A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some
of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask.
Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are
being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical
realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be symbolism. Would most students
of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth
density terms?
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/earth2.htm
Q: (L) What event took place at that time that caused the death of the
dinosaurs?
A: Comet impact.
Q: (L) Did a comet actually strike the earth?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was it a large comet?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How large?
A: The largest was 18 miles diameter, but no one was large enough for
event. 14 hit at that occasion.
Q: (L) Is there any regular periodicity or cycle to this comet
business?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is the period?
A: 3600 years roughly.
Q: (L) Where are these cometary showers from?
A: Clusters in their own orbit.
Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets orbit around the sun?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is the orbit perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) Is this cluster of comets the remains of a planet?
A: No.
Q: (L) What body were the Sumerians talking about when they described
the Planet of the crossing or Nibiru?
A: Comets.
Q: (L) This body of comets you have talked about?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets appear to be a single body as
Sitchen describes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Now, this cluster of comets, when was the last time it came into
the solar system?
A: 3582 yrs ago.
Q: (L) So, when is this cluster expected to hit the plane of the
ecliptic again?
A: 12 to 18 years. [This session was in 1994]
Q: (L) How long has this comet cluster been part of our solar system?
A: 890 million years.
Q: (L) What was the origin of this comet cluster? Was it originally a
large planet?
A: No. Your government already knows they're coming close again.
Q: (L) You said that the orbit is around the Sun. Where does it enter
the plane of the ecliptic?
A: Varies.
Q: (L) Does it enter between Mars and Jupiter, for example?
A: Sometimes.
Q: (L) Is the orbit perpendicular to the plane of the ecliptic? Or is
it at an angle?
A: Not correct idea structure. Picture a spirograph.
Q: (L) Do the comets orbit around themselves. Do they have a sort of
axis?
A: No.
Q: (L) How many are in this cluster?
A: Varies.
Q: (L) Do they lose or pick any up from time to time?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How big is the biggest one at this time?
A: 900 miles diameter. Spirograph.
Q: (L) According to my calculations, the comet cluster came by 8,788
B.C., is that correct?
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) Was there any historical cataclysm recorded in history that we
could relate to that passing?
A: No.
Q: (L) And this was part of the great flood that occurred 12,388 B.C.,
is that correct?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Now, you have said that Venus was drawn into the solar system by
the gravitational pull of the cluster of comets?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where did Venus get all its gases and clouds and so forth? What
was its origin? Where did it get all this stuff?
A: Collected during fiery, friction filled journey and space matter in
general.
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
Q: (L) Now, I have compared certain passages of Revelations to the work
of Immanuel Velikovsky, were those sections accurate in what they
describe?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is there going to be massive disruption on the planet and maybe
a lot of people transitioning out of the body simultaneously because of
the interaction of this cluster of comets and the earth.
A: Close.
Q: Now, when you talk about the comet cluster, as you have on many
occasions, the technical definition of a comet is that it is a chunk of
ice. Is this the case with the comets in this cluster?
A: And other substances, primarily iridium cores.
[...]
Q: (T) Can we ask one more quick question? NASA has announced that the
space telescope, Hubble, has detected clusters of comets, is this, in
effect, the beginning of the government's of the world preparing the
people for what is to come?
A: It certainly is a possibility, but, again, you are accessing a very
touchy area. Too much knowledge for you to gather in this particular
area would not be beneficial to you.
Q: There is a rumor going around that a large object is coming our way,
that is a gigantic, intelligently controlled space craft, loaded with
Lizzies. Could you comment on this please?
A: Comet cluster. Sitchen believes it is a "planet."
Q: In terms of this comet cluster, how many bodies are in this cluster
as a discrete unit?
A: Variable.
Q: What is the ETA?
A: Open.
Q: Why is it open? Why can't we look at it and determine the factors,
the direction, trajectory, velocity...
A: If you could, you would be interrupted in your learning cycle.
Q: What exactly does THAT mean? (F) Because you would never do anything
else because all you would think about is the day the comet is coming!
[...]
Q: Is the government planning to stage an invasion by aliens to cause
the populace of the world to go into such a fear state that they will
accept total control and domination?
A: Open. But if so, will "flop".
Q: Why?
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and will have
"glitches". 2. Real invasion may take place first. 3. Other events may
intercede.
