Re: Johm Lemke!



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Re: Johm Lemke!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "John Lemke"
Date: 13 Apr 2007 05:31:33 PM
Object: Re: Johm Lemke!
On Apr 13, 11:48 am, Dani Bell wrote:

On 13 Apr 2007 05:54:28 -0700, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net>
wrote:

It's been very cool to see Dani grow over the years. Not that she was
a child when we first encountered her.
It's been a matter of someone seeing and accepting challenges in her
life, stretch out, sweat it out and get stronger and wiser. That
should be happening to everyone every day.


Man, what a morning I'm having! You guys are killin' me, John! I'm
blushing over here - at a loss for words!

That is *such* an awesome compliment. Thank you so much.

Do you really think that? That I've gotten "stronger" and "wiser"
from six years ago up until now? You don't even know what that means
to me if you're really serious. That's the BEST possible compliment
anyone could give me.

Wow.

Thanks. (loss for words).

Dani

I'm DEADLY serious, my dear. Mean every word of it.
But it's an intangible thing. Some things you sense but you trust
that sense as time goes by. I'm sure you know about that. Little
clues that point to bigger pictures.
And you come to have a strong respect for people that go thru
adversity and find a way to come out strong and healthy. And then they
work at staying strong and healthy. That's a sign of inner awareness
and a willingness to change. Making the changes involves a conscious
choice and that shows wisdom. So if this is the way it is with you
you're going to be a huge breeding ground for wisdom for the rest of
your life. :-)
I hope you're still working at a vocation where you can pass some of
that wisdom on.
.

User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 09:35:20 AM
On 13 Apr 2007 15:31:33 -0700, "John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net>
wrote:

On Apr 13, 11:48 am, Dani Bell wrote:

On 13 Apr 2007 05:54:28 -0700, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net>
wrote:

It's been very cool to see Dani grow over the years. Not that she was
a child when we first encountered her.
It's been a matter of someone seeing and accepting challenges in her
life, stretch out, sweat it out and get stronger and wiser. That
should be happening to everyone every day.


Man, what a morning I'm having! You guys are killin' me, John! I'm
blushing over here - at a loss for words!

That is *such* an awesome compliment. Thank you so much.

Do you really think that? That I've gotten "stronger" and "wiser"
from six years ago up until now? You don't even know what that means
to me if you're really serious. That's the BEST possible compliment
anyone could give me.

Wow.

Thanks. (loss for words).

Dani


I'm DEADLY serious, my dear. Mean every word of it.

But it's an intangible thing. Some things you sense but you trust
that sense as time goes by. I'm sure you know about that. Little
clues that point to bigger pictures.

And you come to have a strong respect for people that go thru
adversity and find a way to come out strong and healthy. And then they
work at staying strong and healthy. That's a sign of inner awareness
and a willingness to change. Making the changes involves a conscious
choice and that shows wisdom. So if this is the way it is with you
you're going to be a huge breeding ground for wisdom for the rest of
your life. :-)

I hope you're still working at a vocation where you can pass some of
that wisdom on.

Thank you so much for this, John. It means a lot to me. You're a
very kind, good man.
Dani
.
User: "John Lemke"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 01:38:04 PM
On Apr 14, 10:35 am, Dani Bell wrote:

Thank you so much for this, John. It means a lot to me.

You're welcome, sweetie. Just pass on what you've learned to the
people around you and keep growing. Otherwise the struggle and the
pain is just wasted.

You're a
very kind, good man.

That's very true. :-)
.
User: "Dani"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 16 Apr 2007 12:40:18 AM
On 14 Apr 2007 11:38:04 -0700, "John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net>
wrote:

On Apr 14, 10:35 am, Dani Bell wrote:

Thank you so much for this, John. It means a lot to me.

You're welcome, sweetie. Just pass on what you've learned to the
people around you and keep growing. Otherwise the struggle and the
pain is just wasted.

