| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Anonymous" |
| Date: |
14 Mar 2005 06:59:05 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
This is good news for Republicans, since the demonstrable majority
of American voters proved to the world on Tuesday November 2, 2004
that the Republicans are here to stay, and the liberals are losing
their viability as a major player in American politics. Republicans
shall continue to gain majority seats in both the House and Senate,
and naturally the Red counties will continue to encroach upon the
Blue counties. Even the desperate "Buy Blue" efforts of the left-
wing liberals is having the very opposite effect, since Republicans
are using the very same lists of companies to aggressively boycott
those who're contributors to the DNC. E.g. see this recent article:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
As far as religion's integral place in American politics goes, the
Republicans enjoy a clear, overwhelming advantage over the liberals,
because liberalism has become effectively synonymous with anarchism,
lawlessness and terrorism. The liberals hijacked the Democrat party,
especially since their egregiously bitter defeat in 2000. Nowadays,
the ever-dwindling moderate wing of the Democrats have lost control
of the party. That's why radical left-wing extremists like Dean and
Clinton are headlining the DNC...leaving moderates nowhere in sight.
Furthermore, it's become common knowledge that the liberals support
an entirely Anti-Christian left-wing agenda, e.g. the ACLU, radical
judges who legislate from the bench to promote Anti-Judeo-Christian
laws like banning the Ten Commandments from public places, blatant
promotion of homosexuality and other flagrantly-hedonistic gluttony,
supporting terrorists whilst condemning the United States military,
rewarding violent criminals while punishing their hapless victims,
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseam!
While the Republicans are far from perfect, the liberals have self-
imploded, and they're only going to continue their downward spiral
in the abyssal of ineffectiveness and obscurity. The *majority* of
voting Americans equate the liberals with God-hating Anti-Christs!
And why not? Since it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck.
The liberals *behave* like Anti-Christs, thus they are Anti-Christ.
No matter what the liberals do, they'll never recover from their
devastating loses, and the Democrats are paying the price for it.
Watch and see. 2006 and 2008 will be the Democrats' death knell.
Made in America,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
Some liberal nutjob "Roger" defecated in public:
<snipped the usual liberal Bush-bashing tripe>
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"
--William of Ockham (~1300-1349)
Download Free Books by Daniel Joseph Min:
http://danieljosephmin.tripod.com/
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/danieljosephmin/
http://www.freewebs.com/danieljosephmin/
http://danieljosephmin.95mb.com/
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
http://danieljosephmin.0catch.com/
http://danieljosephmin.50megs.com/
http://danieljosephmin.150m.com/
http://danieljosephmin.741.com/
http://danieljosephmin.faithweb.com/
http://danieljosephmin.greatnow.com/
http://danieljosephmin.action-links.net/
http://free.hostdepartment.com/d/danieljosephmin/
http://danieljosephmin.arcadepages.com/
http://www.danieljosephmin.netfirms.com/
http://www.webhosting4free.biz/danieljosephmin/
http://danieljosephmin.aboutme.com/
http://danieljosephmin.freespaces.com/
http://danieljosephmin.freeweb.to/
http://danieljosephmin.mvhosted.com/
http://www.web-space.tv/danieljosephmin/
http://danieljosephmin.wtcsites.com/
Popular Moderate-to-Conservative Bookmarks:
http://www.foxnews.com
http://www.newsmax.com
http://www.worldnetdaily.com
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial
http://www.townhall.com
http://www.freerepublic.com
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews
http://www.conservativenews.org
http://www.lucianne.com
http://www.amconmag.com
http://www.forbes.com
http://www.humaneventsonline.com
http://www.insightmag.com
http://www.nationalreview.com
http://www.tnr.com
http://www.reason.com
http://www.spector.org
http://www.weeklystandard.com
http://www.worldmag.com/world/home.asp
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com
http://www.hannity.com
http://www.lauraingraham.com/public
http://www.glennbeck.com
http://www.northamerican.com
http://www.liddyletter.com
http://www.boortz.com
http://www.michaelsavage.com
http://www.reagan.com
http://www.warroom.com
http://www.tomsullivan.com
http://www.drudgereport.com
http://www.drlaura.com
http://www.blowmeuptom.com
http://www.self-gov.org
http://www.theamericancause.org
http://www.conservative.org
http://www.cc.org
http://www.claremont.org
http://www.cwfa.org
http://www.cpac.org
http://www.eagleforum.com
http://www.frc.org
http://www.free-market.net
http://www.heritage.org
http://www.nra.org
