wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:34:19 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:39:14 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
wrote:
NOTE: SO FAR THIS IS THE LARGEST ARTICLE EVER PRINTED BY THE UK
MAINSTREAM MEDIA RAISING MANY OF THE SERIOUS QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 9/11
COVER UP
9/11 ON TRIAL
Only a conspiracy kook (i.e. paranoia, irrational thinking, inability to
separate fact from fiction, poor judgemental skills), would think it was
staged. Everyone else has no problem whatsoever believing it happened
more or less as it played out.
You and Tony have more in common than either of you would be prepared to
admit.
Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one. Looks like yours is a
little plugged up right now.
Actually it's not an opinion, it's a fact. No rational person would
believe for a second the garble you cut and paste, any more than they
would believe Tony's.
Why? Because your world view, while opposed to his is based on
irrational prejudice and paranoia that neither of you is smart enough to
elucidate by yourself. Thus we see you both cut and pasting articles
from various nut sites, attempting to pass of their words as your
thoughts but trying to absolve yourself from having to defend them.
It's actually quite amusing to watch the way you flinch when anyone
*dares* challenge your nutty world view. As mentioned, neither of you is
capable of actually defending your position, so we get a knee jerk
reaction. Tony falls conspicuously silent or says "Wrong". Whereas you
throw a wobbler about opinions.
You two could be brothers separated at birth.
I never once said they were my "words" or what I beleived.
So as someone else said, that must mean you are a troll.
If you have
a problem with what I cut and paste, get over it. If you don't like my
political leanings...too bad no one said you have to read it.
It has nothing to do with political leaning. You are posting drivel by
any measure. It is quite possible to post left or right wing opinion or
information without coming off looking like a nut.
As far
as people challenging me, who cares, I play till I get bored then move
on to another topic, don't like it, don't read it. Until the US
government is exposed for what it is and what it is doing I will
continue to do what I want, don't like it ..tough...don't read it.
But the US government isn't being "exposed". Ranting about stuff which
is transparently false rather than focussing on stuff that may be true
just makes you look like a nut.
What do people do when they hear a nut screaming and shouting on the
streets? They ignore him.
That's some exposure you're doing. And for that matter, what the hell
does anyone in apn care? Shouldn't you be in soc.culture.usa,
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh & similar posting all this?
Paranoia? Hahahahah it's the dumb Americans that are paranoid, jumping
every time the alert level moves...don't you see, that's the
"terrorism" right there, keep the sheeple in line and they will fall
for anything.
Yes, paranoid. Cutting and pasting stories requiring a cast of thousands
and a highly elaborate, convoluted konspiracy when a simpler more
obvious explanation does a much, much better job is called paranoia.
You're right that alert levels may instil unnecessary fear, but that's
non sequitor.
In fact the sooner the end of the world comes the
better, man no longer cares for their fellow man, look at Africa.
there is no reason those people should be dying of starvation, there
is more than enough food to feed the world many times over, but alas
that will soon change as well with another American disaster...GM
foods.
More non sequitor. What has Africa got to do with this alleged WTC
conspiracy?
Is your idea of justifying yourself to switch subjects when asked? It's
strange but the same kind of whack-a-mole is very common for WTC
conspiracists.
No what we need is to bring down big business, and Neo-Con *****
governments that are just padding their bank accounts. I 'm sorry if
you don't like the truth....deal with it.
You're not bringing down anything. In fact you're helping do the
opposite, since your unfocussed and highly inaccurate drivel tars all
opponents of Bush with the same brush.
.
