Hello I recently have read the holy blood, holy grail, and have began
to start researching The Treasures of Rennes-le-Ch=E2teau the mystery of
the Rennes-le-Chateau is the most interesting mystery I have ever
encounter I would appreciate any books or websites to assist with my
research. I am an amatuer and....I am just satisfying my curiousity.
Thank you for you time
SF
.
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 03:40:16 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Hello I recently have read the holy blood, holy grail, and have
began to start researching The Treasures of
Rennes-le-Ch=E2teau the mystery of the Rennes-le-Chateau
is the most interesting mystery I have ever encounter I
would appreciate any books or websites to assist with my
research. I am an amatuer and....I am just satisfying my
curiousity.
Sure. No problem. This should steer you right:
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/
Good luck!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 04:47:41 AM |
|
|
On Jul 20, 4:29 am, wrote:
Hello I recently have read the holy blood, holy grail, and have began
to start researching The Treasures of Rennes-le-Ch=E2teau the mystery of
the Rennes-le-Chateau is the most interesting mystery I have ever
encounter I would appreciate any books or websites to assist with my
research. I am an amatuer and....I am just satisfying my curiousity.
Thank you for you time
SF
And all of this 'should' point your RESEARCH towards the "Templers".
Chased out of FRANCE (but yet of Francophone Descendent), and the
people that where the 'Original' Western European CRUSADERS
(Pilferers) - of the Middle East Region.
And the 'pursuers' of the believe that a wealthy frenchman (or
englishman) was the TRUE father of Jesus.
Jesus's mother (Mary) was said to be an 'experienced' woman. - already
having had a son - by a roman soldier
Maybe Joseph was just being a 'Good Samaritan' - trying to protect
Mary's integrity !!!
We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus
Other than he 'Believed'' - that he was the SON OF GOD.
8- |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 11:11:57 AM |
|
|
"kmiller" <miller.k@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:1184924861.091761.134200@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 4:29 am, wrote:
Hello I recently have read the holy blood, holy grail, and have began
to start researching The Treasures of Rennes-le-Château the mystery of
the Rennes-le-Chateau is the most interesting mystery I have ever
encounter I would appreciate any books or websites to assist with my
research. I am an amatuer and....I am just satisfying my curiousity.
Thank you for you time
SF
And all of this 'should' point your RESEARCH towards the "Templers".
Chased out of FRANCE (but yet of Francophone Descendent), and the
people that where the 'Original' Western European CRUSADERS
(Pilferers) - of the Middle East Region.
And the 'pursuers' of the believe that a wealthy frenchman (or
englishman) was the TRUE father of Jesus.
Jesus's mother (Mary) was said to be an 'experienced' woman. - already
having had a son - by a roman soldier
No, that was a transient Bedouin she met at a cannabis party.
http://www.cannabis.net/articles/jesus-cannabis.html
Maybe Joseph was just being a 'Good Samaritan' - trying to protect
Mary's integrity !!!
We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus
Other than he 'Believed'' - that he was the SON OF GOD.
8- |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 12:28:41 PM |
|
|
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 11:03:08 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1184952521.754033.214850@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
Werewolfy
Little doubt his painful absolutism is such a hindrance to his greater
understanding and tolerance of the flawed species he just abstractly
associates himself with, that, yes, he must believe that such is his
lineage!
Doc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 11:36:38 PM |
|
|
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian. I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
21 Jul 2007 02:58:16 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite sure
why though!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 02:01:17 AM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote in message
news:s0joi.134789$NV3.22240@pd7urf2no...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite
sure why though!!!
That's a big laugh and a half. Being *far from the perfect Christian*
allows him (and others who often confess the same) to be just what
non-Christians are often accused of by Christians -- being hypocrites,
liars, self-centered assholes, egomaniacs, intemperate idiots, supporters
of mass murder, violence, and oppression. One seriously wonders what the
worth is of a belief system that has doctrinal, moral violators galore.
Should we non-Christians excuse our misbehaviour summarily by simply
stating that it is in our species' innate nature to do destructive things?
Well, it'd be more the truth than thinking supernatural evil causes our
'transgressions' or that one act of rebellion against one of God's
commands millenia ago has resulted in the 'curse' of acts of evil
throughout the species ever since. Two humans can't make one slip-up
without everyone else paying for it for countless generations afterward.
