On 11 May 2006, wrote:
16,895 posts for this
screwball
Fire'n one up for the obsessed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Indeed, according to Google, since Monday August 25, 1997,
albeit the exact count of hits on the Google archives can
vary by up to several thousand, day to day, due to factors
which experts say even Google programmers don't understand:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=author%3Aanon3c67@nyx.nyx.net&safe=off&qt_s=Search&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=25&as_maxm=
Also, the name (exact phrase in body text) "Bruce Watson"
shows up some 51,000 times in the Google usenet archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=%22Bruce+Watson%22&safe=off&qt_s=Search&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=5&as_maxy=2006"
By comparison, my unique full name shows up only about
24,000 times or so, dated since Tuesday March 14, 2000:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=Daniel+Joseph+Min&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=5&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
At least Bruce Watson has been extraordinarily consistent
from day one, with posts about "smoking" from the get-go,
whether anyone personally or collectively "approve" of
his contributions or not. Personally, I could care less,
since I started smoking at age 12, and I quit at age 18.
I don't really mind second-hand smoke, as long as I can
move quickly away from it at my discretion. I gamble up
at the casinos here in Colorado--frequently. I see the
smokers lose money hand-over-fist more than non-smokers
do, if only by a slim but observable statistical margin.
Pattern recognition is my forte. Smokers risk more, and
thus tend to lose slightly more, than us non-smokers do.
As aggressive newsgroup posters go, this "anon3c67@nyx"
seems to be relatively harmless if admirably consistent.
This poster may also have posted under other aliases or
have used the "X-No-Archive" directive at times. But he
hasn't called for the assassination of the President as
far as I could find, so that much makes him vastly more
responsible than most left-wing Liberals out there, for
damn sure! (E.g., such as whom the NSA are wiretapping.) :-D
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRGPujZljD7YrHM/nEQK+PQCbBT/otV86JcZyT2j+qGSh+260kFAAnA5f
2MD1W/3KvbkgcR8Bs0FIoj8g
=9smb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "Hagar" |
|
| Title: Re: Area 51 |
14 May 2006 11:55:13 AM |
|
|
Hey Min ... I must be missing something here, what the ***** does smoking, or
not smoking, for that matter, have to do with the topic of this post, namely
Area 51 ...
"Daniel Joseph Min" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:N4JAJQB838848.9612731481@twistycreek.com...
On 11 May 2006, wrote:
16,895 posts for this
screwball
Fire'n one up for the obsessed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Indeed, according to Google, since Monday August 25, 1997,
albeit the exact count of hits on the Google archives can
vary by up to several thousand, day to day, due to factors
which experts say even Google programmers don't understand:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=author%3Aanon3c67@nyx.nyx.net&safe=off&qt_s=Search&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=25&as_maxm=
Also, the name (exact phrase in body text) "Bruce Watson"
shows up some 51,000 times in the Google usenet archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=%22Bruce+Watson%22&safe=off&qt_s=Search&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=5&as_maxy=2006"
By comparison, my unique full name shows up only about
24,000 times or so, dated since Tuesday March 14, 2000:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=Daniel+Joseph+Min&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=5&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
At least Bruce Watson has been extraordinarily consistent
from day one, with posts about "smoking" from the get-go,
whether anyone personally or collectively "approve" of
his contributions or not. Personally, I could care less,
since I started smoking at age 12, and I quit at age 18.
I don't really mind second-hand smoke, as long as I can
move quickly away from it at my discretion. I gamble up
at the casinos here in Colorado--frequently. I see the
smokers lose money hand-over-fist more than non-smokers
do, if only by a slim but observable statistical margin.
Pattern recognition is my forte. Smokers risk more, and
thus tend to lose slightly more, than us non-smokers do.
As aggressive newsgroup posters go, this "anon3c67@nyx"
seems to be relatively harmless if admirably consistent.
This poster may also have posted under other aliases or
have used the "X-No-Archive" directive at times. But he
hasn't called for the assassination of the President as
far as I could find, so that much makes him vastly more
responsible than most left-wing Liberals out there, for
damn sure! (E.g., such as whom the NSA are wiretapping.) :-D
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRGPujZljD7YrHM/nEQK+PQCbBT/otV86JcZyT2j+qGSh+260kFAAnA5f
2MD1W/3KvbkgcR8Bs0FIoj8g
=9smb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel Joseph Min" |
|
| Title: Re: Area 51 |
11 May 2006 10:43:23 PM |
|
|
In article <N4JAJQB838848.9612731481@twistycreek.com>
Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
Nothing worthwhile as usual.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Flash Bazbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Area 51 |
12 May 2006 12:24:28 AM |
|
|
On 12 May 2006 03:04:14 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
Pattern recognition is my forte.
Really? You've never shown any talent in that area before.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CFA" |
|
| Title: Re: Area 51 |
12 May 2006 02:16:27 AM |
|
|
Flash Bazbo writes...
On 12 May 2006 03:04:14 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
Pattern recognition is my forte.
Really? You've never shown any talent in that area before.
Well, it's some kind of achievement to consistenly be wrong. Chance
would suggest you'd get something right once in a while.
Ken
--
cfa at alt dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Area 51 |
12 May 2006 03:43:58 AM |
|
|
Flash Bazbo wrote:
On 12 May 2006 03:04:14 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
Pattern recognition is my forte.
Really? You've never shown any talent in that area before.
I expect that the misfiring synapses in minibrain's head cause him to
recognise all kinds of patterns.
--
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Area 51 |
12 May 2006 05:37:21 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 12 May 2006 05:24:28 GMT, in alt.astrology, Flash Bazbo
<djflsdkjf@dlsfdslkf.cmk> wrote:
On 12 May 2006 03:04:14 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
Pattern recognition is my forte.
Really? You've never shown any talent in that area before.
Actually he has shown he doesn't know anything about pattern
recognition, otherwise he wouldn't go on and on about astrology,
which is nothing more than Apophenia, a false pattern recognition,
and artifact of how the mind functions, making pattern where no
pattern exists. Recent cambridge has been doing lots of studies on
pattern recognition.
If you are interested, I could post a sample of their study here...
:)
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
