WH a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:3F856CC0.2BE107C3@globetrotter.net...
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F849EC9.F8CAB06E@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F839CB6.FB81ACC6@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
TonyZ2001 a écrit :
Now if there is nothing to hide, why is someone trying
to intimidate the Iraqi scientists from cooperating?
Tony
Exactly.
Maybe the shooters are of the "you're either with us or against us"
mindset,
in
which case, there doesn't have to be anything to hide to be
considered
traitors
worthy of death.
Woods
Nah, not scientists.
There had to be something to hide.
Ah ... you must never have funded a "scientist" then! (Otherwise, you'd
know
that they usually don't know much of what's going on outside their
teeny, tiny,
little micro-universe. If they're even accomplishing anything within
that!)
Woods
I don't get you sometimes or the reasons for all your vain effort to
discredit
the administration. I studied in molecular biology. Scientists would know
better
than anyone if they are part of a covert weapons' program.
If that was the case anway, there would no reason to target them... I
don't see
your point. Why do you try to insist to push the ludicrous idea that
somehow
Saddam is not the problem here?
J.
Woods is being logical here hairball. You just don't get it 'cos you're too
blind.
If scientists are getting killed, along with others for collaborating with
the illegal occupiers then so be it.
Doesn't have to be anything more sinister behind it than that. But the
warmongerers will say that they're getting killed to keep them quiet...'cos
that suits their purpose.
If the scientists are getting killed to shut them up why do you and
yellabelly suppose that all the other people who are not scientists are
getting killed, (the collaborators I'm talking about)? Eh? Got an answer?
WH
If you are so stupid as to think anyone kills innocent scientists on purpose, it
is that you are brain dead.
J.
.
|
|
| User: "Sean" |
|
| Title: Re: Two Iraqi WMD scientists shot for helping U.S.-Kay |
17 Oct 2003 03:16:44 PM |
|
|
Remember who his heros are.
Sean
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:03:26 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> scratched their head and muttered:
WH a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:3F856CC0.2BE107C3@globetrotter.net...
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F849EC9.F8CAB06E@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F839CB6.FB81ACC6@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
TonyZ2001 a écrit :
Now if there is nothing to hide, why is someone trying
to intimidate the Iraqi scientists from cooperating?
Tony
Exactly.
Maybe the shooters are of the "you're either with us or against us"
mindset,
in
which case, there doesn't have to be anything to hide to be
considered
traitors
worthy of death.
Woods
Nah, not scientists.
There had to be something to hide.
Ah ... you must never have funded a "scientist" then! (Otherwise, you'd
know
that they usually don't know much of what's going on outside their
teeny, tiny,
little micro-universe. If they're even accomplishing anything within
that!)
Woods
I don't get you sometimes or the reasons for all your vain effort to
discredit
the administration. I studied in molecular biology. Scientists would know
better
than anyone if they are part of a covert weapons' program.
If that was the case anway, there would no reason to target them... I
don't see
your point. Why do you try to insist to push the ludicrous idea that
somehow
Saddam is not the problem here?
J.
Woods is being logical here hairball. You just don't get it 'cos you're too
blind.
If scientists are getting killed, along with others for collaborating with
the illegal occupiers then so be it.
Doesn't have to be anything more sinister behind it than that. But the
warmongerers will say that they're getting killed to keep them quiet...'cos
that suits their purpose.
If the scientists are getting killed to shut them up why do you and
yellabelly suppose that all the other people who are not scientists are
getting killed, (the collaborators I'm talking about)? Eh? Got an answer?
WH
If you are so stupid as to think anyone kills innocent scientists on purpose, it
is that you are brain dead.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Two Iraqi WMD scientists shot for helping U.S.-Kay |
17 Oct 2003 03:59:50 PM |
|
|
"Sean" <terel@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:sgj0pvo3tgpuftheekvom1n1p9i63c4q2l@4ax.com...
Remember who his heros are.
Sean
Who?
WH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Two Iraqi WMD scientists shot for helping U.S.-Kay |
18 Oct 2003 12:13:00 PM |
|
|
Sean a écrit:
Remember who his heros are.
Sean
Yes, Saddam, amongst others, I know... Sad case.
J.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:03:26 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> scratched their head and muttered:
WH a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:3F856CC0.2BE107C3@globetrotter.net...
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F849EC9.F8CAB06E@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F839CB6.FB81ACC6@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
TonyZ2001 a écrit :
Now if there is nothing to hide, why is someone trying
to intimidate the Iraqi scientists from cooperating?
Tony
Exactly.
Maybe the shooters are of the "you're either with us or against us"
mindset,
in
which case, there doesn't have to be anything to hide to be
considered
traitors
worthy of death.
Woods
Nah, not scientists.
There had to be something to hide.
Ah ... you must never have funded a "scientist" then! (Otherwise, you'd
know
that they usually don't know much of what's going on outside their
teeny, tiny,
little micro-universe. If they're even accomplishing anything within
that!)
Woods
I don't get you sometimes or the reasons for all your vain effort to
discredit
the administration. I studied in molecular biology. Scientists would know
better
than anyone if they are part of a covert weapons' program.
If that was the case anway, there would no reason to target them... I
don't see
your point. Why do you try to insist to push the ludicrous idea that
somehow
Saddam is not the problem here?
J.
Woods is being logical here hairball. You just don't get it 'cos you're too
blind.
If scientists are getting killed, along with others for collaborating with
the illegal occupiers then so be it.
Doesn't have to be anything more sinister behind it than that. But the
warmongerers will say that they're getting killed to keep them quiet...'cos
that suits their purpose.
If the scientists are getting killed to shut them up why do you and
yellabelly suppose that all the other people who are not scientists are
getting killed, (the collaborators I'm talking about)? Eh? Got an answer?
WH
If you are so stupid as to think anyone kills innocent scientists on purpose, it
is that you are brain dead.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sean" |
|
| Title: Re: Two Iraqi WMD scientists shot for helping U.S.-Kay |
18 Oct 2003 12:40:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 17:13:00 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> scratched their head and muttered:
Sean a écrit:
Remember who his heros are.
Sean
Yes, Saddam, amongst others, I know... Sad case.
J.
I have heard that it is some peoples job to be a good bad example,
some people ARE perfect after all.
Sean
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:03:26 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> scratched their head and muttered:
WH a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:3F856CC0.2BE107C3@globetrotter.net...
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F849EC9.F8CAB06E@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F839CB6.FB81ACC6@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
TonyZ2001 a écrit :
Now if there is nothing to hide, why is someone trying
to intimidate the Iraqi scientists from cooperating?
Tony
Exactly.
Maybe the shooters are of the "you're either with us or against us"
mindset,
in
which case, there doesn't have to be anything to hide to be
considered
traitors
worthy of death.
Woods
Nah, not scientists.
There had to be something to hide.
Ah ... you must never have funded a "scientist" then! (Otherwise, you'd
know
that they usually don't know much of what's going on outside their
teeny, tiny,
little micro-universe. If they're even accomplishing anything within
that!)
Woods
I don't get you sometimes or the reasons for all your vain effort to
discredit
the administration. I studied in molecular biology. Scientists would know
better
than anyone if they are part of a covert weapons' program.
If that was the case anway, there would no reason to target them... I
don't see
your point. Why do you try to insist to push the ludicrous idea that
somehow
Saddam is not the problem here?
J.
Woods is being logical here hairball. You just don't get it 'cos you're too
blind.
If scientists are getting killed, along with others for collaborating with
the illegal occupiers then so be it.
Doesn't have to be anything more sinister behind it than that. But the
warmongerers will say that they're getting killed to keep them quiet...'cos
that suits their purpose.
If the scientists are getting killed to shut them up why do you and
yellabelly suppose that all the other people who are not scientists are
getting killed, (the collaborators I'm talking about)? Eh? Got an answer?
WH
If you are so stupid as to think anyone kills innocent scientists on purpose, it
is that you are brain dead.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Two Iraqi WMD scientists shot for helping U.S.-Kay |
19 Oct 2003 01:01:16 AM |
|
|
Sean a écrit:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 17:13:00 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> scratched their head and muttered:
Sean a écrit:
Remember who his heros are.
Sean
Yes, Saddam, amongst others, I know... Sad case.
J.
I have heard that it is some peoples job to be a good bad example,
some people ARE perfect after all.
Sean
Not in modern times. Not even the last prophet was worthy to be called such.
Well, maybe there are those who are canonized...
J.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:03:26 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> scratched their head and muttered:
WH a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:3F856CC0.2BE107C3@globetrotter.net...
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F849EC9.F8CAB06E@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit :
In article <3F839CB6.FB81ACC6@globetrotter.net>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
TonyZ2001 a écrit :
Now if there is nothing to hide, why is someone trying
to intimidate the Iraqi scientists from cooperating?
Tony
Exactly.
Maybe the shooters are of the "you're either with us or against us"
mindset,
in
which case, there doesn't have to be anything to hide to be
considered
traitors
worthy of death.
Woods
Nah, not scientists.
There had to be something to hide.
Ah ... you must never have funded a "scientist" then! (Otherwise, you'd
know
that they usually don't know much of what's going on outside their
teeny, tiny,
little micro-universe. If they're even accomplishing anything within
that!)
Woods
I don't get you sometimes or the reasons for all your vain effort to
discredit
the administration. I studied in molecular biology. Scientists would know
better
than anyone if they are part of a covert weapons' program.
If that was the case anway, there would no reason to target them... I
don't see
your point. Why do you try to insist to push the ludicrous idea that
somehow
Saddam is not the problem here?
J.
Woods is being logical here hairball. You just don't get it 'cos you're too
blind.
If scientists are getting killed, along with others for collaborating with
the illegal occupiers then so be it.
Doesn't have to be anything more sinister behind it than that. But the
warmongerers will say that they're getting killed to keep them quiet...'cos
that suits their purpose.
If the scientists are getting killed to shut them up why do you and
yellabelly suppose that all the other people who are not scientists are
getting killed, (the collaborators I'm talking about)? Eh? Got an answer?
WH
If you are so stupid as to think anyone kills innocent scientists on purpose, it
is that you are brain dead.
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