http://www.traditionalvalues.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQjYE5JljD7YrHM/nEQLsggCgw5kuuNOw/Tub3WKwn9//PIDEHXIAoJ9l
Cn6wxFzBXm+jUeutywr/GpV1
=n58J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "James E. Morrow" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 02:17:20 PM |
|
|
In article <83Q57ZMP38425.7910300926@anonymous.poster>,
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid says...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
This is good news for Republicans, since the demonstrable majority
of American voters proved to the world on Tuesday November 2, 2004
that the Republicans are here to stay, and the liberals are losing
their viability as a major player in American politics. Republicans
shall continue to gain majority seats in both the House and Senate,
and naturally the Red counties will continue to encroach upon the
Blue counties. Even the desperate "Buy Blue" efforts of the left-
wing liberals is having the very opposite effect, since Republicans
are using the very same lists of companies to aggressively boycott
those who're contributors to the DNC. E.g. see this recent article:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
As far as religion's integral place in American politics goes, the
Republicans enjoy a clear, overwhelming advantage over the liberals,
because liberalism has become effectively synonymous with anarchism,
lawlessness and terrorism. The liberals hijacked the Democrat party,
especially since their egregiously bitter defeat in 2000. Nowadays,
the ever-dwindling moderate wing of the Democrats have lost control
of the party. That's why radical left-wing extremists like Dean and
Clinton are headlining the DNC...leaving moderates nowhere in sight.
Furthermore, it's become common knowledge that the liberals support
an entirely Anti-Christian left-wing agenda, e.g. the ACLU, radical
judges who legislate from the bench to promote Anti-Judeo-Christian
laws like banning the Ten Commandments from public places, blatant
promotion of homosexuality and other flagrantly-hedonistic gluttony,
supporting terrorists whilst condemning the United States military,
rewarding violent criminals while punishing their hapless victims,
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseam!
While the Republicans are far from perfect, the liberals have self-
imploded, and they're only going to continue their downward spiral
in the abyssal of ineffectiveness and obscurity. The *majority* of
voting Americans equate the liberals with God-hating Anti-Christs!
And why not? Since it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck.
The liberals *behave* like Anti-Christs, thus they are Anti-Christ.
No matter what the liberals do, they'll never recover from their
devastating loses, and the Democrats are paying the price for it.
Watch and see. 2006 and 2008 will be the Democrats' death knell.
Well said. The hijacking has been ongoing for a very long time now. As
things now stand the moderates in the Demorat Party are almost extinct.
Every issue is seen by Demorats from some strange ultra egalitarian
prospective which is divorce from any political reality. If group A
must have equal rights then so must group B and subset c2 and so on
into absurdism. So this will include all manner of "rights" for
murderers and rapists and ............ Well why not terrorists too. We
must not be unfair to those who are trying to kill us. That wouldn't be
fair. Whine
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
.
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 02:43:17 PM |
|
|
"James E. Morrow" <> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ca02570a60f268a9896d9@news.individual.net...
In article <83Q57ZMP38425.7910300926@anonymous.poster>,
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid says...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
This is good news for Republicans, since the demonstrable majority
of American voters proved to the world on Tuesday November 2, 2004
that the Republicans are here to stay, and the liberals are losing
their viability as a major player in American politics. Republicans
shall continue to gain majority seats in both the House and Senate,
and naturally the Red counties will continue to encroach upon the
Blue counties. Even the desperate "Buy Blue" efforts of the left-
wing liberals is having the very opposite effect, since Republicans
are using the very same lists of companies to aggressively boycott
those who're contributors to the DNC. E.g. see this recent article:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
As far as religion's integral place in American politics goes, the
Republicans enjoy a clear, overwhelming advantage over the liberals,
because liberalism has become effectively synonymous with anarchism,
lawlessness and terrorism. The liberals hijacked the Democrat party,
especially since their egregiously bitter defeat in 2000. Nowadays,
the ever-dwindling moderate wing of the Democrats have lost control
of the party. That's why radical left-wing extremists like Dean and
Clinton are headlining the DNC...leaving moderates nowhere in sight.
