| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"DrPostman" |
| Date: |
23 Apr 2004 10:48:03 PM |
| Object: |
Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
Now, THAT was funny.
"thus avoid flying or make your reservation before the month
Full Moon of February 31st, 1999."
- Louis Turi
source: http://makeashorterlink.com/?H60D65C18
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com
"Stars are visible in the night sky because of the
laser of light they emit."
- Nancy Lieder shares an aspect of
"advanced" Zeta science
.
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
27 Apr 2004 12:16:07 PM |
|
|
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted. I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
The question is now, why would your comments ever be taken seriously?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Baldwin" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOGHIT |
27 Apr 2004 01:08:56 PM |
|
|
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny
because you're an intellectually impoverished fuckwit.
Yes, we know.
--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*
I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative.
Hail the un-alive
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of yearSOLLOG HIT |
28 Apr 2004 05:16:44 PM |
|
|
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
You are about as far objective as it is possible to be kook.
The question is now, why would your comments ever be taken seriously?
Why on earth should we take a kook like you seriously? You're like the
disclaimers on psychic hotlines - for entertainment purposes only.
Take the meds loony.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of yearSOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 03:30:24 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Truth Monopoly" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 03:07:12 PM |
|
|
"Cardinal Blunder" <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com...
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
I think adopting the name "Blunder" is the first appropriate thing you have
ever done, soiled log.
--
I have a monopoly on the truth
I am right,
You are wrong,
Hell, isn't it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 08:53:25 PM |
|
|
Truth Monopoly wrote:
"Cardinal Blunder" <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com...
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
I think adopting the name "Blunder" is the first appropriate thing you have
ever done, soiled log.
I guess you've never heard of sarcasm nor heard of cardinal chunder.
I guess that means you're 1 big dumbshit
.
|
|
|
| User: "Truth Monopoly" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 11:21:54 PM |
|
|
"Cardinal Blunder" <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4098494E.631A@yahoo.com...
Truth Monopoly wrote:
"Cardinal Blunder" <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com...
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be
sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends
of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick
February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it
is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train
accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6
turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't
crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the
113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and
warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the
113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date
to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this
prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
I think adopting the name "Blunder" is the first appropriate thing you
have
ever done, soiled log.
I guess you've never heard of sarcasm nor heard of cardinal chunder.
I guess that means you're 1 big dumbshit
I am familiar with Cardinal Chunder, and unlike you, he makes sense. Your
powers of prediction must have failed to alert you to the fact that you are
guilty of one "cardinal blunder" after another and your patent lack of
originality is glaring.
Now go predict a Kevorkian incursion for yourself.
--
I have a monopoly on the truth
I am right,
You are wrong,
Hell, isn't it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 11:22:01 PM |
|
|
In article <4098494E.631A@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Truth Monopoly wrote:
"Cardinal Blunder" <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com...
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
The hit is clear to all people who analyze the facts of this prophecy
and who have an objective point of view which you clearly lack.
I think adopting the name "Blunder" is the first appropriate thing you have
ever done, soiled log.
I guess you've never heard of sarcasm nor heard of cardinal chunder.
I guess that means you're 1 big dumbshit
Far be it for us to question your calling yourself that name. If the
shoe fits, wear it!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year |
04 May 2004 08:43:05 PM |
|
|
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
It didn't crash. Trucks containing dynamite blew up.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
1 dead yesterday in Australia, another 3 injured in California, 1 killed
on 29th in Charlotte, 12 children killed on 27th in India.
Train crashes are frequent events.
Take the meds freak.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year |
05 May 2004 02:36:17 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
It didn't crash. Trucks containing dynamite blew up.
So now you want to change the terminology and ignore
this was a TRAIN accident into being a truck accident? Hahaha!
Getting desperate?
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
1 dead yesterday in Australia, another 3 injured in California, 1 killed
on 29th in Charlotte, 12 children killed on 27th in India.
Train crashes are frequent events.
No they aren't. But the most lethal accident so far just happen
to occur on sollogs 113 date. The others were barely mentioned anywhere.