LOL! What a crazy concept. Insane~! You can see why Stevie and so many
believers accept the 'eternally punishing deity' concept -- their uptight
lives are fraught with hand-wringing over every act of misbehaviour and
every mistake they make, subservient to human and divine authorities'
harsh punishment. Then they just excuse themselves as being 'not
perfect'...as if the rest of us ever thought they were.
It is a hellish, bizarre, puritanical belief they entertain -- and hardly
the thing such an enlightened, super-intelligent creator would foist upon
its creation. Christians are caught up in the almost endless layers of
laws and rules, trying desperately to either adhere to them all, and go
rather insane trying, or devise effective methods of deception in
violating them.
The multi-level, self-imposed prison of hierarchies and their laws, both
human and divine, have to be obeyed by *good* Christians or they may lose
not only their souls, but one of their most important earthly purposes for
being -- that, being subservience. The bible instructs them to 'render
upon caesar all that is caesar's' and this command more likely originates
from manipulative human authors advocating tight-fisted social control for
its own sake, or for their's, not for God's.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 11:31:29 AM |
|
|
On Jul 24, 12:01 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:s0joi.134789$NV3.22240@pd7urf2no...
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite
sure why though!!!
That's a big laugh and a half. Being *far from the perfect Christian*
allows him (and others who often confess the same) to be just what
non-Christians are often accused of by Christians -- being hypocrites,
liars, self-centered assholes, egomaniacs, intemperate idiots, supporters
of mass murder, violence, and oppression. One seriously wonders what the
worth is of a belief system that has doctrinal, moral violators galore.
Should we non-Christians excuse our misbehaviour summarily by simply
stating that it is in our species' innate nature to do destructive things?
Well, it'd be more the truth than thinking supernatural evil causes our
'transgressions' or that one act of rebellion against one of God's
commands millenia ago has resulted in the 'curse' of acts of evil
throughout the species ever since. Two humans can't make one slip-up
without everyone else paying for it for countless generations afterward.
LOL! What a crazy concept. Insane~! You can see why Stevie and so many
believers accept the 'eternally punishing deity' concept -- their uptight
lives are fraught with hand-wringing over every act of misbehaviour and
every mistake they make, subservient to human and divine authorities'
harsh punishment. Then they just excuse themselves as being 'not
perfect'...
Here we go again -- another poster who first killfiles me, and then
just can't stop talking about me! What is this phenomenon? Does it
have a name? Killfile someone and then keep talking about that person
ad nausem!
By the way, Doc, I don't know where the various secularists who
inhabit this group got the idea that I've tried to set myself up as
some epitome of Christianity. I have never done anything of the sort.
I think it's an excuse on the part of some to hold me up to
perfection, and then remind me of how I fall short. Well, I've never
held myself up as any particular kind of Christian. Just because I
discuss the topic doesn't mean I think of myself as some marvelous
Christian. I am a believer, and I am a humble Christian -- yet you
secularists have invented a reputation for me that I have never
claimed for myself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 07:23:16 PM |
|
|
On Jul 24, 5:31?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
"I am a believer, and I am a humble Christian"
Style Steven. It's somehow wrong, your word selection may be accurate,
but frequently gives an impression that I'm sure you don't really
intend.
If you look at the one line in quotation marks from your post, you may
want to re-examine the use of the word, 'humble'.
If you need to know why you are so often castigated, look no further
than 'style'.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 08:00:13 PM |
|
|
On Jul 24, 5:23 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 24, 5:31?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
"I am a believer, and I am a humble Christian"
Style Steven. It's somehow wrong, your word selection may be accurate,
but frequently gives an impression that I'm sure you don't really
intend.
If you look at the one line in quotation marks from your post, you may
want to re-examine the use of the word, 'humble'.
No, I used the word humble correctly in that context. I don't present
myself here as an exalted Christian, but others here falsely place
that image on me. I am a humble Christian in that I don't go around
saying I'm a better Christian that someone else -- though there is
another poster here who HAS done that, and I notice no criticism of
him. I wonder why that is?
If you need to know why you are so often castigated, look no further
than 'style'.
I don't care about being castigated. But when people spread a false
image of me (that I somehow portray myself as an exalted Christian), I
feel justified in correcting that error.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
25 Jul 2007 01:50:41 AM |
|
|
On Jul 25, 2:00?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
"I wonder why that is?"
Well, I've told you as I see it. It's 'style'.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
25 Jul 2007 11:04:27 AM |
|
|
On Jul 24, 11:50 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 25, 2:00?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
"I wonder why that is?"
Well, I've told you as I see it. It's 'style'.
