On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, "Atheist are Stooges" <Atheist.Stooges@Yahoo.com> wrote:
"Apobetics" <apobetic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181863595.553687.80680@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 14, 11:14 am, "Atheist are Stooges" <Atheist.Stoo...@Yahoo.com> wrote:
"Tiktaalik" <corneliusjmch...@yahoo.ie> wrote
On Jun 14, 4:40 pm, Apobetics aka
IKnowIAmAnOffensivePieceOfOrdure<apobe...@hotmail.com> wailed:
The Myth of Evolution
"Dr. Louis Bounoure, former director of research at the French
National Center for Scientific Research, calls evolution "a fairy tale
for grown-ups." It actually is a cruel hoax! In fact, the arguments
that are used to support evolutionary theory are astonishingly weak
and many are downright frauds.
First, the fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionists. No
verifiable transitions from one kind to another have as yet been
found. Charles Darwin had an excuse: in his day fossil finds were
relatively scarce. Today, however, we have an abundance of fossils.
Still, we have yet to find even one legitimate transition from one
kind to another (sorry no apes to humans and no cats to dogs).
Furthermore, in Darwin's day such enormously complex structures as a
human egg were thought to be quite simple - for all practical
purposes, little more than a microscopic blob of gelatin (the same
argument used by Planed Parenthood to justify abortions today).
Today, we know that a fertilized egg is among the most organized,
complex structures in the universe. In an age of scientific gains, it
is incredible to think people are willing to maintain that something
so vastly complex arose by chance and accident. Like an egg or the
human eye, the universe is a masterpiece of precision and design that
could not have come into existence by blind chance.
Finally, while chance is a blow to the theory of evolution, the basic
laws of science, including law of effects and their causes -energy
conservation and entropy - undergird the creation model for origins
leaving evolution with no foundation at all in science and making it
just another faith - based religion."
The Bible Answer Book, Hank Hanegraaff, Countryman Press, 2004
A cretin citing a moron. How typical.
Of course you provide no scientific rebuttal because you are incapable of
doing so.
Talking mud, flying pigs, magic monkeys, and breathing rocks.
It's all right there in the church of Darwin the apostate preacher who once
practiced witchcraft in the South Pacific.
______________________________________________________________
I never read or answer these naked apes. I do not suffer fools.
Have you noticed that they only attack the person and never have
anything on the subject?
This is the standard MO of the lost.
Who cares what they attempt to think (atheist -think...oxymoron)
Yea and never forget we come from rocks--<snicker>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
(sorry for the long reply, but this got me to thinking)
I agree with what you're saying, as the sixth evening and morning
in Genesis chapter one unambiguously states that Adam (pronounced
"aw-dawm", meaning the red race, the first race, of human beings)
was Created in the image and similitude of the elohiym (which is
plural, ergo the Gods, better known as God the Creator), but here
is an interesting quote from Jesus' first cousin John the Baptist:
"...for I say unto you, that God is able of these
stones to raise up children unto Abraham"
--Matthew 3:9, Luke 3:8 AV
This goes back to Genesis 2:6-7, most of which agrees pristinely
with the creation myths of other cultures. Moses was a very-well
educated, royal Egyptian high priest in the temple of Vulcan. So
it's not surprising that his incomparably erudite understanding
of the Creation myth agreed those of others, e.g., that mankind
was "Created from the dust and spittle of the earth", "Created
from the dust and foamy-crest of the salty ocean waves", etc.
One more quote, where Jesus said:
"...Among them that are born of women there hath not risen
a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that
is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."
--Matthew 11:11; cf. Luke 7:28 AV
So everything that John the Baptist ever said, you can take it
to the bank. God can do anything -- obviously! I'm sure every
believer will agree with that. But why the Atheists seem hell-
bent for leather to "debunk" things which they either don't
understand, or as you've pointed out, Atheists don't *want*
to understand, you seem to have a better grasp of why Atheists
don't want to understand, than I have. I just think Atheists
are mentally insane. I truly believe someone has to be insane
not to believe in God the Creator, our heavenly father, the
One Universal God of all. So what is the Atheists' problem?
Like what makes Atheists believe in their "big bang" theory?
