Re: Is this the same NASA that went to the moon??



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Re: Is this the same NASA that went to the moon??

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Daniel Joseph Min"
Date: 22 Dec 2004 05:46:45 PM
Object: Re: Is this the same NASA that went to the moon??
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Ray Vingnutte wrote:

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 23:00:03 +0100 (CET)
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Ray Vingnutte <rvnospam@againnospam.our.uk> wrote:

I'm astonished at what I have seen on NASA TV, disappointed and
astonished. Disappointed because I thought at least we have this low
earth orbit thing going, and then astonished at how well we have not
got it going.
<snips>


Thanks for the links, but can you explain what you mean about google, I
currently am using Tor and privoxy so when I go to google I never sure
which google I will be accessing, mostly it is foreign google's anyway
that I see come up although I'm in the UK but have not noticed any
problems.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Here in the United States, not 30 days after the left-liberal Democrats
were trounced in our widely-scrutinized presidential election, Google,
which was founded by know radical left-wing liberals Larry Page and
Sergey Brin, kicked in their new "beta" which caused all embedded links
to previously archived newsgroup messages to be broken and dysfunctional,
and mysteriously truncated messages without explanation or any way for
the user to view the actual *original* message in its pristine entirety.
And this censors the *ENTIRE* newsgroup archive, not just parts of it.

I noticed on the "alt.internet.search-engines" newsgroup just a few days
after the Google "beta" took over, someone posted that users could still
find the "old" ergo functional and uncensored Google archives just like
it was before the month after the November 2nd election. I checked it
out and sure enough, any foreign-domain server, like the one in Canada,
et al, has yet to be censored by the busy Google programmers, but this
is not likely to stay that way, because the bitterly-defeated liberals
are desperately trying to hold onto what little power they still have.

Censorship of the archives is the liberals' way of obfuscating all of
the messages on the archives, lest the moderate Democrats search through
the archives and discover that the liberals' continual stream of vitriol
and disinformation, forgeries and slander had a great deal to do with
their resounding loss to Bush and giving up more seats in the Congress.
Even http://news.google.com has now censored moderate-to-conservative
on-line media like FOXNEWS et al, which wasn't the case before Dec 1st.

Meanwhile, until Google completely locks the uncensored archives from
public view, then it's good to hear your UK Google is still functioning.
It damn-sure isn't working here anymore since around December 1st or so.
It's ashamed, really, because the archives hold hundreds of millions of
posts dating back to 1981 when there were only about 150 computers on
the network. The newsgroup archives should be protected by federal law
from Google's draconian censorship thereof. While we know that our US
government maintains *complete* archives on their mainframe computers
on every continent (well, maybe not in Antarctica...who knows?), so
in the long-run the archives are safe and heavily guarded, it'll be
decades probably before they're made publicly available. Thus, the
only way to force Google to release the archives (previously Deja Vu)
would be by federal mandate--which might happen once news of Google's
censorship becomes widely known to the moderate-to-conservative news
media here in America.
So, while the foreign-domain work-around still lasts, everybody who
wants to search the archives had better do so quick, before Google
shuts the whole thing down.
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.google.co.in./groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://www.google.co.uk./groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_joseph_min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQcoGmZljD7YrHM/nEQLYTwCg82+8BFmX6q/Hbu6UJQYNX3rxBrgAoPg8
VyvjDiRG/ilSVv92FeaUt+1g
=GBVN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

.

User: "Grantland"

Title: Re: Is this the same NASA that went to the moon?? 22 Dec 2004 09:11:42 PM
Daniel Joseph Min <Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote:
le
Beat off *****-eater. You're CLOSED DOWN understood? FOREVER!!! And
we're coming for you, personally. SSSoon. EHHEEHEEE\maniacal
laughter\
The Liberal Elite
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER