"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KI6Me.6149$7R.269082@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:ddpku1$8j1$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:nHGLe.76$kz6.16801@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Su Zanadu" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:26938-42FEAD81-731@storefull-3212.bay.webtv.net...
Jane!
We do NOT scoff at book reading in here. Not as long as it's not one
of
those silly "Chick" books off of Oprah's recommended reading list. ;)
Some do, Susan! tw and Stat make fun of me for reading books all the
time
Nope, not once have you been scoffed at for reading books, Jane. If your
reading comprehension was better, you mnight realise that..
I have been scoffed at for my choice of books,
Nope, not taht either. As I sadi, if, in all that book reading, you'd
managed to actually learn how to COMPREHEND what you read, you'd realise
that. At least you're backpedalling from your initail ludicrous claim that
you were scoffed at BECAUE you read, taht's always nice to see.
although I read from an
extremely wide range and have only mentioned a few here.
Of course, you're one of those people who can dismiss an entire genre of
writing without actually having read any of it...
When have I done that?
"Gangsta rap" , remember?
About the only genre I dismiss is the
Harlequin-romance-type genre and I did once attempt to read it.
...just because they don't necessarily agree with the authors.
See above.
Nope. I was right the first time.
But you've already backed off from that claim..keep up!
Jane
Jane
SuZanne
.
