On 9 Jun 2007 02:57:34 +0200, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
<anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007, Jyeshta <whatever@twixtntween.com> wrote:

Edgar Cayce did make vague astrological references in his trance
states, but he was no astrologer. And I don't know if Nostradamus was
really a trained astrologer, either. And the "Scriptures", while
containing some astrology (as well as condemning anyone who'd practice
it), is certainly no astrological textbook.

"LEGIS CANTIO CONTRA INEPTOS CRITICOS
THE LAW IS SINGING AGAINST INEPT CRITICS

Quos legent hosce versus mature censunto,
Whom will be reading these verses maturely they will evaluate,

Profanum vulgus & inscium ne attrectato:
Profane masses & those not sciential not they will be touching:

Omnesq; Astrologi, Blennis, Barbari procul sunto,
Wholly; Astrologer, Blockhead, Barbarian afar off they shall be,

Qui aliter facit, is rite sacer esto."
Who otherwise is doing, this rite sacred he shall be.

--quatrain C6Q100+, Michel de Nostradamus (1503-1566)

Hope that helps, :)

Not much... it looks here like he equates astrologers with blockheads
and barbarians.