On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:53:31 GMT, (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <7mlld0hse2t6tqdi0835di9909r4ckood8@4ax.com>,
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:18:37 -0400, Marvin The Paranoid Android
<marv@HeartOfGold.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:52:16 -0500, dreamwalker overjoyed me with this
news:
From the most respected name in polling. Bush is well on his way to a
landslide victory.
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=836
Good one.
It's an online poll. You have to register. It's hardly a random sampling.
Here's one for you from The Washington Post-ABC News poll ...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58293-2004Jun21.html
Also ...
Kerry's starting to find his voice. He gave a speech recently in Cali on
healthcare ... he's becoming much more forceful in delivery.
"Fahrenheit 9/11" opens Friday. Early reviews are positive. It's gonna be
big. And it's going to get a lot of coverage.
Prison abuse is back in the news with prosecutors about to question
commanding generals. It's moving up the chain. The White House released
documents stating reasons for skirting the Geneva Convention. This is going
to continue to drag on and stay in the news.
More American kids dying in Iraq. Bush still smiles for the camera.
Bush's poll numbers are moving in one direction only ... and it's not up.
And there's too many valid reasons why.
As far as I am concerned Kerry is a lame duck. There isi't a chance in
hell for him to win. Get ready for the draft America, four more years
of killing to go....if you survive this year.
A "lame duck" is someone who is currently in office but is only there until
his/her term is up due to being voted out or having already used up the maximum
number of terms s/he can serve. It is *not* a candidate.
Woods
You are entitled to your interpretation, the end result is the same.
"Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because fiction is obliged to stick with possibilities:truth isin't"
Mark Twain
.
