"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t38hn0l8616mlgot0udnbok5rolbc68bqo@4ax.com
Jean,
You might not like what I have to say, but after just looking over
this group, I feel it needs to be said for your own good.
You throw the "anti-semite" and "terrorist supporter" accusations
around way too often and easily. You have called Krib criminally
insane and an anti-American - you've called Tom an anti-semite
over and over but yet you're unable to produce even one post of his
that is anti-semitic. Also.. why do you think he would be fighting
this accusation so hard if he really is an anti-semite? If he was
one, it would be evident. You've obviously offended him to the
point where he's not going to let this go.
And Krib.. he's most certainly not an anti-American. He's travelled
here, and he told me that he thought Boston was great and the people
were great. He's also said in the past that he has love for America.
So again, like with Tom, I'm sure Krib is offended by that accusation
which is why you are getting so much flack on this group. You can't
expect to throw those accusations out so easily without retribution.
I also remember Krib saying once (before this happened between you
guys) that he liked you even though he's been told by you that he has
"wallowed in fartitude" ..
The point is you throw these accusations around way too easily. When
you're constantly accusing people of it - your words lose conviction
and begin to fall upon deaf ears.. hence you're doing yourself a
disservice because when you come across a *real* anti-semite,
anti-American terrorist supporter - people will think: "Oh there's
Jean shouting anti-semitism and anti-Americanism again!"
Tom isn't an anti-semite, Jean.. and Krib is not anti-American.
It takes a strong man to admit when he is wrong. And it's always
respected and admired when he does.
Maybe you can try?
Dani
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:SP7ed.3736878
$6p.624561@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
The post Guernon! All the facts anyone needs to know are there...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:enRdd.23640$_u6.635@edtnps89...
The same way you lie about my personal life, the same way you lie about
the gist of your public posts.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:PTPdd.23445$_u6.19798@edtnps89...
tw a écrit:
The text, dope!
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:D6Odd.26389$cr4.15502@edtnps84...
Bah the text is a proof that you are an anti-semite and a kook.
Quite the reverse, dope
You mean a kook first, and an anti-semite second?
Are you really that stupid? Of course you are.
The text, dope!
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:D6Odd.26389$cr4.15502@edtnps84...
Bah the text is a proof that you are an anti-semite and a kook.
Quite the reverse, dope
Woodswun "Nope, it's pretty even handed against every group of
fundies."
Dani "Jean, I'm not a troll (nor is Woods) and neither of us
agree
that Tom
has made anti-semitic comments.Can't you find just
*one*
post of his to end this?"
Hence... the header, tw!
J.
tw a écrit:
The text, Dope!
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:GONdd.26375$cr4.14966@edtnps84...
The header, tw.
J.
tw a écrit:
THE CHALLENGE
I will reproduce this challenge which you have run
away from for the last two years:
EITHER:
1) Provide a post where I make an anti-semitic statement (I
nominate
Woodswun and Katherine Wolf to be judges of whether it is
anti-semitic
or not, if they agree)
OR
2) Apologise for you disgusting "anti-semite" smear
..and I will leave alt.prophecies.nostradamus for ever
Your constant failure to accept this challenge shows you don't even
believe the anti-semite smear yourself, and that you are too
cowardly
and
childish to admit you're wrong and apologise. In short, your
pathetic
ego
means more to you than the subject of Nostradamus
JEAN ACCEPTS THE CHALLENGE
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:misHc.19349018$Of.3209525@news.easynews.com...
You mean that what you just said 5 minutes ago, quote: "Jewish
[Christian, and Muslim Fundamentalists] are twisted Hypocrites,
who
really pray to the devil." is not anti-Semite for the religious
Jew?
But yes, if Woodshun that saying that is not an anti-Semite
statement,
then we shall see.
JEAN LOSES THE CHALLENGE
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:npiJc.64672$bp1.2599@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <cd3d76$793$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>,
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
Quite simply, do you find following statement anti-semitic:
"Jewish Christian, Muslim (and any other religious stripe)
Fundamentalists
are twisted Hypocrites, who really pray to the devil."
