Re: THE DRAFT: plans are carefully laid for re-introduction ofconscription absent one catalyzing event



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Re: THE DRAFT: plans are carefully laid for re-introduction ofconscription absent one catalyzing event

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Charly the Bastard"
Date: 22 Nov 2006 06:16:28 AM
Object: Re: THE DRAFT: plans are carefully laid for re-introduction ofconscription absent one catalyzing event
Read this, and get ready...
Charly
AirRaid wrote:

That Draft Just Won't Blow Away
Despite Democratic disinterest, plans are carefully laid for
re-introduction of conscription absent one catalyzing event

Prison Planet | November 21, 2006
Paul Joseph Watson

Charles Rangel's bill to re-introduce the draft has few supporters but
his insistent efforts to keep this issue in the body politic is allied
to an underlying framework that provides for a rapid and extensive
implementation of conscription, be it on the continent or within the
4th Reich of America in the form of Homeland Security Gestapo squads.

Though influential Democrats like Nancy Pelosi have publicly shot down
any chance of the draft returning to America, everything is in place to
activate it, absent a nuclear or biological attack on a U.S. city or
geopolitical turmoil.

"The Selective Service System, an agency independent of the Defense
Department, says it's ready to respond quickly to any crisis that would
threaten to overwhelm the current all-volunteer military," reports CNN
, noting that the agency would be able to fully implement the draft in
under a time period of seven months.

It is widely recognized that a return to the draft is wildly unpopular
amongst both young and old alike, so why do people like Rangel and
others across the political spectrum insist on its constant
re-introduction? Are they simply laying the groundwork for a
cataclysmic event that will soon arrive to justify it?

Legitimate fears that a sudden escalation of a crisis involving a North
Korean attack on South Korea would lead to a draft are given credence
by a military directive known as OPLAN 5027 , under the jurisdiction of
the ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command, which mandates the dispatch of
690,000 troops to aid South Korea in the event of an attack.

Where are they going to get 690,000 troops from when there are barely
enough troops to police Iraq and many are returning on second and third
tours of duty?

While many are focused on the characteristics of any future draft
involving conscripts being sent to the Middle East or Asia to die for
the new world order, it seems eminently more likely that the vast
majority of draftees, should such an event come to pass, would be
forced to serve under domestic Homeland Security brownshirt style
roles.

After 9/11, children's summer camps in Miami and other areas began to
shift into acting as recruiting and training compounds for Homeland
Security. 11th and 12th graders are now being drilled in methods of how
to track down fugitives, run tattle-tale squads and confiscate guns in
America.

Billed as one of the nation's first "homeland security training summer
camps for teenagers," a program called Secure Corps in Bucks County is
drilling 92 young men and women in essential skills for this new,
uncertain era," reported the Miami Herald .

"And those skills include math: "If I have 40 acres of forest," runs a
typical problem, "how many search dogs will I need to find a fugitive?"

An earlier incarnation of Rangel's draft bill, the Universal National
Service Act of 2003 , called for the duty of "all young persons in the
United States, including women, perform a period of military service or
a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and
homeland security, and for other purposes."

Mandatory domestic service has influential cheerleaders like Clinton's
former Secretary of Defense William Cohen. The Republican recently told
Fox News , "I think there should be a commitment to universal service.
I think that only a few people are really committed to this war against
terrorism and called. I think the American people have to be -
understand - that we're all in this together. We ought to have a real
call to national service to commit ourselves to some form of public
service," adding that it is necessary to put the country on a "war
footing."

Substantial planks of the Homeland Security domestic spying corp are
already in place. Highway Watch , which has been funded by Homeland
Security since 2002, now boasts tens of thousands of members. The
program trains truck drivers to be suspicious of everything, where all
unusual activity is potentially terrorism, including vehicles with
tarps over the rear, people with backpacks, and couples who have an
argument.

Port Watch, River Watch and Transit Watch are similar programs
bankrolled by Homeland Security that train American citizens to spy on
each other in the name of the war on terror.

TIPS, the domestic spying program which was supposedly nixed by
Congress, would have recruited one in twenty-four Americans as domestic
informants , a higher percentage than was used by the Stasi in East
Germany. Government funding was temporarily cut until the heat was off
but private funding continues and the same program was introduced under
a number of sub-divisions including AmeriCorps and SecureCorps.

Whether the constant re-introduction of draft legislation is simply a
trial balloon or an organized agenda to prepare a draft in response to
a future false-flag attack, it needs to be shot down now. We refuse to
be herded like cattle into harms way to serve the empire for global
domination and we also will not co-operate if there is an attempt to
deputize U.S. citizens to police other citizens under the banner of
Homeland Security. At least 25% of refusniks will do the same and the
state will have to undertake the gargantuan task of rounding us all up
for the camps - and that's where the fun really begins.

http://infowars.com/articles/military/draft_that_just_wont_blow_away.htm

.

User: "Dr. Psycho"

Title: Re: THE DRAFT: plans are carefully laid for re-introduction of conscription absent one catalyzing event 22 Nov 2006 08:05:37 PM
Charly the ***** wrote:

Read this, and get ready...

Charly

AirRaid wrote:

That Draft Just Won't Blow Away
Despite Democratic disinterest, plans are carefully laid for
re-introduction of conscription absent one catalyzing event

Prison Planet | November 21, 2006
Paul Joseph Watson

Charles Rangel's bill to re-introduce the draft has few supporters but
his insistent efforts to keep this issue in the body politic is allied
to an underlying framework that provides for a rapid and extensive
implementation of conscription, be it on the continent or within the
4th Reich of America in the form of Homeland Security Gestapo squads.

