In article <20040528061940.00694.00000058@mb-m01.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun)
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote:
Look for the Dems to pull a sneak attack with Kerry bashing
Bush right up until the middle of >>September, then back down
and hand the nomination to Hillary >>Clinton.
I doubt it - he's too power-hungry.
Woods
No where near as power hungry as she is.
Which is exactly why he wouldn't want her as his second in command, duh.
Woods
I agree, but that's not what I said; I specifically said that he would hand the
nomination over to her because he has no chance of winning, and given just 6
weeks, the Reps would have a tough time changing their campaign into Hillary
mode, whereas the Dems would have had 9 or 10 months of bashing Bush.
True, but I don't think Hillary could be elected at this point in time, and I
don't think Kerry would want to give up the spotlight.
I do think that if Bush wins this time around, Hillary will run in 2008 and have
a much better chance at winning that she would now.
Woods
.