Q: Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: Am I correct in assuming that some of these hot-shot, big-wig guys
in the government who have plans for taking over the whole world and
making everything all happy and hunky-dory with them in charge, are
just simply not in synch with the fact that there are some definite
earth changes on the agenda? Are they missing something here?
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the arrival of the
cometary cluster?
A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
[...]
A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some
of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask.
Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are
being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical
realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be symbolism. Would most students
of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth
density terms?
Q: (L) Is this comparable to my idea about dream symbolism. For
example, the dream I had about the curling cloud which I saw in a
distance and knew it was death dealing and I interpreted it to be a
tornado, but it was, in fact, a dream of the Challenger disaster. I
understood it to be a tornado, but in fact, what I saw was what I got,
a death dealing force in the sky, a vortex, in the distance. I guess my
dream was a fourth density representation but I tried to interpret it
in terms I was familiar with. Is this what you mean?
A: Close. But it is easy for most to get bogged down by interpreting
prophecies in literal terms.
Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of the most
famous prognosticators of recent note, a large number of the prophecies
he made seemingly were erroneous in terms of their fulfillment. For
example, he prophesied that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not
though certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini which
are thought by many to be remnants of Atlantis. These did, apparently,
emerge from the sand at that time.
A: Example of one form of symbolism.
Q: (L) And the symbolism was that one is reading the event from 3rd
density into sixth density terms and then transmitting it back into
3rd, and while the ideation was correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd
density terms, were slightly askew. Is that what we are dealing with
here?
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept. Most are always
looking for literal translations of dates
A: Analogy is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract
painting and says "I don't get it."
Q: (L) Well, let's not denigrate literal translations or at least
attempts to get things into literal terms. I like realistic art work. I
am a realist in my art preferences. I want trees to look like trees and
people to have only two arms and legs. Therefore, I also like some
literalness in my prognostications.
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else "California falls into the ocean"
will always be interpreted as California falling into the ocean.
Q: (General uproar) (F) Wait a minute, what was the question? (L) I
just said I liked literalness in my prophecies. (F) Oh, I know what
they are saying. People believe that California is just going to go
splat and that Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that
it's at 1800 feet elevation, it's just going to drop down to sea level,
or the sea level is going to rise, but it's not going to affect
Virginia Beach even though that's at sea level. I mean... somehow
Phoenix is just going to drop down and none of the buildings are going
to be damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet... (T) Slowly.
It's going to settle. (F) Slowly? It would have to be so slowly it's
unbelievable how slowly it would have to be. (T) It's been settling for
the last five million years, we've got a ways to go in the next year
and a half! (F) Right! That's my point. (T) In other words, when people
like Scallion and Sun Bear and others say California is going to fall
into the ocean, they are not saying that the whole state, right along
the border is going to fall into the ocean, they are using the term
California to indicate that the ocean ledge along the fault line has a
probability of breaking off and sinking on the water side, because it
is a major fracture. We understand that that is not literal. Are you
telling us that there is more involved here as far as the way we are
hearing what these predictions say?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the ocean, we are
not talking about the whole state literally falling into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do this?
Q: (L) It could take three minutes or three hundred years. (T) Yes.
That is "open" as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (J) Yeah, because they think they have the only line on it. (T)
Okay. So they are thinking in the terms that one minute California will
be there and a minute and a half later it will be all gone. Is this
what you are saying?
A: Or similar.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: "California will fall into the ocean,
which is just the analogy we are using, we are talking about, as far as
earth changes, is the possibility that several seismic events along the
fault line, which no one really knows the extent of...
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? Symbolic of what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute here! That's like sending us out to translate
a book in Latin without even giving us a Latin dictionary.
A: No it is not. We asked you to consider a reexamination.
Q: (L) You have told us through this source, that there is a cluster of
comets connected in some interactive way with our solar system, and
that this cluster of comets comes into the plane of the ecliptic every
3600 years. Is this correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is riding realm border wave to 4th level,
where all realities are different.
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/earth2.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
02 Jan 2005 02:08:52 AM |
|
|
YIKES!!!
:-O :-O :-O
:-O
:-O :-O :-O
:-O :-O :-O :-O
YIKES!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
01 Jan 2005 02:22:22 PM |
|
|
On 1 Jan 2005 11:42:49 -0800, wrote:
A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some
of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask.
Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are
being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical
realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be symbolism. Would most students
of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth
density terms?
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/earth2.htm
Q: (L) What event took place at that time that caused the death of the
dinosaurs?
A: Comet impact.
Nope. Asteroid.
<SNIP of utter bilge>
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
ROFL. And how fast did Venus have to travel through space in order to
get here, and what mechanism slowed it down in to a circular orbit?
BWAHAHHAHAHHAAH
The rest of your stuff, is like the above stuff, arrant nonsense.
<SNIP>
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "The CO" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
01 Jan 2005 08:00:07 PM |
|
|
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:rd1et01e1bj5un0qv33uutl2b5plikpgse@4ax.com...
On 1 Jan 2005 11:42:49 -0800, wrote:
<SNIP of utter bilge>
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
ROFL. And how fast did Venus have to travel through space in order to
get here, and what mechanism slowed it down in to a circular orbit?
Nitpick: It's actually an elliptical orbit...
BWAHAHHAHAHHAAH
The rest of your stuff, is like the above stuff, arrant nonsense.
Actually, it's arrant *made up* nonsense....
Sounds like one of Nancy Lieders drones...
The CO
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
02 Jan 2005 05:12:04 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:30:07 +1030, "The CO" <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:rd1et01e1bj5un0qv33uutl2b5plikpgse@4ax.com...
On 1 Jan 2005 11:42:49 -0800, wrote:
<SNIP of utter bilge>
Q: (L) Where was Venus originally from?
A: Ancient wanderer from near Arcturus.
ROFL. And how fast did Venus have to travel through space in order to
get here, and what mechanism slowed it down in to a circular orbit?
Nitpick: It's actually an elliptical orbit...
ROFL. OK, I should have been more precise. :-)
Still, one wonders where all of the momentum went, and what speed the
planet needed to achieve to get here, and how it slowed down to a
stable elliptical orbit.
BWAHAHHAHAHHAAH
The rest of your stuff, is like the above stuff, arrant nonsense.
Actually, it's arrant *made up* nonsense....
Sounds like one of Nancy Lieders drones...
And not as original.
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "The CO" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
02 Jan 2005 07:45:58 AM |
|
|
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:uklft016fh462i9huhl84m6dmdne7cf953@4ax.com...
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:30:07 +1030, "The CO" <the_xo@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:
Nitpick: It's actually an elliptical orbit...
ROFL. OK, I should have been more precise. :-)
;^)
Still, one wonders where all of the momentum went, and what speed the
planet needed to achieve to get here, and how it slowed down to a
stable elliptical orbit.
Ummm, let me think,
Hmmm, the guys from Planet X were redecorating the solar system and wanted
an evening star, so they sucked it through a wormhole?
Actually, it's arrant *made up* nonsense....
Sounds like one of Nancy Lieders drones...
And not as original.
Yeah, Nancy was at least entertaining.
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
I think he's having another one.......
The CO
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredrick Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
01 Jan 2005 02:55:40 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:42:49 -0800, jha_amin wrote:
A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some
of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask.
Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are
being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical
realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be symbolism. Would most students
of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth
density terms?
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/earth2.htm
Q: (L) What event took place at that time that caused the death of the
dinosaurs?
A: Comet impact.
DOH!
(Huge SNIP!)
There are so many errors in this laughable post I'm not even going to
waste my time on it. Sad really.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism |
01 Jan 2005 11:39:32 PM |
|
|
Subject: Re: Nibiru, comet clusters and symbolism
From: Fredrick Garvin
Date: 1/1/2005 12:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <pan.2005.01.01.21.02.09.558929@elaborate.com>
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:42:49 -0800, jha_amin wrote:
A: Now would be a good "time" for you folks to begin to reexamine some
of the extremely popular "Earth Changes" prophecies. Why, you ask.
Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are
being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical
realm, I.E. Earth changes. This "may" be symbolism. Would most students
of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth
density terms?
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/earth2.htm
Q: (L) What event took place at that time that caused the death of the
dinosaurs?
A: Comet impact.
No it wasn't. I was there! It was a
Snuffeloufagus invasion.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
CHaRleS Turley
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