Though influential Democrats like Nancy Pelosi have publicly shot down
any chance of the draft returning to America, everything is in place to
activate it, absent a nuclear or biological attack on a U.S. city or
geopolitical turmoil.

"The Selective Service System, an agency independent of the Defense
Department, says it's ready to respond quickly to any crisis that would
threaten to overwhelm the current all-volunteer military," reports CNN
, noting that the agency would be able to fully implement the draft in
under a time period of seven months.

It is widely recognized that a return to the draft is wildly unpopular
amongst both young and old alike, so why do people like Rangel and
others across the political spectrum insist on its constant
re-introduction? Are they simply laying the groundwork for a
cataclysmic event that will soon arrive to justify it?

Legitimate fears that a sudden escalation of a crisis involving a North
Korean attack on South Korea would lead to a draft are given credence
by a military directive known as OPLAN 5027 , under the jurisdiction of
the ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command, which mandates the dispatch of
690,000 troops to aid South Korea in the event of an attack.

Where are they going to get 690,000 troops from when there are barely
enough troops to police Iraq and many are returning on second and third
tours of duty?

While many are focused on the characteristics of any future draft
involving conscripts being sent to the Middle East or Asia to die for
the new world order, it seems eminently more likely that the vast
majority of draftees, should such an event come to pass, would be
forced to serve under domestic Homeland Security brownshirt style
roles.

After 9/11, children's summer camps in Miami and other areas began to
shift into acting as recruiting and training compounds for Homeland
Security. 11th and 12th graders are now being drilled in methods of how
to track down fugitives, run tattle-tale squads and confiscate guns in
America.

Billed as one of the nation's first "homeland security training summer
camps for teenagers," a program called Secure Corps in Bucks County is
drilling 92 young men and women in essential skills for this new,
uncertain era," reported the Miami Herald .

"And those skills include math: "If I have 40 acres of forest," runs a
typical problem, "how many search dogs will I need to find a fugitive?"

An earlier incarnation of Rangel's draft bill, the Universal National
Service Act of 2003 , called for the duty of "all young persons in the
United States, including women, perform a period of military service or
a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and
homeland security, and for other purposes."

Mandatory domestic service has influential cheerleaders like Clinton's
former Secretary of Defense William Cohen. The Republican recently told
Fox News , "I think there should be a commitment to universal service.
I think that only a few people are really committed to this war against
terrorism and called. I think the American people have to be -
understand - that we're all in this together. We ought to have a real
call to national service to commit ourselves to some form of public
service," adding that it is necessary to put the country on a "war
footing."

Substantial planks of the Homeland Security domestic spying corp are
already in place. Highway Watch , which has been funded by Homeland
Security since 2002, now boasts tens of thousands of members. The
program trains truck drivers to be suspicious of everything, where all
unusual activity is potentially terrorism, including vehicles with
tarps over the rear, people with backpacks, and couples who have an
argument.

Port Watch, River Watch and Transit Watch are similar programs
bankrolled by Homeland Security that train American citizens to spy on
each other in the name of the war on terror.

TIPS, the domestic spying program which was supposedly nixed by
Congress, would have recruited one in twenty-four Americans as domestic
informants , a higher percentage than was used by the Stasi in East
Germany. Government funding was temporarily cut until the heat was off
but private funding continues and the same program was introduced under
a number of sub-divisions including AmeriCorps and SecureCorps.

Whether the constant re-introduction of draft legislation is simply a
trial balloon or an organized agenda to prepare a draft in response to
a future false-flag attack, it needs to be shot down now. We refuse to
be herded like cattle into harms way to serve the empire for global
domination and we also will not co-operate if there is an attempt to
deputize U.S. citizens to police other citizens under the banner of
Homeland Security. At least 25% of refusniks will do the same and the
state will have to undertake the gargantuan task of rounding us all up
for the camps - and that's where the fun really begins.

http://infowars.com/articles/military/draft_that_just_wont_blow_away.htm

Reactivating the draft has always been a viable option -- which I
support -- IF we're attacked and have no other choice than to defend
ourselves. But, having forced conscription going on during the Vietnam
civil war was just plain unnecessary and it's just as patently unneeded
for this civil war in Iraq.
The fact that a Demo introduced this, and the odd unexpected reaction
of conservatives in opposing it, preferring instead an all-volunteer
armed force, goes to show you how incredibly topsy-turvy some elements
of the Democratic Party are these days. Democrats used to be liberals,
and liberals could usually be counted on to oppose any movement towards
encouraging warfare. But, not in our times where pandering to a wider
idealogical constiutency appears to be the name of the game to gain or
hold onto majority power.
However, in this case, Sen. Rangel grossly miscalculated; the nation,
by a large majority, is opposed to forced conscription. I think Rangel,
like Joe Lieberman, have had their tongues up the conservatives tight
asses too often recently to understand what their Party has
historically represented. Many wouldn't know what liberalism is if it
bit 'em on their pimply butts.
Sure, Lyndon Johnson and JFK started the Vietnam debacle, and Truman
responded to the Korean crisis...there's no doubt one can find
exceptions in recent history where Democrats have thought more about
corporate power and their own megalomaniacal asses than preserving
sanity and human life on the planet.
But, I think the glamorization of war by a consumer culture of mental
midgets is more at the heart of our obsession with military power and
mass violence than it is soley a political partisan issue. It is, in
fact, a human behaviorial failing, one that someday will get our
civilization, and perhaps, ALL civilization, into a state of burnt-out
ruin.
Dr. Psycho
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER