On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:18:54 +0100, wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4273283,00.html
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Prime Minister Iyad Allawi's new government is
considering offering amnesty to Iraqi insurgents who fought the
U.S.-led occupation, perhaps even pardoning those who killed
Americans.
A spokesman for Allawi said fighting with U.S. troops was
``justified'' as resistance to occupation.
``If he (a guerrilla) was in opposition against the Americans,
that will be justified because it was an occupation force,'' spokesman
Georges Sada said of the rebels. ``We will give them freedom.''
And all this time the radical libs have been saying that the new Iraq
government is just a puppet for the US. It hasn't even been a week
and already the Iraq government is flexing it's sovereignty, in a very
sensitive area.
Another day, another looney left conspiracy theory implodes
http://www.sg-eye.com
http://www.daisaku-ikeda.com
http://www.sokacult.com
.
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re:->fresh my memory why the weasels don't see that the US did the |
04 Jul 2004 05:38:52 PM |
|
|
AKnaff a écrit:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:18:54 +0100, wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4273283,00.html
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Prime Minister Iyad Allawi's new government is
considering offering amnesty to Iraqi insurgents who fought the
U.S.-led occupation, perhaps even pardoning those who killed
Americans.
A spokesman for Allawi said fighting with U.S. troops was
``justified'' as resistance to occupation.
``If he (a guerrilla) was in opposition against the Americans,
that will be justified because it was an occupation force,'' spokesman
Georges Sada said of the rebels. ``We will give them freedom.''
And all this time the radical libs have been saying that the new Iraq
government is just a puppet for the US. It hasn't even been a week
and already the Iraq government is flexing it's sovereignty, in a very
sensitive area.
Another day, another looney left conspiracy theory implodes
http://www.sg-eye.com
http://www.daisaku-ikeda.com
http://www.sokacult.com
Indeed, they say anything and its opposite, the only common denominator
being that it is anti-American.
To think that the US merely implemented the only UN resolution
authorizing force to the allies of Kuwait against the dictatorship and
freed these people and that is all the thanks they get from the world
and from these liberated fools.
Indeed the dems, even Albright, are going around criticizing Bush, on a
unanimous UN resolution.
They are all aware that Saddam was in breach with its refusal to give
back Kuwait its national archives (so as to control that nation), and by
its refusal to give them back their POWs (no surprise, they were already
part of his mass grave plots along with half a millions murdered
Iraqis), by his threat to re-annex that country, not to mention by his
breach of the clause 32 of resolution 687e which he had a last chance to
comply with all of it, not only the part about WMD, by paying for actual
serial murders against Israelis, but we know that the UN named a loser
there who's first official act was a total anti-Semite lie that Israel
was controlling Iraq. Hahahaha... How much more loser can one get???!
But anyway, the dems have absolutely nothing to say. Take Albright,
remember when it was time to make a resolution for Rwanda's genocide,
she instead, one day INTO the genocide, threatened other nations not to
get involved.
Maybe she wouldn't have signed 1441 had she been there. But it was
signed by those who supposedly represented the Security Council, and
when the WEASELS amongst them reneged on their own signature, after ALL
THE 4 BREACHES I quote above (right the inspectors would have repaired
any of these, my eye), and pretended it was only about WMD, and that
Saddam was not playing a game with the inspectors they would not end up
thwarting (when in fact he barely started talking about the anthrax, for
example, just one day before the invasion), as he was saying he
destroyed it when in fact everyone knew they signed in that any game
play implicated the implementation of the serious consequences.
Russia is the only one who made some excuse recently, in the same time
speaking of terrorist plot by Saddam. But Putin has no point with its
prima donna pretense of not breaching the sovereignty of the country,
he/they signed that resolution promising the serious consequences that
he was many time threatened with, and if it had implied merely military
strikes like what happened with Desert Fox, there would be a precedent,
they couldn't have said that these were the serious consequences he was
merely threatened with, and anyway, 1441 is clear, it is the lifting of
he 687e resolution back to 678, they signed for. The serious
consequences are clear, non compliance implied what occurred. But at
least I see Putin do a lot of amend even if he keeps some back, for
dignity maybe, but at least he says something. The French weasels like
their Germans butt buddies archenemies really were there to sell their
latest joint weapons technology Roland missiles for instance...
