(Leigh_Bee) wrote in message news:<39cd5fe.0310131501.370b1fcb@posting.google.com>...
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message news:<dd3256f0.0310111231.2837fcda@posting.google.com>...
Saturday Oct. 11, 2003; 2:37 p.m. EDT
Saddam's Forgotten WMD Confession
The elite media continues to insist that Iraq had no weapons of mass
destruction when the U.S. attacked in March, citing the scant evidence
of any actual weapons finds by U.S. arms inspector David Kay.
But if it's true that Saddam Hussein was actually innocent on the WMD
charge, then why did he confess in 1998 that his country had amassed
huge stockpiles of highly toxic weaponized poisons - along with the
delivery systems to take them beyond Iraq's borders.
SNIP>
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/10/11/145715.shtml
Then why did he confess in 1998 that his country had amassed etc.
Answer because he lives in a region that admires strong leaders,
deterrent being a major factor, what better way to deter his
<snip>
Did he really "CONFESS" in the first place? BULL
Or was the media/author overly creative enough? HA
Or did Bush spinners plainly see that majority of readers would
readily agree and took the bait hook-line-and-sinker? GULLIBLE
//a pirate caught redhanded will never say where's the rest of the
loot.
.
