L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra un grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Avant après Mars regner par bon heur.
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf ...It is the year of passage of Nostradamus,
the day of the moon eclipse in France to announce "great Roy of effrayor"
for the ground: old of the universe "present in approximately one the third
of stellar space". It is called "Fatima", it is an iron being (hell :
en-fer )and its age is approximately that of iron. For one 2
part-kitchen-toilets, that represents 250 million years per part for the
human ones, it is to him one 4-5 stages.Its passage of the sky goes back to
1990 and for this reason it has to be appeared as a "individual" to be in
conformity with the human anatomy "at the request of God".Since, a god
plated on ground, but it left only to one base its being: it is attached to
the ground by this base, the remainder its being set out again in the
universe in the year 2000. This scratch corresponds for him to a death and a
rebirth, more alarming for him than one can imagine. This month, october
2004, Nostradamus passed on ground in new "the mandala".
En français:
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf ...C'est l'année de passage de Nostradamus,
le jour de l'éclipse de lune en France pour annoncer le "grand Roy
d'effrayeur" pour la terre : un ancien de l'univers "présent dans environ le
tiers de l'espace stellaire" . On l'appelle "Fatima" , c'est un être en fer
( enfer ) et son âge est environ celui du fer. Pour un 2
pièces-cuisine-toilettes , cela représente 250 millions d'années par pièce
pour les humains, lui c'est un 4-5 étages. Son passage du ciel date de 1990
et pour cela il a dù se présenter sous la forme d'un "individu" pour être
conforme avec l'anatomie humaine "à la demande de Dieu ". Depuis , un dieu
l'a plaqué sur terre , mais il n'a laissé qu'un socle de son être : il est
attaché à la terre par ce socle, le reste de son être est reparti dans
l'univers en l'an 2000. Ce scratch correspond pour lui à une mort et une
renaissance, plus effrayante pour lui que l'on peut imaginer. Ce mois -ci ,
Nostradamus est passé sur terre dans le nouveau " mandala".
fradas@wanadoo.fr
.
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: Quatrain X72 |
22 Oct 2004 05:27:41 PM |
|
|
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "fradas" <fradas@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:30:34 +0200 spoke:
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra un grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Avant après Mars regner par bon heur.
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf ...It is the year of passage of Nostradamus,
the day of the moon eclipse in France to announce "great Roy of effrayor"
The quatrain DOES NOT mention an eclipse.
Since Nostadamus DOES mention them in other quatrains, it MUST mean that an
eclipse was NOT part of this quatrain. PLUS, I see no evidence there even
WAS any lunar eclipse in July 1999.
And I'm AMAZED, you appear to speak French, yet you don't even know what
'Roy' and 'Deffrayeur' mean.
--
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
| User: "fradas" |
|
| Title: Re: Quatrain X72 |
23 Oct 2004 07:49:57 AM |
|
|
"Never anonymous Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> a écrit dans le message de
news: i02jn01qp3vadp3dk8c8u436oirao0l15i@4ax.com...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "fradas" <fradas@wanadoo.fr> on
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:30:34 +0200 spoke:
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra un grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Avant après Mars regner par bon heur.
The quatrain DOES NOT mention an eclipse.
Since Nostadamus DOES mention them in other quatrains, it MUST mean that
an
eclipse was NOT part of this quatrain. PLUS, I see no evidence there even
WAS any lunar eclipse in July 1999.
And I'm AMAZED, you appear to speak French, yet you don't even know what
'Roy' and 'Deffrayeur' mean.
Reponse : The eclipse is not named in the quatrain which must say the main
thing: it is the year which is the intrigue: it is the passage of
Nostradamus to announce that "Roy d' Effrayeur "is to be to it skies which
was present at the time of the Second World war, it is that the
advertisement is made the day of the moon eclipse perceived in France in
1999.I attended the event!
En français :
L'éclipse n'est pas nommée dans le quatrain qui doit dire le principal :
c'est l'année qui est l'intrigue : c'est le passage de Nostradamus pour
annoncer que le Roy d'Effrayeur est l'être des cieux qui était présent lors
de la Seconde Guerre mondiale , il se trouve que l'annonce est faite le jour
de l'éclipse de lune perçu en France en 1999.J'ai assisté à l'événement!
--
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Quatrain X72 |
22 Oct 2004 11:26:33 PM |
|
|
Never anonymous Bud a écrit:
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "fradas" <fradas@wanadoo.fr> on Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:30:34 +0200 spoke:
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra un grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Avant après Mars regner par bon heur.
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf ...It is the year of passage of Nostradamus,
the day of the moon eclipse in France to announce "great Roy of effrayor"
The quatrain DOES NOT mention an eclipse.
Since Nostadamus DOES mention them in other quatrains, it MUST mean that an
eclipse was NOT part of this quatrain. PLUS, I see no evidence there even
WAS any lunar eclipse in July 1999.
And I'm AMAZED, you appear to speak French, yet you don't even know what
'Roy' and 'Deffrayeur' mean.
Remember that deffrayeur is likely d'effrayeur
http://www.michelnostradamus.org/debateX72.html
Otherwise it would be written desfrayeur or defrayeur. More likely
desfraieur in fact as all dictionary relates even if one edition of the
latinogallicum has a typo which IS, BTW, corrected in all other editions.
And besides, do you know of any defraying king? Or are you insisting on
this just for the will of trying to try to pretend Nostradamus made
failed quatrains (which he didn't)?
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kim M" |
|
| Title: Re: Quatrain X72 |
24 Oct 2004 12:21:39 AM |
|
|
d'effrayeur (and we think modern day writers have a 'spelling' mishap). Seperate
the words and you will see.
Roy - (Ruler - not necessarily a 'King' of 'Elected Official')
d' - de, du ,des (of the)
effrayeur - effrayeur ,effrayer (fright OR fear)
The reference is un-mistakable.
--
Just A Thought !!!
Wait, I'm receiving another transmission from the great beyond.
Wouldn't you know it,
it was a 'Wrong Number' :-(
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:Y3led.1669713$yk.276156@news.easynews.com...
Never anonymous Bud a écrit:
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "fradas" <fradas@wanadoo.fr> on
Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:30:34 +0200 spoke:
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois,
Du ciel viendra un grand Roy d'effrayeur:
Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois,
Avant après Mars regner par bon heur.
L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf ...It is the year of passage of Nostradamus,
the day of the moon eclipse in France to announce "great Roy of effrayor"
The quatrain DOES NOT mention an eclipse.
Since Nostadamus DOES mention them in other quatrains, it MUST mean that an
eclipse was NOT part of this quatrain. PLUS, I see no evidence there even
WAS any lunar eclipse in July 1999.
And I'm AMAZED, you appear to speak French, yet you don't even know what
'Roy' and 'Deffrayeur' mean.
Remember that deffrayeur is likely d'effrayeur
http://www.michelnostradamus.org/debateX72.html
Otherwise it would be written desfrayeur or defrayeur. More likely
desfraieur in fact as all dictionary relates even if one edition of the
latinogallicum has a typo which IS, BTW, corrected in all other editions.
And besides, do you know of any defraying king? Or are you insisting on
this just for the will of trying to try to pretend Nostradamus made
failed quatrains (which he didn't)?
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