Furthermore, it's become common knowledge that the liberals support
an entirely Anti-Christian left-wing agenda, e.g. the ACLU, radical
judges who legislate from the bench to promote Anti-Judeo-Christian
laws like banning the Ten Commandments from public places, blatant
promotion of homosexuality and other flagrantly-hedonistic gluttony,
supporting terrorists whilst condemning the United States military,
rewarding violent criminals while punishing their hapless victims,
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseam!
While the Republicans are far from perfect, the liberals have self-
imploded, and they're only going to continue their downward spiral
in the abyssal of ineffectiveness and obscurity. The *majority* of
voting Americans equate the liberals with God-hating Anti-Christs!
And why not? Since it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck.
The liberals *behave* like Anti-Christs, thus they are Anti-Christ.
No matter what the liberals do, they'll never recover from their
devastating loses, and the Democrats are paying the price for it.
Watch and see. 2006 and 2008 will be the Democrats' death knell.
Well said. The hijacking has been ongoing for a very long time now. As
things now stand the moderates in the Demorat Party are almost extinct.
Cite?
Every issue is seen by Demorats from some strange ultra egalitarian
prospective which is divorce from any political reality.
Cite?
If group A
must have equal rights then so must group B and subset c2 and so on
into absurdism. So this will include all manner of "rights" for
murderers and rapists and .
Cite?
............ Well why not terrorists too. We
must not be unfair to those who are trying to kill us. That wouldn't be
fair. Whine
Cite?
Another rightard who thinks he can just make crap up out of his head and
no one will notice. lol
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
As usual, James E. Morrow proves himself to be functionally insane.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 09:39:13 PM |
|
|
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
As usual, James E. Morrow proves himself to be functionally insane.
At least you liberal twits are consistent.
Everyone who disagrees with you is by definition insane.
This approach seems to be serving you rather well in winning elections in
recent decades.
Congratulations on sticking to a proven method.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 11:42:57 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> Spat the Words
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
As usual, James E. Morrow proves himself to be functionally insane.
At least you liberal twits are consistent.
Everyone who disagrees with you is by definition insane.
This approach seems to be serving you rather well in winning elections in
recent decades.
The dems have won a few, but neocons are distinctive for
putting monkey-brain figure-heads at the head of their party.
Ronald "Bedtime for Bonzo" Reagan ?
George W "The Chimp" Bush ?
Conservatives are the blind being led by the stupid.
Congratulations on sticking to a proven method.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 12:05:10 AM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns961AE713DFE2Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> Spat the Words
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
As usual, James E. Morrow proves himself to be functionally insane.
At least you liberal twits are consistent.
Everyone who disagrees with you is by definition insane.
This approach seems to be serving you rather well in winning elections in
recent decades.
The dems have won a few, but neocons are distinctive for
putting monkey-brain figure-heads at the head of their party.
Ronald "Bedtime for Bonzo" Reagan ?
George W "The Chimp" Bush ?
Conservatives are the blind being led by the stupid.
And the majority.
And in charge.
And increasing in power.
Need I go on, you loser liberal has been,
reject from the US political system??
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 12:25:54 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> Spat the Words
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns961AE713DFE2Arrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> Spat the Words
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a
very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
As usual, James E. Morrow proves himself to be functionally insane.
At least you liberal twits are consistent.
Everyone who disagrees with you is by definition insane.
This approach seems to be serving you rather well in winning elections
in
recent decades.
The dems have won a few, but neocons are distinctive for
putting monkey-brain figure-heads at the head of their party.
Ronald "Bedtime for Bonzo" Reagan ?
George W "The Chimp" Bush ?
Conservatives are the blind being led by the stupid.
And the majority.
And in charge.
And increasing in power.
Need I go on, you loser liberal has been,
reject from the US political system??
If you have so much going for you, why continue to put
monkey-brains into power ? With 50 million slobering
conservatives to choose from, surely you could do better
than George Dumbo Bush (the guy has trouble with complete
sentences).
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:14:06 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> Spat the Words
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
As usual, James E. Morrow proves himself to be functionally insane.
At least you liberal twits are consistent.
Everyone who disagrees with you is by definition insane.
This approach seems to be serving you rather well in winning elections in
recent decades.
The dems have won a few,
The only time the Dems have won the Presidency in the last 40 years
was when they totally decieved the electorate.
Both Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton ran as southern Baptists with a
conservative bent, neither one was.
but neocons are distinctive for
putting monkey-brain figure-heads at the head of their party.
Ronald "Bedtime for Bonzo" Reagan ?
George W "The Chimp" Bush ?
You're an idiot, Reagan got this country rolling again after Carter
drove both the economy (20% interest rates) and Military into the
ground, he then won the Cold War by showing the Soviets that they
couldn't compete.
Bush has liberated 50 million people who had be under the boot of
dictators for several decades, that you don't see all of these things
as great achievesments shows that you are a very small person.
Conservatives are the blind being led by the stupid.
Once again proving that you are an idiot.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "James E. Morrow" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 01:02:50 AM |
|
|
In article <d17hda$okn$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>, says...
"James E. Morrow" < > wrote in message
news:MPG.1ca02570a60f268a9896d9@news.individual.net...
In article <83Q57ZMP38425.7910300926@anonymous.poster>,
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid says...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
This is good news for Republicans, since the demonstrable majority
of American voters proved to the world on Tuesday November 2, 2004
that the Republicans are here to stay, and the liberals are losing
their viability as a major player in American politics. Republicans
shall continue to gain majority seats in both the House and Senate,
and naturally the Red counties will continue to encroach upon the
Blue counties. Even the desperate "Buy Blue" efforts of the left-
wing liberals is having the very opposite effect, since Republicans
are using the very same lists of companies to aggressively boycott
those who're contributors to the DNC. E.g. see this recent article:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
As far as religion's integral place in American politics goes, the
Republicans enjoy a clear, overwhelming advantage over the liberals,
because liberalism has become effectively synonymous with anarchism,
lawlessness and terrorism. The liberals hijacked the Democrat party,
especially since their egregiously bitter defeat in 2000. Nowadays,
the ever-dwindling moderate wing of the Democrats have lost control
of the party. That's why radical left-wing extremists like Dean and
Clinton are headlining the DNC...leaving moderates nowhere in sight.
Furthermore, it's become common knowledge that the liberals support
an entirely Anti-Christian left-wing agenda, e.g. the ACLU, radical
judges who legislate from the bench to promote Anti-Judeo-Christian
laws like banning the Ten Commandments from public places, blatant
promotion of homosexuality and other flagrantly-hedonistic gluttony,
supporting terrorists whilst condemning the United States military,
rewarding violent criminals while punishing their hapless victims,
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseam!
While the Republicans are far from perfect, the liberals have self-
imploded, and they're only going to continue their downward spiral
Allow me to direct you to the map. The left is out of touch, far out of
touch with the American people. Vast regions of this great land have
not voted for Demorats in any meaningful numbers since I was a teenager
forty years ago. It is getting more pronounced. The Demorats have lost
elections for a generation at an increasing rate. Note when Demorats
are successful. How did you last win. It was with Bill Clinton. Yes,
Clinton the "Master of the middle." You've forgotten how to do that.
And there aren't anymore Bill Clintons our there.
Look at the map and stop ignoring reality. Middle America deeply
distrusts the left. Fact the facts. The Demorats are far too far to the
left to be viable as a national party. The once great Demorat Party is
a bi-coastal blue smear and little else.
http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html
--
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:16:47 AM |
|
|
In article <d17hda$okn$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>, says...
"James E. Morrow" <jamesemorrow@email.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ca02570a60f268a9896d9@news.individual.net...
In article <83Q57ZMP38425.7910300926@anonymous.poster>,
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid says...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
This is good news for Republicans, since the demonstrable majority
of American voters proved to the world on Tuesday November 2, 2004
that the Republicans are here to stay, and the liberals are losing
their viability as a major player in American politics. Republicans
shall continue to gain majority seats in both the House and Senate,
and naturally the Red counties will continue to encroach upon the
Blue counties. Even the desperate "Buy Blue" efforts of the left-
wing liberals is having the very opposite effect, since Republicans
are using the very same lists of companies to aggressively boycott
those who're contributors to the DNC. E.g. see this recent article:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
As far as religion's integral place in American politics goes, the
Republicans enjoy a clear, overwhelming advantage over the liberals,
because liberalism has become effectively synonymous with anarchism,
lawlessness and terrorism. The liberals hijacked the Democrat party,
especially since their egregiously bitter defeat in 2000. Nowadays,
the ever-dwindling moderate wing of the Democrats have lost control
of the party. That's why radical left-wing extremists like Dean and
Clinton are headlining the DNC...leaving moderates nowhere in sight.
