Notice the media has been very quiet
with promoting of Senate and House seats?
Instead focusing on Governor races and propositions.
I hate to say it but I have a sinking feeling that the
Republicans may steal those Senate and House seats.
Mass conciousness and voter participation may prevent it.
Get out there and vote!
.
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: (Prediction) The Elections? |
04 Nov 2006 02:48:15 AM |
|
|
Spoken like a TRUE Republican that still thinks that the Bush (G.W.B..)
/ Chaney initiative to Invade Iraq was a required necessity to
'control' the threat towards North America.
News Flash (For You) - there was NO "WMDs" found in Iraq, and there
still seems to be no "Outlined" policy as to how to return the Country
(of Iraq) back to "its people" without the Bush Government lossing FACE
!!!.
Looks like Korea War (all over again !!!).
Just A Thought.
8< |
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: (Prediction) The Elections? |
04 Nov 2006 04:25:06 AM |
|
|
kmiller wrote:
News Flash (For You) - there was NO "WMDs" found in
Iraq, and there still seems to be no "Outlined" policy as
to how to return the Country (of Iraq) back to "its people"
without the Bush Government lossing FACE
!!!.
I disrespectfully disagree.
If we had rapidly pulled out of Iraq the result would have been
civil war.
The Kurds had enjoyed autonomy (under the umbrella of
the U.S. no-fly zone) for more than a decade. This was a
welcome change from the persecuted minority status they
endured since the days of British rule... and going back
even further if you include Iranian & Turkish Kurdistan.
Anyhow, the Kurds were never going to allow themselves
to return to Iraqi rule. Never. A quick war, a withdrawal of
U.S. troops, an end to sanctions and a sovereign Iraq
would have left a strong central government to deal with the
"Kurdish problem."
Civil war.
Bush needed to invent a crisis in Iraq, he needed to set all
the parties at each others throats just to make sure that
nobody would ever fight to keep the country together.
That was the goal all along. From the begining, going back
to 2003, Bush's plan was to divide Iraq into three "sectors,"
those sectors to correspond with the future nation states.
Kurdistan.
Iran-lite.
Saudi Disneyland.
The U.S. diplomat "advising" the Kurds through the whole
Iraqi constitution process? He had himself authored one
such three-state solution for Iraq. That was his plan: break
up the country. That's what he thinks they should all do.
"He's doing it on his own!"
No he isn't. It would be illegal. A private citizen? In Iraq?
During a war? Working against official U.S. government
policy?
Believe it or not, there are laws against such things on the
books.
The author of a three-state solution for Iraq could go to
Iraq and advise one of the major parties because -- now
get this -- he was never laboring counter to U.S. objectives
in Iraq.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: (Prediction) The Elections? |
04 Nov 2006 08:37:41 AM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
I disrespectfully disagree.
Troll at work.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: (Prediction) The Elections? |
04 Nov 2006 06:36:18 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
Troll at work.
Yes. Definitely.
No go away, puppy. We wouldn't want to force you
to think.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: (Prediction) The Elections? |
05 Nov 2006 07:01:00 AM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
No go away, puppy. We wouldn't want to force you
to think.
I think your 'prediction' may fall to the ground. Where did you get
that one? Oh yes, of course, old Nostradamus told you whilst you were
chatting over a cup of tea.
Shall we all send our 'donations' to you now?
Christ, it's scarcely credible, but you've been posting like this since
1993...give or take a few pseudonyms. Ten or twenty a day to dozens of
groups ranging from alt. abortion, through alt. homosexuality, pausing
in the dirty story alt. sex.moss (or something like that) and wandering
through alt.fucking time travel.
You're barmy.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
