On 17 Feb 2007, "America First" <progressive_libertarian@yahoo.com> wrote:
Stanley F. Nelson wrote:
Gingrich is intelligent, well educated, and articulate, and has a little
intellectual honesty. He is also damaged goods and probably not electable.
Don't be too sure about that.
Newt Gingrich riles up leftwingers. So?
He's no more "damaged goods" than, for example, Hillary, who's hated
by more people than Adolph Hitler was. Yet she's considered Dems'
frontrunning "candidate".
The fact Gingrich riles up leftwingers might just be a good thing.
He's far more interesting than McCain or Rudy G.
Smarter too.
I'll vote for Gingrich. I'd prefer to vote for Condoleezza Rice.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gingrich-Rice 2008 Vs. Obama-Clinton 2008, perhaps?
I hope so. The GOP needs all the help they can get
nowadays. I think that's why they've been floating
balloons for what can only be described as Liberal
Republican candidates: pro-abortion, pro-homosexual
"marriage", "civil unions" for abominable adulterers,
open borders, and similarly weak on national defense,
and generally Liberal on every sociopolitical issue.
If the GOP wants their grass-roots Conservative base
to stay at home Tuesday November 4th, 2008, all they
need to do is continue what they're doing status quo.
I mean, what's it going to take, a nuclear war maybe?
If the hard-line extremist, Pinko Atheistic Anti-Xian
Liberal Left have, forsooth, struck the coup de grace
(which they've been working toward since 1947 to wit),
then we Conservatives ought to be man enough to admit
defeat. If it's over, it's over. If not, then give us
_real_ Conservative candidates that we can *vote* for.
Rejoice! God shall Judge America and the whole world.
The question is Which side of the aisle do *you* want
to be found on come Judgment Day? Best get there quick.
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRdfEwJljD7YrHM/nEQKKVACfQ2Con0XujyXLUldJbI/AjajLA0IAnA2G
3H3s3SRaF6QV44inghnldryN
=skpN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 12:42:27 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Conservative Astronomer
<conservative.astronomer@righteous.wing.usa> Spat the Words
On 17 Feb 2007, "America First" <progressive_libertarian@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Stanley F. Nelson wrote:
Gingrich is intelligent, well educated, and articulate, and has a
little intellectual honesty. He is also damaged goods and probably
not electable.
Don't be too sure about that.
Newt Gingrich riles up leftwingers. So?
He's no more "damaged goods" than, for example, Hillary, who's hated
by more people than Adolph Hitler was. Yet she's considered Dems'
frontrunning "candidate".
The fact Gingrich riles up leftwingers might just be a good thing.
He's far more interesting than McCain or Rudy G.
Smarter too.
I'll vote for Gingrich. I'd prefer to vote for Condoleezza Rice.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gingrich-Rice 2008 Vs. Obama-Clinton 2008, perhaps?
I hope so. The GOP needs all the help they can get
Newt Gingrich is a washed-up has-been.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist minister" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 01:47:30 AM |
|
|
On Feb 18, 6:42 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Conservative Astronomer
<conservative.astrono...@righteous.wing.usa> Spat the Words
On 17 Feb 2007, "America First" <progressive_libertar...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Stanley F. Nelson wrote:
Gingrich is intelligent, well educated, and articulate, and has a
little intellectual honesty. He is also damaged goods and probably
not electable.
Don't be too sure about that.
Newt Gingrich riles up leftwingers. So?
He's no more "damaged goods" than, for example, Hillary, who's hated
by more people than Adolph Hitler was. Yet she's considered Dems'
frontrunning "candidate".
The fact Gingrich riles up leftwingers might just be a good thing.
He's far more interesting than McCain or Rudy G.
Smarter too.
I'll vote for Gingrich. I'd prefer to vote for Condoleezza Rice.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gingrich-Rice 2008 Vs. Obama-Clinton 2008, perhaps?
I hope so. The GOP needs all the help they can get
Newt Gingrich is a washed-up has-been.
Daniel Joseph Min is a psychotic never-has-been-and-never-will-be.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:07:31 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:42:27 -0600, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Newt Gingrich is a washed-up has-been.
Well, kinda.
Neutie is still "behind the scenes", articulating
position papers and lecturing.
I seriously doubt that many ever watched his GOPAC
lectures aired on C-SPAN years ago----but if you had,
you'd see about 80% of his articulated "principles"
STILL being carried out by policy makers in the GOP
(including CPAC which is one of the policy making arms
of the RNC/GOP)
No doubt the phrase: "Who is better able to spend your
money----you or the government" was issued in his
lectures, and the grass roots workers were told to
"spread that phrase as "often as possible"
Today that is still used by nearly every republican.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kT" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 01:52:47 AM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Conservative Astronomer
<conservative.astronomer@righteous.wing.usa> Spat the Words
On 17 Feb 2007, "America First" <progressive_libertarian@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Stanley F. Nelson wrote:
Gingrich is intelligent, well educated, and articulate, and has a
little intellectual honesty. He is also damaged goods and probably
not electable.
Don't be too sure about that.
Newt Gingrich riles up leftwingers. So?
He's no more "damaged goods" than, for example, Hillary, who's hated
by more people than Adolph Hitler was. Yet she's considered Dems'
frontrunning "candidate".
The fact Gingrich riles up leftwingers might just be a good thing.
He's far more interesting than McCain or Rudy G.
Smarter too.
I'll vote for Gingrich. I'd prefer to vote for Condoleezza Rice.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gingrich-Rice 2008 Vs. Obama-Clinton 2008, perhaps?
I hope so. The GOP needs all the help they can get
Newt Gingrich is a washed-up has-been.
As well as being a psychotic liar.
--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:03:19 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:44:56 +0100, Conservative
Astronomer <conservative.astronomer@righteous.wing.usa>
wrote:
If the GOP wants their grass-roots Conservative base
to stay at home Tuesday November 4th, 2008, all they
need to do is continue what they're doing status quo.
I mean, what's it going to take, a nuclear war maybe?
If the hard-line extremist, Pinko Atheistic Anti-Xian
Liberal Left have, forsooth, struck the coup de grace
(which they've been working toward since 1947 to wit),
then we Conservatives ought to be man enough to admit
defeat. If it's over, it's over. If not, then give us
_real_ Conservative candidates that we can *vote* for.
Sorry, but ultra-conservatives, Hitler, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Mao are dead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kinik" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:43:45 AM |
|
|
..
Sorry, but ultra-conservatives, Hitler, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Mao are dead.
That may rank as the dumbest and most uniformed statement I've ever read on
this newsgroup.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
19 Feb 2007 09:22:46 AM |
|
|
"Kinik" <Kinik@yahoo.com> writes:
Sorry, but ultra-conservatives, Hitler, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Mao are dead.
That may rank as the dumbest and most uniformed statement I've ever read on
this newsgroup.
No, they really are dead.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
21 Feb 2007 12:01:06 AM |
|
|
Brian Westley wrote:
"Kinik" <Kinik@yahoo.com> writes:
Sorry, but ultra-conservatives, Hitler, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Mao are dead.
That may rank as the dumbest and most uniformed statement I've ever
read on this newsgroup.
No, they really are dead.
Maybe they are and maybe they aren't.
fnord
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 12:36:57 PM |
|
|
Kinik wrote:
That may rank as the dumbest and most uniformed statement I've ever read on
this newsgroup.
By replying you feed the troll and thus insure many other posts of this type.
Stop responding and the troll will get bored and go away.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:48:46 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 15:43:45 GMT, in alt.atheism
"Kinik" <Kinik@yahoo.com> wrote in <Ru_Bh.3117$ya1.2235@news02.roc.ny>:
.
Sorry, but ultra-conservatives, Hitler, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Mao are dead.
That may rank as the dumbest and most uniformed statement I've ever read on
this newsgroup.
It is a strange one, but Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and Mao had more in
common with each other than they did with any democratic nation.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:49:04 AM |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
It is a strange one, but Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and Mao had more in
common with each other than they did with any democratic nation.