I'll tell ya, John.. I came to this group when I was only 21. And I
look back now and I barely remember that girl! SO much has changed
during the past six years. I learned a lot here. A lot about
different countries, different cultures - as depressing as it was, I
was so damn sheltered in the sense that I really didn't think of the
world outside of America. But that wasn't by *choice* it was more-so
by conditioning. I also felt lucky; felt like we had it made here in
America and everyone else was envious of us. And everyone else didn't
have the luxuries that we had. I felt sorry for them, John.
(please, for the others reading this - don't get MAD until you read
my next paragraph! .. ;)
BUT THEN.. I found myself on an international group. People from
Canada, England, Ireland, Sweden, South Africa etc., at first I was
obviously still ignorant at that point so I was all gung-ho, backing
my country that (back then could do NO WRONG!), bleating on about the
eeeevil-doerrrs - and (get this!) I SUPPORTED GEORGE BUSH BACK
THEN!!!!!!
...but I was very young and very immature. And I was straight outta
Southie so of course I thought I was the cat's *****. I was stubborn;
belligerent, unwilling to open my mind to anything that went against
my preconceived notions.
Then more time went by. I started hearing things that made sense
(secretly I'd agree they made sense), but I still wasn't ready to make
that plunge and admit that there was so damn much that I needed to
learn. But I stayed here, John. And that wasn't like me. I barely
ever used my computer back then...and I certainly never dreamed I'd be
an active regular on a group for 6 straight years. But I kept coming
back. Something was driving me. A thirst for knowledge; a journey
that somehow I knew needed to be ventured.
I began to change so much, that the friends I had in the beginning,
and the ones I didn't get along with in the beginning completely
switched roles. My friends were no longer my friends and the ones
that I originally fought with became my friends. Think about that.
THAT is how much my views changed.
This is getting far too long-winded! Sorry (writing mood).
I'll close by saying that the vast majority of people here and
elsewhere on the net that participate in newsgroups, chat boards etc..
are already grown and set in their ways. Like you mentioned a few
days ago that you've enjoyed watching me grow thru the years. Well, I
was one of the rare ones who was lost...believing what I *thought* I
was supposed to believe - rather than finding out exactly what it is
that I DO believe.
Now I have friends all over the world (when at one point America *was*
the only world to me. I've traveled to England, Ireland, Amsterdam
and France. Back when I was blind I remember thinking I wasn't very
interested in traveling. Now, I still wanna hit Australia, Canada,
Italy and Germany.
If you haven't fallen asleep yet, thanks for bearing with me!
I'm trying to express my gratitude to many of you who could've easily
given up on me because I was such a righteous ***** back then. But I
think you may have seen that I was young, came from a rough city, was
real street-savvy ... but there was also a lost girl in there with a
lot of pain. Someone who needed a little bit of a nudge; someone that
could learn and grow - someone who would never admit it, but who
*wanted* to learn and grow.
In closing: This should wrap up how much I've changed:
When I first cam here, guys - I SUPPORTED GEORGE BUSH!!!!
....need I say more .. ;)
Dani
.
User: "John Lemke"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 16 Apr 2007 03:06:29 PM
On Apr 16, 1:40 am, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
That's all good stuff. Ya gotta be a bit adventurous and a lot open
minded. The last thing you'll ever be is some drone, another worker
bee.
I think you've got a very interesting life ahead of you.
Enjoy........................
.

User: "=?utf-8?B?4pi6IC7CtzoqwqjCqCo6wrcuwrc6KsKowqgqOsK3LiDimaUgw4AgYmllbnTDtHQgJiBIYXN0YSBtYcOxYW5hLCBwZW9wbGV6ICBIT09ST08g4pi7IC7CtzoqwqjCqCo6wrcuIOKZpQ==?="

Title: John Lemke! 18 Apr 2007 11:02:31 PM
VGhlcmUgVSBnbyAhISEg4pi6CgpIT09ST08g4pi7CgpVTkNMRSBXQUxMWSDimLsK
.




User: "eric"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 13 Apr 2007 09:52:23 PM
On Apr 13, 6:31 pm, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:

On Apr 13, 11:48 am, Dani Bell wrote:



On 13 Apr 2007 05:54:28 -0700, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net>
wrote:


It's been very cool to see Dani grow over the years. Not that she was
a child when we first encountered her.
It's been a matter of someone seeing and accepting challenges in her
life, stretch out, sweat it out and get stronger and wiser. That
should be happening to everyone every day.