Hardly tragedies anywhere near like the Nk tragedy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year |
05 May 2004 06:23:55 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
It didn't crash. Trucks containing dynamite blew up.
So now you want to change the terminology and ignore
this was a TRAIN accident into being a truck accident? Hahaha!
Getting desperate?
Train truck you fucking kook. Wagon.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
1 dead yesterday in Australia, another 3 injured in California, 1 killed
on 29th in Charlotte, 12 children killed on 27th in India.
Train crashes are frequent events.
No they aren't. But the most lethal accident so far just happen
to occur on sollogs 113 date. The others were barely mentioned anywhere.
Hardly tragedies anywhere near like the Nk tragedy.
The most lethal accident so far? Hardly.
Neysahbur, Iran - 18 Feb 2004. 300 Killed. A direct miss
Dodoma, Tanzania - 24 June 2002. 200 killed. A direct miss
Egypt - 20 Feb 2002. 300 killed. A direct miss
And lesser accidents happen every week. It doesn't stop you screaming
about them of course if they by chance fall on your date. Or falling
conspicuously silent when they don't.
Take the meds kook.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year |
05 May 2004 11:59:10 AM |
|
|
In article <409899AD.78AD@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
It didn't crash. Trucks containing dynamite blew up.
So now you want to change the terminology and ignore
this was a TRAIN accident into being a truck accident? Hahaha!
Getting desperate?
Well, you want to change the terminology and ignore that you said CRASH
and turn it into a TRAGEDY or ACCIDENT, so I suppose it's only fair.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 12:07:47 PM |
|
|
In article <409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
A train can't crash when it's standing still, dumbshit.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
Geez, just happened yesterday and you know nothing about it? Too few
people die for it to get on your radar screen, Johnnie? *****, this was
a REAL crash, too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 08:48:17 PM |
|
|
Phoenix wrote:
In article <409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
A train can't crash when it's standing still, dumbshit.
The initial news reports all reported both an explosion and collision.
No matter what the outcome, the pyschic prediction was very accurate in
what the prediction foresaw showing up in the news. Keywords that were
predicted: TRAIN CRASH ACCIDENT and 113. All those things appeared. A
very amazing and accurate account of a future event that sollog saw
appearing.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
And like I said in a previous post, that "crash" barely showed up or was
noticeable. But because 1 didn't happen on a day linked to 113, doesn't
change a thing about 1 happening. I think when you calculate these
accidents
and look at how many occur on days with 113, only then can a fair
assessment of
accuracy be given. You won't even do that probability calculation done
by truthseeker so what does your opinion matter?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 11:10:17 PM |
|
|
In article <4098481B.2D85@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
A train can't crash when it's standing still, dumbshit.
The initial news reports all reported both an explosion and collision.
The initial news reports also said there were 4X the actual number of
casualties.
No matter what the outcome, the pyschic prediction was very accurate in
what the prediction foresaw showing up in the news. Keywords that were
predicted: TRAIN CRASH ACCIDENT and 113. All those things appeared. A
very amazing and accurate account of a future event that sollog saw
appearing.
Impossible. There is no reliable evidence that the train ever crashed.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
And like I said in a previous post, that "crash" barely showed up or was
noticeable.
Try telling that to the folks cleaning up the San Antonio River.
But because 1 didn't happen on a day linked to 113, doesn't
change a thing about 1 happening. I think when you calculate these
accidents
and look at how many occur on days with 113, only then can a fair
assessment of
accuracy be given.
Or, that one of the many accidents of the year happened to take place on
one of your shot-in-the-dark days.
You won't even do that probability calculation done
by truthseeker so what does your opinion matter?
Why bother when your prediction was wrong in the first place? Why don't
you say anything about the Pope these days, Johnnie?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
05 May 2004 02:48:52 AM |
|
|
Phoenix wrote:
In article <4098481B.2D85@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6 turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
A train can't crash when it's standing still, dumbshit.
The initial news reports all reported both an explosion and collision.
The initial news reports also said there were 4X the actual number of
casualties.
And its still one of the biggest train tragedies to ever occur which
just happened to occur on the 113th day of the year.
