| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Uncle Wallys World" |
| Date: |
16 Jul 2004 10:22:19 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
"Sola Fire" <not@home.now.com> wrote in message news:<2lp7gmFfebqnU1@uni-berlin.de>...
Google really delivers accurate results these days!
That's *Truly* Wondrous ;-)
Yes siree yes indeedy do ;-)
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-) (Ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky ?!?! Well, do ya
punk ?!?!?
========================================================================
.
|
|
| User: "Charles Douglas Wehner" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 09:11:10 AM |
|
|
HOT NEWS - SEE BOTTOM OF PAGE.
unclewallysworld@yahoo.ca (Uncle Wally's World) wrote in message news:<a7ef5981.0407161922.6d4f3fac@posting.google.com>...
"Sola Fire" <not@home.now.com> wrote in message news:<2lp7gmFfebqnU1@uni-berlin.de>...
Google really delivers accurate results these days!
That's *Truly* Wondrous ;-)
Yes siree yes indeedy do ;-)
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-) (Ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky ?!?! Well, do ya
punk ?!?!?
========================================================================
Type "miserable" into Google and "I'm feeling Lucky".
Then
Type "failure" into Google and "I'm feeling Lucky".
Now THERE's democracy!
Charles Douglas Wehner
http://www.geocities.com/charleswehner/nicework.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
16 Jul 2004 11:00:54 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060102090604090507050500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Uncle Wally's World a écrit:
"Sola Fire" <not@home.now.com> wrote in message news:<2lp7gmFfebqnU1@uni-berlin.de>...
Google really delivers accurate results these days!
That's *Truly* Wondrous ;-)
Yes siree yes indeedy do ;-)
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-) (Ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky ?!?! Well, do ya
punk ?!?!?
========================================================================
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
--------------060102090604090507050500
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
Uncle Wally's World a écrit:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mida7ef5981.0407161922.6d4f3fac@posting.google.com">
<pre wrap="">"Sola Fire" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:not@home.now.com"><not@home.now.com></a> wrote in message news:<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:2lp7gmFfebqnU1@uni-berlin.de"><2lp7gmFfebqnU1@uni-berlin.de></a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Google really delivers accurate results these days!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
That's *Truly* Wondrous ;-)
Yes siree yes indeedy do ;-)
HOOROO ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-) (Ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky ?!?! Well, do ya
punk ?!?!?
========================================================================</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed! <br>
<br>
By the guys at google of course. <br>
<br>
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.<br>
<br>
But they should be sued.<br>
<br>
J.<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------060102090604090507050500--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Highlandish" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
16 Jul 2004 11:21:52 PM |
|
|
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
--
Always avoid generalisations.
Take out the _CURSEING to reply to me
.
|
|
|
| User: "Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
17 Jul 2004 02:28:11 AM |
|
|
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
17 Jul 2004 05:53:40 PM |
|
|
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Douglas Wehner" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 09:02:00 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<U5iKc.55798$RD4.2447262@news20.bellglobal.com>...
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
"Sources close to the President have explained that his views on
General Relativity are similar to those of Einstein, but differ in the
detail".
His Skull-and-Bones Masonic lodge has put the most stupid twat in
American history into the White House. The "Image Builders" put out a
torrent of commentaries about his intellectual musings - when, in
fact, he understands nothing.
What have people got against war? Look at this:
http://www.geocities.com/charleswehner/bliar.htm
and this:
http://www.geocities.com/charleswehner/nicework.htm
Note the BOTTOM LINE of the page.
"I'm Feeling Lucky" on Google is supposed to deliver the SUBJECT
MATTER. If - in the spirit of Internet Democracy - everybody knows
what "Miserable Failure" refers to, then why should Google not deliver
that verdict?
Charles Douglas Wehner
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 09:11:22 AM |
|
|
(Charles Douglas Wehner) Spat the Words
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<U5iKc.55798$RD4.2447262@news20.bellglobal.com>...
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
"Sources close to the President have explained that his views on
General Relativity are similar to those of Einstein, but differ in the
detail".
His Skull-and-Bones Masonic lodge has put the most stupid twat in
American history into the White House. The "Image Builders" put out a
torrent of commentaries about his intellectual musings - when, in
fact, he understands nothing.