Man, what a morning I'm having! You guys are killin' me, John! I'm
blushing over here - at a loss for words!


That is *such* an awesome compliment. Thank you so much.


Do you really think that? That I've gotten "stronger" and "wiser"
from six years ago up until now? You don't even know what that means
to me if you're really serious. That's the BEST possible compliment
anyone could give me.


Wow.


Thanks. (loss for words).


Dani


I'm DEADLY serious, my dear. Mean every word of it.

But it's an intangible thing. Some things you sense but you trust
that sense as time goes by. I'm sure you know about that. Little
clues that point to bigger pictures.

And you come to have a strong respect for people that go thru
adversity and find a way to come out strong and healthy. And then they
work at staying strong and healthy. That's a sign of inner awareness
and a willingness to change. Making the changes involves a conscious
choice and that shows wisdom. So if this is the way it is with you
you're going to be a huge breeding ground for wisdom for the rest of
your life. :-)

I hope you're still working at a vocation where you can pass some of
that wisdom on.

Hey, John, you really, really need a girlfriend. Seriously dude.
.
User: "John Lemke"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 13 Apr 2007 10:40:51 PM
On Apr 13, 10:52 pm, "eric" <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 13, 6:31 pm, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:



On Apr 13, 11:48 am, Dani Bell wrote:


On 13 Apr 2007 05:54:28 -0700, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net>
wrote:


It's been very cool to see Dani grow over the years. Not that she was
a child when we first encountered her.
It's been a matter of someone seeing and accepting challenges in her
life, stretch out, sweat it out and get stronger and wiser. That
should be happening to everyone every day.


Man, what a morning I'm having! You guys are killin' me, John! I'm
blushing over here - at a loss for words!


That is *such* an awesome compliment. Thank you so much.


Do you really think that? That I've gotten "stronger" and "wiser"
from six years ago up until now? You don't even know what that means
to me if you're really serious. That's the BEST possible compliment
anyone could give me.


Wow.


Thanks. (loss for words).


Dani


I'm DEADLY serious, my dear. Mean every word of it.


But it's an intangible thing. Some things you sense but you trust
that sense as time goes by. I'm sure you know about that. Little
clues that point to bigger pictures.


And you come to have a strong respect for people that go thru
adversity and find a way to come out strong and healthy. And then they
work at staying strong and healthy. That's a sign of inner awareness
and a willingness to change. Making the changes involves a conscious
choice and that shows wisdom. So if this is the way it is with you
you're going to be a huge breeding ground for wisdom for the rest of
your life. :-)


I hope you're still working at a vocation where you can pass some of
that wisdom on.


Hey, John, you really, really need a girlfriend. Seriously dude.

:-)
That was no rap, Eric. Just a sage, fatherly offering.
Seriously, dude, it's covered.
.
User: "eric"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 13 Apr 2007 11:11:31 PM
On Apr 13, 11:40 pm, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:

On Apr 13, 10:52 pm, "eric" <ericdavis...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 13, 6:31 pm, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:


On Apr 13, 11:48 am, Dani Bell wrote:


On 13 Apr 2007 05:54:28 -0700, "John Lemke" <jfle...@locallink.net>
wrote:


It's been very cool to see Dani grow over the years. Not that she was
a child when we first encountered her.
It's been a matter of someone seeing and accepting challenges in her
life, stretch out, sweat it out and get stronger and wiser. That
should be happening to everyone every day.


Man, what a morning I'm having! You guys are killin' me, John! I'm
blushing over here - at a loss for words!


That is *such* an awesome compliment. Thank you so much.


Do you really think that? That I've gotten "stronger" and "wiser"
from six years ago up until now? You don't even know what that means
to me if you're really serious. That's the BEST possible compliment
anyone could give me.


Wow.


Thanks. (loss for words).


Dani


I'm DEADLY serious, my dear. Mean every word of it.


But it's an intangible thing. Some things you sense but you trust
that sense as time goes by. I'm sure you know about that. Little
clues that point to bigger pictures.


