abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
I see their hatred flourishing about the >success of late in the war. evident
in their replies.
Very perceptive of you, they are livid about the successes in Iraq, and about
the handover of power to the Iraqis. They know that with each success President
Bush moves one step closer to reelection and that is eating them up inside.
Do you think Allah's Army would like to >recruit them? They seem ripe for the
picking now the lefty media has control
over their minds.
Oh they'd fit right in, they're already in the ranks listed as "usful idiots".
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
04 Jul 2004 10:28:44 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040704092006.05881.00001299@mb-m05.aol.com...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
You might believe your lies tony and the golden shower ranger will
because he's as fucked up as you are, dreamwalker plays along because
he lives in a fantasy and like all of you has no concept of life outside
the little towns you infest.
I see their hatred flourishing about the >success of late in the war.
evident
in their replies.
Very perceptive of you, they are livid about the successes in Iraq, and
about
the handover of power to the Iraqis. They know that with each success
President
Bush moves one step closer to reelection and that is eating them up
inside.
How often have you been challenged by myself and others to provide one link
that offers evidence in your favour and failed? you daren't debate your own
stinking hypocrisy because you know what a cess pit your life is so all your
left with is your lies. How disgusting that someone like you pretends to
be a good christian and pro-American when you're neither.
Do you think Allah's Army would like to >recruit them? They seem ripe for
the
picking now the lefty media has control
over their minds.
Oh they'd fit right in, they're already in the ranks listed as "usful
idiots".
Like you'd know, like you'd know anything at all ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
05 Jul 2004 04:14:00 AM |
|
|
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
I see their hatred flourishing about the >success of late in the war. evident
in their replies.
Very perceptive of you, they are livid about the successes in Iraq, and about
the handover of power to the Iraqis. They know that with each success President
Bush moves one step closer to reelection and that is eating them up inside.
How quickly you forget. *we* were arguing for a handover of power,
whilst *you* were opposed. What a moron. You change your mind like
the wind. I still cannot comment on any successes in Iraq at this
stage.
Do you think Allah's Army would like to >recruit them? They seem ripe for the
picking now the lefty media has control
over their minds.
Oh they'd fit right in, they're already in the ranks listed as "usful idiots".
while you two are listed in your ranks under "useless idiots".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
05 Jul 2004 09:56:16 AM |
|
|
Cuan wrote:
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
I see their hatred flourishing about the >success of late in the war.
evident
in their replies.
Very perceptive of you, they are livid about the successes in Iraq, and
about the handover of power to the Iraqis. They know that with each
success President Bush moves one step closer to reelection and that is
eating them up inside.
How quickly you forget. *we* were arguing for a handover of power,
whilst *you* were opposed. What a moron. You change your mind like
the wind. I still cannot comment on any successes in Iraq at this
stage.
Do you think Allah's Army would like to >recruit them? They seem ripe for
the picking now the lefty media has control
over their minds.
Oh they'd fit right in, they're already in the ranks listed as "usful
idiots".
while you two are listed in your ranks under "useless idiots".
Tony's 'flip-flopping' and rabid support of the Iraq Invasion is apparently
on orders from his Al Qaeda controllers.
Al Qaeda has managed to regroup, recruit and prepare for the next large
scale attack on the U.S. because of the Iraq Invasion.
From now on, Tony needs to be exposed in every post he makes.
Please refer to him as 'Tony Al Wassabi' in replies to him. We need to get
the word out. ;-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
05 Jul 2004 09:15:18 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 07:56:16 -0700, Marvin The Paranoid Android
<marv@galaxy.com> wrote:
Cuan wrote:
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
I see their hatred flourishing about the >success of late in the war.
evident
in their replies.
Very perceptive of you, they are livid about the successes in Iraq, and
about the handover of power to the Iraqis. They know that with each
success President Bush moves one step closer to reelection and that is
eating them up inside.
How quickly you forget. *we* were arguing for a handover of power,
whilst *you* were opposed. What a moron. You change your mind like
the wind. I still cannot comment on any successes in Iraq at this
stage.
Do you think Allah's Army would like to >recruit them? They seem ripe for
the picking now the lefty media has control
over their minds.
Oh they'd fit right in, they're already in the ranks listed as "usful
idiots".
while you two are listed in your ranks under "useless idiots".
Tony's 'flip-flopping' and rabid support of the Iraq Invasion is apparently
on orders from his Al Qaeda controllers.
A veil of deceit. Too true.
Al Qaeda has managed to regroup, recruit and prepare for the next large
scale attack on the U.S. because of the Iraq Invasion.
Yes. A clever plot. Attack the WTC, then, when the US sends all its
forces to attack Iraq, kapow! Only thing I don't get is: how did they
know the US would attack Iraq? tsk. tsk. so many questions, very
little answers. I think Mullah Tony Al Wassabi might know the answer.
From now on, Tony needs to be exposed in every post he makes.
Please refer to him as 'Tony Al Wassabi' in replies to him. We need to get
the word out. ;-)
it shall be done.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
05 Jul 2004 05:14:38 PM |
|
|
In article <th6ie0lk54f2dv1iao7svsbstl5cv0f1q9@4ax.com>, Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
"Profound"? Does that have another meaning where you are?
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
06 Jul 2004 02:27:22 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:14:38 GMT, (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <th6ie0lk54f2dv1iao7svsbstl5cv0f1q9@4ax.com>, Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
"Profound"? Does that have another meaning where you are?
should it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
06 Jul 2004 09:45:34 AM |
|
|
In article <52lke0l9ao444f61mbb76f6nb28kf9i863@4ax.com>, Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:14:38 GMT, (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <th6ie0lk54f2dv1iao7svsbstl5cv0f1q9@4ax.com>, Cuan
<an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
"Profound"? Does that have another meaning where you are?
should it?
Usually means "with great depth", such as one would expect from a great Teacher.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Does anyone object to this statement? |
07 Jul 2004 03:52:44 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 14:45:34 GMT, (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <52lke0l9ao444f61mbb76f6nb28kf9i863@4ax.com>, Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:14:38 GMT, (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <th6ie0lk54f2dv1iao7svsbstl5cv0f1q9@4ax.com>, Cuan
<an@nymous.co.za> wrote:
On 04 Jul 2004 13:20:06 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael >Johnathan McDonald)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040702111659.10918.00000725@mb-m25.aol.com>...
You peg these anti-westerns out pretty >good Tony. Nice list.
I always have, which is why they unite to attack me on a contstant basis.
united? hardly. I don't see the 'liberal camp' passing compliments
between each other like you and Ronald. If it *appears* that we are
united against you, perhaps it is because you write such profound crap
that it urges us to remark on it.
"Profound"? Does that have another meaning where you are?
should it?
Usually means "with great depth", such as one would expect from a great Teacher.
that is what *someone* might expect. Your interpretation of
"profound" still makes for a suitable adjective, though. There are
other interpretations, but yours is just as appropriate. There is
nothing to specify that it would only be expected of a great teacher,
however. Think of it like this: "...perhaps it is because you write
such deep crap that it urges us to remark on it."
That's not the correct translation, but still illustrates the meaning.
Make sense?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
