| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Anonyma" |
| Date: |
29 Oct 2006 12:57:47 PM |
| Object: |
Re: *LAST REMINDER*: Most Haunted LIVE!, Halloween Seances Begin... |
X-No-Archive: yes
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, "midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk" wrote:
His date of birth, by the way, is available online.
<s>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Not last time I looked it wasn't. And I'm pretty damned
good at finding information on the Internet. You failed
to cite your alleged URL(s) to definitive birth data for
David Wells. Yours is a typical Liberal tactic, to make
claims and not back them up with demonstrable facts, as
with the amateurishly-forged CBS "Rathergate" memos that
*failed* to put Hanoi John Kerry in the White House. :-D
But I'm the first to acknowlege facts over fiction, and
truth above lies. Show me don't tell me. Put up or shut
up. Prove me wrong about David Wells' actual birth data
*not* being on-line, and I'll be the first to thank you.
As for Wells being the Ouranos sojourn, that's my innate
pattern-recognition faculties at work. Of this I am sure.
Thus getting back to your gratuitous mockery of what you
neither understand nor practice, (i.e. judicial astrology)...
Personally, I don't care who you are or what you believe
to be true and/or factual, versus what you believe to be
false and/or fictitious. Your personal beliefs are your
business. All I care about is if you're Pro-American or
Anti-American. You're either for US or you're against US.
And *every* Republican voter in America understands this
clearly. You are either our friend, or you are our enemy.
God doesn't tolerate fence-riders. All MUST choose sides
in the eternal Battle of Armageddon--I'm on the Olympian
side. Liberals are on the Titan side. Guess who wins! :)
And in this day and age, it's easy enough for anyone with
an Internet connection to skiptrace, and develop dossiers
on, just about anyone else in the first-world nations, if
one were so inclined. That's what government intelligence
and national security agencies do better than anyone else.
Rest assured, our United States Government N.S.A., C.I.A.,
H.L.S., F.B.I., etc. know just who's who, and what's what,
better than anyone else of the world knows this--bar none.
As in this example, you're obviously what we'd call a low-
level target, non-threat, a dim and insignificant blip on
the global radar in our ongoing WWIII/Global War on Terror.
With the U.S. mid-term elections imminent, We Republicans
are doing everything in our individual & collective power
to ensure, -- to absolutely, positively guarantee without
the even the remotest possibility of error, -- Republican-
victory in the aforesaid Tuesday 7 November 2006 elections.
__________________________________________________________
That said, for the sake of conscientious non-Liberals who
may be reading (and certainly lurking, and snooping) some
helpful suggestions, if one were interested, for whatever
reason, in tracking down Anti-American Anti-Christ Liberal
Atheists & Co., one should start with his/her/its on-line
e-paper trail, beginning by searching the usenet newsgroup
archives, then branching out into the WWW search engines,
then consulting professional skiptracers, bounty hunters,
and even law-enforcement, State and/or Federal Government
intelligence and security agencies, in more extreme cases.
E.g., I began this search in the 'Google Groups' archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=29&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
NOTE: "midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk" started and/or repeated
relying on the "X-No-Archive: yes" request to conceal past
usenet newsgroup activity. Of course, Our US Government &
other allied government agencies around the free world do
not honor the "X-No-Archive: yes" directive, but gather &
cross-reference *every* bit and byte of data in the world.