And you come to have a strong respect for people that go thru
adversity and find a way to come out strong and healthy. And then they
work at staying strong and healthy. That's a sign of inner awareness
and a willingness to change. Making the changes involves a conscious
choice and that shows wisdom. So if this is the way it is with you
you're going to be a huge breeding ground for wisdom for the rest of
your life. :-)


I hope you're still working at a vocation where you can pass some of
that wisdom on.


Hey, John, you really, really need a girlfriend. Seriously dude.


:-)

That was no rap, Eric. Just a sage, fatherly offering.

Seriously, dude, it's covered.

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.
.
User: "burkhard.heim"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 10:38:17 AM


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -

Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.
Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.
Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.
Over and out.
.
User: "burkhard.heim"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 11:30:24 AM
On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.

Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.

Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.

Over and out.

Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.
Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc6140c8ae37f66?hl=en&
Au-revoir
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 11:52:45 AM
On 14 Apr 2007 09:30:24 -0700, "burkhard.heim"
<burkhard.heim@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.

Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.

Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.

Over and out.



Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.

Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc6140c8ae37f66?hl=en&

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
So good to see you! .. ;)
.
User: "burkhard.heim"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 03:28:59 PM
On 14 Apr, 17:52, Dani Bell wrote:

On 14 Apr 2007 09:30:24 -0700, "burkhard.heim"





<burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

So good to see you! .. ;)

Ditto -- still drivin' the old men crazy, I see ;)
http://www.lyricsondemand.com/onehitwonders/theboysarebackintownlyrics.html
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 01:30:51 PM
On 14 Apr 2007 13:28:59 -0700, "burkhard.heim"
<burkhard.heim@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 17:52, Dani Bell wrote:

On 14 Apr 2007 09:30:24 -0700, "burkhard.heim"





<burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

So good to see you! .. ;)


Ditto -- still drivin' the old men crazy, I see ;)

Ah, ya know.. I try not to make too much of a spectacle of myself
(which is why I usually just say "thanks" and don't go on and on about
myself). I am very flattered, though. Actually, I'm still not quite
sure what they see that is so great about me! But you know me, I'm my
worst critic.
And another thing - currently there are only two females (Woods and I)
that post - the rest are men. Who is to say that if 7 other women
were posting here, that it still would be *me* that they all like?
There's no competition. But...when Susan and Jane were here, they had
their admirers too. And so did you when everyone thought you were a
woman. Not to say the kind things they say to me aren't genuine; I
believe they are. It's just there aren't many other women here to
choose from.

http://www.lyricsondemand.com/onehitwonders/theboysarebackintownlyrics.html

Love that song! Reminds me of when I was a teenager. The vast
majority of my friends were guys (I've always gotten along better with
men). Women can be caddy bitches! .. ;) ..and I'm no exception! So,
that song "The boys are back in town" reminded me of *my boys* that's
what I called my male friends back then...and still call some of them
that to this day.
Anyway, again...so happy to see you. Let's keep in touch.
Dani
.
User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 02:00:49 PM
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:30:51 -0400, wrote:

On 14 Apr 2007 13:28:59 -0700, "burkhard.heim"
<burkhard.heim@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 17:52, Dani Bell wrote:

On 14 Apr 2007 09:30:24 -0700, "burkhard.heim"





<burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

So good to see you! .. ;)


Ditto -- still drivin' the old men crazy, I see ;)


Ah, ya know.. I try not to make too much of a spectacle of myself
(which is why I usually just say "thanks" and don't go on and on about
myself). I am very flattered, though. Actually, I'm still not quite
sure what they see that is so great about me! But you know me, I'm my
worst critic.

And another thing - currently there are only two females (Woods and I)
that post - the rest are men. Who is to say that if 7 other women
were posting here, that it still would be *me* that they all like?

There's no competition. But...when Susan and Jane were here, they had
their admirers too. And so did you when everyone thought you were a
woman. Not to say the kind things they say to me aren't genuine; I
believe they are. It's just there aren't many other women here to
choose from.