What have people got against war? Look at this:
http://www.geocities.com/charleswehner/bliar.htm
and this:
http://www.geocities.com/charleswehner/nicework.htm
I think Blair is more popular in the US than in the UK.
Strange how that works. Blair is definitely more eloquent
than dimwit Bush but they both carry pretty much the same
message. Pre-emptive war is never going to be popular.
Note the BOTTOM LINE of the page.
"I'm Feeling Lucky" on Google is supposed to deliver the SUBJECT
MATTER. If - in the spirit of Internet Democracy - everybody knows
what "Miserable Failure" refers to, then why should Google not deliver
that verdict?
Charles Douglas Wehner
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
17 Jul 2004 09:21:17 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam?? It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden. So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 08:25:41 AM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marv@HeartOfGold.com> wrote in message
news:cdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com...
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in
message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I
fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line
to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">
Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented
to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam?? It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no
Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden. So who's fault is
it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
Because my opinion differs from yours, you shoot it down as being not "a
real opinion"??? YOU should know better!
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 09:18:39 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 09:25:41 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marv@HeartOfGold.com> wrote in message
news:cdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com...
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in
message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I
fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line
to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">
Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented
to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam?? It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no
Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden. So who's fault is
it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
Because my opinion differs from yours, you shoot it down as being not "a
real opinion"??? YOU should know better!
Jane
Sorry ... let me rephrase.
You can't support Bush's Iraq invasion without falling back on his line
"your with us or you're with the terrorists" or changing justification for
it by calling it 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'.
The Iraqi invasion is one part of the War on Terror. The war on terror is
being lost because of the Iraqi invasion. I tend to differentiate between
the War in Iraq and the War on Terrorism. The war in Iraq is a massive
tactical blunder within the broader war on terror. I support the war on
terror ... I don't support the war in Iraq since it's crippled the war on
terror. And Bush is an imbecile who put his personal agenda before the
national and global agenda of combatting terrorism. He should be impeached.
My response was based on your reply to calling the guy an idiot for doing
the Google joke of 'miserable failure' linking to GW's bio on the White
House page. Bush *is* a miserable failure, partly because of the reasons I
stated above. You do *not* have to support George Bush to support the war
on terror. Bush is one of the worst 'war' Presidents in history. He ignored
the advice of professional military personnel to settle old scores and line
the pockets of his inner circle.
If you want to win a war listen to the people who have studied war and
practiced war.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
17 Jul 2004 10:52:19 PM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
You can try to justify your position as much as you like, but the fact
remains that you are supporting the terrorists. Remember George W
Bush's speech before the war? It went something like this, ...
Every nation, in every region, and every individual the world over, now
has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the
terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor
or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile
regime, just as any individual who does not support our actions to rid
the world of terrorists, will be regarded as terrorists themselves.
So it appears that you are not only supporting terrorism, you ARE a
terrorist yourself. Now where's my fridge magnet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sola Fire" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
19 Jul 2004 12:18:26 PM |
|
|
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in
message news:40F9F3F3.80682FA7@yahoo.fr...
So it appears that you are not only supporting terrorism, you ARE a
terrorist yourself. Now where's my fridge magnet?
You are an incredibly profuse and acute idiot and you really do not
deserve to breathe the air around us all any longer.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 05:22:25 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:52:19 +1000, Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour
overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
You can try to justify your position as much as you like, but the fact
remains that you are supporting the terrorists. Remember George W
Bush's speech before the war? It went something like this, ...
Every nation, in every region, and every individual the world over, now
has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the
terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor
or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile
regime, just as any individual who does not support our actions to rid
the world of terrorists, will be regarded as terrorists themselves.
So it appears that you are not only supporting terrorism, you ARE a
terrorist yourself. Now where's my fridge magnet?
LOL ...
Good trolling ... you're a pro.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 06:54:34 PM |
|
|
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:52:19 +1000, Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour
overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
You can try to justify your position as much as you like, but the fact
remains that you are supporting the terrorists. Remember George W
Bush's speech before the war? It went something like this, ...
Every nation, in every region, and every individual the world over, now
has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the
terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor
or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile
regime, just as any individual who does not support our actions to rid
the world of terrorists, will be regarded as terrorists themselves.
So it appears that you are not only supporting terrorism, you ARE a
terrorist yourself. Now where's my fridge magnet?
LOL ...
