Prime Minister of Terror: Who is Allawi?
Ghali Hassan | June 21 2004
On 30 June 2004, Mr. Iyad Allawi will switch his position from the
Iraqi Governing Council (IGC) to be come the Iraq’s new Prime Minister
in the new named Iraqi Interim Government (IIG), another creature of
the U.S. Nothing will change for the Iraqi People. The Iraqi people
are very sceptical and despised those expatriates the U.S. piggybacked
to Baghdad. For Mr. Allawi and his clique, they will be richer and
brutal. Mr. Allawi will appear on American TV screens as often as
possible, simply to legitimise the occupation of Iraq.
Mr. Allawi is a secular of prominent Moslem merchant family. He was a
former member of the Baath Party underground movement, and was in
Saddam’s regime unti1 1979. His wealthy family was close to the royal
family that ruled before Saddam Hussein took power. After falling out
of favour with Saddam, Allawi sought exile in London, where he
developed a relationship with Britain's MI-6 intelligence service
during the 1980s, and eventually he also formed a relationship with
the CIA. Allawi and Chalabi are related by marriage, have been
alternately rivals and allies. Chalabi had a bitter break-up with the
CIA in the 1990s but became close with the Pentagon. Meanwhile, Allawi
and his Iraqi National Accord (INA) organization have solid
relationships with the CIA and State Department.
In 1991, Allawi with Salih Omar Ali Al-Tikriti founded the INA as an
opposition to Saddam’s Baath Party. Both were ex-Baathist and former
supporters of Saddam’s regime. Salih Al-Tikriti viewed as unsavoury by
the U.S. The INA constituted of disillusioned former Baathists from
the military and security fields. With support from the CIA and MI-6,
the INA instigated a coup d’étate within the Iraqi Army, the attempt
ended disastrously. In London, Allawi’s job was to keep an eye on
Iraqi students studying in the UK. After moving to London in 1971 as a
medical student he received payment from the Iraqi embassy there. It
is also alleged that he did not quit the Baath party until 1975, and
that he escaped an assassination attempt on his life in 1978.
According to Patrick Cockburn of The Independent of London, “[Allawi]
is the person through whom the controversial claim was channelled that
Iraqi weapons of mass destruction could be operational in 45 minutes”.
This lie, helped prepare the British citizens to support Tony Blair
messianic war on Iraq. In January 2004 a New York spokesman for Allawi
acknowledged this was in fact “a crock of *****.” Almost sounds like
the new Prime Minister has learned his skill of lying from his masters
in London and Washington.
The Iraqi Girl Blog, Baghdad Burning, wrote on 18 June 2002: “Iyad
Allawi is completely America and Britain’s boy. He has been on the
CIA’s payroll for quite some time now and I don’t think anyone was
particularly surprised when he was made Prime Minister. The cabinet of
ministers is an interesting concoction of exiled Iraqis, Kurdish
Iraqis who were in the northern region and a few Iraqis who were
actually living inside of Iraq”.
Like Chalabi, Allawi too was appointed to the IGC. He has been
responsible for overseeing the council's security committee of the
IGC. His position in the IGC was to recruit new army, police and
intelligent members, a job he had under Saddam. Allawi was a member of
Hunein, a security apparatus headed by Saddam Hussein. He has always
opposed to the purging of members of the Baath party from senior
government posts. I wonder if Mr. Allawi is not able to resurrect some
of “Saddam’s doubles”. The mainstream media and particularly the BBC
used to be obsessed with Saddam’s doubles. Where on earth are Saddam’s
famed look-alikes?
The choice of Iyad Allawi as Iraq’s prime minister of the upcoming IIG
was “forced by the United States as a fait accompli on the UN and the
Iraqi people. He was an American candidate than one of the UN or the
Iraqis themselves. “When we first heard the news today, we thought
that the [IGC] had hijacked the process”, a senior U.N. official said.
Lakhdar Brahimi, the UN special envoy to Iraq resigned as a result of
his failure to stand up to the U.S. and show some credibility in Iraq.
Once again, the UN failed the Iraqi people and denied them their
legitimate human rights. Allawi’s choice and his close ties with the
U.S. came in a country where public opinion has grown almost
universally hostile to the Americans. Recent polls reveal that Mr.
Allawi has almost 5 percent supports, just below the president, with a
7 percent approval rating.
In Washington and London, Mr. Allawi is well connected, but in Iraq
everyone mistrusts Mr Allawi. Extensive PR campaign last year to built
support in Washington rather than in Baghdad seemed to pay off.
Danielle Pletka, a Middle East analyst at the American Enterprise
Institute, a Washington think tank, said: “It was a bid for influence,
and it was money well spent”. "Allawi has always assumed, in many ways
correctly, that he didn't need a constituency in Iraq as long as he
had one in Washington”, Pletka added.