Right. So someone else can actually call himself a better Christian,
and as long as he does it with "style" you're fine with it. But I have
never presented myself as an exalted Christian, but since you don't
like my "style" it doesn't matter what my words are. Style over
substance, that's what matters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
25 Jul 2007 02:58:39 PM |
|
|
On Jul 25, 5:04?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 24, 11:50 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Right. So someone else can actually call himself a better Christian,
and as long as he does it with "style" you're fine with it. But I have
never presented myself as an exalted Christian, but since you don't
like my "style" it doesn't matter what my words are. Style over
substance, that's what matters.
For Christ's sake man!
I was trying to HELP you.
Go your own way.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
26 Jul 2007 03:48:25 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1185393519.255452.51410@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 25, 5:04?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 24, 11:50 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Right. So someone else can actually call himself a better Christian,
and as long as he does it with "style" you're fine with it. But I have
never presented myself as an exalted Christian, but since you don't
like my "style" it doesn't matter what my words are. Style over
substance, that's what matters.
For Christ's sake man!
I was trying to HELP you.
Go your own way.
Werewolfy
Stevie has been using this group like a teething ring in a 'soul struggle'
ever since he first appeared here years ago. Like a baby, whose teeth
kinda' hurt and are aided by the teething ring action, Stevie's
personality's 'soreness' and troubled soul pain are made more tolerable by
constantly arguing his largely hypocritical 'righteousness' against what
he perceives as forms of 'evil.' The 'tiny leftist fringe' he rails
against here is his grindstone with which he attempts to 'polish' the
'rough diamond' of his ideology. He grinds against it every day, trying to
get it to shine beyond all others' ideologies that oppose his.
It's always a deluded sucker's process that will ultimately have him end
up in either an insane asylum (if he hasn't been in one already!), suicide
or suicidal ideation, or he'll join a militant right-wing group and burn
the ACLU or Planned Parenthood offices down.
We may sadly hear about him some day on the news. Perhaps he will have
assassinated someone like Howard Dean, or have set himself on fire outside
the Democratic Convention. LOL!!!
Doc :|
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
26 Jul 2007 10:56:44 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Docrodile"
<swampthing@hellsbayou.net> Spat the Words
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1185393519.255452.51410@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 25, 5:04?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 24, 11:50 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Right. So someone else can actually call himself a better Christian,
and as long as he does it with "style" you're fine with it. But I have
never presented myself as an exalted Christian, but since you don't
like my "style" it doesn't matter what my words are. Style over
substance, that's what matters.
For Christ's sake man!
I was trying to HELP you.
Go your own way.
Werewolfy
Stevie has been using this group like a teething ring in a 'soul
struggle'
ever since he first appeared here years ago.
I find it hard to believe he's still playing his word games.
He just fights to defend Bush tooth and nail.. I've said it before
but this looks on the surface to be true *****-sucking man-love that
stevie has for GWB.. nobody but a hopeless lover would fight so hard
to defend a proven incompetent bufoon like GWB.
Stevie's favorite game is to draw everyone else into the decision
for war with Iraq, and thereby spread the blame around to everyone.
Instead of making decisions on his own based on the mountains of
damning evidence, stevie chooses to pick 1-line quotes out of the
statements of democratic congressmen from 6 years ago which seems
to indicate they would have invaded Iraq if they had been living in
a vacuum isolated from the outside world and with no other information
available to them. These quotes are often taken out of context and nobody
at that time could have formed opinions on Iraq without reading all the
current knowledge available, including the cherry-picked intelligence
being foisted on us by the Bush propagandists, these facts don't seem
to bother stevie one bit.
Stevie loves to point out the $$millions lost in the oil-for-food
scandals, then easily dismisses the $$billions gone missing in the
no-bid Iraq war contract scandals.. US taxpayer money appropriated by
Congress to repair the war-torn country.. all money which stevie helps
to pay from his own taxes.. in effect stevie is saying it's ok with him
for the Bush cronyism to ***** him up the ***** and steal his money.
GWB, by sending $$trillions into a black hole called Iraq, has declined
the living standard of Americans, including future generations of stevie's
own family, and stevie is ok with this. This is true *****-sucking man-love
that stevie has for GWB.
Like a baby, whose teeth
kinda' hurt and are aided by the teething ring action, Stevie's
personality's 'soreness' and troubled soul pain are made more tolerable
by
constantly arguing his largely hypocritical 'righteousness' against what
he perceives as forms of 'evil.' The 'tiny leftist fringe' he rails
against here is his grindstone with which he attempts to 'polish' the
'rough diamond' of his ideology. He grinds against it every day, trying
to
get it to shine beyond all others' ideologies that oppose his.