Good trolling ... you're a pro.
ta.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 08:36:55 AM |
|
|
Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> Spat the Words
Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in
message news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click
I fee lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this
line to their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">
Miserable Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn
up http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first
find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy
if you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
You can try to justify your position as much as you like, but the fact
remains that you are supporting the terrorists. Remember George W
Bush's speech before the war? It went something like this, ...
Every nation, in every region, and every individual the world over, now
has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the
terrorists.
Yes, we remember. That's how pre-pubescent children view the
world - black and white (no gray area), good and bad, with us
or against us. Well George W I'm neither with you or against
you. I bet that doesn't really compute for you but that's more
a statement of your mental condition and maturity than my
patriotism.
From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor
or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile
regime, just as any individual who does not support our actions to rid
the world of terrorists, will be regarded as terrorists themselves.
So it appears that you are not only supporting terrorism, you ARE a
terrorist yourself. Now where's my fridge magnet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 12:00:46 AM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020707080808060202000500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden.
YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...
So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not.
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
You should follow your own advice.
J.
--------------020707080808060202000500
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:suvvdj@yahoo.fr"><suvvdj@yahoo.fr></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr">news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Highlandish wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> in
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com">Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com</a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">"http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"</a>> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">first
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html</a> as the first find.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Because he's an idiot.
Jane
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam?? </pre>
</blockquote>
You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply. <br>
<br>
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is <u>not</u>
the fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice
and go bomb Iran out of the map then?<br>
<br>
Interesting...<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
</pre>
</blockquote>
WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda.
It is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq,
nor even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there
weren't ties and other collaboration. <br>
<br>
So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden. </pre>
</blockquote>
YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not. <br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcdcmrh015rr@news1.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
You should follow your own advice.<br>
<br>
J.<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------020707080808060202000500--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 05:20:28 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:00:46 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
Regarless, which country, which orgnizagion posed the 'clear and present'
danger?? Al Qaeda and/or Iran, not Saddam, and the 9-11 Commission stated
that.
It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
Jean, the maggots on this dead horse you keep dragging around is getting
disgusting. Bury it.
It's unbelievable that after Dr. Kay and the guy that replaced him hasn't
found squat. Not even production equipment or any trace of the existence of
production equipment.
C'mon, give it up.
So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?
It's anti-Bush. Stop touting the neocon line ... you're smart enough to
form your opinion.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden.
YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...
No. I wish Bin Laden *was* in prison or dead ... I've stated this before.
Bush put his personal agenda before that of his country.
So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not.
Bush failed to capture or kill Bin Laden. He's the Commander In Chief, no
one else.
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
You should follow your own advice.
I did. And I'm not spouting any 'party line' nonsense. If you're going to
fight a war, fight it win. Don't fight it for personal gain.
Bush is thief and a liar and should be impeached.
The U.S. needs a leader who understands the enemy and knows how to defeat
them. I couldn't give a hoot if the person to do it is either a Repub or
Dem, just so long as they put personal gain aside and focus on defeating
the threat and deal with the cause.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 12:38:22 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000900060806030500020305
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:00:46 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
Regarless, which country, which orgnizagion posed the 'clear and present'
danger?? Al Qaeda and/or Iran, not Saddam, and the 9-11 Commission stated
that.
It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
Jean, the maggots on this dead horse you keep dragging around is getting
disgusting. Bury it.
It's unbelievable that after Dr. Kay and the guy that replaced him hasn't
found squat. Not even production equipment or any trace of the existence of
production equipment.
Doesn't mean he didn't hide them or shipped them elsewhere. He did. and
no one will speak because of the new sovereignty that would condemn them.
C'mon, give it up.
So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?
It's anti-Bush. Stop touting the neocon line ... you're smart enough to
form your opinion.
You are crazy to think I follow anyone line. I tell things the way they are.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden.
YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...
No. I wish Bin Laden *was* in prison or dead ... I've stated this before.
Bush put his personal agenda before that of his country.
Nope. This is a lie.
So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not.
Bush failed to capture or kill Bin Laden. He's the Commander In Chief, no
one else.
So? He is still at it. Not getting the assholes doesn't mean he doesn't
use whatever is available to get him. The failure is not that of Bush,
Clinton too wanted him and failed, all the world is looking to get him,
the failure is of the intelligence community.