No matter what the outcome, the pyschic prediction was very accurate in
what the prediction foresaw showing up in the news. Keywords that were
predicted: TRAIN CRASH ACCIDENT and 113. All those things appeared. A
very amazing and accurate account of a future event that sollog saw
appearing.
Impossible. There is no reliable evidence that the train ever crashed.
Train crash implies a train tragedy. Sollog warned that such things
would happen on days with 113. It did, like it or not.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the 113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the 113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was written.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
And like I said in a previous post, that "crash" barely showed up or was
noticeable.
Try telling that to the folks cleaning up the San Antonio River.
One of the biggest train accidents occurred on sollogs 113 date. Nothing
more
need be shown, and train accidents don't happen frequently, especially
ones of this size.
But because 1 didn't happen on a day linked to 113, doesn't
change a thing about 1 happening. I think when you calculate these
accidents
and look at how many occur on days with 113, only then can a fair
assessment of
accuracy be given.
Or, that one of the many accidents of the year happened to take place on
one of your shot-in-the-dark days.
You won't even do that probability calculation done
by truthseeker so what does your opinion matter?
Why bother when your prediction was wrong in the first place? Why don't
you say anything about the Pope these days, Johnnie?
Whats there to say when I'm not johnnie? The pope will die when his
time is up. The only thing is, as pointed out, the date sollog
described will show up when he does. From what I understand there's only
a specific set of possibilities. If the pope dies on one of those
dates given, the odds of it occurring is a billion to 1.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
05 May 2004 11:50:00 AM |
|
|
In article <40989C9F.1553@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <4098481B.2D85@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey
Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be
sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends
of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick
February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it
is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train
accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1 in 6
turd
of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your
stupid
prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North Korea didn't
crash -
the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train crashed
due to whatever caused it to.
A train can't crash when it's standing still, dumbshit.
The initial news reports all reported both an explosion and collision.
The initial news reports also said there were 4X the actual number of
casualties.
And its still one of the biggest train tragedies to ever occur which
just happened to occur on the 113th day of the year.
"Just happened to" being the relevant phrase...
No matter what the outcome, the pyschic prediction was very accurate in
what the prediction foresaw showing up in the news. Keywords that were
predicted: TRAIN CRASH ACCIDENT and 113. All those things appeared. A
very amazing and accurate account of a future event that sollog saw
appearing.
Impossible. There is no reliable evidence that the train ever crashed.
Train crash implies a train tragedy. Sollog warned that such things
would happen on days with 113. It did, like it or not.
Sorry, Johnnie, but to rational people crash != tragedy. Try again.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on the
113th
day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained and
warned
about many times before it happened because in fact it was the
113th
day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a date
to
watch for and that train crashes would happen on such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is your
point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was
written.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
And like I said in a previous post, that "crash" barely showed up or was
noticeable.
Try telling that to the folks cleaning up the San Antonio River.
One of the biggest train accidents occurred on sollogs 113 date. Nothing
more
need be shown, and train accidents don't happen frequently, especially
ones of this size.
Too bad the word used was CRASH.
But because 1 didn't happen on a day linked to 113, doesn't
change a thing about 1 happening. I think when you calculate these
accidents
and look at how many occur on days with 113, only then can a fair
assessment of
accuracy be given.
Or, that one of the many accidents of the year happened to take place on
one of your shot-in-the-dark days.
Note: no response.
You won't even do that probability calculation done
by truthseeker so what does your opinion matter?
Why bother when your prediction was wrong in the first place? Why don't
you say anything about the Pope these days, Johnnie?
Whats there to say when I'm not johnnie?
Who knows? I'm not really interested in how you delegate authority to
your multiple personalities.
The pope will die when his time is up. The only thing is, as pointed out,
the date sollog described will show up when he does.
Sure hasn't so far! I've been better at predicting the Pope than any of
those predictions!!
From what I understand there's only
a specific set of possibilities. If the pope dies on one of those
dates given, the odds of it occurring is a billion to 1.
Funny, I wasn't aware it was possible for the Pope to be alive another
billion days. Exactly how does such an extravagant figure materialize,
Johnnie?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
05 May 2004 08:58:58 AM |
|
|
Let's find out what Cardinal Blunder has to contribute...
Phoenix wrote:
In article <4098481B.2D85@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <409754DD.48E2@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Cardinal Blunder wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla
(Monkey Boy)" <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in
alt.fan.art-bell in message
<c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he
should be sued for discrimination, or defamation, or
something, by the Friends of February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick
February 31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument
how it is. I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny
for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
So why didn't other notable train accidents occurs on this 1
in 6 turd of a prediction?
And why be so coy eh kook? Why say "train accident" when your
stupid prediction says 'train crash'? The train in North
Korea didn't crash - the dynamite packed onto it blew up.
No matter how you twist it, the end result was that the Train
crashed due to whatever caused it to.
A train can't crash when it's standing still, dumbshit.
The initial news reports all reported both an explosion and
collision.
The initial news reports also said there were 4X the actual number of
casualties.
And its still one of the biggest train tragedies
But not a *crash* as Soiled Log predicted.
to ever occur which
just happened to occur on the 113th day of the year.
Oh, wow.
No matter what the outcome, the pyschic prediction was very
accurate in what the prediction foresaw showing up in the news.
Keywords that were predicted: TRAIN CRASH ACCIDENT and 113. All
those things appeared. A very amazing and accurate account of a
future event that sollog saw appearing.
Impossible. There is no reliable evidence that the train ever
crashed.
Train crash implies a train tragedy. Sollog warned that such things
No, he wrote *crash*. He was wrong. Live with it.
would happen on days with 113. It did, like it or not.
God help me; I hear it on end forever when one of these stupid frauds gets
a prediction almost vaguely correct.
I guess the problem for you is
that you can't show how a train accident didn't happen on
the 113th day
of the year and wasn't the number or day sollog explained
and warned about many times before it happened because in
fact it was the 113th day
of the year, sollog did say the 113th day of the year was a
date to watch for and that train crashes would happen on
such a date.
And train crashes happen on other dates too. What the hell is
your point?
Whats your point? Name other crashes since the prediction was
written.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index
.html
And like I said in a previous post, that "crash" barely showed up
or was noticeable.
Try telling that to the folks cleaning up the San Antonio River.
One of the biggest train accidents occurred on sollogs 113 date.
Nothing more
need be shown, and train accidents don't happen frequently, especially
ones of this size.
So you're admitting he was wrong, but less off then usual, eh?
But because 1 didn't happen on a day linked to 113, doesn't
change a thing about 1 happening. I think when you calculate these
accidents
and look at how many occur on days with 113, only then can a fair
assessment of
accuracy be given.
Or, that one of the many accidents of the year happened to take place
on one of your shot-in-the-dark days.
Note: no response.
You won't even do that probability calculation done
by truthseeker so what does your opinion matter?
Why bother when your prediction was wrong in the first place? Why
don't you say anything about the Pope these days, Johnnie?
Whats there to say when I'm not johnnie? The pope will die when his
time is up. The only thing is, as pointed out, the date sollog
described will show up when he does. From what I understand there's
only a specific set of possibilities. If the pope dies on one of those
dates given, the odds of it occurring is a billion to 1.
And the odds that one of you prediction frauds will accurately predict it
is a trillion to zero.
--
Robert Buchanan
http://www.robertbuchanan.us
"...live and recorded performance of classical music is stone cold dead."
<6Hjkc.18037$e4.60@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Does ignorant buffoon Bill Cleere have the faintest clue that Mikhail
Pletnev, Zoltán Kocsis, Anne-Sophie Mutter, Claudio Abbado, Itzhak Perlman,
Paul Crossley, Gidon Kremer, Martha Argerich, Kyoko Takezawa, Alexander
Mogilewsky, Alexandre Gurning, Mitsuko Uchida, and so many other
accomplished performers still record and perform music to sold-out shows
and good sales? Does he even know who these reknowned musicians are?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl R. Osterwald" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 08:52:54 PM |
|
|
In article <4098481B.2D85@yahoo.com>, Cardinal Blunder
<cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
And like I said in a previous post, that "crash" barely showed up or was
noticeable. But because 1 didn't happen on a day linked to 113, doesn't
FLUSH
Lunatic postdicting ghoul.
-=-=-=-=-
Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, Gubmint Disinformation
Agent, "Dr. Green" Sockpuppet, and Chief AFA-B Vote Rustler.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vanilla Gorilla Monkey Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
28 Apr 2004 09:06:31 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:16:44 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6pagb01jsg@news4.newsguy.com>:
Take the meds loony.
There are no meds for whatever he's got, with the possible exception
of cyanide.
--
V.G.
Change pobox dot alaska to gci.
"I are so sure of yourself don't you .. (ehe ehe ehe)" - Peitro Alitardia (67d7a369.0404071016.2364431d@posting.google.com)
"No doubt about it, 9-11 was orchestrated by Lockheed." - *lexa 'connects the dots' (cg5t80pl73d7r1s8113tqd19qse0ji0nrq@4ax.com)
(This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM)
Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
27 Apr 2004 01:52:30 PM |
|
|
In article <408E9582.7666@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
I don't find it uncanny at all, especially in a country that has
notoriously bad maintenance and overuse of its antique rail system.
Johnnie will never go out on a limb, or care for anyone killed horribly,
that much is a very safe, Sollog-esque, prediction!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
27 Apr 2004 09:39:41 PM |
|
|
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408E9582.7666@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
I don't find it uncanny at all, especially in a country that has
notoriously bad maintenance and overuse of its antique rail system.
Johnnie will never go out on a limb, or care for anyone killed horribly,
that much is a very safe, Sollog-esque, prediction!
And that reply refutes what portion of the evidence? You completely and
intentionally evaded the question because you can't refute facts.
Is there no one here with a brain who can show any intelligent reasoning
how the prediction missed? The only thing I see is repeated rantings
that
have nothing to do with disproving the evidence.
here's the facts and argument that I've compiled so far that I
have yet to see anyone address or refute:
===========================
skeptics fail to refute the following facts :
1. Madrid train terrorism occurred on 3/11, a day with 113 in it.
2. North Korean train disaster occurred on the 113th day of the year,
a day with 113 in it.
Sollog said train crashes and terrorism will occur on days with 113 in
them. Exactly what he said has now happened. His prophecy was
written over two years before these disasters took place.
See time-stamped prophecy for proof skeptics are liars :
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=9dca61bc.0203072305.28bb8518%40posting.google.com
It's an undeniable hit if you do a correct
analysis. Too bad morons like you chose to believe lies rather than
actually looking at the facts...
When I did the math I came out with the odds of 1 in 24. So look at
those
odds then think, when's the last time you've heard of a train disaster
taking this many lives. Use you're brain moron, it's a hit. Your
problem
is you just don't have an analytical mind and you're blinded by your own
stupidity.
Now let's take a trip back in time... The Bali bombings occured on a
date
cotaining 113, 10/13/2002. The Madrid bombings contained a date with
113,
3/11/2004. Those were the two most significant terrorist attacks since
911!
And the odds of those two events occuring on dates with 113 in them is
about
1 in 576! Do you have any idea how improbable that is?
Anyway, here's Sollog's 113 prophecy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=9dca61bc.0203072305.28bb8518%40posting.google.com
As you can see, it specifically mentions train crashes and terrorism.
So
not only was the date of the event in the prophecy, but the actual
tragedy
was also named.
Subject:
Re: Sollog Hit - Train Crash - 113th Day of Year and Triple
4
Date:
Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:42:00 GMT
From:
"TruthSeeker" <Truth@Truth.net>
Organization:
SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
Newsgroups:
alt.prophecies.nostradamus
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c69fpl0152m@news1.newsguy.com...
TruthSeeker wrote:
"Cardinal Chunder" <cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in message
news:c69b1r03ug@news2.newsguy.com...
Jahiro wrote:
Yet another Clear Sollog hit
Who has warned 113 is a major day for terrorism and tragedy?
"BEWARE OF 113
113 is a date that brings death to many"
Sure you did kook. You're so amazing to play 1 in 6 with the dates.
Must you always show your stupidity to everyone? Where do you get 1 in
6
from? Oh I forgot, you enjoy lying all the time and presenting false
information.