Next... (this is just an example, fine-tune your searches)
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=america+god+bible+christian+conservative+republican+bush+cheney+coulter+hannity+oreilly+fnc+fox+jew+muslim+israel+iraq+saddam+iran+antichrist+atheist+liberal+gay+homosexual+pedophile+rapist+traitor+treason+dnc+un+aclu+nambla&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=14&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=&as_oq=pta+antichrist+qaeda+democrat+hammas+hezbollah+jazeera+wmd+murderer+kill+murder+knife+gun+bullet+shot+shoot+trigger+strangle+rope+rape+kidnap+torture+bury+hide+body+snuff+film&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=14&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=%28%22I+live%22+OR+%22my+house%22+OR+%22my+home%22+OR+%22here+in%22+OR+%22moved+here%22+OR+%22moved+to%22+OR+%22I+was+born%22+OR+%22my+birthplace%22+OR+%22my+birthday%22+OR+%22my+family%22+OR+%22my+wife%22+OR+%22my+husband%22+OR+%22my+son%22+OR+%22my+daughter%22+OR+%22my+kids%22%29+author%3Amidwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk&safe=off&qt_s=Search
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=100&q=%28%22my+parents%22+OR+%22I+drive%22+OR+%22my+car%22+OR+%22like+to+go%22+OR+%22visit+my%22+OR+%22my+website%22+OR+%22my+picture%22+OR+%22I+work%22+OR+%22my+employer%22+OR+%22my+job%22+OR+%22I+have+to%22+OR+%22I+voted%22+OR+%22my+vote%22%29+author%3Amidwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk&safe=off&qt_s=Search
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=K3J7hhkAAACkJpR-VsIabDKn-LqRV-V8RI44KMM6xyXsoU7EP0pg3g&hl=en
Etc. etc. etc.
Of course, you might want to expand your search to the popular
Internet search engines, e.g.: <http://www.bjorgul.com/>, etc.
(search http://www.ripe.net/, http://www.arin.net/, etc.; see
http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=52, etc.),
and refine your search by "tells", like unusual misspellings
that are consistently misspelled by the suspect, antiquated
words or phrases that hardly anyone else uses any more, some
words or phrases in "mixed" languages, like British English
uniquely mixed with American English by the suspect. Or some
foreign language influences in the suspect's grammar. Or the
suspect's dialect, jargon, "favorite" things, etc. And that's
just the tip of the proverbial iceberg... you'd be amazed at
how much you can find out about your suspect if you dig deep
enough into their on-line paper trail. You'll find their old
or obsolete email address(es) and a whole lot more than that.
E.g., look for their oldest archived messages under the name
or alias they're presently using, then look at other slightly
older archived messages in the same newsgroup(s), and compare
message headers with those of the latest suspect message. See?
Once in a while you'll find a match. Or sometimes, the suspect
simply posted a notice about the change in their email address.
Locate their date and place of birth. (I'm really good at that,
being an astrologer who's done hundreds of natal charts, etc.,
for both the famous, infamous, and anonymous,--even Liberals!)
If they've ever been listed in any of the various on-line white,
green, etc. pages, you might identify their current address and
permanent address(es), and other info. Additional information on
where they live, their activities, their livelihood, friends and
associates, their local police department, their neighbors, and
their entry(ies) in on-line genealogical records, etc. etc. etc.
But again, this is only if the suspect in question is considered
to be a particularly high-value target. And since Liberals don't
matter any more, that would pretty much render such nonessential
or extraneous searches a "waste of time". It's still fun, though,
and you can be sure our Republican-controlled N.S.A. is searching
aggressively 24/7/365.2422 through any and all left-wing Liberal-
biased Internet messages, because radical left-wing Anti-American
Liberal "democrats" are known to actively aid and abet terrorists.
But just for the fun of it, searching the Internet and archived
usenet newsgroup messages can yield some interesting, and often
telling, results. At least it can help us to identify who is an
Anti-American Liberal, so that we can aggressively denounce and
boycott them, and draw attention to others who are reading that
this suspect is a known left-wing Liberal extremist. That's all.
And names, email addresses, etc. aren't the only way to locate
someone. E.g., I prefer the antiquated spelling of "celestial",
"caelestial". Not too many other folks spell it this way, so a
simple search on 'Google Groups', and 'Google Search', returns
some of my articles and books, and some by others who've either
quoted or written this word, "caelestial", in the same way I do:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=caelestial&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=14&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
And that's just *one word* that I've consistently misspelled!
*************************************************************
IN CONCLUSION, there are very easy and simple ways to help us
patriotic God-fearing Republican Americans identify who these
radical Anti-American Liberals really are and where they live,
how they vote, if they're American citizens, and if they have
a criminal record (and they actively support terrorists), etc.
(Of course, everybody knows that Liberals support terrorists!)
We law-abiding, Republican American civilians will never come
close to gathering, compiling & cross-referencing comprehensive
dossiers to the meticulous extent that our N.S.A. etc. have, but
at least we can positively identify who these Liberal Anarchists
are, and be certain to blacklist them in every *legal* way that
we possibly, *aggressively*, actively and proactively can. That
means *NEVER* hire Liberals for a job! *NEVER* do business with
Liberals! *NEVER* associate with Liberals on a friendly basis!
And above all: always *DO* register and *VOTE* Republican across-
the-board in every election, with very rare exceptions of voting
for some "Independent" candidates, as with Joe Lieberman, et al,
since the **BIG PICTURE** is what matters most: We Republicans
SHALL retain majority control of all three main branches of our
U.S. Federal Government, and we SHALL drive the radical Liberals
& their genocidal terrorist friends utterly to global extinction. :-D
*VOTE* Republican! (and send the Liberal Anti-Christs to Hell!)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRUTwEpljD7YrHM/nEQK4xQCg1QeMOhD7wpgIdeoW/wdn6mUhafAAmwa/
SQPpYnNUul9US3zLbTEsx95o
=KfW6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "Midwinter" |
|
| Title: Re: *LAST REMINDER*: Most Haunted LIVE!, Halloween Seances Begin... |
29 Oct 2006 06:42:42 PM |
|
|
Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
Not last time I looked it wasn't. And I'm pretty damned
good at finding information on the Internet. You failed
to cite your alleged URL(s) to definitive birth data
Yes, it's a tricky game, isn't it? I tell you I can find his date of
birth, you demand the URL, I provide it to prove that I can find it so
that you can say "yes, well, I knew about that one", and for extra good
measure in preparation for same, you make deliberate fuss about
'definitive' in the hope you can make the information I found 'not count'.
Well, you'll have to play that game with someone else. Or play with
yourself. I can tell you the info is there. Beyond that, it's your
problem.
David Wells. Yours is a typical Liberal tactic
Ah? So I'm a 'liberal' (sorry, 'Liberal') now, as well as either
'atheist' or 'Xian'. It must be lovely to live in such an easy world as
yours, where everyone you meet falls instantly into such easy-to-judge
categories.
There again, since you seem to believe that everyone in the world can be
slotted into one of twelve 'fits-all' descriptions, I suppose I shouldn't
be all that surprised that you're good at pigeonholing.
claims and not back them up with demonstrable facts
The fact is, the date of birth is there, and it's pretty easy to find.
Whether it's right or not is not my concern, since I'm not the one who
imagines the gentleman's date of birth will tell me any more than his date
of birth.
with the amateurishly-forged CBS "Rathergate" memos that
*failed* to put Hanoi John Kerry in the White House. :-D
Irrelevant.
But I'm the first to acknowlege facts over fiction, and
truth above lies. Show me don't tell me. Put up or shut
up. Prove me wrong about David Wells' actual birth data
*not* being on-line, and I'll be the first to thank you.
Prove you wrong? About what? You only said you couldn't find it, and how
can I prove that you can but say you can't? You didn't say it wasn't
there, did you?
Personally, I don't care who you are or what you believe
to be true and/or factual, versus what you believe to be
false and/or fictitious. Your personal beliefs are your
business. All I care about is if you're Pro-American or
Anti-American. You're either for US or you're against US.
Oh, bollocks. Sorry to be blunt, and I rarely resort to profanity here,
but this, frankly, has ***** all to do with whether I'm for America or
against it, and honestly, this remark of yours here is utterly and
completely fatuous.
I'm particularly entertained that you can take a conversation about a
British programme that involves a British medium and make it a pro/anti-
America issue.
For crying out loud, grow some perspective.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