Now, the US tried to tone it down to regime change. But noo, France the
weasel refused to make out an amendment. Or another resolution.
There was ONLY one resolution, 1441, the last chance one.
Not implementing it would have spelled the end of the UN very meaning.
This the bigger picture of the threat of terrorism, the end of the
meaning of the UN, the demeaning of its very last chance for
authorization of force... in fact Bush and the coalition that did the
right thing is the last rampart of democracy against all the opponents.
The libs, as you call them (the only true liberals are the Greens, ever
since Clinton destroyed welfare - and no, not that anti-semite *****
Nader who is an independent now thank heaven, THE GREENS), I'd rather
call them the dems, will disregard any logic to support their side
against the prez... This is un-American IMO (but I digress here with US
domestic politics, sorry, my main point here is about the foreign policy
on Iraq.)
And no, the insurgent have no point, their occupation was Saddam who
played them against the world. They are now free, and despite the fact
that we now know he murdered 500,000 of them they are still ungrateful
bastards. It is a shame. And all that is fueled by the weasels like
France who still maintain there was no legitimacy to the UN resolution.
Well, they should apologize. It is black on white.
J.
* See "The French, I'm shocked" article:
http://archives.newsbank.com/ar-search/we/Archives?p_action=search&p_theme=NWEC&p_product=NWEC&p_perpage=20&s_search_type=keyword&p_text_base=french%20shocked&p_maxdocs=200&p_sort=_rank_%3AD&xcal_ranksort=4&xcal_useweights=yes&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date%3AB%2CE&p_text_date-0=&p_field_YMD_date-0=YMD_date&p_field_YMD_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_YMD_date-0=date%3AB%2CE&%5B+Search+%5D.x=54&%5B+Search+%5D.y=14
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "AK" |
|
| Title: Re: Re : Allawi considers amnesty to insurgents |
05 Jul 2004 05:19:04 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:48:43 GMT, (AKnaff) wrote:
And all this time the radical libs have been saying that the new Iraq
government is just a puppet for the US. It hasn't even been a week
and already the Iraq government is flexing it's sovereignty, in a very
sensitive area.
The amnesty is a ploy to defeat the insurgency. They are using stick and carrot
approach to legitimize the occupation and the puppet regime. How does that prove
this is not a puppet regime?
Even if there is a disagreement on some issues, even then it still would be a
puppet government. It was elected by people chosen by the US. That makes it a
puppet government.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AKnaff" |
|
| Title: Re: Re : Allawi considers amnesty to insurgents |
05 Jul 2004 02:11:51 PM |
|
|
And all this time the radical libs have been saying that the new Iraq
government is just a puppet for the US. It hasn't even been a week
and already the Iraq government is flexing it's sovereignty, in a very
sensitive area.
The amnesty is a ploy to defeat the insurgency. They are using stick and carrot
approach to legitimize the occupation and the puppet regime. How does that prove
this is not a puppet regime?
Even if there is a disagreement on some issues, even then it still would be a
puppet government. It was elected by people chosen by the US. That makes it a
puppet government.
Right! And the criminal zionist Bush hired the muppets to play that part!
http://www.sg-eye.com
http://www.daisaku-ikeda.com
http://www.sokacult.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re:ality should sink in, but seldom does Re : Allawi considers amnestyto insurgents |
05 Jul 2004 01:53:59 PM |
|
|
There is no crime Bush is charged with. Or has comiited. The invasion of
Israq was a inanymous UN resolution. Zionism is merely the right of
Israel to exist. Anyone who disagree with all that is a moron.
But assholes will be assholes.
J.
