On Tue, 25 May 2004 14:55:56 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
Zak@home.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2004 17:19:13 +0100, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
Zak@home.com wrote:
Why the exposure of US torture and abuse
serves the Illuminati agenda so well
By David Icke
David Icke is
1. A former goalkeeper for Coventry City
2. A former TV sports presenter
3. The messiah / son of god; wearer of turquoise tracksuits
4. Conspiracy theorist and student of the "all leaders are actually
reptilian space aliens" school of mental illness.
In short he has no credibility and even fewer marbles.
And you are any better?
Why are you going to start citing me too? In the event that I make
suitably outlandish claims, I sure hope I provide a lot more evidence
than Icke or Eastman.
Read this link and apply what you learn to their claims:
http://www1.tpgi.com.au/users/tps-seti/baloney.html
As it stands, you have to try pretty hard to pick two worse and
credulous sources.
Given the point of view you are promoting you really shouldn't need to
stoop this low anyway.
If I want any lip out of you I will rattle my zipper. ***** off.
.
