
investigations from FBI headquarters before the September 11 attacks."
U.N. GRANTS AMERICA IMMUNITY FROM WAR CRIMES PROSECUTION
The U.S. has been granted immunity from crimes prosecution by United Nations
International Criminal Court. American peace-keeping troops can now
officially never be tried for war crimes.
It is impossible to think of any reason why the U.S. would need to seek
immunity from prosecution for war crimes unless they either have committed a
war crime or expect to do so in the future.
"The United Nations Security Council has voted unanimously to exempt U.S.
peacekeepers from prosecution by the new war crimes court..."
"The Bush administration, which considers the court an affront to U.S.
sovereignty, had said it would veto such missions wherever it believed
American troops might be prosecuted [for war crimes]."
[ SOURCE: BBC News, "Dispute over war crimes court settled", 13 July 2002. ]
If soldiers from any country commits a war crime, why shouldn't they be
brought to trial? Why should America be treated differently from other
countries?
U.S. GOVERNMENT TALKING ABOUT INVADING SAUDI ARABIAN OIL FIELDS
U.S. Government advisors are talking about extending the objectives of the
"War on Terror" to include an invasion of Saudi Arabia and the "seizure of
its oil fields".
A report leaked to the Washington Post newspaper revealed that this action
was recommended to the U.S. Defence Policy Board, which advises the Pentagon
on military policy, by the RAND Corporation, an official expert advisory
group to the U.S. military.
"A briefing given last month to a top Pentagon advisory board described
Saudi Arabia as an enemy of the United States, and recommended that U.S.
officials give it an ultimatum to stop backing terrorism or face seizure of
its oil fields and its financial assets invested in the United States."
[ SOURCE: The Washington Post, "Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies", 06
August 2002. ]
The U.S. government now wishes to distance its self from the policy
recommended by its advisory groups, but these groups are run by people with
close and top-level connections with the U.S. government, and their advice
is ultimately paid for by the tax-paying American public. Nevertheless, this
high-profile controversy has reminded the public that oil appears to be a
recurring theme in the war on terror.
The RAND Corporation was created in 1946 by the U.S. Air Force, and is
currently led by Dr James A. Thomson, a former member of the National
Security Council staff at the White House. The Defence Policy Board is an
influential group of elite intellectuals and former leading U.S. officials,
including Henry Kissinger, James Schlesinger and Newt Gingrich, and chaired
by Richard Perle.
This new direction in the "War on Terror", which is being proposed to the
U.S. government by its top advisors, raises yet again the extremely serious
question of whether or not it is ethical to deploy military force,
unprovoked, to overthrow a foreign government just because the country
doesn't agree with the way you are doing things.
---------------------------------------
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 05:07:38 AM |
|
|
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 06:28:47 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:KlS4d.78299$KU5.29015@edtnps89...
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national
security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now
begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
I agree with you here Jean.
I don't think the agenda was hidden at all. Bush wasn't smart enough to hide
his real intents.
Bravo to you Jean for admitting this!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 09:00:11 AM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:KlS4d.78299$KU5.29015@edtnps89...
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national
security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now
begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
I agree with you here Jean.
I don't think the agenda was hidden at all. Bush wasn't smart enough to hide
his real intents.
So you agree you lie, and then make up some unrelated ***** about it? LOL
You really are pathetic.
J.
Bravo to you Jean for admitting this!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 11:05:32 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LLV4d.79188$KU5.23821@edtnps89...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:KlS4d.78299$KU5.29015@edtnps89...
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on
Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national
security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now
begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
I agree with you here Jean.
I don't think the agenda was hidden at all. Bush wasn't smart enough to
hide
his real intents.
So you agree you lie, and then make up some unrelated ***** about it? LOL
You really are pathetic.
J.
Bravo to you Jean for admitting this!
No, you idiot, I agree with YOU that Bush's agenda was never a secret.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 12:06:36 PM |
|
|
Bush never had any oil design for Afghanistan. This is no secret.
If this is what you are inferring, then sure.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LLV4d.79188$KU5.23821@edtnps89...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:KlS4d.78299$KU5.29015@edtnps89...
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on
Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national
security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now
begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
I agree with you here Jean.
I don't think the agenda was hidden at all. Bush wasn't smart enough to
hide
his real intents.
So you agree you lie, and then make up some unrelated ***** about it? LOL
You really are pathetic.
J.
Bravo to you Jean for admitting this!
No, you idiot, I agree with YOU that Bush's agenda was never a secret.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 03:09:12 PM |
|
|
LOL ... you're funny.
Iraq.
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:wuY4d.81695$KU5.36916@edtnps89...
Bush never had any oil design for Afghanistan. This is no secret.
If this is what you are inferring, then sure.
J.
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LLV4d.79188$KU5.23821@edtnps89...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:KlS4d.78299$KU5.29015@edtnps89...
