New extinction Theory


 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > New extinction Theory

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
Date: 18 Feb 2005 06:23:29 PM
Object: New extinction Theory
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/bright_flash_050218.html
magnetar can stop us if at 10 LY away or -.
.

User: "Absolute Zero"

Title: Re: New extinction Theory 18 Feb 2005 06:49:58 PM
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/bright_flash_050218.html

magnetar can stop us if at 10 LY away or -.

There are only 11 stars, not counting sol, within that range.
Common Name Scientific Name Distance (light years)
Proxima Centauri V645 Cen 4.2
Rigil Kentaurus Alpha Cen A 4.3
Alpha Cen B 4.3
Barnard's Star 6.0
Wolf 359 CN Leo 7.7
BD +36 2147 8.2
Luyten 726-8A UV Cet A 8.4
Luyten 726-8B UV Cet B 8.4
Sirius A Alpha CMa A 8.6
Sirius B Alpha CMa B 8.6
Ross 154 9.4
...and none are large enough to become a magnetar.
-A
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: New extinction Theory 18 Feb 2005 06:49:25 PM
Absolute Zero wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/bright_flash_050218.html

magnetar can stop us if at 10 LY away or -.

What about 65 million years ago? ...as in was...?



There are only 11 stars, not counting sol, within that range.

Common Name Scientific Name Distance (light years)
Proxima Centauri V645 Cen 4.2
Rigil Kentaurus Alpha Cen A 4.3
Alpha Cen B 4.3
Barnard's Star 6.0
Wolf 359 CN Leo 7.7
BD +36 2147 8.2
Luyten 726-8A UV Cet A 8.4
Luyten 726-8B UV Cet B 8.4
Sirius A Alpha CMa A 8.6
Sirius B Alpha CMa B 8.6
Ross 154 9.4

..and none are large enough to become a magnetar.

-A

.
User: "Absolute Zero"

Title: Re: New extinction Theory 18 Feb 2005 07:03:35 PM
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

Absolute Zero wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/bright_flash_050218.html

magnetar can stop us if at 10 LY away or -.



What about 65 million years ago? ...as in was...?

Oh I see, the Dino's - well, it would still be there now, radiating huge
amounts of RF... we couldn't possibly miss it.
-A




There are only 11 stars, not counting sol, within that range.

Common Name Scientific Name Distance (light years)
Proxima Centauri V645 Cen 4.2
Rigil Kentaurus Alpha Cen A 4.3
Alpha Cen B 4.3
Barnard's Star 6.0
Wolf 359 CN Leo 7.7
BD +36 2147 8.2
Luyten 726-8A UV Cet A 8.4
Luyten 726-8B UV Cet B 8.4
Sirius A Alpha CMa A 8.6
Sirius B Alpha CMa B 8.6
Ross 154 9.4

..and none are large enough to become a magnetar.

-A



.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: New extinction Theory 18 Feb 2005 07:04:36 PM
Absolute Zero wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

Absolute Zero wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/bright_flash_050218.html

magnetar can stop us if at 10 LY away or -.



What about 65 million years ago? ...as in was...?


Oh I see, the Dino's - well, it would still be there now, radiating

huge

amounts of RF... we couldn't possibly miss it.

I guess so. However, intresting stuff anywhoooooo.


-A




There are only 11 stars, not counting sol, within that range.

Common Name Scientific Name Distance (light years)
Proxima Centauri V645 Cen 4.2
Rigil Kentaurus Alpha Cen A 4.3
Alpha Cen B 4.3
Barnard's Star 6.0
Wolf 359 CN Leo 7.7
BD +36 2147 8.2
Luyten 726-8A UV Cet A 8.4
Luyten 726-8B UV Cet B 8.4
Sirius A Alpha CMa A 8.6
Sirius B Alpha CMa B 8.6
Ross 154 9.4

..and none are large enough to become a magnetar.

-A



.



User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: New extinction Theory 18 Feb 2005 06:59:31 PM
Absolute Zero wrote:

Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:
Sirius A Alpha CMa A 8.6
Sirius B Alpha CMa B 8.6

Actually Sirius B was mis-named. According to legend, some tribes had
said that their ancient relatives (ancestors) came from Serious A. For
some reason, they knew of Sirius B ( The smaller of the two that orbits
Sirius A) because they had it in the groups records. However, there was
a disagreement that some people said that their ancestors did not come
from Serious A, but actually came from the twin known to them as
Sillious. Actually, it boiled down to half the people claiming they
came from Sillious - they claimed they came by this reasoning by
understanding that life was not all that Serious to them.
Better get out of here before I make more of a goof of myself :-)
.



  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
 

NEWER
pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER