http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
.
|
|
| User: "Dani Bell" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
05 Apr 2007 08:06:10 PM |
|
|
On 5 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
LOL! I'm so *proud* of my President! Would ya look at 'em? My God
is he IMPRESSIVE!!
'Love that guy!
(not)
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 02:18:03 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On 5 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
LOL! I'm so *proud* of my President! Would ya look at 'em? My God
is he IMPRESSIVE!!
Hey, what can we say. The guy flunked out of Yale liberal
arts and parties... that's tough to do. I'm sure you could
get stevie to say a few words in his defense.
'Love that guy!
(not)
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani Bell" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 09:17:02 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:18:03 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On 5 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
LOL! I'm so *proud* of my President! Would ya look at 'em? My God
is he IMPRESSIVE!!
Hey, what can we say. The guy flunked out of Yale liberal
arts and parties... that's tough to do. I'm sure you could
get stevie to say a few words in his defense.
Hehe.. look at this clip of him below, too funny (can you let me know
if it works?)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2B-IWVUikHM&mode=related&search=
'Love that guy!
(not)
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 09:26:14 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:18:03 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On 5 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
LOL! I'm so *proud* of my President! Would ya look at 'em? My God
is he IMPRESSIVE!!
Hey, what can we say. The guy flunked out of Yale liberal
arts and parties... that's tough to do. I'm sure you could
get stevie to say a few words in his defense.
Hehe.. look at this clip of him below, too funny (can you let me know
if it works?)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2B-IWVUikHM&mode=related&search=
That's pretty funny. If only he'd been doing that his ENTIRE
presidency, then he wouldn't have created such a mess.
The youtube stuff works for me in firefox, but I've got flash
animations disabled in ie (makes the surfing go faster).
'Love that guy!
(not)
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani Bell" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 10:21:58 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 21:26:14 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:18:03 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On 5 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
LOL! I'm so *proud* of my President! Would ya look at 'em? My God
is he IMPRESSIVE!!
Hey, what can we say. The guy flunked out of Yale liberal
arts and parties... that's tough to do. I'm sure you could
get stevie to say a few words in his defense.
Hehe.. look at this clip of him below, too funny (can you let me know
if it works?)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2B-IWVUikHM&mode=related&search=
That's pretty funny.
If only he'd been doing that his ENTIRE
presidency, then he wouldn't have created such a mess.
Yeah, it's also rather disturbing to know that I'm smarter than my own
president.. LOL! Obviously I want someone who is far, far smarter
than I to be in charge. I honestly think I'm more intelligent than he
is. (lol).
The youtube stuff works for me in firefox, but I've got flash
animations disabled in ie (makes the surfing go faster).
Thanks for letting me know that it worked (the last time I tried to
post a video it didn't work for most people).
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani Bell" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 10:36:15 PM |
|
|
LOL.. here's a good one too:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=CrlswSo6i-U&mode=related&search=
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 12:20:14 AM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 4:17 am, Dani Bell wrote:
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:18:03 -0500, Perseid
<eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words
On 5 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
LOL! I'm so *proud* of my President! Would ya look at 'em? My God
is he IMPRESSIVE!!
Hey, what can we say. The guy flunked out of Yale liberal
arts and parties... that's tough to do. I'm sure you could
get stevie to say a few words in his defense.
Hehe.. look at this clip of him below, too funny (can you let me know
if it works?)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2B-IWVUikHM&mode=related&search=
'Love that guy!
(not)
Dani- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
He just doesen't know eh? Nice bird the camera keeps pointing at...got
a telephone no. to her or what?
WH
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
05 Apr 2007 10:30:40 AM |
|
|
On Apr 5, 11:08 am, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
I never Forgot...What a scumbag!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
05 Apr 2007 08:45:38 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
I think it would be far more watchable if glowing red eyes, horns, and a
moving tail were photoshopped in ...
;-)
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
05 Apr 2007 10:50:45 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.06.01.45.38.405045@tepidmail.com...
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
I think it would be far more watchable if glowing red eyes, horns, and a
moving tail were photoshopped in ...
How could he president be such a blatant liar and yet people seem to ignore
it? The glory that America once was is slowly fading from memory. One day
everyone will forget.
;-)
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 07:16:58 AM |
|
|
On Apr 5, 11:50 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.06.01.45.38.405045@tepidmail.com...
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
I think it would be far more watchable if glowing red eyes, horns, and a
moving tail were photoshopped in ...
How could he president be such a blatant liar and yet people seem to ignore
it? The glory that America once was is slowly fading from memory. One day
everyone will forget.
That's it.
It's common knowledge now that Iraq never attempted to buy uranium,
was not working with or supporting Al Qaeda, that all human
intelligence relating to Iraq's alleged WMD programs came from a
single source (Curveball) ... all this we found out *later* but that
the Bush Administration was fully aware of when this press conference
was held.
Bush and Cheney are criminals and need to be dealt with as such. They
cannot be trusted.
Cheers,
Marvin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 08:25:17 AM |
|
|
On Apr 6, 5:16 am, "Marvin The Paranoid Android"
<marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 5, 11:50 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.06.01.45.38.405045@tepidmail.com...
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:08:16 -0700, Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=wsCgelq-kT8
I think it would be far more watchable if glowing red eyes, horns, and a
moving tail were photoshopped in ...
How could he president be such a blatant liar and yet people seem to ignore
it? The glory that America once was is slowly fading from memory. One day
everyone will forget.
That's it.
It's common knowledge now that Iraq never attempted to buy uranium,
It's amazing the things that are "common knowledge" that are not true.
was not working with or supporting Al Qaeda,
That's not what Hillary Clinton believed when she gave her vote to
authorize the use of military force in Iraq.
that all human
intelligence relating to Iraq's alleged WMD programs came from a
single source (Curveball) ... all this we found out *later* but that
the Bush Administration was fully aware of when this press conference
was held.
Bush and Cheney are criminals and need to be dealt with as such. They
cannot be trusted.
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators who
voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 05:34:55 PM |
|
|
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators who
voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of responsibility the
President does Seven.
You say things that prove that you are such a nitwit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
06 Apr 2007 11:13:28 PM |
|
|
On Apr 6, 3:34 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators who
voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of responsibility the
President does Seven.
Does that mean they have NO responsibility?
You say things that prove that you are such a nitwit.
No, that would be you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 10:33:26 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 6, 3:34 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators who
voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of responsibility the
President does Seven.
Does that mean they have NO responsibility?
Well stevie, it's sort of like blaming the Jews for being scape-goated
in nazi germany. The Jews weren't entirely without responsibility.. they
WERE taking jobs that otherwise might have gone to 'pure-blood' Germans,
and they DID choose to be in Germany at that time, but to BLAME them
for becoming scape-goats ? I don't know.. that's a real stretch.
Your thinking is twisted stevie. You are wishing you could
become more like that which twisted you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 01:30:11 PM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 8:33 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 6, 3:34 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators who
voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of responsibility the
President does Seven.
Does that mean they have NO responsibility?
Well stevie, it's sort of like blaming the Jews for being scape-goated
in nazi germany.
No it's not. How stupid of you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 06:26:48 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 7, 8:33 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 6, 3:34 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators
who voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven.
Does that mean they have NO responsibility?
Well stevie, it's sort of like blaming the Jews for being scape-goated
in nazi germany.
No it's not. How stupid of you.
Stupid of you not being able to see it. The Congress were the
victims just like you and the rest of us.. difference is you
chose to hail your victimizer as a hero.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 06:54:33 PM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 4:26 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 7, 8:33 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 6, 3:34 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and Senators
who voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven.
Does that mean they have NO responsibility?
Well stevie, it's sort of like blaming the Jews for being scape-goated
in nazi germany.
No it's not. How stupid of you.
Stupid of you not being able to see it.
No, stupic is comparing Congress to Jews in Nazi Germany. That's so
stupid it's almost unspeakable.
The Congress were the victims just like you and the rest of
us.. difference is you chose to hail your victimizer as a hero.
Just another lie of the left. You just refuse to acknowledge the
Democrats who said they did not listen to Bush for their WMD
intelligence. You just refuse to acknowledge the ranking member of the
Senate Intelligence Committee who said we could not afford to wait for
further proof, because to wait for further proof could put Americans
in danger. You refuse to acknowledge that the former First Lady spoke
of the four years the inspectors were absent from Iraq -- two of those
four years were while she was in the White House. Just keep your head
in the sand and ignore the facts, weakling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 08:18:47 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 7, 4:26 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 7, 8:33 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 6, 3:34 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
So obviously you feel the same way about Congressmen and
Senators
who voted to authorize the use of military force in Iraq>
Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven.
Does that mean they have NO responsibility?
Well stevie, it's sort of like blaming the Jews for being scape-
goated
in nazi germany.
No it's not. How stupid of you.
Stupid of you not being able to see it.
No, stupic is comparing Congress to Jews in Nazi Germany. That's so
stupid it's almost unspeakable.
The Congress were the victims just like you and the rest of
us.. difference is you chose to hail your victimizer as a hero.
Just another lie of the left. You just refuse to acknowledge the
Democrats who said they did not listen to Bush for their WMD
intelligence.
Decisions like that don't get made in a vacuum stevie. The
propaganda at the time being spread by the likes of Cheney,
Feith, Rumsfeld, Condi, was well known to all. They were
dedicated to a war with Iraq and were actively suppressing
every other bit of information.
Similarly, you have latched onto one small sentence of one
or two congressmen and are using that as your entire defense.
Instead of seeing the larger truth, you have myopically chosen
to see nothing but this one small bit of information.
You're a fool stevie. I'll bet most of your old republican
buddies don't even like you anymore.. most of them have
chosen to see the truth.
You just refuse to acknowledge the ranking member of the
Senate Intelligence Committee who said we could not afford to wait for
further proof, because to wait for further proof could put Americans
in danger. You refuse to acknowledge that the former First Lady spoke
of the four years the inspectors were absent from Iraq -- two of those
four years were while she was in the White House. Just keep your head
in the sand and ignore the facts, weakling.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 01:47:32 AM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 5:13?am, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Mondo noted;
"Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven."
Steven responded;
"Does that mean they have NO responsibility?"
Now Steven. This is a good example of why people find
you...disagreeable.
Mondo poined out a fairly evident fact. Rather than answer that fact,
you respond with a question that deflects from the issue discussed,
and asks something else of the poster. You should, of course, respond
to his question, not pose a veiled rebuttal.
Oddly enough, it's a habit, a trait I have found amongst Godly people
fairly often. It must come from years of deflecting direct questions,
years of answering in parables.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 01:28:48 PM |
|
|
On Apr 6, 11:47 pm, "Werewolfy" <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Apr 7, 5:13?am, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Mondo noted;
"Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven."
Steven responded;
"Does that mean they have NO responsibility?"
Now Steven. This is a good example of why people find
you...disagreeable.
Mondo poined out a fairly evident fact. Rather than answer that fact,
you respond with a question that deflects from the issue discussed,
and asks something else of the poster. You should, of course, respond
to his question, not pose a veiled rebuttal.
Oddly enough, it is you who has changed the subject. I responded to
his statement with a pertinent question. It seems many posters here
are anxious to give a pass to those Democrats who voted to authorize
the use of military force in Iraq. Well, the legislative branch in our
government is co-equal (in terms of power) to the executive branch. So
to dismiss their role in the Iraq war is dishonest.
Oddly enough, it's a habit, a trait I have found amongst Godly people
fairly often. It must come from years of deflecting direct questions,
years of answering in parables.
I think that's what you just did in your reply to me, isn't it? I
notice you had no interest in addressing the actual topic, but instead
chose to make it all about me. Well, the topic was not about me until
you attempted to change it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 03:13:20 PM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 7:28?pm, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Oddly enough, it is you who has changed the subject. I responded to
his statement with a pertinent question.
This is where your logic fails. The word, 'pertinant'. Your question
was a side-step. It was not pertinant to the premis Mondo propounded.
His comment is either true, or it is false.
You ignored it, and asked a generalisation..a simplistic question
about authority instead of either agreeing or disagreeing.
I change no subject. I read the post from Mondo, read your reply and
posted accordingly. That the thread has taken a number of twists is
neither here nor there. I point out your inability to be direct. It
matters not if that is the initial topic or otherwise.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 06:40:36 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1
@yahoo.co.uk> Spat the Words
On Apr 7, 7:28?pm, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Oddly enough, it is you who has changed the subject. I responded to
his statement with a pertinent question.
This is where your logic fails. The word, 'pertinant'. Your question
was a side-step. It was not pertinant to the premis Mondo propounded.
His comment is either true, or it is false.
You ignored it, and asked a generalisation..a simplistic question
about authority instead of either agreeing or disagreeing.
I change no subject. I read the post from Mondo, read your reply and
posted accordingly. That the thread has taken a number of twists is
neither here nor there. I point out your inability to be direct. It
matters not if that is the initial topic or otherwise.
Werewolfy
I'm telling you, stevie is a fricking computer program.. he
says the exact same thing EVERY time...
"it is you who have not responded to the issue which I raised
and responded though you diverted attention which is why I made
the point and did so not before making clear.
were you aware that maliki is not the President, but the
Prime Minister ? You are so stupid that I won't even respond
to your original question."