It's always a deluded sucker's process that will ultimately have him end
up in either an insane asylum (if he hasn't been in one already!),
suicide
or suicidal ideation, or he'll join a militant right-wing group and burn
the ACLU or Planned Parenthood offices down.
We may sadly hear about him some day on the news. Perhaps he will have
assassinated someone like Howard Dean, or have set himself on fire
outside
the Democratic Convention. LOL!!!
Doc :|
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
26 Jul 2007 11:15:01 AM |
|
|
On Jul 26, 8:56 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Docrodile"
<swampth...@hellsbayou.net> Spat the Words
"Werewolfy" <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1185393519.255452.51410@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 25, 5:04?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 24, 11:50 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Right. So someone else can actually call himself a better Christian,
and as long as he does it with "style" you're fine with it. But I have
never presented myself as an exalted Christian, but since you don't
like my "style" it doesn't matter what my words are. Style over
substance, that's what matters.
For Christ's sake man!
I was trying to HELP you.
Go your own way.
Werewolfy
Stevie has been using this group like a teething ring in a 'soul
struggle' ever since he first appeared here years ago.
I find it hard to believe he's still playing his word games.
He just fights to defend Bush tooth and nail.. I've said it before
but this looks on the surface to be true *****-sucking man-love that
stevie has for GWB.. nobody but a hopeless lover would fight so hard
to defend a proven incompetent bufoon like GWB.
Yes, you have said it before, as you regularly express your
fascination for same-sex fantasies.
Stevie's favorite game is to draw everyone else into the decision
for war with Iraq, and thereby spread the blame around to everyone.
Instead of making decisions on his own based on the mountains of
damning evidence, stevie chooses to pick 1-line quotes out of the
statements of democratic congressmen from 6 years ago which seems
to indicate they would have invaded Iraq if they had been living in
a vacuum isolated from the outside world and with no other information
available to them.
Those Senators and Congressmen voted to give Bush authorization to use
military force in Iraq. Some of those Senators and Congressmen have
said they did not listen to Bush for the WMD intelligence, but went
directly to former Clinton administration officials, who convinced
them Saddam was a threat. And what about Bill Clinton himself, who
told the British people (on the very eve of the war) to trust Tony
Blair's decision to go to war? Does any of that mean anything to you?
Or would you rather just sweep it all under the rug?
These quotes are often taken out of context
I provide a link to those quotes, in which anyone who cares to look
can see those quotes in context. And if you read some of those
speeches during the authorization for the war, you'll see (for
example), Jay Rockefeller saying we could not afford to wait for
further proof, because to wait for further proof could put Americans
in danger!
and nobody at that time could have formed opinions on Iraq without
reading all the current knowledge available, including the cherry-picked
intelligence being foisted on us by the Bush propagandists, these facts
don't seem to bother stevie one bit.
And what about British intelligence? Did Bush foist cherry-picked
intelligence on them to? Did Bush foist cherry-picked intelligence on
Bill Clinton? What about Gephardt and Edwards, both of whom have
admitted they did not listen to Bush for their intelligence? Just keep
ignoring those facts so you can believe your leftist spin? Okay!
Stevie loves to point out the $$millions lost in the oil-for-food
scandals, then easily dismisses the $$billions gone missing in the
no-bid Iraq war contract scandals.. US taxpayer money appropriated by
Congress to repair the war-torn country.. all money which stevie helps
to pay from his own taxes.. in effect stevie is saying it's ok with him
for the Bush cronyism to ***** him up the ***** and steal his money.
I haven't defended the Bush administration. In fact, I have said
numerous times that I don't particularly like Bush, and I'm not part
of his 30% approval rating. But don't let those facts get in the way
of your rant there, Randy.
GWB, by sending $$trillions into a black hole called Iraq, has declined
the living standard of Americans, including future generations of stevie's
own family, and stevie is ok with this. This is true *****-sucking man-love
that stevie has for GWB.
You just exude class, you know Randy? I'll bet every poster here is
just sitting back in awe at how *classy* you are!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
26 Jul 2007 10:11:52 AM |
|
|
On Jul 26, 1:48 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Werewolfy" <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1185393519.255452.51410@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 25, 5:04?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 24, 11:50 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Right. So someone else can actually call himself a better Christian,
and as long as he does it with "style" you're fine with it. But I have
never presented myself as an exalted Christian, but since you don't
like my "style" it doesn't matter what my words are. Style over
substance, that's what matters.