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on
Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a
hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national
security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now
begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
I agree with you here Jean.
I don't think the agenda was hidden at all. Bush wasn't smart enough to
hide
his real intents.
So you agree you lie, and then make up some unrelated ***** about it? LOL
You really are pathetic.
J.
Bravo to you Jean for admitting this!
No, you idiot, I agree with YOU that Bush's agenda was never a secret.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.767 / Virus Database: 514 - Release Date: 9/21/04
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
25 Sep 2004 05:47:35 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:06:36 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Bush never had any oil design for Afghanistan. This is no secret.
And we must take your assurances as fact instead of the overwhelming
evidence why, exactly?
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LLV4d.79188$KU5.23821@edtnps89...
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:KlS4d.78299$KU5.29015@edtnps89...
Barbarossa a écrit:
SELECTED HEADLINES
There is growing concern over mounting evidence that the "War on
Terror"
military campaign against Iraq and Afghanistan is motivated by a hidden
agenda of oil, profit and financial factors, rather than national
security.
AFGHANISTAN OIL PIPELINE: CONSTRUCTION STARTS
The construction a massive oil pipeline through Afghanistan will now
begin,
MORE LIE.
NO feasibility studies have even been made.
You only try to spread total ***** based on lies.
You stink.
J.
I agree with you here Jean.
I don't think the agenda was hidden at all. Bush wasn't smart enough to
hide
his real intents.
So you agree you lie, and then make up some unrelated ***** about it? LOL
You really are pathetic.
J.
Bravo to you Jean for admitting this!
No, you idiot, I agree with YOU that Bush's agenda was never a secret.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Oil Wars |
25 Sep 2004 12:58:41 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:06:36 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Jean Guernon écrit:
Bush never had any oil design for Afghanistan. This is no secret.
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message
news:<63jal0tshk9r821bs6c76gnd5o7a9hh5ks@4ax.com>...
Cuan écrit: :(
And we must take your assurances as fact instead of the overwhelming
evidence why, exactly?
Yeah, the Catholic Church and the aristocracy had so much
"overwhelming
evidence " that the world was flat....
So much good that was! ;)
We got plenty of oil in the US!
Do you know who was the number one oil producing country in the world
prior to 1950s? Yes it was America. And I'm still waiting for the
political left to back the (G. Bush) President's plan to drill on
American soil. No more war excuses ;) That would be nice :)
((:0-()>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Oil Wars |
26 Sep 2004 04:04:47 AM |
|
|
On 25 Sep 2004 10:58:41 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:06:36 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Jean Guernon écrit:
Bush never had any oil design for Afghanistan. This is no secret.
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message
news:<63jal0tshk9r821bs6c76gnd5o7a9hh5ks@4ax.com>...
Cuan écrit: :(
And we must take your assurances as fact instead of the overwhelming
evidence why, exactly?
Yeah, the Catholic Church and the aristocracy had so much
"overwhelming
evidence " that the world was flat....
So much good that was! ;)
We got plenty of oil in the US!
Do you know who was the number one oil producing country in the world
prior to 1950s? Yes it was America. And I'm still waiting for the
political left to back the (G. Bush) President's plan to drill on
American soil. No more war excuses ;) That would be nice.
I wish they would! I think human nature, ie: greed, is the dominant
factor in this case, however. Sorry bud.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: More Disturbing News About The Fascist USA |
24 Sep 2004 08:11:04 PM |
|
|
Barbarossa wrote:
SELECTED HEADLINES
snippage
U.S. GOVERNMENT TALKING ABOUT INVADING SAUDI ARABIAN OIL FIELDS
U.S. Government advisors are talking about extending the objectives of the
"War on Terror" to include an invasion of Saudi Arabia and the "seizure of
its oil fields".
A report leaked to the Washington Post newspaper revealed that this action
was recommended to the U.S. Defence Policy Board, which advises the Pentagon
on military policy, by the RAND Corporation, an official expert advisory
group to the U.S. military.
"A briefing given last month to a top Pentagon advisory board described
Saudi Arabia as an enemy of the United States, and recommended that U.S.
officials give it an ultimatum to stop backing terrorism or face seizure of
its oil fields and its financial assets invested in the United States."
[ SOURCE: The Washington Post, "Briefing Depicted Saudis as Enemies", 06
August 2002. ]
The U.S. government now wishes to distance its self from the policy
recommended by its advisory groups, but these groups are run by people with
close and top-level connections with the U.S. government, and their advice
is ultimately paid for by the tax-paying American public. Nevertheless, this
high-profile controversy has reminded the public that oil appears to be a
recurring theme in the war on terror.
Vietnam was an oil war. There are offshore deposits that rival the Gulf of
Mexico. This was highlighted in "The Petroleum Journal" in 1972, complete with a
lease map of the fields and who was going to develop them after the 'final
victory'. This goes back a lot farther than you'd care to believe.
Charly
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