I think the reason they believe that, is because to believe
that the Universe is infinite and eternal, that sounds too
much like God the Creator. So I think that that is why the
Atheists prefer their pet "big bang" theory, because they
can't get their fragile egos around infinity and eternity.
Who can, after all? That's why the ultimate name for God,
and for the dimensions, planes, heavens, of God's Universe,
is deemed ultimately ineffable, unspeakable, indescribable,
etc. It's like that classic 1962 film 'Barabbas', starring
Anthony Quinn, where he visits the house of aging Lazarus,
and asks him "what's it like?" "What's it like to be dead?"
And Lazarus replies with what is arguably the best-written
description of what it's like to be dead, ever rendered in
the history of cinema. I googled for the film's script, but
to no avail. I do remember that Lazarus told him "how do I
tell an unborn child what life is like? Death is like that."
When I first watch that film years ago, I didn't like what
Lazarus said. But when I watch the film again earlier this
year, the writer's very keen insight became crystal clear.
I think that if "unbelievers" would listen more carefully
for the profound, spiritual connotation above the mundane
denotation, as with the Egyptian hieroglyphs, for example,
they would begin to realize what they've been missing, and
have been so foolishly mocking, for all these years.
Perhaps that's the main reason why Atheists refuse to see
the Light, because of the shame that it would illuminate.
That would be one rational explanation, but I'm not sure
Atheists are particularly rational people to begin with.
So they'll argue "but the evidence shows this", or "the
evidence shows that", ad nauseam. Like the ancient maxim
says, "any finite set of facts can evoke an infinite set
of conclusions". So the Atheists simply skew all of their
theories, conclusions, etc., to fit their profane agenda,
whilst completely ignoring (or gratuitously mocking) all
evidence which proves things supernatural, paranormal,
spiritual, divine, Intelligent Design, ad infinitum.
You know how their "peer review" process works, or their
"million dollar prize" so-called "contests" for anyone who
"proves the supernatural", ad nauseam. Personally, I'd like
to see one of their famous "skeptics" spend the night alone
in one of the most maliciously-haunted castles in the world,
with no phone, no cameras, no outside contact whatsoever.
Just a bottle of drinking water, a good flashlight, and a
backup flashlight, extra batteries, and the clothes on their
back. Lock *all* the doors and shutters. They must enter at
sunset, and they don't get to leave until sunrise. And this
is no matter what. If they're screaming bloody murder, too
bad. They do *NOT* get to leave until sunrise. Also, do it
during a Full Moon, of course. The only other stipulation
is that we get to pick the castle they have to investigate,
and they have to enter parts of the castle we tell them to.
We'll leave a notepad where they can sign their name, thus
proving they were there. It'd be a world-infamous hellhole,
probably somewhere in the UK, although there are plenty of
other badly-haunted locations around the world which would
assuredly make a believer out of that poor "skeptic", too.
But fools rush in where angels fear to tread, etc. Maybe
there's a "skeptic" out there who is actually dumb enough
to try it? And you can bet the resident poltergeists would
have a freaking field day with a dyed-in-the-wool Atheist! :)
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRnIU3ZljD7YrHM/nEQLV/gCdEdVCnB3jNrCdPOxGkzx3oZIJ0j4AoIut
13Pb5UUmJMGMbkiXwheOcS5f
=NfKA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "Abdul The Krout" |
|
| Title: Re: The Myth of Evolution |
02 Aug 2007 09:24:56 AM |
|
|
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:4a0d0071a730bb3bbf081888047ddedb@dizum.com...
<snip>
So everything that John the Baptist ever said, you can take it
to the bank. God can do anything -- obviously! I'm sure every
believer will agree with that. But why the Atheists seem hell-
bent for leather to "debunk" things which they either don't
understand, or as you've pointed out, Atheists don't *want*
to understand, you seem to have a better grasp of why Atheists
don't want to understand, than I have. I just think Atheists
are mentally insane. I truly believe someone has to be insane
not to believe in God the Creator, our heavenly father, the
One Universal God of all. So what is the Atheists' problem?
When was the last time that a mother killed her children in the name of
atheism? When was the last time someone murdered or was put into a mental
institution because they "...heard voices from atheists?".