I get it from here kook:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=AnMy8.199082%24YJ3.4167142%40news.webusenet.com&output=gplain
Haha, this is your source??? Most of those dates are either irrelevant
or
they are tied to specific predictions. For example, the only time the
number 911 was ever mentionned was here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=6tb7rp%24gvr%241%40winter.news.erols.com
And that was already fulfilled so you can eliminate all of those
numbers.
Numbers like 183 are used when analyzing the pope or Rome because Sollog
has
used that number in such a way in the past.
The 113 prophecy is specifically for dates with 113 in them and not
103. So
you can eliminate all of those dates. The number 103 usually connects
to
plane crashes anyway.
The point of creation, creator formula, selena's death, etc. are totally
irrelevant dates. The guy who posted that is a complete moron who is
poor
at observation and analysis.
The simple fact is, the worst terrorist attacks since 911, Bali and
Madrid,
have aligned with Sollog's 113 prophecy, and this is surely one of the
most
tragic train crashes in recent times. This is not just your average
train
derailment that injures 5 people, this is a rare train crash that kills
thousands and occured on a date with 113. The odds are very low.
That doesn't even count the other recent babble such as 11/11 4/4/4 etc.
1 in 6 lotto. What a great seer you are. It's funny you don't scream and
shout when you miss, for example yesterday.
What event occured yesterday that was as noteworthy as this? When's the
last time you heard of a train crash claiming THOUSANDS of lives???
It's an
extremely rare event that occured on a date with 113. The same thing
goes
for Bali and Madrid. Those were the two most significant terrorist
attacks
since 911 and they both aligned to 113. Sorry, but the odds prove it
all.
Like I said before, the chances of a major event occuring on 113 is 1 in
24.
And the fact that Bali and Madrid attacks and this recent train crash
aligned with 113 proves that it was highly improbable. Therefore, one
can
easily conclude that this is a hit simply by analyzing the probability.
Unfortunately, your lack of brain power prevents you from doing this...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
28 Apr 2004 12:30:11 PM |
|
|
In article <408F1996.26A4@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408E9582.7666@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
I don't find it uncanny at all, especially in a country that has
notoriously bad maintenance and overuse of its antique rail system.
Johnnie will never go out on a limb, or care for anyone killed horribly,
that much is a very safe, Sollog-esque, prediction!
And that reply refutes what portion of the evidence? You completely and
intentionally evaded the question because you can't refute facts.
I do indeed concede that the evidence confirms you made a very safe
prediction that sheds no light whatsoever on any exceptional abilities
you claim to have. You chose 9 possible dates, with 9 possible
disasters that can happen on them, and a disaster to which NK's system
is prone, of a type of accident that happens somewhere on earth every
day, happened. You gambled and happened to hit a jackpot. Instead of
mourning the over 75 kids who got blasted into eternity, you dance
around on their graves shouting "Look at me! Look at me!"
Glad to see we've ruffled your feathers so much, Johnnie. I'll look
forward to annoying you more in the future, incompetent ghoul.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 02:45:43 AM |
|
|
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408F1996.26A4@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408E9582.7666@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
I don't find it uncanny at all, especially in a country that has
notoriously bad maintenance and overuse of its antique rail system.
Johnnie will never go out on a limb, or care for anyone killed horribly,
that much is a very safe, Sollog-esque, prediction!
And that reply refutes what portion of the evidence? You completely and
intentionally evaded the question because you can't refute facts.
I do indeed concede that the evidence confirms you made a very safe
prediction that sheds no light whatsoever on any exceptional abilities
you claim to have.
Thats not what the evidence shows which you evaded.
You chose 9 possible dates, with 9 possible
disasters that can happen on them, and a disaster to which NK's system
is prone, of a type of accident that happens somewhere on earth every
day, happened.
except such happenings don't occur on earth everyday. In fact the
evidence you evaded by the way, shows the probability for the
connections to be highly rare and unprobable.
You gambled and happened to hit a jackpot.
nothing more need be said except what you admit. Its a jackpot of a hit
and since the same pattern or code has been shown to connect to the same
numbers over and over, coincidence and luck has nothing to do with it.