Hey, Dani - it's coming from their hearts, not because there's slim
pickin's in here. They'd have just kept their mouths shut if they didn't
mean it. I mean, they're guys! ;-)
Woods
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 03:09:40 PM
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:00:49 -0400, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:30:51 -0400, wrote:

On 14 Apr 2007 13:28:59 -0700, "burkhard.heim"
<burkhard.heim@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 17:52, Dani Bell wrote:

On 14 Apr 2007 09:30:24 -0700, "burkhard.heim"





<burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!

So good to see you! .. ;)


Ditto -- still drivin' the old men crazy, I see ;)


Ah, ya know.. I try not to make too much of a spectacle of myself
(which is why I usually just say "thanks" and don't go on and on about
myself). I am very flattered, though. Actually, I'm still not quite
sure what they see that is so great about me! But you know me, I'm my
worst critic.

And another thing - currently there are only two females (Woods and I)
that post - the rest are men. Who is to say that if 7 other women
were posting here, that it still would be *me* that they all like?

There's no competition. But...when Susan and Jane were here, they had
their admirers too. And so did you when everyone thought you were a
woman. Not to say the kind things they say to me aren't genuine; I
believe they are. It's just there aren't many other women here to
choose from.

Hey, Dani - it's coming from their hearts, not because there's slim
pickin's in here. They'd have just kept their mouths shut if they didn't
mean it. I mean, they're guys! ;-)

Yeah, you're right, Woods. I'm just my worst critic is all. It
doesn't appear it here, but in my everyday life I'm a tad bit insecure
and believe this or not - a bit shy! I have a little bit of a low
self-esteem at times which is why sometimes I question why they think
I'm great. They must be seeing things that I don't see. But boy am I
flattered.
Thank you for saying this to me!
Cheers,
Dani

Woods

.





User: "WH"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 11:51:11 AM
On Apr 14, 6:30 pm, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:





hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.

Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...

Au-revoir- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I wondered where you got to Taffy :-)
WH
.
User: "burkhard.heim"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 03:35:30 PM
On 14 Apr, 17:51, "WH" <boll...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 6:30 pm, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:





On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


Au-revoir- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I wondered where you got to Taffy :-)

WH

Hey ya... any dragons left in apn these days?
.


User: "Steven Douglas"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 04:33:35 PM
On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:



hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.

Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc6140c8ae37f66?hl=en&

So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 01:38:26 PM
On 14 Apr 2007 14:33:35 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:



hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.

Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc6140c8ae37f66?hl=en&


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.

Oh, Steven! Do you never laugh? Crack a smile? you're always such a
naysayyer and a downer. You seem like the type that would hear a
joke, watch a funny movie - or a funny video clip and say: "I don't
geddit!!!" LOL!
You're so straightedged. And it seems you view your cup as always
half empty rather than half full.
You honestly can't see even the slightest bit of humor in what Amy did
to Tony?
Dani
.

User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 12:49:39 PM
On 14 Apr 2007 14:33:35 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote:

So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.

Ha?
.
User: "Perseid"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 05:44:09 PM
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words

On 14 Apr 2007 14:33:35 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote:

So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.


Ha?


Everybody keeps giving the same response to stevie on this
particular mental gyration of his.
.
User: "Steven Douglas"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 07:12:36 PM
On Apr 15, 3:44 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Dani Bell Spat the Words

On 14 Apr 2007 14:33:35 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.


Ha?


Everybody keeps giving the same response to stevie on this
particular mental gyration of his.

Except for the actual person the post was addressed to.
.



User: "burkhard.heim"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 07:30:58 PM
On 14 Apr, 22:33, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:





On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus,

So you're still twisting words. Quelle surprise.

yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway.

A stopped clock is inadvertently correct twice every 86,400 seconds.
You've misread an insult as insight.

And
he was right.

See above.

And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.