You might want to re-check your facts before playing the insanity card,
pal...
Like what makes Atheists believe in their "big bang" theory?
How about evidence? Scientific, observational evidence?
It's the best explanation that meets the evidence.
Where, outside of your holy books, is there evidence for "Poofism". Your
answer is a package of contradictions wrapped in bad logic that does nothing
but prevent human intellectual advancement.
<snipped rest of bullcrap>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: The Myth of Evolution |
02 Aug 2007 11:15:57 AM |
|
|
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:4a0d0071a730bb3bbf081888047ddedb@dizum.com...
<snip>
So everything that John the Baptist ever said, you can take it
to the bank.
Only in your delusinoal ignorance.
God can do anything -- obviously! I'm sure every
believer will agree with that.
No.
there is nothing to agree to - since neither your or anyone else has
provided ANY valid information to support even just the existance of this
"gawd".
Even believers are stuck, when they calim god can do everything, with the
logical "can god make a stone so heavy even he couldn't lift it?"
But why the Atheists seem hell-
bent for leather to "debunk" things which they either don't
understand,
There is nothing to debunk, since all you have are ancient fables, fantasies
and fairy tales.
or as you've pointed out, Atheists don't *want*
to understand, you seem to have a better grasp of why Atheists
don't want to understand, than I have. I just think Atheists
are mentally insane. I truly believe someone has to be insane
not to believe in God the Creator, our heavenly father, the
One Universal God of all. So what is the Atheists' problem?
That fanatics, like you, are the really insane - and you're trying to spread
YOUR insanity into eveyone elses lives as though it's absolute fact.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: The Myth of Evolution |
15 Jun 2007 02:25:15 AM |
|
|
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:4a0d0071a730bb3bbf081888047ddedb@dizum.com...
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, "Atheist are Stooges" <Atheist.Stooges@Yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Apobetics" <apobetic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181863595.553687.80680@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 14, 11:14 am, "Atheist are Stooges" <Atheist.Stoo...@Yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Tiktaalik" <corneliusjmch...@yahoo.ie> wrote
On Jun 14, 4:40 pm, Apobetics aka
IKnowIAmAnOffensivePieceOfOrdure<apobe...@hotmail.com> wailed:
The Myth of Evolution
"Dr. Louis Bounoure, former director of research at the French
National Center for Scientific Research, calls evolution "a fairy
tale
for grown-ups." It actually is a cruel hoax! In fact, the
arguments
that are used to support evolutionary theory are astonishingly weak
and many are downright frauds.
What about the THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of scientists you conveniently
ignore - who SUPPORT evolution - AND have supportive evidence?
First, the fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionists.
Bull *****!
No
verifiable transitions from one kind to another have as yet been
found.
Yes, they have.
Yopur ignorance of this reality is not unusual, or surprising, from an
anti-science fool!
Charles Darwin had an excuse: in his day fossil finds were
relatively scarce. Today, however, we have an abundance of fossils.
Still, we have yet to find even one legitimate transition from one
kind to another (sorry no apes to humans and no cats to dogs).
Furthermore, in Darwin's day such enormously complex structures as a
human egg were thought to be quite simple - for all practical
purposes, little more than a microscopic blob of gelatin (the same
argument used by Planed Parenthood to justify abortions today).
Today, we know that a fertilized egg is among the most organized,
complex structures in the universe. In an age of scientific gains,
it
is incredible to think people are willing to maintain that something
so vastly complex arose by chance and accident.
"Chance" and "accident" are only terms bellowed by ignorant creationists who
know nothing about physics, chemistry and statistics.
Like an egg or the
human eye, the universe is a masterpiece of precision and design
that
could not have come into existence by blind chance.
It didn't.
It evolved, ***** for brains!
Finally, while chance is a blow to the theory of evolution, the
basic
laws of science, including law of effects and their causes -energy
conservation and entropy - undergird the creation model for origins
leaving evolution with no foundation at all in science and making it
just another faith - based religion."
IOW - because you are SO ignorant, uneducated, and mentally corrupt -
evolution is a religon.
The Bible Answer Book, Hank Hanegraaff, Countryman Press, 2004
A cretin citing a moron. How typical.