No, they didn't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:53:37 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:49:04 -0800 (PST), in alt.atheism
brian@example.com wrote in <er9shg$9ni$1@praesepe.isi.edu>:
Free Lunch wrote:
It is a strange one, but Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and Mao had more in
common with each other than they did with any democratic nation.
No, they didn't.
The distinction among totalitarians is far less than even within
democracies. The supposed ideals are meaningless -- power and absolute
control were what mattered to all four.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ed" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 09:26:15 AM |
|
|
Newt,
This is the same guy who got thrown out of Congress some years ago and
also
Divorced his wife as she was dieing of cancer.
I wouldn't vote for him if you paid me a million dollars.
.
|
|
|
| User: "655321" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 12:53:50 PM |
|
|
In article <1171812375.549611.94500@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Ed" <ed1ward2@verizon.net> wrote:
Newt,
This is the same guy who got thrown out of Congress some years ago and
also
Divorced his wife as she was dieing of cancer.
I wouldn't vote for him if you paid me a million dollars.
I would. Then I'd give a portion of that million dollars to someone
else's campaign, or to help several people get to the polls who would
offset my vote but otherwise wouldn't be able to for hardship reasons.
--
655321
"We are heroes in error" -- Ahmad Chalabi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tirebiter" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 10:40:52 AM |
|
|
On Feb 18, 10:26 am, "Ed" <ed1wa...@verizon.net> wrote:
Newt,
This is the same guy who got thrown out of Congress some years ago and
also
Divorced his wife as she was dieing of cancer.
I wouldn't vote for him if you paid me a million dollars.
Yeah, and Rudy annulled his first marriage to his cousin, married
Donna Hanover, had 2 kids, fooled around in public, wasted $100ks in
city paid security details for his mistress, brought her to the
mayor's residence (Gracie Mansion) when his children were there.
His shady penny stock and fuzzy math based business dealings will
brighten up his candidacy. I read recently that he's trademarked his
name so he can sue any news outlet that publishes negative stories
which prints his name without permission. I can't wait for him to get
slapped down the first time he tries that.
But that doesn't even measure 1.0 on the richter scale compared to how
he disgraced himself during the 2004 GOP convention, when he, a man
who who thanks to three deferments, never served a second in the
military, belittled Kerry's volunteer service and his bravery at
turning his swiftboat into enemy fire to rescue U.S. troops.
Maybe Newt and Rudy will team up for the GOP ticket and run on the
platform of "(you will) Do what I say, not what I do".
---
a.a. #2273
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dano" |
|
| Title: Re: Newt Gingrich for President - |
18 Feb 2007 11:38:43 AM |
|
|
"tirebiter" <dontspamme666@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:1171816852.249438.232520@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 18, 10:26 am, "Ed" <ed1wa...@verizon.net> wrote:
Newt,
This is the same guy who got thrown out of Congress some years ago and
also
Divorced his wife as she was dieing of cancer.
I wouldn't vote for him if you paid me a million dollars.
Yeah, and Rudy annulled his first marriage to his cousin, married
Donna Hanover, had 2 kids, fooled around in public, wasted $100ks in
city paid security details for his mistress, brought her to the
mayor's residence (Gracie Mansion) when his children were there.
His shady penny stock and fuzzy math based business dealings will
brighten up his candidacy. I read recently that he's trademarked his
name so he can sue any news outlet that publishes negative stories
which prints his name without permission. I can't wait for him to get
slapped down the first time he tries that.
But that doesn't even measure 1.0 on the richter scale compared to how
he disgraced himself during the 2004 GOP convention, when he, a man
who who thanks to three deferments, never served a second in the
military, belittled Kerry's volunteer service and his bravery at
turning his swiftboat into enemy fire to rescue U.S. troops.
Maybe Newt and Rudy will team up for the GOP ticket and run on the
platform of "(you will) Do what I say, not what I do".
---
I see Min is still another in a long line of handles. He's single handedly
filling up my killfile. We should only be so lucky to have the Republicans
put either of these two on a ticket. Please let that happen!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
