wrote:
I know what you're getting at and my is answer is they're both
correct.
1. Nostie knew he cannot alter the future
Correct.
(misterious sky effects when
he did) so he wrote a little off on purpose.
No.
2. They are both correct: Nay pau loron = both city and Napoleon Roy
Hister = Both river and Hitler Child of Germany
Back to the double meaning. Things if life follow patterns like this.
Some call it a coincidence.
Light = Both particle and wave
So End the debate
3. King of Mongols and King of Angoumois France(vague on purpose) =
both Correct
Well Nostradamus has double meanings in much of his work.
It will be another West Christian Crusaders lead by the Celtic Ogmios
King of France (replacing the old King St-Louis 1220AC) VERSUS the
EAST
renewed Communist China Mongol Empire (and perhaps Muslem) (replacing
the old Ghangis Khan Emperor 1260AC )
The Mongol Empire was a huge French Topic and well documented in
history. To say the French weren't concern is to ignore hist.
June 15 1999 Compte Henry died and his Grandson Duke D'Angouleme
(capital of Angoumois) got married then religiously in July 1999.
This can be the turning point where Nostradamus' letter to Henry
explain France the Lady will be Barren (without King) for a time but
then after a New King will emerge = Nostradamus "RESURRECTING" and a
new turning point for France.
Kingship in France was not established or a concern in these periods of
1999.
Considering there is only 2 Malachy Pope's left and the present very
sick, it would be a good 1999 quatrain interpretation for the coming
of
the new celtic Ogmios King of France and leader of the new Crusaders.
What events in this 1999 time period relate to your interpretation? If
applicable they count, if not they don't... One must tie in the
time-line judiciously, so-to-speak.
Michael Johnathan McDonald wrote:
Again, Obviously you didn't follow what the propagandist said.
Here is Lamer's 1999 Prophecy interpretation.
http://prophet.michaelreport.com/nostradamus/critics/peterlemesurier.html
.