It is absurd to completely deny an interpretation of a word if:
1. The same and sufficiently rare word is used in two approximate
quatrains.
2. A combination of two or more of the same rare words are found in
two or more quatrains.
Yet many if not most have denied these two criterias above and then
persued their own interpretations. If such, the interpretations would
be numerous; but using the two criterias above Nostradamus would have
considerably shortened the playing field.
--------------------------------------
Therefore forget the quatrains for now and stand back a little to
observe the following evidence using the two criterias above:
(NEIGHBORING Quatrains 3.4, 3.5 and .... 5.93) and NEIGHBORING
quatrains (10.61 to 10.66)
1. (3.4:) "when they will be close" vs (3.5:) "near"
2. (3.4:) "lunar oneS" vs (3.5:) "two luminaries"
3. (3.4:) "lunar ones FAIL" vs (3.5:) "FAILURE of two luminaries"
4. (3.4:) "fail from one another NOT GREATLY DISTANT" vs (3.5:)
"failure between April and March"
5. (3.4:) "failure & danger at the frontier"(= "loss at the
frontier") vs (3.5:) "Oh, what a loss" and "relieve all parts".
-------------------------------
6. (3.4:)"lunar" and neighboring (3.5:)"luminary" vs (5.93) Scotland
is both "lunar" and "luminary"
7. (3.4&3.5:) failure of lunar & luminary brings trouble/danger vs
(5.93) "luminary" puts England into confusion.
--------------------------------
1. (10.62:) Hungary assailed and converted to Arab vs neighboring
(10.63) "Europe, Arabia & Hungary to grow green again (= rebuild after
war)
2. (10.63) Evil King's son dead (killed by 2 heroes) vs neighboring
(10.66) "Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist"
---------------------------------
1. (3.5:) Two heroes come to the rescue vs (10.63) Two heroes come to
the rescue
2. (3.4) Cold vs (10.66) Cold
3. (3.4) Scotland vs (10.66) Scotland
4. (3.4) has a major INITIAL event (Oracle's BEGINNING) vs (10.66)
major INITIAL event marked by America & London (England) agreement
involving SCOTLAND
5. (3.4 & neighboring 3.5) both lunar (sky nuke missiles) and luminary
(nuke missiles), missiles produce light vs (10.66) strongly possible
Polaris nuclear missiles.
6. (3.4) Oracle or major INITIAL event is tied to lunar/luminaries
(missiles) vs (10.66) major INITIAL event tied to Polaris missiles.
7. (5.93) Scotland mentioned and England into confusion vs (10.66)
Scotand mentioned and all brought into trouble/conflict
8. (3.5) failed luminary and 2 heroes vs matches found (10.63, 10.66,
5.93) luminary and 2 heroes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As already mentioned, many will reply that there are other possible
interpretations, this is already understood but .....the above provide
TOO many matches and on top involves neighboring quatrains which
strongly promote the possible and unique interpretation that is given.
Therefore Persa/Iran may very well stragically at 1st elliminate all
of Europe's nuclear defense. And Iran lunars (crescent moon sign) =
sky nuclear missiles may ellliminate (produce a "luminary") England's
nuclear defense Polaris (now named Trident) missiles located in
Scotland (Her Majestie's Vanguard).
Quatrain 3.4's SAYS the lunars (nuke sky missiles) will fail where
their Oracle had it's beginning (major INITIAL event) was the Polaris
(now Trident) deal produced between America and London England....and
the failures are close to each other which mean Iran will logically
and strategically attack all European nuke sites simultaneously.
*************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************
Reference quatrains to the above:
Quatrain 3,4
When they will be close the lunar ones will fail,
From one another not greatly distant.
Cold, dryness, danger towards the frontiers,
Even where the ***ORACLE**** has had its beginning.
Quatrain 5,93
Under the land of the round lunar globe,
When Mercury will be dominating:
The isle of Scotland will produce a luminary,
One who will put the English into confusion.
Quatrain 10,62
Near "Sorbia" to assail Hungary,
The herald of "Brudes" will come to warn them:
Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia,
He will come to convert them to the law of the Arabs.
Quatrain 10,63
Cydonia, Ragusa, the city of St. Jerome,
With healing help to grow green again:eront vn mesme cours.
The King's sone dead because of the death of two heroes,
Araby and Hungary will take the same course.
Quatrain 10.66
The London premier through American power
will burden the island of Scotland with a cold thing.
Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist
who will bring them all into trouble.
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
18 Mar 2007 03:05:30 PM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1174246812.781102.308050@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It is absurd.
Agreed, no more needs to be said about you or your stupid interpretations.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
18 Mar 2007 03:08:54 PM |
|
|
It is absurd to completely deny an interpretation of a word if:
1=2E The same and sufficiently rare word is used in two approximate
quatrains.
2=2E A combination of two or more of the same rare words are found in
two or more quatrains.
Yet many if not most have denied these two criterias above and then
persued their own interpretations. If such, the interpretations would
be numerous; but using the two criterias above Nostradamus would have
considerably shortened the playing field.
--------------------------------------
Therefore forget the quatrains for now and stand back a little to
observe the following evidence using the two criterias above:
(NEIGHBORING Quatrains 3.4, 3.5 and .... 5.93) and NEIGHBORING
quatrains (10.61 to 10.66)
1=2E (3.4:) "when they will be close" vs (3.5:) "near"
2=2E (3.4:) "lunar oneS" vs (3.5:) "two luminaries"
3=2E (3.4:) "lunar ones FAIL" vs (3.5:) "FAILURE of two
luminaries"
4=2E (3.4:) "fail from one another NOT GREATLY DISTANT" vs (3.5:)
"failure between April and March"
5=2E (3.4:) "failure & danger at the frontier"(=3D "loss at the
frontier") vs (3.5:) "Oh, what a loss" and "relieve all parts".
-------------------------------
6=2E (3.4:)"lunar" and neighboring (3.5:)"luminary" vs (5.93) Scotland
is both "lunar" and "luminary"
7=2E (3.4&3.5:) failure of lunar & luminary brings trouble/danger vs
(5.93) "luminary" puts England into confusion.
--------------------------------
1=2E (10.62:) Hungary assailed and converted to Arab vs neighboring
(10.63) "Europe, Arabia & Hungary to grow green again (=3D rebuild
after
war)
2=2E (10.63) Evil King's son dead (killed by 2 heroes) vs neighboring
(10.66) "Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist"
---------------------------------
1=2E (3.5:) Two heroes come to the rescue vs (10.63) Two heroes come
to
the rescue
2=2E (3.4) Cold vs (10.66) Cold
3=2E (3.4) Scotland vs (10.66) Scotland
4=2E (3.4) has a major INITIAL event (Oracle's BEGINNING) vs (10.66)
major INITIAL event marked by America & London (England) agreement
involving SCOTLAND
5=2E (3.4 & neighboring 3.5) both lunar (sky nuke missiles) and
luminary
(nuke missiles), missiles produce light vs (10.66) strongly possible
Polaris nuclear missiles.
6=2E (3.4) Oracle or major INITIAL event is tied to lunar/luminaries
(missiles) vs (10.66) major INITIAL event tied to Polaris missiles.
7=2E (5.93) Scotland mentioned and England into confusion vs (10.66)
Scotand mentioned and all brought into trouble/conflict
8=2E (3.5) failed luminary and 2 heroes vs matches found (10.63, 10.66,
5=2E93) luminary and 2 heroes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As already mentioned, many will reply that there are other possible
interpretations, this is already understood but .....the above
provide
TOO many matches and on top involves neighboring quatrains which
strongly promote the possible and unique interpretation that is
given.
Therefore Persa/Iran may very well stragically at 1st elliminate all
of Europe's nuclear defense. And Iran lunars (crescent moon sign) =3D
sky nuclear missiles may ellliminate (produce a "luminary") England's
nuclear defense Polaris (now named Trident) missiles located in
Scotland (Her Majestie's Vanguard).
Quatrain 3.4's SAYS the lunars (nuke sky missiles) will fail where
their Oracle had it's beginning (major INITIAL event) was the Polaris
(now Trident) deal produced between America and London England....and
the failures are close to each other which mean Iran will logically
and strategically attack all European nuke sites simultaneously.
***************************************************************************=
=AD
**********
***************************************************************************=
=AD
**********
Reference quatrains to the above:
Quatrain 3,4
When they will be close the lunar ones will fail,
From one another not greatly distant.
Cold, dryness, danger towards the frontiers,
Even where the ***ORACLE**** has had its beginning.
Quatrain 5,93
Under the land of the round lunar globe,
When Mercury will be dominating:
The isle of Scotland will produce a luminary,
One who will put the English into confusion.