According to report by Jim Drinkard of USA Today: “Lobbying records
show that the law firm of Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds and the
New York public relations firm of Brown Lloyd James engaged in a
flurry of contacts on Allawi's behalf beginning in late October. Most
were aimed at setting up meetings with influential members of Congress
and their staffs, administration officials, think tanks and
journalists”. The money paid by a wealthy Iraqi expatriate in London.
Dr. Haifa al-Azawi, a California-based gynaecologist and a U.S.
citizen who went to school with Allawi in Baghdad in the 1960s,
remembered Mr. Allawi as: “big, husky man. The Baath party union
leader, who carried a gun on his belt and frequently brandished it
terrorizing the medical students, was a poor student and chose to
spend his time standing in the school courtyard or chasing female
students to their homes. His medical degree is bogus and was conferred
upon him by the Baath party, soon after a World Health Organization
(WHO) grant was orchestrated for him to go to England and study public
health accompanied by his Christian wife, whom he dumped later to
marry a Muslim woman. In England he was a poor student, visiting the
Iraqi embassy at the end of each month to collect his salary as the
Baath party representative. According to his first wife and her family
members, he spent his time dealing with assassins doing the dirty work
for the Iraqi government, until his time was up and he became their
target”. It is not uncommon in Iraq during the Baath Party rule to
give special favours for those who choose to serve its agenda.
A report in The New York Times described the INA (funded by the CIA of
course), as “a terrorist organization. In the early 1990's the INA
sent agents into Baghdad to plant bombs and sabotage government
facilities under the direction of the C.I.A., several former
intelligence officials say, they also bombed movie theatres and school
buses full of children”. Furthermore, the Times reported “[i] n 1996,
Amneh al-Khadami, who described himself as the chief bomb maker for
the Iraqi National Accord and as being based in Sulaimaniya, in
northern Iraq, recorded a videotape in which he talked of the bombing
campaign and complained that he was being short-changed money and
supplies. Two former intelligence officers confirmed the existence of
the videotape.”[W]e blew up a car, and we were supposed to get $2,000
but got only $1,000’ Mr. Khadami alleged told The Independent in
1997”. Who the Americans are fighting in their “war on terror”?
The Iraqi born novelist and artist, Haifa Zangana wrote in The
Guardian of London: “The CPA also ignores the violent activities of
the four militias in Iraq, which have taken the law into their own
hands: the peshmergas of the two Kurdish parties; the Badr brigade of
the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq; Ahmed Chalabi's
troops; and the ex-Ba'athist Mukhabarats under Iyad A[l]lawi's
national accord. These militias are run by members of the IGC and no
one can touch them. No high-ranking official of Saddam's regime has
yet been prosecuted either, despite the wish of most Iraqis that they
be bought to justice”.
In September 2003, Akila Al-Hashimi, a female member of the council,
was shot and died later of her wounds. A rotating president of the
U.S.-appointed council was assassinated on May 17 in a car-bomb attack
on his convoy west of Baghdad. At least 1000 professionals and
intellectuals have been murdered. “Many academics fear a deliberate
brain drain is now being executed through murder. The mukhabarat
(secret intelligence) of all the surrounding countries are active
here: Mossad, the Iranians, Turks, Kuwaitis, Jordanians, Syrians,”
said an unnamed academic. “They are settling scores with each other,
with the Americans and the Americans with them”. “Why are they still
detaining university professors if they are re-analysing their own
intelligence on whether Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction?”
Gulshan Husayn, wife of Dr Ali al-Zaak, detained dean of Genetic
Engineering at Baghdad University told Al-Jazeera.
The U.S. is not interested in genuine democracy, the democracy of one
citizen, one vote. In fact, the U.S. refused to allow local elections
in Iraq last summer. The U.S. administration is interested in a
U.S-controlled democracy. The kind of democracy enforced on the people
of Latin America. In Allawi’s Iraq, if he survived, elections will be
an open contest but that candidates have to be vetted in an opaque
process achieved by the return of many thugs of the old regime.
After more than thirty years in exile (London and Washington) and a
“bogus” medical degree, the Iraqi people expected “their” Prime
Minister to speak their language, not broken English. Unfortunately,
Dr. Allawi has failed the Iraqi people. How can Dr. Allawi and those
around him watch their compatriots (the Iraqi people) abused,
tortured, raped and murdered by the same occupying forces they are
collaborating with. He should learn to speak the language of the vast
majority of the Iraqi people. He should learn to say: End the
occupation; free the Iraqi people from America’s violent militarism.
"Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because fiction is obliged to stick with possibilities:truth isin't"
Mark Twain
.
|