Of course you provide no scientific rebuttal because you are incapable
of
doing so.
Of course, YOU provided no scientific EVIDENCE to support your foaming at
the mouth ignorance.
Talking mud, flying pigs, magic monkeys, and breathing rocks.
It's all right there in the church of Darwin the apostate preacher who
once
practiced witchcraft in the South Pacific.
Wow .... rather than not taking your medications, obviosuly you've been
ovrdosing!
______________________________________________________________
I never read or answer these naked apes. I do not suffer fools.
Have you noticed that they only attack the person and never have
anything on the subject?
This is the standard MO of the lost.
Who cares what they attempt to think (atheist -think...oxymoron)
Yea and never forget we come from rocks--<snicker>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
(sorry for the long reply, but this got me to thinking)
I agree with what you're saying,
Which only makes you, at he very least, just as ignorant.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: The Myth of Evolution |
16 Jun 2007 08:24:36 AM |
|
|
in article 4a0d0071a730bb3bbf081888047ddedb@dizum.com, Nomen Nescio at
nobody@dizum.com wrote on 6/15/07 2:50 AM:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, "Atheist are Stooges" <Atheist.Stooges@Yahoo.com> wrote:
"Apobetics" <apobetic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181863595.553687.80680@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 14, 11:14 am, "Atheist are Stooges" <Atheist.Stoo...@Yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Tiktaalik" <corneliusjmch...@yahoo.ie> wrote
On Jun 14, 4:40 pm, Apobetics aka
IKnowIAmAnOffensivePieceOfOrdure<apobe...@hotmail.com> wailed:
The Myth of Evolution
"Dr. Louis Bounoure, former director of research at the French
National Center for Scientific Research, calls evolution "a fairy tale
for grown-ups." It actually is a cruel hoax! In fact, the arguments
that are used to support evolutionary theory are astonishingly weak
and many are downright frauds.
First, the fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionists. No
verifiable transitions from one kind to another have as yet been
found. Charles Darwin had an excuse: in his day fossil finds were
relatively scarce. Today, however, we have an abundance of fossils.
Still, we have yet to find even one legitimate transition from one
kind to another (sorry no apes to humans and no cats to dogs).
Furthermore, in Darwin's day such enormously complex structures as a
human egg were thought to be quite simple - for all practical
purposes, little more than a microscopic blob of gelatin (the same
argument used by Planed Parenthood to justify abortions today).
Today, we know that a fertilized egg is among the most organized,
complex structures in the universe. In an age of scientific gains, it
is incredible to think people are willing to maintain that something
so vastly complex arose by chance and accident. Like an egg or the
human eye, the universe is a masterpiece of precision and design that
could not have come into existence by blind chance.
Finally, while chance is a blow to the theory of evolution, the basic
laws of science, including law of effects and their causes -energy
conservation and entropy - undergird the creation model for origins
leaving evolution with no foundation at all in science and making it
just another faith - based religion."
The Bible Answer Book, Hank Hanegraaff, Countryman Press, 2004
A cretin citing a moron. How typical.
Of course you provide no scientific rebuttal because you are incapable of
doing so.
Talking mud, flying pigs, magic monkeys, and breathing rocks.
It's all right there in the church of Darwin the apostate preacher who once
practiced witchcraft in the South Pacific.
______________________________________________________________
I never read or answer these naked apes. I do not suffer fools.
Have you noticed that they only attack the person and never have
anything on the subject?
This is the standard MO of the lost.
Who cares what they attempt to think (atheist -think...oxymoron)
Yea and never forget we come from rocks--<snicker>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
(sorry for the long reply, but this got me to thinking)
I agree with what you're saying, as the sixth evening and morning
in Genesis chapter one unambiguously states that Adam (pronounced
"aw-dawm", meaning the red race, the first race, of human beings)
was Created in the image and similitude of the elohiym (which is
plural, ergo the Gods, better known as God the Creator), but here
is an interesting quote from Jesus' first cousin John the Baptist:
"...for I say unto you, that God is able of these
stones to raise up children unto Abraham"
--Matthew 3:9, Luke 3:8 AV
This goes back to Genesis 2:6-7, most of which agrees pristinely
with the creation myths of other cultures. Moses was a very-well
educated, royal Egyptian high priest in the temple of Vulcan. So
it's not surprising that his incomparably erudite understanding
of the Creation myth agreed those of others, e.g., that mankind
was "Created from the dust and spittle of the earth", "Created
from the dust and foamy-crest of the salty ocean waves", etc.