You fell at the first hurdle. So anyway, I'm not here to bandy words,
just to undermine eric's fanciful notion. Post away, I'm orf.
@WH - I'm won't be hanging around long enough for your post to appear
on google.. so just to say it's I, not TW. I wondered what you meant
by taffy, it should've clicked :)
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 12:54:36 PM
On 14 Apr 2007 17:30:58 -0700, "burkhard.heim"
<burkhard.heim@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

@WH - I'm won't be hanging around long enough for your post to appear
on google.. so just to say it's I, not TW. I wondered what you meant
by taffy, it should've clicked :)

Awwww! You're not hanging around? Come ahhhhnnnn! I really miss you
here. We were good together - ya can't deny that! .. ;) A good team.
Hey, I've changed my email address. It is no longer
dani7200@hotmail.com I'll try writing you soon and we'll catch up,
and I'll give you my new email address, okay?
You take care, hun.
Cheers,
Dani
.

User: "Steven Douglas"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 08:35:37 PM
On Apr 14, 5:30 pm, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 22:33, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:


On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus,


So you're still twisting words. Quelle surprise.

Actually, when you take your own words from your post of a few months
ago, and combine that with your own quoted words above, I'm right on
the money. Here's what you said previously: "I decided that it would
be quite amusing to kick seven shades of faecal matter out of the
prehensile ape as a weak, stupid girly." Combine that sentence with
this one, "...it became an interesting exercise in Tony training...
the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed, seemingly, by a
member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head." Taken together,
the two sentences add up to my conclusion above.


yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway.


A stopped clock is inadvertently correct twice every 86,400 seconds.
You've misread an insult as insight.

Whatever you say, but his suspicions were correct.


And he was right.


See above.

See above.


And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.


You fell at the first hurdle.

Not really, but have it your way if you wish.


So anyway, I'm not here to bandy words,
just to undermine eric's fanciful notion.

Apparently he didn't get it.


Post away, I'm orf.

Take care, dude.
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 12:47:11 PM
On 14 Apr 2007 18:35:37 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 5:30 pm, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 22:33, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:


On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus,


So you're still twisting words. Quelle surprise.


Actually, when you take your own words from your post of a few months
ago, and combine that with your own quoted words above, I'm right on
the money. Here's what you said previously: "I decided that it would
be quite amusing to kick seven shades of faecal matter out of the
prehensile ape as a weak, stupid girly." Combine that sentence with
this one, "...it became an interesting exercise in Tony training...
the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed, seemingly, by a
member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head." Taken together,
the two sentences add up to my conclusion above.


yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway.


A stopped clock is inadvertently correct twice every 86,400 seconds.
You've misread an insult as insight.


Whatever you say, but his suspicions were correct.


And he was right.

Um, Steven.. that was only *one* post where Tony said he thought Amy
was a guy. ALL of his other posts to her were using the same
male-chauvinistic, dirty pig woman demoralizing type tactics towards
her. He would say such things as she's "a dried up *****" - "A ditz"
an "an air-head" - "A dumb broad" - her "husband must've left her."
Do not all of those things he said indicate that at that point, when
he was saying it he (obviously) was saying it to a woman?
So no - he wasn't right. He only made that comment thinking she may
be a dude ONCE - but there were many, many posts where he believed he
was speaking to a woman.
Dani
.


User: "WH"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 04:47:41 AM
On Apr 15, 2:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 22:33, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:





On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:


On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus,


So you're still twisting words. Quelle surprise.

yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway.


A stopped clock is inadvertently correct twice every 86,400 seconds.
You've misread an insult as insight.

And
he was right.


See above.

And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.


You fell at the first hurdle. So anyway, I'm not here to bandy words,
just to undermine eric's fanciful notion. Post away, I'm orf.

@WH - I'm won't be hanging around long enough for your post to appear
on google.. so just to say it's I, not TW. I wondered what you meant
by taffy, it should've clicked :)-

Well do I have egg on my face this morning :-) I thought it might be
you but the "Amy was the one who transgendered" is what made me switch
to TW. Not to worry though :-) I'll get over this little embarrassment
and come out stronger on the other side most likely :-)
Good to see that you're still kicking anyway!
WH
.
User: "Dani Bell"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 15 Apr 2007 12:35:29 PM
On 15 Apr 2007 02:47:41 -0700, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 15, 2:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

On 14 Apr, 22:33, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:





On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:


On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus,


So you're still twisting words. Quelle surprise.

yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway.


A stopped clock is inadvertently correct twice every 86,400 seconds.
You've misread an insult as insight.

And
he was right.


See above.

And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.


You fell at the first hurdle. So anyway, I'm not here to bandy words,
just to undermine eric's fanciful notion. Post away, I'm orf.

@WH - I'm won't be hanging around long enough for your post to appear
on google.. so just to say it's I, not TW. I wondered what you meant
by taffy, it should've clicked :)-


Well do I have egg on my face this morning :-) I thought it might be
you but the "Amy was the one who transgendered" is what made me switch
to TW. Not to worry though :-) I'll get over this little embarrassment
and come out stronger on the other side most likely :-)

Don't worry about it, Chris. I can see how Paul saying "it was Amy"
would lead you to think it was someone else, and not Paul posting.
But I knew it was him right away. His style is very original. And
I've had extensive conversations with him off and on the group for
many years. I immediately knew it was him...and the biggest,
brightest smile shined on my face - so happy to see him!
Now, if we could just get Grantland, Susan, Paul, TW (hell, even Tony!
Just to kick 'em around, of course .. ;) ..back then that would be
great.
Dani

Good to see that you're still kicking anyway!

WH

.



User: "WH"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 04:40:23 PM
On Apr 14, 11:33 pm, "Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 14, 9:30 am, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:





On 14 Apr, 16:38, "burkhard.heim" <burkhard.h...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:


hey, no offense, John...u have a good heart...But Dani, ain't who u
think "she" is.- Hide quoted text -


Jeeze eric, 'twas amy who transgendered... as both Dani and WH will
confirm.


Initially a simple login mistake, it became an interesting exercise in
Tony training... the worse for him having his gluteus maximus flayed ,
seemingly, by a member of the subhuman sub-species, girly air-head.
Nothing particularly weird by the standards of the prepubescent *****-
gargling and such found hereabouts.


Hopefully you'll recognise the over-wordiness and give up... either
that or take Dani up on her offer.


Over and out.


Here, one addendum, utilising my still-legendary gOOgle searching
skills... WH being a cheeky bugger.


Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.-

What?
WH
.
User: "Perseid"

Title: Re: Johm Lemke! 14 Apr 2007 05:25:29 PM
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> Spat the
Words

Look at what he says in the context of what he's replying to.


http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/fdc61...


So the entire exercise was to demonstrate that a female could flay
Tony's gluteus maximus, yet Tony suspected you were a guy anyway. And
he was right. And with your earlier admission of your charade, it
seems all you've done is discredit the concept you set out to
demonstrate.-


What?

WH

Stevie probably didn't know what he was trying to say when he
wrote it.. there is little chance that going back over it
will help him express these ideas any better.
.









  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
Johm Lemke!
Re: Johm Lemke!
To Johm Lemke
attn: John F Lemke, Randy Perseid, Marvy baby & all other ANTI- GERBILFRICKERS !!!
OT: Lemke's new grandson
John F. Lemke found dead?
PING: JOHN F. LEMKE -- FROM YOUR UNCLE WALLY
PING; JOHN F LEMKE & PERSEID -- FROM UNCLE WALLY
John F. Lemke Drip Drip
ATTN: RANDOLPH FOREMAN, JOHN F. LEMKE, GARY RAY LESLEY ET AL.....AN EYE-OPENING **MUST-READ ARTICLE** FOLLOWS:
Oh well, peoplez ;-), yeppers it'z that time of the day once again for your dear old Uncle Wally to say yet again HOOROO to all of my favorite peoplez out there in APN land -- HOOROO John F Lemke, Randy, Sandy, Eric, Ricky, Leigh Ballaam, Marvin the
Travel and life..John Lemke.
Uncle Wally 's "Joke Of The Day" for John F Lemke & Randy Foreman ;-)
attn: RANDOLPH FOREMAN & JOHN F. LEMKE !!!! FROM YOUR UNCLE WALLY.... HOOROO
Uh-Oh, John F Lemke, Randolph & Gazza -- Time to add another notch to the old Frickability Scale methinks !!!!
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER