Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]>
wrote :

X-No-Archive: yes
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Ms Captain Liberty
<Ms_Captain_Liberty@Liberty.oma> wrote:

Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote :

X-No-Archive: yes
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Ms Captain Liberty
<Ms_Captain_Liberty@Liberty.oma> wrote:

Daniel Joseph Min
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote :

On Tue, 30 May 2006, Ms Captain Liberty
<Ms_Captain_Liberty@Liberty.oma> wrote:

Daniel Joseph Min <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]>
wrote
:

Yes, and when we look at the primary cause of all the
violent
crime in America, we see that it is the A.C.L.U.

<snips>

Tread carefully, Ms. Captain Liberty, we mutually being of
and for these United States of America...I'm beginning to
like you.

That isn't dangerous or anything, is it? :)

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. We're practically next-door
neighbors!

Oh?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Well, not quite. It's not like I live on the same street as
you do, like right next door. My house is roughly a hundred
miles from where you live, in round numbers, give or take.

Are you really with the Fred Phelps group? <shudder>

As for the potential for being dangerous to associate with
known, patriotic, law-abiding, tax-paying, smart-working,
God-fearing, gloatingly-victorious Judeo-Xian Republican
Americans, that's always a possibility.

Hey don't call me Republican, I'm a libertarian. :)

I didn't. I merely pointed out that any association with me
that isn't extremely negative might be perceived by Liberals
as some sort of endorsement. You know, since Liberals always
think in terms of extremes. If you express views that appear
even slightly to the right of the extreme, radical, far-left,
you might as well paste a Bush/Cheney bumper sticker on your
car. I know you wouldn't do that, because you're libertarian.

Yep.

I've browsed through some your articles over the last several
months. While there are some issues we disagree on, there are
other issues that we generally do agree on, albeit for perhaps
different reasons. You seem to be generally patriotic towards
America. That's a far cry from those angry Liberals, who I am
diametrically *opposed* to across-the-board, without
exception.

Ok, we have that in common anyway.

Thus, by comparison to the Liberals, you seem much more like a
friend among patriotic Americans than our mutual Liberal
enemy.

Ok. But tell me you're not with Fred Phelps or I'll throw up on
your shoes if we ever meet.

No one who values liberty is safe from the liberal socialists.

You'll get no argument from me. And I read that you believe
the U.N. to be the most dangerous organization in the entire
world.

Yep.

"It's time to get the U.S. out of the UN and the UN out of the
U.S." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UN-OUT/

Shut it the hell down before it taxes us and multiplies!

Personally, I'd have to put them in a close-second
place, maybe slightly behind the A.C.L.U.

But the ACLU is so much smaller. The ACLU isn't playing with making
international law and pushing the U.S. to buy into it. They're a
tiny group of pinko putzes compared to the Big Brother One World
Government plans of the UN!

If they really knew
what I would do if I were the President of the United States,
they would be down on bended knees thanking God Almighty that
George W. Bush is such a kind, meek, tolerant, patient,
peaceful human being.

You won't be President but I'd settle for someone like Ron Paul if
I couldn't get a libertarian. I wish a classic conservative ( near-
libertarian ) like him had a chance and would run. Or maybe Condi
Rice but she won't run.

And I like your spelling of LIEberals. They seem to have
cornered the market on unbridled dishonesty, and a complete,
psychological disconnection--dissociation--from reality.
Theirs is a culture of death, a culture of hate, a culture of
the "chalkboard" mentality.

SLOBS: Smearing Lying Obstructing Bashing Socialists.

They can't win a war without getting tens of millions of
illegal invaders to move here and vote for socialism.

This is one area I humbly disagree with you, as with some of
my fellow Republicans, on. Personally, I believe that the vast
majority of illegal Mexican immigrants are very hard-working,
generally law-abiding people. The potential for bigotry and
prejudice beclouding anyone's otherwise rational views is too
great to be ignored. Do unto others as you would have them do
unto you. If I were a non-violent, responsible, God-fearing
illegal immigrant, I'd want American citizenship, too.

Sure, most of the world does, but if we're going to remain a
nation, we HAVE to be able to control our borders.

But I
would expect to work and pay taxes, to contribute to society.
I would expect to help expand and improve the *infrastructure*
of my community, to support the needs of the rising
population.

That's all great but there are lots of legal people here, who obey
our laws. Give them that chance.

The primary complaint against the illegal immigrants,
invaders, etc., is generally three-fold: They are undermining
our limited infrastructure; many of them seem unwilling or
simply unable to learn to speak even kindergarten-level
English; and some of them are dangerously-violent criminals
who should be shot dead on sight.

Yep. The main complaint is that they break our laws just coming
here, and are therefore criminals.

I believe there are fair and equitable solutions to the
problem of illegal immigration. But unwarranted fearmongering
isn't part of the solution, it's part of the problem. We know
the Mexican government is probably the most corrupt government
in the world, totally bought off by the drug cartels, etc.
But we can't blame ordinary Mexican citizens for the sorry
state of Mexico, at least not completely. Fear and
intimidation keeps common Mexicans down.

That's their problem.

If it were up to me, I'd require every human being in,
entering, or leaving the United States, to submit a blood or
tissue sample for our national DNA fingerprinting database.
This would help us to *positively* identify
dangerously-violent criminals, so that our law-enforcement
professionals could get the green light to shoot them dead on
sight--knowing for a fact that they are doing Americans,
Mexicans, and the whole world a big favor. Of course, the
Liberal A.C.L.U. lawyers and judges and prison cartels would
definitely not like that. But I'm for bankrupting every
Liberal in America. I would ban Liberals from entering
politics, too...

Nice plans for a dictatorship.

So, please forgive my sometimes archaic usage of words and
phrases. Like "Let us call a spade a spade". Or using the
word "gay" to describe a joyous, lively, merry, happy, and
lighthearted, jovial feeling. By contrast, when I refer to
homosexuals, I call them homosexuals, shameless adulterers.
Am I "talking down" to them? Of course not! All mortal men
are sinners. We ALL need to ask God to forgive us our sins.
(You may believe otherwise. I respect your personal faith.)

Whew...

Anyway, I like to call things what they are. I don't speak
"Liberalspeak", which tries--in vain, all in vain--to turn
everything upside down and inside out.

Do what thou wilt (Aleister Crowley's favorite expression),

Wasn't he an insane opium user?