One more quote, where Jesus said:
"...Among them that are born of women there hath not risen
a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that
is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he."
--Matthew 11:11; cf. Luke 7:28 AV
So everything that John the Baptist ever said, you can take it
to the bank. God can do anything -- obviously! I'm sure every
believer will agree with that. But why the Atheists seem hell-
bent for leather to "debunk" things which they either don't
understand, or as you've pointed out, Atheists don't *want*
to understand, you seem to have a better grasp of why Atheists
don't want to understand, than I have. I just think Atheists
are mentally insane. I truly believe someone has to be insane
not to believe in God the Creator, our heavenly father, the
One Universal God of all. So what is the Atheists' problem?
Like what makes Atheists believe in their "big bang" theory?
I think the reason they believe that, is because to believe
that the Universe is infinite and eternal, that sounds too
much like God the Creator. So I think that that is why the
Atheists prefer their pet "big bang" theory, because they
can't get their fragile egos around infinity and eternity.
Who can, after all? That's why the ultimate name for God,
and for the dimensions, planes, heavens, of God's Universe,
is deemed ultimately ineffable, unspeakable, indescribable,
etc. It's like that classic 1962 film 'Barabbas', starring
Anthony Quinn, where he visits the house of aging Lazarus,
and asks him "what's it like?" "What's it like to be dead?"
And Lazarus replies with what is arguably the best-written
description of what it's like to be dead, ever rendered in
the history of cinema. I googled for the film's script, but
to no avail. I do remember that Lazarus told him "how do I
tell an unborn child what life is like? Death is like that."
When I first watch that film years ago, I didn't like what
Lazarus said. But when I watch the film again earlier this
year, the writer's very keen insight became crystal clear.
I think that if "unbelievers" would listen more carefully
for the profound, spiritual connotation above the mundane
denotation, as with the Egyptian hieroglyphs, for example,
they would begin to realize what they've been missing, and
have been so foolishly mocking, for all these years.
Perhaps that's the main reason why Atheists refuse to see
the Light, because of the shame that it would illuminate.
That would be one rational explanation, but I'm not sure
Atheists are particularly rational people to begin with.
So they'll argue "but the evidence shows this", or "the
evidence shows that", ad nauseam. Like the ancient maxim
says, "any finite set of facts can evoke an infinite set
of conclusions". So the Atheists simply skew all of their
theories, conclusions, etc., to fit their profane agenda,
whilst completely ignoring (or gratuitously mocking) all
evidence which proves things supernatural, paranormal,
spiritual, divine, Intelligent Design, ad infinitum.
You know how their "peer review" process works, or their
"million dollar prize" so-called "contests" for anyone who
"proves the supernatural", ad nauseam. Personally, I'd like
to see one of their famous "skeptics" spend the night alone
in one of the most maliciously-haunted castles in the world,
with no phone, no cameras, no outside contact whatsoever.
Just a bottle of drinking water, a good flashlight, and a
backup flashlight, extra batteries, and the clothes on their
back. Lock *all* the doors and shutters. They must enter at
sunset, and they don't get to leave until sunrise. And this
is no matter what. If they're screaming bloody murder, too
bad. They do *NOT* get to leave until sunrise. Also, do it
during a Full Moon, of course. The only other stipulation
is that we get to pick the castle they have to investigate,
and they have to enter parts of the castle we tell them to.
We'll leave a notepad where they can sign their name, thus
proving they were there. It'd be a world-infamous hellhole,
probably somewhere in the UK, although there are plenty of
other badly-haunted locations around the world which would
assuredly make a believer out of that poor "skeptic", too.
But fools rush in where angels fear to tread, etc. Maybe
there's a "skeptic" out there who is actually dumb enough
to try it? And you can bet the resident poltergeists would
have a freaking field day with a dyed-in-the-wool Atheist! :)
Aren't they too busy having sex to do that?
Paul
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|