AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040524065804.27047.00001628@mb-m19.aol.com...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
The fakes could've been posted at >>any time of the day
But they weren't, they were posted right >in the middle of your daily pre-dawn
spew.
Wrong.
Exactly, and had they been posted 12 >>hours after my posts here, you would
have used that time difference as your >>"proof".
Silly. Who else in APN uses AOL and >posts before 6am?
Uh, as far as I know that post wasn't in APN.
mention of oral sex
Uh, all you need to to do is check Dani's posts for that, go ahead, you
like
doing that.
I counted 40+TonyZ posts mentioning >oral sex and Dani.
And how many does Dani have? Or have you seen to it that she deleted all of
those?
In her first few months here, Dani spoke about sex more than anyone in this
group combined for the previous 5 years.
Why don't you look that up, eh?
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Alright, who did this? |
25 May 2004 04:32:04 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message news:20040525104101.22589.00001209@mb-m29.aol.com...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040524065804.27047.00001628@mb-m19.aol.com...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
The fakes could've been posted at any time of the day
But they weren't, they were posted right in the middle of your daily pre-dawn
spew.
Wrong.
I've posted the times "for all to see". Show where my data is "Wrong".
Here, have another go...
=>
If you look at the posting times of the fake posts against the times
of that day's Tony/apn posts, you can see that the fakes sit slap-bang
in the middle of an 80 minute gap in his posting stream. Also notice
the seconds... I'm guessing that the AOL user's client software pushes
posts out once a minute, add a little network traffic variability and
an individuals posts will *tend* to show up in a narrow band within
the minute. Further, few Americans get up as early as Tony to post,
the first fake was posted at 06:56am EST. Circumstantial, but these
bizarre coincidences do seem to follow him around.
2004-05-13 02:28:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:30:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:32:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:38:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:39:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:46:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:48:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:51:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:54:55 PST
2004-05-13 02:59:55 PST
2004-05-13 03:09:55 PST
2004-05-13 03:16:55 PST
2004-05-13 03:19:55 PST
2004-05-13 03:25:56 PST
Fakes:
2004-05-13 03:56:00 PST
2004-05-13 04:00:01 PST
2004-05-13 04:45:55 PST
2004-05-13 04:46:55 PST
2004-05-13 04:50:55 PST
2004-05-13 04:57:55 PST
2004-05-13 05:02:56 PST
2004-05-13 05:04:55 PST
2004-05-13 05:12:57 PST
2004-05-13 05:14:55 PST
2004-05-13 06:28:58 PST
<=
I'll make it easier for you to make a fool of yourself.
Your posts for May 13.
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=UTF-8&as_uauthors=tonyz2001@aol.com&as_drrb=b&as_mind=13&as_minm=5&as_miny=2004&as_maxd=13&as_maxm=5&as_maxy=2004&as_scoring=d&lr=&hl=en
Your, I mean *the* fake posts on the same date.
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=UTF-8&as_uauthors=dani7200@mindless.com&lr=&hl=en
Exactly, and had they been posted 12 >>hours after my posts here, you would
have used that time difference as your >>"proof".
Silly. Who else in APN uses AOL and posts before 6am?
Uh, as far as I know that post wasn't in APN.
Where did the info in the fake posts come from? Your sick mind and
APN.
-A
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Try answering this Amy, you seem to have missed it |
26 May 2004 09:17:27 AM |
|
|
tonyz2001@aol.com
wrote:
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
I counted 40+TonyZ posts mentioning >oral sex and Dani.
And how many does Dani have? Or have you seen to it that she deleted all of
those?
In her first few months here, Dani spoke about sex more than anyone in this
group combined for the previous 5 years.
Why don't you look that up, eh?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
