Hillary Rodham Clinton has said over and over that she won't run for President in 2004,
and I believe her.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is possible that this is a very clever political move towards becoming a candidate.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But how about this scenario?
It is not a secret that Gen. Wesley Clark is the Clinton's candidate.
What if Clark wins the Democrat nomination, and then picks Hillary as
his running mate? If she accepts, she is not breaking her promise.
Then, if they win two terms,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Clark and Hillary would make a powerful combination to be reckoned with.
Far more powerful than either of them, paired with someone else.
The voter support is out there for this COMBINATION.
It is certainly not impossible that this pair could win two terms.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hillary would be set up to run for President in 2012.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forget it.
The time for Hillary to be #1 or #2 is 2005, or not at all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the more likely scenario where they lose a close one to President Bush,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Clark / Hillary combination is more powerful than the Bush / Cheney combination.
The balance of probability would favor the Clark / Hillary combination.
Clark, as a retired army general, must be aware of this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hillary is then perfectly set up to run for President in 2008.
Don't get me wrong, I believe Hillary is one of the mostly ruthlessly
calculating dangers to our way of life I have ever seen, but you have
to admire her talent. If she gets elected President, I do hope she
has the sense to take it easy as she tries to convert us to
state-sponsored socialism. If she acts too quickly, she will end up
as a one-term footnote to history.
.
|
|
| User: "neo677" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For Vice-President in 2004. |
23 Dec 2003 04:56:44 PM |
|
|
wrote in message news:<o12huv86vtkl5vd0lsvc824dpdu2bltgk2@4ax.com>...
Hillary Rodham Clinton has said over and over that she won't run for President in 2004,
and I believe her.
Actually all politicians lie. Bush lied about not being convicted for
a crime. That lost him votes at the close of the last presidential
election. Bill Clinton lied about Monica. Hillary said she would serve
out her term as senator of NY; but Bill said he would serve out his
governor's term before running in 1992. And Bill became a somewhat
successful president in creating contruction jobs and balancing the
budget despite fat cats cheating people, from Enron and other high
places.
Bush favors fat cats and ravages Medicaid for kids and the poor. He
has made Baltimore's school program go broke and lay off 700 workers.
It's obvious Bush knows the wealthy butter his bread.
I am a Hillary fan. But it is clear that Dean at this stage would run
poorly against Bush, because Bush is using the patriot card. Bush
cannot use the patriot card against Wesley Clark. For the liberals,
Hillary would be a liberal-moderate voice to tone down fears that
Clark is another war monger.
The Clark-Hillary ticket might be attractive to moderates who care
about a balanced budget, not wrecking the economy, and getting good
jobs to Americans.
===============
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is possible that this is a very clever political move towards becoming a candidate.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But how about this scenario?
It is not a secret that Gen. Wesley Clark is the Clinton's candidate.
What if Clark wins the Democrat nomination, and then picks Hillary as
his running mate? If she accepts, she is not breaking her promise.
Then, if they win two terms,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Clark and Hillary would make a powerful combination to be reckoned with.
Far more powerful than either of them, paired with someone else.
The voter support is out there for this COMBINATION.
It is certainly not impossible that this pair could win two terms.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hillary would be set up to run for President in 2012.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forget it.
The time for Hillary to be #1 or #2 is 2005, or not at all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the more likely scenario where they lose a close one to President Bush,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Clark / Hillary combination is more powerful than the Bush / Cheney combination.
The balance of probability would favor the Clark / Hillary combination.
Clark, as a retired army general, must be aware of this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hillary is then perfectly set up to run for President in 2008.
Don't get me wrong, I believe Hillary is one of the mostly ruthlessly
calculating dangers to our way of life I have ever seen, but you have
to admire her talent. If she gets elected President, I do hope she
has the sense to take it easy as she tries to convert us to
state-sponsored socialism. If she acts too quickly, she will end up
as a one-term footnote to history.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For Vice-President in 2004. |
23 Dec 2003 08:48:48 PM |
|
|
(neo677) wrote in message news:<86eee63d.0312231456.53a4d10b@posting.google.com>...
grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk wrote in message news:<o12huv86vtkl5vd0lsvc824dpdu2bltgk2@4ax.com>...
