How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not just
a figment of people's imagination?
.
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 11:45:05 AM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:AaROh.87321$zU1.48991@pd7urf1no...
How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not
just a figment of people's imagination?
Five depends on your perception of reality. You can use common definitions.
You can call five "zork" if you choose. You can skip "zork' and go straight
to "zifbn".
How may right hand finger bones did they find in Jesus' bone box?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 04:31:27 PM |
|
|
On Mar 30, 2:45 am, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in messagenews:AaROh.87321$zU1.48991@pd7urf1no...
How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not
just a figment of people's imagination?
Five depends on your perception of reality. You can use common definitions.
You can call five "zork" if you choose. You can skip "zork' and go straight
to "zifbn".
How may right hand finger bones did they find in Jesus' bone box?
Well they are still looking, but the yarn has him dodging mortal
death, and skipping off to heaven.
How about numbers 1 to 4 are they already proven?
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 05:18:18 PM |
|
|
<leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:1175203887.785095.3800@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 30, 2:45 am, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in
messagenews:AaROh.87321$zU1.48991@pd7urf1no...
How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not
just a figment of people's imagination?
Five depends on your perception of reality. You can use common
definitions.
You can call five "zork" if you choose. You can skip "zork' and go
straight
to "zifbn".
How may right hand finger bones did they find in Jesus' bone box?
Well they are still looking, but the yarn has him dodging mortal
death, and skipping off to heaven.
How about numbers 1 to 4 are they already proven?
LB
I haven't seen any proof yet, LB, but I'm waiting and waiting and
ooooooooooooooooops
still waiting.............................
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 10:58:43 AM |
|
|
* mukyuk:
How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not just
a figment of people's imagination?
Because then 3+2 would equal 4 or 6 and it would throw the entire
universe into a tizzy!!! ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "franckspike" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 11:03:35 AM |
|
|
It doesn't exist!
it is just marks we put on things so that you aren't getting lost
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 11:01:53 AM |
|
|
* mukyuk:
How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not just
a figment of people's imagination?
It certainly is an "odd" thing
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 04:39:36 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:45:36 +0000, mukyuk wrote:
How does one prove the number 5 actually exists in reality, and is not just
a figment of people's imagination?
5 is a concept, not a "thing" that physically exists.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Question about proof... |
29 Mar 2007 06:44:34 PM |
|
|
On Mar 29, 10:39?pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
5 is a concept, not a "thing" that physically exists.
--------------------------------------------------
Bit like God then Woodsy...;)
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