Thanks in advance
Nope, it's pretty even handed against every group of fundies.
JEAN TRIES TO WRIGGLE OUT OF THE CHALLENGE BY REDEFINING THE
STATEMENT
UNDER
CONTENTION AS WELL AS THE DEFINITION OF ANTI-SEMITISM
In article <8ajJc.19677883$Id.3259321@news.easynews.com>,
Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
So it is anti-Semite, and anti Christian, and anti-Islamic,
wouldn't
you
agree?
JEAN LOSES THERE AS WELL!
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:npiJc.64698$bp1.31131@twister.nyroc.rr.com>
No, I wouldn't - it's anti-fundie. You can be pro-christian, and
still
be
anti-fundie-christian. In fact, I know quite a few regular
churchgoers
who
are in that category. I don't know anybody who can stand fundies
of
any
religion.
The first part is the main interest in the discussion.
That may be *your* main interest, but that's not what the threat
started
off with, and I do think it's important to realize that
fundamentalism
is a
threat to freedoms and liberty if such groups are permitted
excessive
influence over the government.
JEAN LIES ABOUT LOSING THE CHALLENGE AND STARTS MAKING THINGS UP!
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:5gtQc.52156$pF1.8177@news.easynews.com...
What Woods said was that it
was not ONLY anti-semite, that it was also an insult to the two
other
monotheist religions.
--
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:qdnXc.152269$RY5.24085@news.easynews.com...
"On the other hand, I know I am
bunked and that you are debunked."
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:UkNdd.26352$cr4.24995@edtnps84...
All you can do is make up lies here on a NG where you don't have
any
legitimacy. You are a pathetic little troll.
J.
tw a écrit:
Change the record. And GET A HAIRCUT!
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:2bqdd.21913$cr4.19331@edtnps84...
Doesn't matter, he was threatened by a UN resolution t o comply
or
face
the serious consequences he was repeatedly warned about, which
were
of
course the lifting of the cease fire to get rid of his
government,
no
other serious consequences were ever repeatedly put to him.
Anyway, if the worlds, who designed unanimously for this last
chance
resolution, had wanted lesser consequences in case of non
compliance,
they would have made an amendment.
12 years of seeing him breach 687e without ever getting what he
was
threatened with required this 1441 last chance resolution to
stop
the
total stagnation of the UN resolve about its only resolution
that
had
authorized force.
But what happened? Kofi himself made the UN irrelevant after his
steak
was salvaged. Why? To conceal his complicity with thieves in
cahoots
with Saddam to take the meager crumbs from the mouth of the
Iraqi
people.
Anyway, weasels like you would always blame the US even if it is
black
on white that he was repeatedly told he would get this if he
kept
being
in breach.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in
message
news:dd3256f0.0410181739.28b1dde9@posting.google.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:20:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:19:11 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Except it was neither illegal nor unjustified.
Dani a écrit:
Jean, we've been over this enough times that we've reached
the
point
of agreeing to disagree because neither of us will change
our
minds.
I know you have children and grandchildren that live here
(what
are
their views on Bush and the war speaking of which?) But I
live
here
while you're in Canada so it's a reality for me.
There were no weapons of mass destruction. Saddam, yes,
an
evil
man - but *not* an imminent threat
WHAT??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?
?
Exactly what Dani said - he was not an imminent threat. He had
no
airforcwe
(otehr than some 30 year old aircraft buried in teh sand) no
WMD,
virtually
no army, he was being bombed more or less daily by aircratf
enforcing
teh no
fly zone etc. He was contained, toothless and a threat to no
one
other
than
the poor bastards who lived under his regime.
John Kerry said Saddam and Iraq were a threat in debate number
two.
So fucking what?
We're dealing with a true presidential-hopeful-moron or we're
dealing
with a true hard core LIAR
IOW, there is little to no difference between him and Bush.
Duuuhhh.
.
