Here are 3 links about some of the methodology that might have been used.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/s258277.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/s227039.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/s148930.htm
.
|
|
| User: "H T" |
|
| Title: Re: Pyramids a look at. |
25 Jan 2004 11:40:30 AM |
|
|
Nothing in those links have anythng to do with the cruci-fiction, the
encoding of the length of a pyramid passage with hidden meaning or any
of the doomsday predictions made by Peter Britton AKA Peter
Lemming-sewer.
The Pyramid Inch is a farce Leigh-bee fess it up! You have to have at
least one logic circuit still functioning. Peter the Lames Pyramid INCH
is a total joke and all those who defend it are becoming a joke as well.
The best argument is that three castor beans equals an inch......WRONG.
3 castor beans may equal 95% of an inch leaving a dfference that may not
seem crucial when measuring something a foot long but becomes a
staggering inequality when measuring the length of the passage to the
Kings chamber. So 2000 inches does NOT equal 6000 castor beans! The
crucifiction if encoded with 6000 castor beans falls yards short of the
position that 2000 inches marks.
Can't you logically see the error that Peter is perpetrating by rounding
off the numbers so that 3 beans equals an inch?????!!!!
Once again the Egyptians did not worship Christ nor would they be at all
interested in his cruci-fiction.
There really is nothing more to say about the Pyramid Inch oher than it
is a joke told by a skeptic who peddles fantasy for profit.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