Furthermore, it's become common knowledge that the liberals support
an entirely Anti-Christian left-wing agenda, e.g. the ACLU, radical
judges who legislate from the bench to promote Anti-Judeo-Christian
laws like banning the Ten Commandments from public places, blatant
promotion of homosexuality and other flagrantly-hedonistic gluttony,
supporting terrorists whilst condemning the United States military,
rewarding violent criminals while punishing their hapless victims,
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseam!
While the Republicans are far from perfect, the liberals have self-
imploded, and they're only going to continue their downward spiral
Allow me to direct you to the map. The left is out of touch, far out of
touch with the American people. Vast regions of this great land have
not voted for Demorats in any meaningful numbers since I was a teenager
forty years ago. It is getting more pronounced. The Demorats have lost
elections for a generation at an increasing rate. Note when Demorats
are successful. How did you last win. It was with Bill Clinton. Yes,
Clinton the "Master of the middle." You've forgotten how to do that.
And there aren't anymore Bill Clintons our there.
True, but watch out for Hillary, she's trying to imitate Bill with her
move to the center.
Look at the map and stop ignoring reality. Middle America deeply
distrusts the left. Fact the facts. The Demorats are far too far to the
left to be viable as a national party. The once great Demorat Party is
a bi-coastal blue smear and little else.
http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html
Those who vote for the Dems are very stupid, thus easily deceived.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:08:51 AM |
|
|
In article <83Q57ZMP38425.7910300926@anonymous.poster>,
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid says...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
This is good news for Republicans, since the demonstrable majority
of American voters proved to the world on Tuesday November 2, 2004
that the Republicans are here to stay, and the liberals are losing
their viability as a major player in American politics. Republicans
shall continue to gain majority seats in both the House and Senate,
and naturally the Red counties will continue to encroach upon the
Blue counties. Even the desperate "Buy Blue" efforts of the left-
wing liberals is having the very opposite effect, since Republicans
are using the very same lists of companies to aggressively boycott
those who're contributors to the DNC. E.g. see this recent article:
http://www.google.co.in/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://www.google.co.uk/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=83118de57802e2ce2c34f02e91c8b56d@dizum.com
As far as religion's integral place in American politics goes, the
Republicans enjoy a clear, overwhelming advantage over the liberals,
because liberalism has become effectively synonymous with anarchism,
lawlessness and terrorism. The liberals hijacked the Democrat party,
especially since their egregiously bitter defeat in 2000. Nowadays,
the ever-dwindling moderate wing of the Democrats have lost control
of the party. That's why radical left-wing extremists like Dean and
Clinton are headlining the DNC...leaving moderates nowhere in sight.
Furthermore, it's become common knowledge that the liberals support
an entirely Anti-Christian left-wing agenda, e.g. the ACLU, radical
judges who legislate from the bench to promote Anti-Judeo-Christian
laws like banning the Ten Commandments from public places, blatant
promotion of homosexuality and other flagrantly-hedonistic gluttony,
supporting terrorists whilst condemning the United States military,
rewarding violent criminals while punishing their hapless victims,
and the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on ad nauseam!
While the Republicans are far from perfect, the liberals have self-
imploded, and they're only going to continue their downward spiral
in the abyssal of ineffectiveness and obscurity. The *majority* of
voting Americans equate the liberals with God-hating Anti-Christs!
And why not? Since it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck.
The liberals *behave* like Anti-Christs, thus they are Anti-Christ.
No matter what the liberals do, they'll never recover from their
devastating loses, and the Democrats are paying the price for it.
Watch and see. 2006 and 2008 will be the Democrats' death knell.
Well said. The hijacking has been ongoing for a very long time now. As
things now stand the moderates in the Demorat Party are almost extinct.