I'll look
forward to annoying you more in the future, incompetent ghoul.
annoying? Haha! Your feeble attempts to deny obvious facts and hits is
comic relief few people can offer. I enjoy watching knuckleheads make
themselves look stupid.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phoenix" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 12:14:02 PM |
|
|
In article <40974A64.1E95@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408F1996.26A4@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408E9582.7666@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be
sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick
February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
I don't find it uncanny at all, especially in a country that has
notoriously bad maintenance and overuse of its antique rail system.
Johnnie will never go out on a limb, or care for anyone killed
horribly,
that much is a very safe, Sollog-esque, prediction!
And that reply refutes what portion of the evidence? You completely and
intentionally evaded the question because you can't refute facts.
I do indeed concede that the evidence confirms you made a very safe
prediction that sheds no light whatsoever on any exceptional abilities
you claim to have.
Thats not what the evidence shows which you evaded.
How can I evade it when I just talked about it?
You chose 9 possible dates, with 9 possible
disasters that can happen on them, and a disaster to which NK's system
is prone, of a type of accident that happens somewhere on earth every
day, happened.
except such happenings don't occur on earth everyday. In fact the
evidence you evaded by the way, shows the probability for the
connections to be highly rare and unprobable.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
Just yesterday, and a real train crash to boot. Not predicted by you.
Care for some more?
You gambled and happened to hit a jackpot.
nothing more need be said except what you admit. Its a jackpot of a hit
and since the same pattern or code has been shown to connect to the same
numbers over and over, coincidence and luck has nothing to do with it.
You're right because you say so? You're certainly not the first Kook to
assert that!
I'll look
forward to annoying you more in the future, incompetent ghoul.
annoying? Haha! Your feeble attempts to deny obvious facts and hits is
comic relief few people can offer. I enjoy watching knuckleheads make
themselves look stupid.
So why do you get so indignant when you respond to us?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Blunder" |
|
| Title: Re: OH NO North Korean TRAIN ACCIDENT struck on 113th Day of year SOLLOG HIT |
04 May 2004 08:17:40 PM |
|
|
Phoenix wrote:
In article <40974A64.1E95@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408F1996.26A4@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
In article <408E9582.7666@yahoo.com>,
Cardinal Blunder <cardinalblunderboy@yahoo.com> wrote:
DrPostman wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:17:47 -0800, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
<vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:08:54 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in
message <c6b4h302tf8@news3.newsguy.com>:
GWB wrote:
Yes it is another HIT for Sollog
113 STRIKES AGAIN
Slopshit lotto strikes again:
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
Take the meds freak.
AssHat never picks any days in February. I think he should be
sued
for discrimination, or defamation, or something, by the Friends of
February, or something.
Even if he did with his 113 nonsense he would probably pick
February
31st, like Turi did once.
I curious why if its nonsense, you can't show any argument how it is.
I find the prophecy very interesting and uncanny for a train accident
to
occur on one of the days he predicted.
I don't find it uncanny at all, especially in a country that has
notoriously bad maintenance and overuse of its antique rail system.
Johnnie will never go out on a limb, or care for anyone killed
horribly,
that much is a very safe, Sollog-esque, prediction!
And that reply refutes what portion of the evidence? You completely and
intentionally evaded the question because you can't refute facts.
I do indeed concede that the evidence confirms you made a very safe
prediction that sheds no light whatsoever on any exceptional abilities
you claim to have.
Thats not what the evidence shows which you evaded.
How can I evade it when I just talked about it?
lacking in the mental arena are you?
You chose 9 possible dates, with 9 possible
disasters that can happen on them, and a disaster to which NK's system
is prone, of a type of accident that happens somewhere on earth every
day, happened.
except such happenings don't occur on earth everyday. In fact the
evidence you evaded by the way, shows the probability for the
connections to be highly rare and unprobable.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Southwest/05/03/trains.collide.ap/index.html
Just yesterday, and a real train crash to boot. Not predicted by you.
yes, "I" didn't predict anything.
Care for some more?
In comparison to the Nk accident they aren't even in the same league.
I hardly think that accident would have even made the "psychic radar"
for something worth predicting.
But who cares if | | | | | | | |
