Flyfish a écrit :

Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in
news:3F2534AF.11F6EA93@globetrotter.net:

Flyfish a écrit :

Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in
news:3F222EC0.37F5F64C@globetrotter.net:

Woodswun a écrit :

In article <3F20D03A.FD3EBB9E@globetrotter.net>,
jguernon@michelnostradamus.org wrote:

Dani a écrit :

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:47:53 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:

Funny from a guy who calls someone who smoked a joint a long
time ago a drug addict for life. As usual whatever you are
saying is not convictions, but only to get attention.

Nothing at all wrong with smoking a joint, Jean.. it's the
tamest drug out there and it's actually beneficial for some.
God knows I used to enjoy it.. but it fucked with my memory a
bit ..and we all know I can't have that.

Marijuana is the only drug that never killed anybody.

Don't worry about it - we all know you're not a drug addict;
and it was years ago anyway like you said.

Dani

No not years ago. Well this year is an exception, there was the
war, so I didn't get wasted as I wanted to have all my head. And
the war isn't over... But I wasn't that straight until then. Not
that I smoked a lot, but didn't mind going to parties and have a
good time, and since I don't drink...

But this year is special. One thing is for sure, this doesn't
make a junkie out of me. There is no addiction with soft drugs,
but perhaps some desire for a couple of days. Nothing to do with
hard drugs.

Not that it should matter one bit to anyone here, or that it's any
of our business, mind!

Woods

The point is that flyshit now denies he said the following.

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Xns92EA581BB8218Flyfishnotherecom%
40130.133.1.4

And keeps making up more ***** about me... You are right woods, it
is not. He can't help himself.

Flyshit is like an old woman with no memory.

J.

I didn't deny that post at all, show me where I denied it. You can't,
this means again I show that you are lying about me.

You deny you said that 3 days ago?

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Xns93C393FC73EFCFlyfishnotherecom%401
30.133.1.4

QUOTE: "I still don't see where I called you an "addict for life",
again you're shown to be a liar. And liar, junkie is YOUR word,
attempting to pin that on me."

When in the post I quote above and which you don't deny you said:

Quote: "In the meantime, you as a recovering addict, can go *insert
your own personal vendom here* yourself." (protesty from me) then you
keep on saying: "Exactly, what is the lie? That you are an addict?
Didn't you admit having used illegal drugs? Then by the reasoning of
the Office of Drug policy you are either an addict or a
recovering/recovered addict. Learn something about the world around
you."

Recovering doesn't mean addict for life to me. If it does to you then I'd
say we're suffering from a failure to communicate (as if that's in
question). It was a taunt, a mockery, and should have been taken in that
light.

So you admit it now... but NOW you say this was a mockery, not a lie,
yeah riiiiiight...

J.