Every issue is seen by Demorats from some strange ultra egalitarian
prospective which is divorce from any political reality. If group A
must have equal rights then so must group B and subset c2 and so on
into absurdism. So this will include all manner of "rights" for
murderers and rapists and ............ Well why not terrorists too. We
must not be unfair to those who are trying to kill us. That wouldn't be
fair. Whine
Great post.
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
Indeed he was.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nomen Nescio" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 03:50:02 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, James E. Morrow <> wrote:
In article <83Q57ZMP38425.7910300926@anonymous.poster>,
nobody@bikikii.ath.cx.invalid says...
In reality, American voters have become so politically-polarized
that neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are apt to attract
any significant numbers of previous opposition voters to switch
their party alliance and vote accordingly. It ain't gonna happen.
<snips>
No matter what the liberals do, they'll never recover from their
devastating loses, and the Democrats are paying the price for it.
Watch and see. 2006 and 2008 will be the Democrats' death knell.
Well said. The hijacking has been ongoing for a very long time now. As
things now stand the moderates in the Demorat Party are almost extinct.
Every issue is seen by Demorats from some strange ultra egalitarian
prospective which is divorce from any political reality. If group A
must have equal rights then so must group B and subset c2 and so on
into absurdism. So this will include all manner of "rights" for
murderers and rapists and ............ Well why not terrorists too. We
must not be unfair to those who are trying to kill us. That wouldn't be
fair. Whine
Note the quote below which I believe is pertinent. Dr. Hayek was a very
perceptive and wise man.
James E. Morrow Email to
"I am certain that nothing has done so much to destroy the
juridical safeguards of individual freedom as the striving after the
mirage of social justice." Dr. Fredrich August von Hayek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
That's a very interesting quotation. I hadn't seen it before.
And we must add the one conspicuous exception to Group A and
Group B and subset c2 ad infinitum. The *only* group who the
liberals DON'T want to have any rights whatsoever, much less
equal rights, is the Judeo-Christian traditional family values
oriented majority voter base of the Republican party. Liberals
don't want *any* part of religious freespeech in their heathen
world. But apart from the Judeo-Xian majority, everybody ELSE
gets "equal rights" from the liberals, even inhuman genocidal
vermin like Adolf Hitler would've been sitting in Howard Dean's
chair of the DNC if the liberals had anything to say about it.
The liberals seem to believe that inhuman terminally-diseased
rabid animals somehow manage to retain their humanity? I guess
that's why they openly support Al-Qaeda, Bin Laden, Al-Zarqawi
and those of their heartless and murderous ilk. The right thing
to do would be to capture and euthanize the poor little critters
and put them out of their hate-filled misery, and for the sake of
protecting our families, our communities, cities, states, nation
and the whole free world from that oft-fatal bite of the serpent.
Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQjdYOJljD7YrHM/nEQI5agCgkOXFcqlrLx65uHxkm7KeJ3K4RYMAnAhs
ng9eOYHeaLZPvy62MpN3q3Vg
=N0W/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 05:04:53 PM |
|
|
Unable to differentiate between a Hog and a Porker, our erstwhile hero
tries vainly to paint his side as the white side, and all else as
beneath contempt, funny he wants to boycott the system because a
rational approach does not impress our rough hewn no manners ding from
the Mid West.
You are also the problem not the solution.
Make a straight path for those who are coming to replace you.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 08:13:03 AM |
|
|
Of course he is, and so is his nutty wife.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 08:25:40 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
and so is his nutty wife.
See above. She ain't half as nutty as you, you incest-promoting,
panty-obsessed, oxcodyn peddling pool of disturbed filth.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
15 Mar 2005 09:32:11 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to the
sane)
END
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:19:21 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to the
sane)
Yep, but the dishonest Liberals will never face up to the facts.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:27:32 AM |
|
|
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110989881.45f9adb66f93482f533b165d6f385089@teranews...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to
the
sane)
Yep, but the dishonest Liberals will never face up to the facts.
Nope the plain dishonest, like you will never back up your ludicrous
accusations.
NO then, here is the legal definition of treason, please indicat how JKerry
(and his wife! LOL) are guilty of it;
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t103.htm
"The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against
the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is
punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person
shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to
the same overt act, or on confession in open court. "
Take your time, you'll need it...