Quatrain 10,62
Near "Sorbia" to assail Hungary,
The herald of "Brudes" will come to warn them:
Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia,
He will come to convert them to the law of the Arabs.
Quatrain 10,63
Cydonia, Ragusa, the city of St. Jerome,
With healing help to grow green again:eront vn mesme cours.
The King's sone dead because of the death of two heroes,
Araby and Hungary will take the same course.
Quatrain 10.66
The London premier through American power
will burden the island of Scotland with a cold thing.
Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist
who will bring them all into trouble.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
18 Mar 2007 04:02:39 PM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1174248534.170974.183270@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
It is absurd to completely deny an interpretation of a word if:
1. The same and sufficiently rare word is used in two approximate
quatrains.
2. A combination of two or more of the same rare words are found in
two or more quatrains.
Why? because YOU say so? you've said many many stupid and ridicilous
things, this is just another in a LONG list of them.
Yet many if not most have denied these two criterias above and then
persued their own interpretations.
As do you despite the obvious fallacies and flaws in your argument, your lack
of knowledge and your terrible logic.
If such, the interpretations would be numerous;
Perhaps you haven't noticed but even in this single newsgroup the interpretations
are indeed numerous. There are as many interpretations as there are self
proclaimed experts.
but using the two criterias above Nostradamus would have
considerably shortened the playing field.
In your opinion but you're an idiot and a flake.
I've snipped the rest of your idiocy. Did you have any luck turning salt into
gold using FM radio waves moron?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
18 Mar 2007 04:16:10 PM |
|
|
It is absurd to completely deny an interpretation of a word if:
1=2E The same and sufficiently rare word is used in two approximate
quatrains.
2=2E A combination of two or more of the same rare words are found in
two or more quatrains.
Yet many if not most have denied these two criterias above and then
persued their own interpretations. If such, the interpretations would
be numerous; but using the two criterias above Nostradamus would have
considerably shortened the playing field.
--------------------------------------
Therefore forget the quatrains for now and stand back a little to
observe the following evidence using the two criterias above:
(NEIGHBORING Quatrains 3.4, 3.5 and .... 5.93) and NEIGHBORING
quatrains (10.61 to 10.66)
1=2E (3.4:) "when they will be close" vs (3.5:) "near"
2=2E (3.4:) "lunar oneS" vs (3.5:) "two luminaries"
3=2E (3.4:) "lunar ones FAIL" vs (3.5:) "FAILURE of two
luminaries"
4=2E (3.4:) "fail from one another NOT GREATLY DISTANT" vs (3.5:)
"failure between April and March"
5=2E (3.4:) "failure & danger at the frontier"(=3D "loss at the
frontier") vs (3.5:) "Oh, what a loss" and "relieve all parts".
-------------------------------
6=2E (3.4:)"lunar" and neighboring (3.5:)"luminary" vs (5.93) Scotland
is both "lunar" and "luminary"
7=2E (3.4&3.5:) failure of lunar & luminary brings trouble/danger vs
(5.93) "luminary" puts England into confusion.
--------------------------------
1=2E (10.62:) Hungary assailed and converted to Arab vs neighboring
(10.63) "Europe, Arabia & Hungary to grow green again (=3D rebuild
after
war)
2=2E (10.63) Evil King's son dead (killed by 2 heroes) vs neighboring
(10.66) "Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist"
---------------------------------
1=2E (3.5:) Two heroes come to the rescue vs (10.63) Two heroes come
to
the rescue
2=2E (3.4) Cold vs (10.66) Cold
3=2E (3.4) Scotland vs (10.66) Scotland
4=2E (3.4) has a major INITIAL event (Oracle's BEGINNING) vs (10.66)
major INITIAL event marked by America & London (England) agreement
involving SCOTLAND
5=2E (3.4 & neighboring 3.5) both lunar (sky nuke missiles) and
luminary
(nuke missiles), missiles produce light vs (10.66) strongly possible
Polaris nuclear missiles.
6=2E (3.4) Oracle or major INITIAL event is tied to lunar/luminaries
(missiles) vs (10.66) major INITIAL event tied to Polaris missiles.
7=2E (5.93) Scotland mentioned and England into confusion vs (10.66)
Scotand mentioned and all brought into trouble/conflict
8=2E (3.5) failed luminary and 2 heroes vs matches found (10.63, 10.66,
5=2E93) luminary and 2 heroes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As already mentioned, many will reply that there are other possible
interpretations, this is already understood but .....the above
provide
TOO many matches and on top involves neighboring quatrains which
strongly promote the possible and unique interpretation that is
given.