Any president who would deal with it would have gotten the same result.
Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
You should follow your own advice.
I did. And I'm not spouting any 'party line' nonsense. If you're going to
fight a war, fight it win. Don't fight it for personal gain.
Bah, there is never any sure things in a war. The allies who authorized
the last chance resolution and turned on the coalition just to avoid
paying are to blame for much of the problems.
Bush is thief and a liar and should be impeached.
Only because of lies you spread which are totally false. Bush was always
totally honest and you cannot find any lie from him. You find many
fabrications from others like you. It is sad that the issues in this
upcoming election will be about the truth versus liars and the lies may
win.
The U.S. needs a leader who understands the enemy and knows how to defeat
them. I couldn't give a hoot if the person to do it is either a Repub or
Dem, just so long as they put personal gain aside and focus on defeating
the threat and deal with the cause.
The president is that person. He has to learn from the lesson taught by
the coalition of the weasels. This was unexpected when you have a
resolution they all signed that is black on white. Breach->war.
But he knows not to give in the terrorists. I doubt someone who would
say otherwise would.
J.
--------------000900060806030500020305
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:00:46 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:suvvdj@yahoo.fr"><suvvdj@yahoo.fr></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr">news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Highlandish wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> in
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com">Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com</a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">"http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"</a>> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">first
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html</a> as the first find.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Because he's an idiot.
Jane
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Regarless, which country, which orgnizagion posed the 'clear and present'
danger?? Al Qaeda and/or Iran, not Saddam, and the 9-11 Commission stated
that.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Jean, the maggots on this dead horse you keep dragging around is getting
disgusting. Bury it.
It's unbelievable that after Dr. Kay and the guy that replaced him hasn't
found squat. Not even production equipment or any trace of the existence of
production equipment. </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Doesn't mean he didn't hide them or shipped them elsewhere. He did. and
no one will speak because of the new sovereignty that would condemn
them.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
C'mon, give it up.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
It's anti-Bush. Stop touting the neocon line ... you're smart enough to
form your opinion.
</pre>
</blockquote>
You are crazy to think I follow anyone line. I tell things the way they
are.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
No. I wish Bin Laden *was* in prison or dead ... I've stated this before.
Bush put his personal agenda before that of his country.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Nope. This is a lie.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Bush failed to capture or kill Bin Laden. He's the Commander In Chief, no
one else.
</pre>
</blockquote>
So? He is still at it. Not getting the assholes doesn't mean he doesn't
use whatever is available to get him. The failure is not that of Bush,
Clinton too wanted him and failed, all the world is looking to get him,
the failure is of the intelligence community.<br>
<br>
Any president who would deal with it would have gotten the same result.
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Get a real opinion. Use your head. Quit spouting this NeoCon ***** ...
you should know better.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">You should follow your own advice.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I did. And I'm not spouting any 'party line' nonsense. If you're going to
fight a war, fight it win. Don't fight it for personal gain.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Bah, there is never any sure things in a war. The allies who authorized
the last chance resolution and turned on the coalition just to avoid
paying are to blame for much of the problems. <br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
Bush is thief and a liar and should be impeached.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Only because of lies you spread which are totally false. Bush was
always totally honest and you cannot find any lie from him. You find
many fabrications from others like you. It is sad that the issues in
this upcoming election will be about the truth versus liars and the
lies may win. <br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcddiu303hp@news3.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">
The U.S. needs a leader who understands the enemy and knows how to defeat
them. I couldn't give a hoot if the person to do it is either a Repub or
Dem, just so long as they put personal gain aside and focus on defeating
the threat and deal with the cause. </pre>
</blockquote>
The president is that person. He has to learn from the lesson taught by
the coalition of the weasels. This was unexpected when you have a
resolution they all signed that is black on white. Breach->war. <br>
<br>
But he knows not to give in the terrorists. I doubt someone who would
say otherwise would.<br>
<br>
J.<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000900060806030500020305--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marvin The Paranoid Android" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 01:25:11 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:38:22 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:00:46 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
Regarless, which country, which orgnizagion posed the 'clear and present'
danger?? Al Qaeda and/or Iran, not Saddam, and the 9-11 Commission stated
that.
It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
Jean, the maggots on this dead horse you keep dragging around is getting
disgusting. Bury it.
It's unbelievable that after Dr. Kay and the guy that replaced him hasn't
found squat. Not even production equipment or any trace of the existence of
production equipment.
Doesn't mean he didn't hide them or shipped them elsewhere. He did. and
no one will speak because of the new sovereignty that would condemn them.
They were offered rewards to lead the U.S. to the weapons. This should be
obvious considering the fallout happening to the Bush Admin from not
finding them.
C'mon, give it up.
So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?
It's anti-Bush. Stop touting the neocon line ... you're smart enough to
form your opinion.
You are crazy to think I follow anyone line. I tell things the way they are.
Until WMD are found, you're telling things the way you *think* they are or
hope they are.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden.
YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...
No. I wish Bin Laden *was* in prison or dead ... I've stated this before.
Bush put his personal agenda before that of his country.
Nope. This is a lie.
Proof to the contrary would be useful. You've bought into the groupthink of
'you're with us or you're with the terrorists'. Completely wrong. You're
spouting Bush's neocon lines even tho you deny it.
Iraq is *not* the whole war on terrorism. It's one huge tactical blunder
that's put the war on terrorism at risk. Bin Laden's not in Iraq, nor WMD's
nor was there ever a working relationship between the two.
So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not.
Bush failed to capture or kill Bin Laden. He's the Commander In Chief, no
one else.
So?
<headShake=1>
Forget it.
You've been brainwashed beyond hope.
Goodbye.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Type "miserable failure" into Google and press "I'm Feeling Lucky" |
18 Jul 2004 07:14:15 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010402080102020905000506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:38:22 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:00:46 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr...
Highlandish wrote:
Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> in
Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com
If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
first
found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html as the first find.
What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
Because he's an idiot.
Jane
Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
Regarless, which country, which orgnizagion posed the 'clear and present'
danger?? Al Qaeda and/or Iran, not Saddam, and the 9-11 Commission stated
that.
It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
Jean, the maggots on this dead horse you keep dragging around is getting
disgusting. Bury it.
It's unbelievable that after Dr. Kay and the guy that replaced him hasn't
found squat. Not even production equipment or any trace of the existence of
production equipment.
Doesn't mean he didn't hide them or shipped them elsewhere. He did. and
no one will speak because of the new sovereignty that would condemn them.
They were offered rewards to lead the U.S. to the weapons. This should be
obvious considering the fallout happening to the Bush Admin from not
finding them.
There is no reward if they have no power to grant them immunity because
they listened to liberals (like you), Europeans and Arabs who wanted to
give Iraq full sovereignty. Why are you so slow?
C'mon, give it up.
So all your little anti-US objection don't hold water. Still, it was
because Saddam thumbed his nose at the UN that we went top war. Where
the heck were you all this time?
It's anti-Bush. Stop touting the neocon line ... you're smart enough to
form your opinion.
You are crazy to think I follow anyone line. I tell things the way they are.
Until WMD are found, you're telling things the way you *think* they are or
hope they are.
They ARE. Today there is a big cache that has been found from YOURSELF,
without the help of scientists, which proves my point. Under the header
"(Reuters breaking News) U.S. Troops May Have Discovered Suspected WMD
Cache"
(news:cdej7j0n1i@news1.newsguy.com in Google
http://www.google.ca/groups?selm=cdej7j0n1i@news1.newsguy.com ). So
since you posted it one hour after this post, I excuse you. but YOU are
the one who makes my point on this.
Bush no longer has the resources, nor did he ever commit sufficient
resources to track down and capture or kill Bin Laden.
YOU wish. But this is just another one of your lies...
No. I wish Bin Laden *was* in prison or dead ... I've stated this before.
Bush put his personal agenda before that of his country.
Nope. This is a lie.
Proof to the contrary would be useful. You've bought into the groupthink of
'you're with us or you're with the terrorists'. Completely wrong. You're
spouting Bush's neocon lines even tho you deny it.
Iraq is *not* the whole war on terrorism. It's one huge tactical blunder
that's put the war on terrorism at risk. Bin Laden's not in Iraq, nor WMD's
nor was there ever a working relationship between the two.
You are an idiot, you make up a total lie and you want me to unprove it?