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 11:45:26 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d19mgi$3i3$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110989881.45f9adb66f93482f533b165d6f385089@teranews...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a
cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to
the
sane)
Yep, but the dishonest Liberals will never face up to the facts.
Nope the plain dishonest, like you will never back up your ludicrous
accusations.
Forget treason!
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him an
honorable discharge???
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
17 Mar 2005 02:06:44 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39r9loF64u0krU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d19mgi$3i3$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110989881.45f9adb66f93482f533b165d6f385089@teranews...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a
cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal
of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to
the
sane)
Yep, but the dishonest Liberals will never face up to the facts.
Nope the plain dishonest, like you will never back up your ludicrous
accusations.
Forget treason!
So you both admit you lied. Great!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
17 Mar 2005 10:18:44 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1bdhh$r6m$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39r9loF64u0krU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d19mgi$3i3$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110989881.45f9adb66f93482f533b165d6f385089@teranews...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a
cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal
of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious(
to
the
sane)
Yep, but the dishonest Liberals will never face up to the facts.
Nope the plain dishonest, like you will never back up your ludicrous
accusations.
Forget treason!
So you both admit you lied. Great!
No, I concede that you will stonewall anything said on the subject, so we go
looking for the next stone wall.
The part you so conveniently deleted is reposted below. start stacking those
stones.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him an
honorable discharge???
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
17 Mar 2005 10:30:31 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39tov5F67at4eU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1bdhh$r6m$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39r9loF64u0krU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d19mgi$3i3$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110989881.45f9adb66f93482f533b165d6f385089@teranews...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote:
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide
a
cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you
go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the
reversal
of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious(
to
the
sane)
Yep, but the dishonest Liberals will never face up to the facts.
Nope the plain dishonest, like you will never back up your ludicrous
accusations.
Forget treason!
So you both admit you lied. Great!
No, I concede that you will stonewall anything said on the subject,
LOL! Asking for evidence to back up your kooky claims is stonewalling is it?
Figures...
so we go
looking for the next stone wall.
The part you so conveniently deleted is reposted below.
And it is utterly irrelevant to whether he is guilty of treason (which he
isnt) and hence a traitor (which he isn't).
I'd like to say nice try, but it was in fact a *****-poor one.
start stacking those
stones.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him an
honorable discharge???
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
17 Mar 2005 02:54:58 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1cb25$f4p$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him an
honorable discharge???
Obviously a fact you can't dispute, so you choose to ignore.
Hanoi John is not a traitor, the same way OJ
Simpson is not a murderer.
Something you can be very proud of.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
18 Mar 2005 02:27:24 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39u953F64l1pgU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1cb25$f4p$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him an
honorable discharge???
Obviously a fact you can't dispute, so you choose to ignore.
It's an opinion I'm not bothered about. You said he was a traitor, I asked
what deeds he had comitted that fall under the definiton of treason, you
were manifestly unable to do so so now you attempt to obfuscate to divert
attention from your lies and cowardice.
Hanoi John is not a traitor, the same way OJ
Simpson is not a murderer.
Hardly. When was John Kerry put on trial for treachery again?
Something you can be very proud of
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
18 Mar 2005 09:35:51 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1e349$aak$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39u953F64l1pgU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1cb25$f4p$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him
an
honorable discharge???
Obviously a fact you can't dispute, so you choose to ignore.
It's an opinion I'm not bothered about. You said he was a traitor, I asked
what deeds he had comitted that fall under the definiton of treason, you
were manifestly unable to do so so now you attempt to obfuscate to divert
attention from your lies and cowardice.
Hanoi John is not a traitor, the same way OJ
Simpson is not a murderer.
Hardly. When was John Kerry put on trial for treachery again?
Something you can be very proud of
Jim E
2 Nov 04
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
18 Mar 2005 09:48:42 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:3a0aqnF65mvg2U1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1e349$aak$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39u953F64l1pgU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d1cb25$f4p$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
Justify the re issue of his dubious awards at a date years past his
separation.
The mere fact that they needed to be *re instated* speaks for
itself.
Why were they withdrawn in the first place??
Why did he have to wait for that loser the Peanut Farmer to give him
an
honorable discharge???
Obviously a fact you can't dispute, so you choose to ignore.