Therefore Persa/Iran may very well stragically at 1st elliminate all
of Europe's nuclear defense. And Iran lunars (crescent moon sign) =3D
sky nuclear missiles may ellliminate (produce a "luminary") England's
nuclear defense Polaris (now named Trident) missiles located in
Scotland (Her Majestie's Vanguard).
Quatrain 3.4's SAYS the lunars (nuke sky missiles) will fail where
their Oracle had it's beginning (major INITIAL event) was the Polaris
(now Trident) deal produced between America and London England....and
the failures are close to each other which mean Iran will logically
and strategically attack all European nuke sites simultaneously.
***************************************************************************=
=AD=AD
**********
***************************************************************************=
=AD=AD
**********
Reference quatrains to the above:
Quatrain 3,4
When they will be close the lunar ones will fail,
From one another not greatly distant.
Cold, dryness, danger towards the frontiers,
Even where the ***ORACLE**** has had its beginning.
Quatrain 5,93
Under the land of the round lunar globe,
When Mercury will be dominating:
The isle of Scotland will produce a luminary,
One who will put the English into confusion.
Quatrain 10,62
Near "Sorbia" to assail Hungary,
The herald of "Brudes" will come to warn them:
Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia,
He will come to convert them to the law of the Arabs.
Quatrain 10,63
Cydonia, Ragusa, the city of St. Jerome,
With healing help to grow green again:eront vn mesme cours.
The King's sone dead because of the death of two heroes,
Araby and Hungary will take the same course.
Quatrain 10.66
The London premier through American power
will burden the island of Scotland with a cold thing.
Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist
who will bring them all into trouble.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
19 Mar 2007 04:35:46 AM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1174252570.059782.186590@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It is absurd...
Yes, you haven't quite grasped that constant repetition of lies and
***** does not change its nature ;0)
Guskz... that's the moron who declared it's possible to transmute salt into gold ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
19 Mar 2007 06:23:21 AM |
|
|
It is absurd to completely deny an interpretation of a word if:
1=2E The same and sufficiently rare word is used in two approximate
quatrains.
2=2E A combination of two or more of the same rare words are found in
two or more quatrains.
Yet many if not most have denied these two criterias above and then
persued their own interpretations. If such, the interpretations would
be numerous; but using the two criterias above Nostradamus would have
considerably shortened the playing field.
--------------------------------------
Therefore forget the quatrains for now and stand back a little to
observe the following evidence using the two criterias above:
(NEIGHBORING Quatrains 3.4, 3.5 and .... 5.93) and NEIGHBORING
quatrains (10.61 to 10.66)
1=2E (3.4:) "when they will be close" vs (3.5:) "near"
2=2E (3.4:) "lunar oneS" vs (3.5:) "two luminaries"
3=2E (3.4:) "lunar ones FAIL" vs (3.5:) "FAILURE of two
luminaries"
4=2E (3.4:) "fail from one another NOT GREATLY DISTANT" vs (3.5:)
"failure between April and March"
5=2E (3.4:) "failure & danger at the frontier"(=3D "loss at the
frontier") vs (3.5:) "Oh, what a loss" and "relieve all parts".
-------------------------------
6=2E (3.4:)"lunar" and neighboring (3.5:)"luminary" vs (5.93) Scotland
is both "lunar" and "luminary"
7=2E (3.4&3.5:) failure of lunar & luminary brings trouble/danger vs
(5.93) "luminary" puts England into confusion.
--------------------------------
1=2E (10.62:) Hungary assailed and converted to Arab vs neighboring
(10.63) "Europe, Arabia & Hungary to grow green again (=3D rebuild
after
war)
2=2E (10.63) Evil King's son dead (killed by 2 heroes) vs neighboring
(10.66) "Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist"
---------------------------------
1=2E (3.5:) Two heroes come to the rescue vs (10.63) Two heroes come
to
the rescue
2=2E (3.4) Cold vs (10.66) Cold
3=2E (3.4) Scotland vs (10.66) Scotland
4=2E (3.4) has a major INITIAL event (Oracle's BEGINNING) vs (10.66)
major INITIAL event marked by America & London (England) agreement
involving SCOTLAND
5=2E (3.4 & neighboring 3.5) both lunar (sky nuke missiles) and
luminary
(nuke missiles), missiles produce light vs (10.66) strongly possible
Polaris nuclear missiles.