Hillary Rodham Clinton has said over and over that she won't run for President in 2004,
and I believe her.
Actually all politicians lie. Bush lied about not being convicted for
a crime. That lost him votes at the close of the last presidential
election. Bill Clinton lied about Monica. Hillary said she would serve
out her term as senator of NY; but Bill said he would serve out his
governor's term before running in 1992. And Bill became a somewhat
successful president in creating contruction jobs and balancing the
budget despite fat cats cheating people, from Enron and other high
places.
Bill Clinton had many Ken Lay meetings out on the golf course. They
were buds.. the media tends forget what they report on years after it
happens. Enron was a big part of the booming '90s economy. Yep, Bill
( OKd) got the ol' boy some $4.5 billion contracts too. Ever wonder
why the dems have not brought this Enron fiasco to fruition in the
impeachment council - because they have dirty hands.
Bush favors fat cats
So, Bernard Swarts and C. M. Armstrong were not fat cats?
and ravages Medicaid for kids and the poor.
Apparently the Congress didn't like Hillary's Medicare plan. It
seemed her plan would have made a large percent job loss per state.
He
has made Baltimore's school program go broke and lay off 700 workers.
It's obvious Bush knows the wealthy butter his bread.
I think he is trying to do his best under the circumstances.
I am a Hillary fan.
Absolutely no problem with that.
But it is clear that Dean at this stage would run
poorly against Bush,
"If someone punches me I am apt to chase them down, and I need to be
restrained by the people who know better and have been in the game
longer than I have," Dean told MSNBC.
Democratic presidential front-runner Howard Dean admitted on Monday
that he sometimes gets so angry over political attacks on his
character and record that he needs to be "restrained."
because Bush is using the patriot card.
Imagine if Bush went to WWII level of the patriot laws. Curfew for the
United States, Concentration camps… etc… Now that would be
restrictive.
Bush
cannot use the patriot card against Wesley Clark. For the liberals,
Hillary would be a liberal-moderate voice to tone down fears that
Clark is another war monger.
The Clark-Hillary ticket might be attractive to moderates who care
about a balanced budget, not wrecking the economy, and getting good
jobs to Americans.
If somehow Clark gets the presidency, make sure he holds up to his own
words:
"This is the way it works in the Navy, if you're the captain of a
ship, and it runs aground, they only ask two questions: Did it run
aground, and were you the captain?" he explained. "If the answer is
yes to both, you're fired."
The former NATO commander said that Bush deserves to be "fired" for
not doing more to prevent 9/11.
.
|
|
|
| User: "neo677" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For Vice-President in 2004. |
25 Dec 2003 03:02:34 PM |
|
|
You fail to understand that the economy is built on debt. Having golf
course meetings is different than giving breaks to corporations that
steal or actually being on the board of companies that steal. Bush
himself was on the board of a company that went broke soon after Bush
sold his million dollars worth of stock. Halliburton has been
mentioned by Democrats as have been many companies. It was where
Cheney worked. Bush's policies are the kind that allow companies to
make a profit while polluting the environment all they want.
The outsourcing of jobs must continue with the present economy because
the rising cost of core goods. Clothing is made in China, Indonesia,
South Korea. My printer has parts from Hungary and Malaysia. Obviously
Japan and Taiwan exports to the US as well. If you call Dell tech
support, you talk to someone from India.
Meanwhile Americans are unemployed or settling for lesser paying jobs.
Meanwhile the government keeps spending with borrowed money, since by
law the federal government can't go broke.
But how can the economy be anything but lousy, when so many Americans
are in debt? The falling dollar could mean higher costs for goods and
higher interest rates. It is not unusual to see Americans with 50
thousand dollars in credit card debt; or 150 thousand dollars in
mortgage debt. Borrowing and spending is not the sign of a strong
economy. There is a temporary good feeling in a jobless economy. But
then the bills come due. Also Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are
sinkholes for money. The companies are scrambling to stay price
competitive, since core goods have became pricier. The economy is held
together by stretched rubber bands.