It's an opinion I'm not bothered about. You said he was a traitor, I
asked
what deeds he had comitted that fall under the definiton of treason, you
were manifestly unable to do so so now you attempt to obfuscate to
divert
attention from your lies and cowardice.
Hanoi John is not a traitor, the same way OJ
Simpson is not a murderer.
Hardly. When was John Kerry put on trial for treachery again?
Something you can be very proud of
Jim E
2 Nov 04
Inability to rebut noted..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 01:55:54 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39pnlnF5ujghaU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
I take it that means you can't prove it? Hey, I can say you ***** pigs if I
want, does that make you a pigfucker?
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to the
sane)
The fact that you have never denied fucking pigs makes the whole thing
pretty obvious( to the
sane)
Now then, what about his wife, how was she a traitor?
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
and so is his nutty wife.
See above. She ain't half as nutty as you, you incest-promoting,
panty-obsessed, oxcodyn peddling pool of disturbed filth.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:53:42 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d18oh8$gb2$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39pnlnF5ujghaU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
I take it that means you can't prove it? Hey, I can say you ***** pigs if I
want, does that make you a pigfucker?
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to
the
sane)
The fact that you have never denied fucking pigs makes the whole thing
pretty obvious( to the
sane)
Now then, what about his wife, how was she a traitor?
I will agree she lacks the smarts to be a traitor.
A clown, yes.
A public embarrassment for the left, thank you.
And a damn fine source of money for the left.
But not a traitor.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 03:41:23 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39pnlnF5ujghaU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
Strange... the legal definition for treason doesn't agree.
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t103.htm
"The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against
the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is
punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person
shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to
the same overt act, or on confession in open court. "
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
No need.. the activity you accuse him of doesn't fall under the definiton of
"treason". For example, if a captured officer negotiates for e.g. better
conditions for the POW men under his command without authorisation from teh
government, that woudl obviously not be treason.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to the
sane)
I'm pretty sure the penalty for treason is rather stricter that a "less than
honourable discharge" and re-awarding of medals...
END
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:56:21 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d18una$jqs$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39pnlnF5ujghaU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
Strange... the legal definition for treason doesn't agree.
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t103.htm
"The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against
the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is
punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person
shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to
the same overt act, or on confession in open court. "
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
No need.. the activity you accuse him of doesn't fall under the definiton
of
"treason". For example, if a captured officer negotiates for e.g. better
conditions for the POW men under his command without authorisation from
teh
government, that woudl obviously not be treason.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to
the
sane)
I'm pretty sure the penalty for treason is rather stricter that a "less
than
honourable discharge" and re-awarding of medals...
So you admit that Hanoi john was given a less than honorable discharge due
to his illegal activities, that was upgraded by the peanut farmer.
Thank you.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Hanoi John Kerry A Traitor? (was Bush-bashing balderdash) |
16 Mar 2005 10:58:16 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39r6pmF63f8n8U1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d18una$jqs$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:39pnlnF5ujghaU1@individual.net...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:d16r0b$ia4$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110895904.23037b6723d248234f3b7d164d7b7457@teranews...
Of course he is,
Now, seeing as treason is a legal term, you will have to provide a
cite
of
what crimes he has commited that fall under that term. Off you go.
Negotiating with the enemy in time of war without government
authorization.
Strange... the legal definition for treason doesn't agree.
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t103.htm
"The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason
against
the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is
punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person
shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses
to
the same overt act, or on confession in open court. "
now you start the revisionists *prove it* mantra.
No need.. the activity you accuse him of doesn't fall under the
definiton
of
"treason". For example, if a captured officer negotiates for e.g. better
conditions for the POW men under his command without authorisation from
teh
government, that woudl obviously not be treason.
The fact that all his medals had to be re awarded after the reversal of
his
less than honorable discharge makes the whole thing pretty obvious( to
the
sane)
I'm pretty sure the penalty for treason is rather stricter that a "less
than
honourable discharge" and re-awarding of medals...
So you admit that Hanoi john was given a less than honorable discharge due
to his illegal activities
Nope.But since you want to play it that way, you admit that nothing J Kerry
did falls under the term "treason" as defined:
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t103.htm
"The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against
the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is
punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person
shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to
the same overt act, or on confession in open court. "
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