6=2E (3.4) Oracle or major INITIAL event is tied to lunar/luminaries
(missiles) vs (10.66) major INITIAL event tied to Polaris missiles.
7=2E (5.93) Scotland mentioned and England into confusion vs (10.66)
Scotand mentioned and all brought into trouble/conflict
8=2E (3.5) failed luminary and 2 heroes vs matches found (10.63, 10.66,
5=2E93) luminary and 2 heroes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As already mentioned, many will reply that there are other possible
interpretations, this is already understood but .....the above
provide
TOO many matches and on top involves neighboring quatrains which
strongly promote the possible and unique interpretation that is
given.
Therefore Persa/Iran may very well stragically at 1st elliminate all
of Europe's nuclear defense. And Iran lunars (crescent moon sign) =3D
sky nuclear missiles may ellliminate (produce a "luminary") England's
nuclear defense Polaris (now named Trident) missiles located in
Scotland (Her Majestie's Vanguard).
Quatrain 3.4's SAYS the lunars (nuke sky missiles) will fail where
their Oracle had it's beginning (major INITIAL event) was the Polaris
(now Trident) deal produced between America and London England....and
the failures are close to each other which mean Iran will logically
and strategically attack all European nuke sites simultaneously.
***************************************************************************=
=AD=AD=AD
**********
***************************************************************************=
=AD=AD=AD
**********
Reference quatrains to the above:
Quatrain 3,4
When they will be close the lunar ones will fail,
From one another not greatly distant.
Cold, dryness, danger towards the frontiers,
Even where the ***ORACLE**** has had its beginning.
Quatrain 5,93
Under the land of the round lunar globe,
When Mercury will be dominating:
The isle of Scotland will produce a luminary,
One who will put the English into confusion.
Quatrain 10,62
Near "Sorbia" to assail Hungary,
The herald of "Brudes" will come to warn them:
Byzantine chief, Salona of Slavonia,
He will come to convert them to the law of the Arabs.
Quatrain 10,63
Cydonia, Ragusa, the city of St. Jerome,
With healing help to grow green again:eront vn mesme cours.
The King's sone dead because of the death of two heroes,
Araby and Hungary will take the same course.
Quatrain 10.66
The London premier through American power
will burden the island of Scotland with a cold thing.
Reb the King will have so dreadful an antichrist
who will bring them all into trouble.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani Bell" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
21 Mar 2007 04:04:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:35:46 GMT, "Krib" <kribuk@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1174252570.059782.186590@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
It is absurd...
Yes, you haven't quite grasped that constant repetition of lies and
***** does not change its nature ;0)
Guskz... that's the moron who declared it's possible to transmute salt into gold ;0)
LOL! Oh, please ask him to send his "formula" over to me immediately.
... ;)
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
21 Mar 2007 04:42:08 PM |
|
|
<Dani Bell> wrote in message news:fb73039jn9gvgc721nabffg0i4l3n9hi5k@4ax.com...
Guskz... that's the moron who declared it's possible to transmute salt into gold ;0)
LOL! Oh, please ask him to send his "formula" over to me immediately.
Sure...
1) Get a shitload of salt
2) Bombard it with FM radio Waves
3) Scoop up all the gold and take it to the bank *
* Please note this step will not work if you are sane.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
23 Mar 2007 10:49:33 PM |
|
|
On Mar 21, 5:42 pm, "Krib" <kri...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
<Dani Bell> wrote in messagenews:fb73039jn9gvgc721nabffg0i4l3n9hi5k@4ax.com...
Guskz... that's the moron who declared it's possible to transmute salt into gold ;0)
LOL! Oh, please ask him to send his "formula" over to me immediately.
Sure...
1) Get a shitload of salt
2) Bombard it with FM radio Waves
3) Scoop up all the gold and take it to the bank *
* Please note this step will not work if you are sane.
--
krib
Ask yourself, how long has camcorders/microwaves/cds/electricity/
planes/cars been in existant as compared to the entire human history?
There are SEQUENTIAL stages, humanity must take in its discoveries.
The initial stages (nuclear bomb, etc) is obviously to simply and
barbaricaly bombard the atom to generate a nuclear explosion or to
kill cancer cells. The next stages will be timing/synchronocity, ....,
specific sequences/intensities wish may indeed not kill/destroy the
atom(or the cells) but instead convert it into another element.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
26 Mar 2007 09:50:15 AM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1174708173.765811.41690@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Ask yourself, how long has camcorders/microwaves/cds/electricity/
planes/cars been in existant as compared to the entire human history?