=================
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message news:<dd3256f0.0312231848.1dd3217@posting.google.com>...
eo677eo677eo@yahoo.com (neo677) wrote in message news:<86eee63d.0312231456.53a4d10b@posting.google.com>...
grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk wrote in message news:<o12huv86vtkl5vd0lsvc824dpdu2bltgk2@4ax.com>...
Hillary Rodham Clinton has said over and over that she won't run for President in 2004,
and I believe her.
Actually all politicians lie. Bush lied about not being convicted for
a crime. That lost him votes at the close of the last presidential
election. Bill Clinton lied about Monica. Hillary said she would serve
out her term as senator of NY; but Bill said he would serve out his
governor's term before running in 1992. And Bill became a somewhat
successful president in creating contruction jobs and balancing the
budget despite fat cats cheating people, from Enron and other high
places.
Bill Clinton had many Ken Lay meetings out on the golf course. They
were buds.. the media tends forget what they report on years after it
happens. Enron was a big part of the booming '90s economy. Yep, Bill
( OKd) got the ol' boy some $4.5 billion contracts too. Ever wonder
why the dems have not brought this Enron fiasco to fruition in the
impeachment council - because they have dirty hands.
Bush favors fat cats
So, Bernard Swarts and C. M. Armstrong were not fat cats?
and ravages Medicaid for kids and the poor.
Apparently the Congress didn't like Hillary's Medicare plan. It
seemed her plan would have made a large percent job loss per state.
He
has made Baltimore's school program go broke and lay off 700 workers.
It's obvious Bush knows the wealthy butter his bread.
I think he is trying to do his best under the circumstances.
I am a Hillary fan.
Absolutely no problem with that.
But it is clear that Dean at this stage would run
poorly against Bush,
"If someone punches me I am apt to chase them down, and I need to be
restrained by the people who know better and have been in the game
longer than I have," Dean told MSNBC.
Democratic presidential front-runner Howard Dean admitted on Monday
that he sometimes gets so angry over political attacks on his
character and record that he needs to be "restrained."
because Bush is using the patriot card.
Imagine if Bush went to WWII level of the patriot laws. Curfew for the
United States, Concentration camps… etc… Now that would be
restrictive.
Bush
cannot use the patriot card against Wesley Clark. For the liberals,
Hillary would be a liberal-moderate voice to tone down fears that
Clark is another war monger.
The Clark-Hillary ticket might be attractive to moderates who care
about a balanced budget, not wrecking the economy, and getting good
jobs to Americans.
If somehow Clark gets the presidency, make sure he holds up to his own
words:
"This is the way it works in the Navy, if you're the captain of a
ship, and it runs aground, they only ask two questions: Did it run
aground, and were you the captain?" he explained. "If the answer is
yes to both, you're fired."
The former NATO commander said that Bush deserves to be "fired" for
not doing more to prevent 9/11
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For Vice-President in 2004. |
26 Dec 2003 04:36:31 PM |
|
|
(neo677) wrote in message news:<86eee63d.0312251302.51d6f978@posting.google.com>...
You fail to understand that the economy is built on debt.
Nope, You are correct that we live in a tolerable debt society. Yet,
in the beginning of America we paid all of our debts off and had a
balanced budget. AN example: Today no...
Having golf
course meetings is different than giving breaks to corporations
You missed my point - both were business partners and Clinton made
billion dollar deals with Lay. Everyone in congress knows it and that
is why Daschle could not bring him up on impeachment over this;
Although, in the beginning investigation he thought he had a chance,
but this would mean bringing in Clinton to testify – and the
dems didn’t want that.
that
steal or actually being on the board of companies that steal. Bush
himself was on the board of a company that went broke soon after Bush
sold his million dollars worth of stock.
So was former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe, the person who got the
financial inside trading council from Clinton on WorldCom stocks who
took $100,000 and turned into $18 million.
