On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
An informative Intelligent Design debate is at
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=329
<snipped for clarity>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
While that's all fine and good, it's the teeth of the law
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
From that point, verily, upon America's immediate horizon,
it'll be much more interesting to see how those accepting
fate challenge those vainly evading, postponing, the same. :-D
Enjoy Life! (here comes U.S. Supreme Court Justice Alito!)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ88nSJljD7YrHM/nEQL11QCgxXHFD9Mo62731s3HXHEAVOfd9J0AoJC+
sNuOOXG6yhVTFfGnD+S/SpCy
=RZLS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "goozlefotz" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 11:30:25 AM |
|
|
Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
An informative Intelligent Design debate is at
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=329
<snipped for clarity>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
While that's all fine and good, it's the teeth of the law
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Notice that it is lawyers not scientists pushing intelligent design.
What a joke!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Terry" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 09:21:58 AM |
|
|
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Daniel Joseph Min) wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
An informative Intelligent Design debate is at
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=329
<snipped for clarity>
-----BEGIN
F%%O%%A%%D
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 01:11:38 AM |
|
|
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>,
Daniel Joseph Min <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Proof that 'Intelligent Design' doesn't exist:
Daniel Joseph Min
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Baldwin Bruce" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 02:32:24 AM |
|
|
wrote:
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>,
Daniel Joseph Min <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Proof that 'Intelligent Design' doesn't exist:
Daniel Joseph Min
AOL!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kmiller" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 01:38:36 AM |
|
|
Human Kind has been in Existence for over 10.000 yrs (history proves it).
That pretty much puts "Biblical Purists" and "Intelligent Design' Theorists in the same Boat
!!!
If it was The Almighty's will to say "Life Began" 6000 yrs ago, then how do they explain the
existence of Humans (with a 'passed down' history) that extends beyond 10.000 yrs?
Maybe Both 'Extremists' Are In Denial ???
Just A Thought.
:-(]
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BaronLurk" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 06:53:37 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:11:38 -0000, () wrote:
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>,
Daniel Joseph Min <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Proof that 'Intelligent Design' doesn't exist:
Daniel Joseph Min
Edmo
Sollog
'Zoose
Bartlo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 09:18:16 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:53:37 -0800, in alt.astrology, BaronLurk
<BaronLurk@not.home> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:11:38 -0000, () wrote:
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>,
Daniel Joseph Min <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Proof that 'Intelligent Design' doesn't exist:
Daniel Joseph Min
Edmo
Sollog
'Zoose
Bartlo
Kettler
Curley
Zic
Herc
Stoolman
Alexa
Guth
Lieder
Sommerville
Albian
Archie Plutonium
Bush
Ashcroft
Rummy
Rice
Gore
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 02:34:00 PM |
|
|
In article <69bvs197sfd6dnfos201gl6645v1jn1mfq@4ax.com>,
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:53:37 -0800, in alt.astrology, BaronLurk
<BaronLurk@not.home> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:11:38 -0000, () wrote:
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>,
Daniel Joseph Min <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Proof that 'Intelligent Design' doesn't exist:
Daniel Joseph Min
Edmo
Sollog
'Zoose
Bartlo
Kettler
Curley
Zic
Herc
Stoolman
Alexa
Guth
Lieder
Sommerville
Albian
Archie Plutonium
Bush
Ashcroft
Rummy
Rice
Gore
wouldnt be more accurate to include anyone who has ever run for poublic office?
arf meow arf - nsa fodder
al qaeda terrorism nuclear bomb iran taliban big brother
if you meet buddha on the usenet killfile him
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Intelligent Design or Cosmic Landscape? |
19 Jan 2006 09:09:41 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:11:38 -0000, in alt.astrology, ()
wrote:
In article <4Q21M2VT38736.0556365741@twistycreek.com>,
Daniel Joseph Min <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
which dictates 'Intelligent Design' shall become integral
by effective superimposition with the theory of evolution.
Proof that 'Intelligent Design' doesn't exist:
Daniel Joseph Min
Comic design?
Even god Laughs at Min
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