I don't need to, history is a longtime study of mine... some of it anyway :0)
There are SEQUENTIAL stages, humanity must take in its discoveries.
So what? by your logic you could state that anyone can do anything in
time they just need enough time to reach the EQUENTIAL stage they
need to be at in order to do it.
Why can't you just accept you're wrong and leave it at that?
The initial stages (nuclear bomb, etc) is obviously to simply and
barbaricaly bombard the atom to generate a nuclear explosion or to
kill cancer cells. The next stages will be timing/synchronocity, ....,
specific sequences/intensities wish may indeed not kill/destroy the
atom(or the cells) but instead convert it into another element.
Obviously quite a lot you do not know about fission and fusion reactions, you
will still never turn a bunch of salt into gold by bombarding it with FM
radio waves. You don't even understand the difference between radioactivity
and radio waves do you gus, you moron.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
28 Mar 2007 03:22:02 AM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 10:50 am, "Krib" <kri...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
<g...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1174708173.765811.41690@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Ask yourself, how long has camcorders/microwaves/cds/electricity/
planes/cars been in existant as compared to the entire human history?
I don't need to, history is a longtime study of mine... some of it anyway :0)
There are SEQUENTIAL stages, humanity must take in its discoveries.
So what? by your logic you could state that anyone can do anything in
time they just need enough time to reach the EQUENTIAL stage they
need to be at in order to do it.
Why can't you just accept you're wrong and leave it at that?
The initial stages (nuclear bomb, etc) is obviously to simply and
barbaricaly bombard the atom to generate a nuclear explosion or to
kill cancer cells. The next stages will be timing/synchronocity, ....,
specific sequences/intensities wish may indeed not kill/destroy the
atom(or the cells) but instead convert it into another element.
Obviously quite a lot you do not know about fission and fusion reactions, you
will still never turn a bunch of salt into gold by bombarding it with FM
radio waves. You don't even understand the difference between radioactivity
and radio waves do you gus, you moron.
--
krib
Name calling? In that case the moron is you since there is *little*
difference between radioactivity(1)
and radio waves(2)....hence you're an imbecile.
(1) Radioactivity is the continuous emissions of "harmful" radio
waves(2)
You sure due complain and cry a lot.....no wonder I called you way
back a BABY KRIB (CRIB).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Nostradamus: Iran to 1st nuke & eliminate England's nuclear missiles |
28 Mar 2007 07:44:22 AM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1175070122.764093.12490@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Obviously quite a lot you do not know about fission and fusion reactions, you
will still never turn a bunch of salt into gold by bombarding it with FM
radio waves. You don't even understand the difference between radioactivity
and radio waves do you gus, you moron.
Name calling? In that case the moron is you since there is *little*
difference between radioactivity(1)
and radio waves(2)....hence you're an imbecile.
Really? perhaps you should actually do some basic research
before you display your stupidity again, moron.
(1) Radioactivity is the continuous emissions of "harmful" radio
waves(2)
" Main Entry: ra·dio·ac·tiv·i·ty
Pronunciation: -ak-'ti-v&-tE
Function: noun
Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary
: the property possessed by some elements (as uranium) or isotopes (as carbon 14) of spontaneously
emitting energetic particles (as electrons or alpha particles) by the disintegration of their atomic
nuclei; also : the rays emitted"
Main Entry: 1ra·dio
Pronunciation: 'rA-dE-"O
Function: adjective
Etymology: 2radio or radio-
1 : of, relating to, or operated by radiant energy
2 : of or relating to electric currents or phenomena (as electromagnetic radiation ) of frequencies
between about 3000 hertz and 300 gigahertz
3 a : of, relating to, or used in radio or a radio set b : specializing in radio or associated with
the radio industry c (1) : transmitted by radio (2) : making or participating in radio broadcasts d
: controlled or directed by radio
You sure due complain and cry a lot.....no wonder I called you way
back a BABY KRIB (CRIB).
You're still an ignorant, know nothing moron gus, you can't change because
you're too fucking stupid and ignorant to do so. ;0)
begin 666 audio.gif
M1TE&.#EA$ `+`+,``,X`(?___P``````````````````````````````````
M`````````````````````"P`````$ `+```$(C#(&0"@F-HK>=Y>I8&6:'8D
3IT[I>K9=C)*R
|
Related Articles |
|
|