For Christ's sake man!
I was trying to HELP you.
Go your own way.
Werewolfy
Stevie has been using this group like a teething ring in a 'soul struggle'
ever since he first appeared here years ago. Like a baby, whose teeth
kinda' hurt and are aided by the teething ring action, Stevie's
personality's 'soreness' and troubled soul pain are made more tolerable by
constantly arguing his largely hypocritical 'righteousness' against what
he perceives as forms of 'evil.' The 'tiny leftist fringe' he rails
against here is his grindstone with which he attempts to 'polish' the
'rough diamond' of his ideology. He grinds against it every day, trying to
get it to shine beyond all others' ideologies that oppose his.
It's always a deluded sucker's process that will ultimately have him end
up in either an insane asylum (if he hasn't been in one already!), suicide
or suicidal ideation, or he'll join a militant right-wing group and burn
the ACLU or Planned Parenthood offices down.
We may sadly hear about him some day on the news. Perhaps he will have
assassinated someone like Howard Dean, or have set himself on fire outside
the Democratic Convention. LOL!!!
I see a lot of your typical *projection* in that little rant, Doc.
None of it applies to me.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
21 Jul 2007 08:32:36 AM |
|
|
On Jul 21, 12:58 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite sure
why though!!!
That's an unfair comparison. Why would you compare the teachings of
Jesus to poop? Which of his teachings, in particular, bother you to
such a degree?
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 09:48:02 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1185024756.621496.266200@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 21, 12:58 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite sure
why though!!!
That's an unfair comparison. Why would you compare the teachings of
Jesus to poop?
Which of his teachings, in particular, bother you to such a degree?
I'm repulsed by any teaching that would allow people as yourself to be
'saved'....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 10:15:33 PM |
|
|
On Jul 24, 7:48 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1185024756.621496.266200@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 21, 12:58 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called' Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite sure
why though!!!
That's an unfair comparison. Why would you compare the teachings of
Jesus to poop?
Which of his teachings, in particular, bother you to such a degree?
I'm repulsed by any teaching that would allow people as yourself to be
'saved'....
I've never claimed to be saved, I *pray* that I'm saved. You're making
my point for me. You and others here can make up all sorts of things
about me that I have never claimed for myself. And just what have I
done to you that would cause you to wish me to not be saved? Have I
wished you dead the way you've wished me dead?
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
24 Jul 2007 11:31:57 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1185333333.001051.136620@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 24, 7:48 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1185024756.621496.266200@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 21, 12:58 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184992598.827708.201590@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 20, 10:28 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Jul 20, 5:11?pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"We May Never Know The TRUE Liinage - of this person 'Called'
Jesus"
I wonder. There are times when I feel sure Steven is 'the direct
descendent', La Sang Royale.
I have this feeling that he believes this too!
What have I ever said that would give you that idea? What I have
actually said, more than once, is that I'm far from the perfect
Christian.
I don't know why, but it seems to me that you're far more
bothered by what I may or may not believe than the other way around.
If I saw a child playing with poop, it would bother me... not quite
sure
why though!!!
That's an unfair comparison. Why would you compare the teachings of
Jesus to poop?
Which of his teachings, in particular, bother you to such a degree?
I'm repulsed by any teaching that would allow people as yourself to be
'saved'....
I've never claimed to be saved, I *pray* that I'm saved. You're making
my point for me. You and others here can make up all sorts of things
about me that I have never claimed for myself.
So what are you saying then? That you are NOT saved?
And just what have I
done to you that would cause you to wish me to not be saved?
Everything!!!
Have I wished you dead the way you've wished me dead?
You would never tell. You do these things in secret, just like the
terrorists!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New Member |
20 Jul 2007 04:47:48 PM |
|
|
On Jul 20, 6:29 pm, wrote:
Hello I recently have read the holy blood, holy grail, and have began
to start researching The Treasures of Rennes-le-Ch=E2teau the mystery of
the Rennes-le-Chateau is the most interesting mystery I have ever
encounter I would appreciate any books or websites to assist with my
research. I am an amatuer and....I am just satisfying my curiousity.
Thank you for you time
SF
Oh well you would not be alone in fact a veritable path would have
been worn looking for the supposed treasure.
But not so much a mystery, more a hoax with Legs.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