And then you add more lies? Binny is the UN resolution about terrorism
and Iraq is the UN resolution about Saddam. Period. There was two
resolutions calling for force, two agendas for the world. That you are a
***** who takes for the weasels of the world against America doesn't
change that. Bush never lied. You assholes make up that he lied because
you make up the lies, or else you focus on irrelevant details and blow
them up of proportion for YOUR own agenda.
So who's fault is it
now that the U.S. elections are being threatened with another massive
attack by Al Qaeda?? The fucking Liberals???
Yes, they have a big responsibility for not supporting their prez if
that is what you are aiming at, even if it is not.
Bush failed to capture or kill Bin Laden. He's the Commander In Chief, no
one else.
So?
<headShake=1>
Forget it.
You've been brainwashed beyond hope.
Goodbye.
In you terrorists ***** kissing dreams. So you snipped the reply. but who
cares. Good then, I gather you will stop polluting here
(news:alt.prophecies.nostradamus ) perhaps? At least stop polluting my
posts, yes? Doesn't mean I won't point out your lies, if you post here
(on apn). Just that you won't reply, much like zaakaasss in final
analysis. Good.
Like that you can't make me lose my time by adding more insanities and
snipping what sets you straight and saying the same idiocoies beyond
contempt again after snipping the reply, like here (i.e. here on the
specialized NG alt.prophecies.nostradamus that is)... if you have a word
of course. Which I seriously doubt given that you continually lie. But
we shall see.
J.
--------------010402080102020905000506
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
<br>
Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midcdefaq02j69@news2.newsguy.com">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:38:22 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 05:00:46 GMT, Jean Guernon overjoyed me with this news:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Marvin The Paranoid Android a écrit:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0400, Jane overjoyed me with this news:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:suvvdj@yahoo.fr"><suvvdj@yahoo.fr></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr">news:40F8D50B.E92B963C@yahoo.fr</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Highlandish wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Quoth The Raven "Jean Guernon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jguernon@globetrotter.net"><jguernon@globetrotter.net></a> in
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com">Wv1Kc.19844958$Id.3283339@news.easynews.com</a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If you get the same result every time you type in that and click I fee
lucky it is because it,s fixed!
By the guys at google of course.
Only a brain dead idiot wouldn't figure that out.
But they should be sued.
J.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">***** google fixed it, thousands of war protesters added this line to
their own website
GWB:<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">"http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html"</a>> Miserable
Failure
like I have. google works by placing the most linked to file as the
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">first
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">found in a search, so the phrase Miserable Failure will always turn up
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html">http://www.whitehouse.gov/president/gwbbio.html</a> as the first find.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">What have you got against the war? Why do you live in a democracy if
you support terrorism?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Because he's an idiot.
Jane
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Ok ... LOL ... if I'm against the war, then *I* automaticly support
terrorism. *Which* war you talking about??
Iran has sponsored terrorist groups since day one. They've sponsored
Hezbollah extensively. The 9-11 Commission stated the evidence presented to
them indicated more of working relationship between Iran and Al Qaeda then
Iraq and Al Qaeda ... and Iran's a breath away from owning a nuke. So why
did Bush insist on blowing his load over Saddam??
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">You ARE truly an idiot. BECAUSE OF THE UN RESOLUTION that required it.
The only UN resolution that authorized force against a country for
non-compliance to all its clauses, and Saddam did breach virtually all
of them, even AGAIN after a last chance resolution to comply.
This resolution and the one against terrorism is what the world
required. That weasels weaseled out after it was time to act is not the
fault of the US. But theirs. But so, we should follow your advice and go
bomb Iran out of the map then?
Interesting...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Regarless, which country, which orgnizagion posed the 'clear and present'
danger?? Al Qaeda and/or Iran, not Saddam, and the 9-11 Commission stated
that.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It was wrong. It cost
billions of dollars and thousands of lives ... for what? No WMD's and no Al
Qaeda links ... the 'Iraqi Freedom' pitch is total *****.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">WMD are hidden in the sand as Blair said, the ones the UN inventoried
didn't disappear into thin air, and yes there were ties with AlQaeda. It
is not because 9-11 was the secret plan of Bin Laden and nor Iraq, nor
even the hijackers knew about it until the last day, that there weren't
ties and other collaboration.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Jean, the maggots on this dead horse you keep dragging around is getting
disgusting. Bury it.
It's unbelievable that after Dr. | | | | | | | | | | |
