"Rabbi Min" <rabbi.min@neo.iervsalem.zion> wrote in message
news:4W59LP9Q37934.8451157407@Gilgamesh-frog.org...

"Jeffrey" wrote:

Every now and then I read
compelling evidences that the moon landing in 1969 was faked. The

below gives some interesting facts/lies:
http://www.hostileinvader.com/MoonLanding~ns4.html
Why can't the government get the facts straight..??

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Back in the late 60s to early 70s, the cold war
between the west and east was nearing a plateau.
By portraying unmanned missions as being manned,
the USA dug itself a pit out of which she can't
climb out of without extreme embarrassment. Put
yourself in their enviable place: you have been
telling lies upon lies for decades, "we went to
the moon".."one small step..one giant leap" etc.
The taxpaying public would soon be disenchanted
with uncle sam if the cat got let out o the bag
by the mainstream media. FOX TVs documentary on
the manned moon landing hoaxes, 'Did We Land On
The Moon?' which first aired Thu Feb 15th, 2001,
and was repeated again several days later, this
was replete with irrefutable evidence that NASA
never sent any living human to the Moon--albeit
dead humans may have been sent there for all we
know? Certainly unmanned missions landed on the
Moon many times over. The Russians did this too,
and in the same time period that the U.S.A. did
it. That's a fine accomplishment, but in no way
does it prove humans made it to the Moon & back.

To be sure, you're all going to be looking a little daft if someone goes
there and finds the site.

As it happens, the transmissions from the site were, at the time being
monitored - outside NASA's control, by Goonhilly and Jodrell Bank. The
transmissions were coming from the moon. One Cornish grammar school built

reciever to monitor the transmissions of Apollo 11 - again, they came from
the Moon. Unfortunately I forget who they were, but they were quite well
known for their astronomical projects at the time. And of course the
Russians would have been monitoring the transmissions - had they not been
coming from anywhere near the flight path, or from the moon itself, then
they would have been blowing the whistle.

Then of course you've got a large number of moon rocks that came back and
went off for study. And of course practically every tracking station and
reciever was pointed at Apollo 13 - think that they might have noticed if

wasn't coming from anywhere near the moon. Ond of course, there's the fact
that several bloody great Saturn V's were fired off in front of the

press, and tracked by stations around the world - if they didn't go to the
moon, where did they go?

Of course, you might argue that it was only a transponder that went

but then that contradicts your argument that there was no time lag.

there was - I remember it. However, if a transponder alone was sent, you'd
get double the time lag, because the tranmission has to go out before it
comes back again.

Of course, to do this perfectly, you'd have to spend considerably more

you would sending a man to the moon. Let's see now - you've got to have a
launch anyway, otherwise you're into paying off the world's press. Then
you've got to get the world's tracking stations to go along with it,
including those on the other side of the Iron Curtain. Now that means
bringing the Politburo into the conspiracy - mind you, if there was a
conspiracy involving the Russians, we'd have heard something from there
since Soviet Russia collapsed . . . in short, by the time you've finished,
you've had to bring in half the world. You can't do it with less,

there's going to be some person somewhere, some amateur astronomer who has
built their own radio telescope (and they do exist - a couple of keen
astronomers did it at my school) who will be phoning the newspapers to say
"Hey - those transmissions aren't coming from anywhere near the moon!"

a bloody sight easier to send a few men rather than do that.

Now the underlying argument is that there is no direct evidence, beyond

of the television, that it happened; consequently since it could have been
achieved by other means, it must have been. Logically this is fallacious.
Most Americans would similarly be unable to prove that their head of state
is a President - after all, you've not met him. You've only seen him on

TV - how do you know that those aren't faked broadcasts featuring an

Or even a digital creation? How do you know that the news you see is real
and not actually staged? You ever read 1984? You're supposed to have a
vote. How do you know that isn't faked as well? The votes may go straight
from the polling station into a furnace - the outcome may have been

already and the powers that be may, for their own reasons (largely to keep
people quiet with an illusion) have decided to have the illusion of an
election. Nearly slipped when Dubya got 'elected' didn't it? For all you
know, extraterrestrials may have taken out the US government decades ago,
and are now running the country from Area 51. Why do you think that they
don't want people near there? Why do you think technology has accelerated

much over the last 50 years? Why the interest in genetic engineering?

be that David Icke is right and the world is now run by a conspiracy of
lizards - people call him mad, but that's always the best way to stop

listening to someone telling the truth. Can you prove that the people you
work with or live next door to are human? You only see them for a small

of the day. You only assume that their clothes hide a normal human body,

that they have the normal biological functions and mental patterns that

would call human. Of course these extraterrestrials could be responsible

the Apollo conspiracy simply because they've replaced everyone of
importance. If anyone outside the conspiracy finds out, they just bump

off quietly and replace them. In which case you're next - THEY KNOW!

seen your post! I should run for the hills if I were you. Speak to no

You can't tell who you can trust - you may be one of the few human beings
left and they're getting fewer! They're not sure enough yet to reveal
themselves - there's still too many humans left. You never know - this may
be a disguised warning - THEY KNOW! THEY ARE WATCHING YOU! Who is in that
car outside your house? How long have they been there? Is there anyone
watching from one of those darkened windows? How long have they been

Ever had the phone ring, and there's no one there? Are they monitoring

websites you've been visiting? Who knows what hidden features the software
you've got has. Time is short.

Of course, that way lies madness. On balance, one applies Occam's Razor

deduces said conspiracy is a load of hot air and hogwash. As for Fox TV,
you're more likely to get factual information from watching Bug's Bunny.

of course I may be one of the lizards; I may know how far we've led you up
the garden path. I may even have told you how and why it was done. You'll
never know. ]:-)

Never trust a smiling lizard! ]:-)

Kevin

Rabbi Min <rabbi.min@neo.iervsalem.zion> wrote in message

Good Lord, somebody is dragging this up again?????

Rabbi Min <rabbi.min@neo.iervsalem.zion> wrote in message news:<4W59LP9Q37934.8451157407@Gilgamesh-frog.org>...

"Jeffrey" wrote:

Every now and then I read
compelling evidences that the moon landing in 1969 was faked. The article
below gives some interesting facts/lies:
http://www.hostileinvader.com/MoonLanding~ns4.html
Why can't the government get the facts straight..??

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Back in the late 60s to early 70s, the cold war
between the west and east was nearing a plateau.
By portraying unmanned missions as being manned,
the USA dug itself a pit out of which she can't
climb out of without extreme embarrassment. Put
yourself in their enviable place: you have been
telling lies upon lies for decades, "we went to
the moon".."one small step..one giant leap" etc.
The taxpaying public would soon be disenchanted
with uncle sam if the cat got let out o the bag
by the mainstream media. FOX TVs documentary on
the manned moon landing hoaxes, 'Did We Land On
The Moon?' which first aired Thu Feb 15th, 2001,
and was repeated again several days later, this
was replete with irrefutable evidence that NASA
never sent any living human to the Moon--albeit
dead humans may have been sent there for all we
know? Certainly unmanned missions landed on the
Moon many times over. The Russians did this too,
and in the same time period that the U.S.A. did
it. That's a fine accomplishment, but in no way
does it prove humans made it to the Moon & back.

Daniel Joseph Min

Good Lord, somebody is dragging this up again?????