AKnaff a écrit:
And all this time the radical libs have been saying that the new Iraq
government is just a puppet for the US. It hasn't even been a week
and already the Iraq government is flexing it's sovereignty, in a very
sensitive area.
The amnesty is a ploy to defeat the insurgency. They are using stick and carrot
approach to legitimize the occupation and the puppet regime. How does that prove
this is not a puppet regime?
Even if there is a disagreement on some issues, even then it still would be a
puppet government. It was elected by people chosen by the US. That makes it a
puppet government.
Right! And the criminal zionist Bush hired the muppets to play that part!
http://www.sg-eye.com
http://www.daisaku-ikeda.com
http://www.sokacult.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "AKnaff" |
|
| Title: Re: ality should sink in, but seldom does Re : Allawi considers amnesty to insurgents |
05 Jul 2004 04:29:27 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:53:59 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
There is no crime Bush is charged with. Or has comiited. The invasion of
Israq was a inanymous UN resolution. Zionism is merely the right of
Israel to exist. Anyone who disagree with all that is a moron.
But assholes will be assholes.
J.
I was making fun of the looney left... I guess I should have put a
LOL after my comment ( :
AKnaff a écrit:
Right! And the criminal zionist Bush hired the muppets to play that part!
http://www.sg-eye.com
http://www.daisaku-ikeda.com
http://www.sokacult.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: ality should sink in, but seldom does Re : Allawi considers amnestyto insurgents |
05 Jul 2004 04:43:31 PM |
|
|
AKnaff a écrit:
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 18:53:59 GMT, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
There is no crime Bush is charged with. Or has comiited. The invasion of
Israq was a inanymous UN resolution. Zionism is merely the right of
Israel to exist. Anyone who disagree with all that is a moron.
But assholes will be assholes.
J.
I was making fun of the looney left... I guess I should have put a
LOL after my comment ( :
It figures. :-)
Then it was not addressed to you, but was a precision, a statement for
the "looney left" as you call them. :-)
J.
AKnaff a écrit:
Right! And the criminal zionist Bush hired the muppets to play that part!
http://www.sg-eye.com
http://www.daisaku-ikeda.com
http://www.sokacult.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re:->consider given the unconfirmed legitimacy Re : Allawi considersamnesty to insurgents |
05 Jul 2004 01:47:09 PM |
|
|
AK a écrit:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 17:48:43 GMT, (AKnaff) wrote:
And all this time the radical libs have been saying that the new Iraq
government is just a puppet for the US. It hasn't even been a week
and already the Iraq government is flexing it's sovereignty, in a very
sensitive area.
The amnesty is a ploy to defeat the insurgency. They are using stick and carrot
approach to legitimize the occupation and the puppet regime. How does that prove
this is not a puppet regime?
So you are saying that he has no right to consider letting the
terrorists *****-lickers insurgents go free then? I agree with that part. ;-)
Even if there is a disagreement on some issues, even then it still would be a
puppet government. It was elected by people chosen by the US. That makes it a
puppet government.
*****!
The only puppet government there was under Saddam who named whoever was
ready to kiss his *****, to hold high position. And eliminated anyone who
showed any initiative or independence of thought. No democracy there,.
The actual provisional government is made out of the most representative
of the people there. It is not coordinated to push any other agenda than
that of Iraq and each of its region.
Maybe it is not the final word of the Iraqis, but it is the fist word of
the IRAQIS.
It is the first time the have a government that is NOT a puppet one.
Whether terrorists *****-lickers (may God all eradicate them) like it or
not, these are the real Iraqis running their country, and they are the
ones that will make the regime even more representative. This is the way
it is. But yes, the assholes who attack the liberators should remain in
prison until there is a general election.
Those who spread these sick rumors that this is as much a puppet
government than the previous regime, still manage to convince the
majority are still bullshiters who convince morons, but should be
debunked to the bone. Except maybe for when it comes to letting the
other assholes go. LOL The logic is impeccable.
J.
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