Some computer programmer somewhere is laughing his fricking
***** off watching us argue with his AI dialog program.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
08 Apr 2007 11:04:07 PM |
|
|
Some computer programmer somewhere is laughing his fricking
***** off watching us argue with his AI dialog program.
I think then you are probably over estimating Stevens intellect!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 07:01:44 PM |
|
|
On Apr 8, 12:40?am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Some computer programmer somewhere is laughing his fricking
***** off watching us argue with his AI dialog program
It's a bit like discussing a simple issue with a brick wall Randy. He
so often answers with a question.
Everything has been written in stone in his world. I'm reminded of
the last member of the Flat Earth Society when I consider the depths
of his intransigence.
Steve's asteroid is over-due.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 07:20:17 PM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 5:01 pm, "Werewolfy" <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:40?am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Some computer programmer somewhere is laughing his fricking
***** off watching us argue with his AI dialog program
It's a bit like discussing a simple issue with a brick wall Randy.
You didn't even try to discuss the actual issue before changing the
subject to me. Even Randie acknowledged that the issue had become me.
I didn't make me the issue, but you certainly did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 08:10:13 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Apr 7, 5:01 pm, "Werewolfy" <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Apr 8, 12:40?am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Some computer programmer somewhere is laughing his fricking
***** off watching us argue with his AI dialog program
It's a bit like discussing a simple issue with a brick wall Randy.
You didn't even try to discuss the actual issue before changing the
subject to me.
Even Randie acknowledged that the issue had become me.
The issue didn't 'become' you, it always WAS you stevie.
We're all trying to figure out which is more productive..
arguing with you, or having discussion with a piece of lettuce.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 06:49:47 PM |
|
|
On Apr 7, 1:13 pm, "Werewolfy" <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Apr 7, 7:28?pm, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Oddly enough, it is you who has changed the subject. I responded to
his statement with a pertinent question.
This is where your logic fails. The word, 'pertinant'. Your question
was a side-step. It was not pertinant to the premis Mondo propounded.
It was far more pertinent than this diversion you've put us on.
His comment is either true, or it is false.
It is false. Which is why I asked my pertinent question. The
legislative branch has a responsibility that is exactly equal to the
executive branch (as well as the judicial branch).
You ignored it, and asked a generalisation..a simplistic question
about authority instead of either agreeing or disagreeing.
My question implied disagreement, don't you think?
I change no subject.
Yes you did. You decided to make me the issue.
I read the post from Mondo, read your reply and
posted accordingly. That the thread has taken a number of twists is
neither here nor there. I point out your inability to be direct. It
matters not if that is the initial topic or otherwise.
I was direct. My question *was* pertinent, and this diversion you
initiated is pointless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 06:32:45 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:47:32 -0700, Werewolfy wrote:
On Apr 7, 5:13?am, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Mondo noted;
"Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven."
Steven responded;
"Does that mean they have NO responsibility?"
Now Steven. This is a good example of why people find
you...disagreeable.
Mondo poined out a fairly evident fact. Rather than answer that fact,
you respond with a question that deflects from the issue discussed,
and asks something else of the poster. You should, of course, respond
to his question, not pose a veiled rebuttal.
Oddly enough, it's a habit, a trait I have found amongst Godly people
fairly often. It must come from years of deflecting direct questions,
years of answering in parables.
Werewolfy
People find it disagreeable because it's dishonest, in a sneaky way - as
opposed to being dishonest in a straightforward way, like completely
making stuff up.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: OK ... now I remember ... |
07 Apr 2007 10:44:48 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:47:32 -0700, Werewolfy wrote:
On Apr 7, 5:13?am, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Mondo noted;
"Senetors and Congressmen do not bear the same degree of
responsibility the President does Seven."
Steven responded;
"Does that mean they have NO responsibility?"
Now Steven. This is a good example of why people find
you...disagreeable.
Mondo poined out a fairly evident fact. Rather than answer that fact,
you respond with a question that deflects from the issue discussed,
and asks something else of the poster. You should, of course, respond
to his question, not pose a veiled rebuttal.
Oddly enough, it's a habit, a trait I have found amongst Godly people
fairly often. It must come from years of deflecting direct questions,
years of answering in parables.
Werewolfy
People find it disagreeable because it's dishonest, in a sneaky way - as
opposed to being dishonest in a straightforward way, like completely
making stuff up.
I would agree with this for the most part, but what stevie is
doing goes beyond just deflecting a question by changing the
subject. His logic is simply flawed and hence he is stating a
falsehood. He is implying the democratic congressmen were a
causal factor in the push for war, which they clearly were not.
They relied on intelligence gathered and provided by the bush
administration to make their decision. The Congress were played..
they were pawns in the Bush agenda.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