Halliburton has been
mentioned by Democrats as have been many companies.
Halliburton is a corporation.
It was where
Cheney worked.
Yep.
Bush's policies are the kind that allow companies to
make a profit while polluting the environment all they want.
But the dems still drive in cars that have oil? Also, dems agree that
other companies go outside of America and polute their soil, all for
the sake of business.
The outsourcing of jobs must continue with the present economy because
the rising cost of core goods. Clothing is made in China, Indonesia,
South Korea. My printer has parts from Hungary and Malaysia. Obviously
Japan and Taiwan exports to the US as well. If you call Dell tech
support, you talk to someone from India.
Meanwhile Americans are unemployed or settling for lesser paying jobs.
Meanwhile the government keeps spending with borrowed money, since by
law the federal government can't go broke.
But how can the economy be anything but lousy, when so many Americans
are in debt?
You answered yourself with your opening statement.
The falling dollar could mean higher costs for goods and
higher interest rates. It is not unusual to see Americans with 50
thousand dollars in credit card debt; or 150 thousand dollars in
mortgage debt. Borrowing and spending is not the sign of a strong
economy.
Nope.
There is a temporary good feeling in a jobless economy. But
then the bills come due. Also Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are
sinkholes for money.
Yep.
The companies are scrambling to stay price
competitive, since core goods have became pricier. The economy is held
together by stretched rubber bands.
On top of it Bush got a trillion dollar tax break passed.
=================
abookoflife@yahoo.com (Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message news:<dd3256f0.0312231848.1dd3217@posting.google.com>...
(neo677) wrote in message news:<86eee63d.0312231456.53a4d10b@posting.google.com>...
grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk wrote in message news:<o12huv86vtkl5vd0lsvc824dpdu2bltgk2@4ax.com>...
Hillary Rodham Clinton has said over and over that she won't run for President in 2004,
and I believe her.
Actually all politicians lie. Bush lied about not being convicted for
a crime. That lost him votes at the close of the last presidential
election. Bill Clinton lied about Monica. Hillary said she would serve
out her term as senator of NY; but Bill said he would serve out his
governor's term before running in 1992. And Bill became a somewhat
successful president in creating contruction jobs and balancing the
budget despite fat cats cheating people, from Enron and other high
places.
Bill Clinton had many Ken Lay meetings out on the golf course. They
were buds.. the media tends forget what they report on years after it
happens. Enron was a big part of the booming '90s economy. Yep, Bill
( OKd) got the ol' boy some $4.5 billion contracts too. Ever wonder
why the dems have not brought this Enron fiasco to fruition in the
impeachment council - because they have dirty hands.
Bush favors fat cats
So, Bernard Swarts and C. M. Armstrong were not fat cats?
and ravages Medicaid for kids and the poor.
Apparently the Congress didn't like Hillary's Medicare plan. It
seemed her plan would have made a large percent job loss per state.
He
has made Baltimore's school program go broke and lay off 700 workers.
It's obvious Bush knows the wealthy butter his bread.
I think he is trying to do his best under the circumstances.
I am a Hillary fan.
Absolutely no problem with that.
But it is clear that Dean at this stage would run
poorly against Bush,
"If someone punches me I am apt to chase them down, and I need to be
restrained by the people who know better and have been in the game
longer than I have," Dean told MSNBC.
Democratic presidential front-runner Howard Dean admitted on Monday
that he sometimes gets so angry over political attacks on his
character and record that he needs to be "restrained."
because Bush is using the patriot card.
Imagine if Bush went to WWII level of the patriot laws. Curfew for the
United States, Concentration camps… etc… Now that would be
restrictive.
Bush
cannot use the patriot card against Wesley Clark. For the liberals,
Hillary would be a liberal-moderate voice to tone down fears that
Clark is another war monger.
The Clark-Hillary ticket might be attractive to moderates who care
about a balanced budget, not wrecking the economy, and getting good
jobs to Americans.
If somehow Clark gets the presidency, make sure he holds up to his own
words:
"This is the way it works in the Navy, if you're the captain of a
ship, and it runs aground, they only ask two questions: Did it run
aground, and were you the captain?" he explained. "If the answer is
yes to both, you're fired."
The former NATO commander said that Bush deserves to be "fired" for
not doing more to prevent 9/11
.
|
|
|
| User: "neo677" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For Vice-President in 2004. |
26 Dec 2003 11:34:19 PM |
|
|
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message news:<dd3256f0.0312261436.7d098e33@posting.google.com>...
eo677eo677eo@yahoo.com (neo677) wrote in message news:<86eee63d.0312251302.51d6f978@posting.google.com>...
You fail to understand that the economy is built on debt.
Nope, You are correct that we live in a tolerable debt society. Yet,
in the beginning of America we paid all of our debts off and had a
balanced budget. AN example: Today no...
Having golf
course meetings is different than giving breaks to corporations
You missed my point - both were business partners and Clinton made
billion dollar deals with Lay. Everyone in congress knows it and that
is why Daschle could not bring him up on impeachment over this;
Although, in the beginning investigation he thought he had a chance,
but this would mean bringing in Clinton to testify – and the
dems didn’t want that.
that
steal or actually being on the board of companies that steal. Bush
himself was on the board of a company that went broke soon after Bush
sold his million dollars worth of stock.
So was former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe, the person who got the
financial inside trading council from Clinton on WorldCom stocks who
took $100,000 and turned into $18 million.
Halliburton has been
mentioned by Democrats as have been many companies.
Halliburton is a corporation.
It was where
Cheney worked.
Yep.
Bush's policies are the kind that allow companies to
make a profit while polluting the environment all they want.
But the dems still drive in cars that have oil? Also, dems agree that
other companies go outside of America and polute their soil, all for
the sake of business.
The outsourcing of jobs must continue with the present economy because
the rising cost of core goods. Clothing is made in China, Indonesia,
South Korea. My printer has parts from Hungary and Malaysia. Obviously
Japan and Taiwan exports to the US as well. If you call Dell tech
support, you talk to someone from India.
Meanwhile Americans are unemployed or settling for lesser paying jobs.
Meanwhile the government keeps spending with borrowed money, since by
law the federal government can't go broke.
But how can the economy be anything but lousy, when so many Americans
are in debt?
You answered yourself with your opening statement.
The falling dollar could mean higher costs for goods and
higher interest rates. It is not unusual to see Americans with 50
thousand dollars in credit card debt; or 150 thousand dollars in
mortgage debt. Borrowing and spending is not the sign of a strong
economy.
Nope.
There is a temporary good feeling in a jobless economy. But
then the bills come due. Also Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are
sinkholes for money.
Yep.
The companies are scrambling to stay price
competitive, since core goods have became pricier. The economy is held
together by stretched rubber bands.
On top of it Bush got a trillion dollar tax break passed.
Thank goodness some people care about clean air and land. Bush is
unrepentant about his support in POLICIES for his rich constituents.
[presented for nonprofit info purposes]
Bush Pollution Changes Blocked
WASHINGTON, Dec. 24, 2003
(AP) A federal appeals court on Wednesday blocked new Bush
administration changes to the Clean Air Act from going into effect the
next day, in a challenge from state attorneys general and cities that
argued they would harm the environment and public health.
The Environmental Protection Agency rule would have made it easier for
utilities, refineries and other industrial facilities to make repairs
in the name of "routine maintenance" without installing additional
pollution controls.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia issued an order that blocks the rules from going
into effect until the legal challenge from the states and cities is
heard, a process likely to last months.
The court's decision blocks at least temporarily one of the Bush
administration's major environmental decisions. The court's justices
said the challengers "demonstrated the irreparable harm and likelihood
of success" of their case, which are required to stop the rule from
taking effect.
EPA proposed the rule in December, the then-acting administrator
signed it in August and it was made final in October. It was due to
have gone into effect this week.
Bringing suit were attorneys general for 12 states — Connecticut,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey,
New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin — and
legal officers for New York City, Washington, San Francisco, New Haven
and a host of other cities in Connecticut.
There was no immediate comment available from EPA officials.
EPA has maintained that it does not believe the rule will result in
significant changes in emissions, and that it will preserve the public
health protections required under law.
Environmental and health groups, including Natural Resources Defense
Council and the American Lung Association, also challenged the rule in
the appeals court.
They argued EPA's maintenance rule violates the Clean Air Act by
letting power plants and other industries increase pollution
significantly without adopting control measures, and public harm would
result.
"This is a great gift to the American people and a lump of coal to the
Bush administration and its polluter friends," John Walke, NRDC's
clean air director. "The court agreed this rule would cause great harm
to the public that could not be undone, and it's likely the rule will
be struck down for running afoul of the Clean Air Act."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "neo677" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For Vice-President in 2004. |
26 Dec 2003 11:16:37 PM |
|
|
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message news:<dd3256f0.0312261436.7d098e33@posting.google.com>...
eo677eo677eo@yahoo.com (neo677) wrote in message news:<86eee63d.0312251302.51d6f978@posting.google.com>...
You fail to understand that the economy is built on debt.
Nope, You are correct that we live in a tolerable debt society. Yet,
in the beginning of America we paid all of our debts off and had a
balanced budget. AN example: Today no...
Having golf
course meetings is different than giving breaks to corporations
You missed my point - both were business partners and Clinton made
billion dollar deals with Lay. Everyone in congress knows it and that
is why Daschle could not bring him up on impeachment over this;
Although, in the beginning investigation he thought he had a chance,
but this would mean bringing in Clinton to testify – and the
dems didn’t want that.
that
steal or actually being on the board of companies that steal. Bush
himself was on the board of a company that went broke soon after Bush
sold his million dollars worth of stock.
So was former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe, the person who got the
financial inside trading council from Clinton on WorldCom stocks who
took $100,000 and turned into $18 million.
Halliburton has been
mentioned by Democrats as have been many companies.
Halliburton is a corporation.
It was where
Cheney worked.
Yep.
Bush's policies are the kind that allow companies to
make a profit while polluting the environment all they want.
But the dems still drive in cars that have oil? Also, dems agree that
other companies go outside of America and polute their soil, all for
the sake of business.
The outsourcing of jobs must continue with the present economy because
the rising cost of core goods. Clothing is made in China, Indonesia,
South Korea. My printer has parts from Hungary and Malaysia. Obviously
Japan and Taiwan exports to the US as well. If you call Dell tech
support, you talk to someone from India.
Meanwhile Americans are unemployed or settling for lesser paying jobs.
Meanwhile the government keeps spending with borrowed money, since by
law the federal government can't go broke.
But how can the economy be anything but lousy, when so many Americans
are in debt?
You answered yourself with your opening statement.
The falling dollar could mean higher costs for goods and
higher interest rates. It is not unusual to see Americans with 50
thousand dollars in credit card debt; or 150 thousand dollars in
mortgage debt. Borrowing and spending is not the sign of a strong
economy.
Nope.
And Halliburton is back in the news, about Iraq deals. Bush is
unrepentant about letting companies pollute at will. He neglects
school and Medicaid funds and gives to the rich, while giving a token
amount to the middle class in taxes. The Social Security fund is a
memory.
A Democrat would have done something for the middle class and the less
well off. Bush leaves them pittance and tries to make up for it by
going for the elderly vote; all with borrowed money.
There is a temporary good feeling in a jobless economy. But
then the bills come due. Also Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan are
sinkholes for money.
Yep.
The companies are scrambling to stay price
competitive, since core goods have became pricier. The economy is held
together by stretched rubber bands.
On top of it Bush got a trillion dollar tax break passed.
With borrowed money. What else is new. Borrow and spend. You keep
exaggerating things about the Clintons, so I can't take your word for
anything. Your Google record is atrocious, with exaggerations.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "torresdD" |
|
| Title: Re: Hillary For President in 2004. |
24 Dec 2003 02:30:43 AM |
|
|
President Hillary Rodham Clinton.
YES!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
