Re: Why does Sollog make it so hard?



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Re: Why does Sollog make it so hard?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Never anonymous Butt"
Date: 17 Jan 2004 03:53:28 PM
Object: Re: Why does Sollog make it so hard?
DaarkSyde wrote:


On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:52:02 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
<"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote:

Never anonymous Bud wrote:


While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',

(hermesnines)
scribbled:

1. April 1995 Sollog gives a clear fax warning to the US


*****. Just more of the standard lies by SlapDork and his followers.


No. You're bullshitting and lying as usual. I just read and saw that fax
that
anyone can verify if they want. He did warn about a blast occurring
which he
described as a big bang and said it would happen on april 19, 1995.
Pretty clear
to me. He clearly stated an actual year, month and day date for a major
blast. The odds of a major blast happening on the day he said and that
it was
the first biggest act of terror on US soil on that date proves his
prophecy
was beyond coincidence if you have some intelligence.

I know you lie about sollog all the time here and never give any
evidence to
support what you say, so watching you lie like a rug again is no
surprise.

I hope people with brains will look into this particular hit of his. Its
really
quite interesting and does lend validity to sollog in a big way making
liars
like anonymous bud looks like a fool.


Total ***** just like all of SlowFog's trash.

So why don't you prove its trash? Sollog can prove the above claims are
true.
I can prove its true. Anyone that looks into the claims above will see
that the above facts are indeed facts exactly as its stated.
Obviously you claim its trash as always, because you know you can't
disprove whats being said.
Loser. You can't see your evasive response doesn't disprove sollog at
all.
In fact, it helps to show how morons like you can't give any proof
against
what he's saying aside from all the evidence that does prove he's not
a false prophet.
.

User: "Anonymoose Ihatespam"

Title: Re: Why does Sollog make it so hard? 19 Jan 2004 10:41:59 AM
Never anonymous Butt <newskat@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:4009B056.617B@earthlink.net:
<nonsense snipped>

Loser. You can't see your evasive response doesn't disprove sollog at
all.
In fact, it helps to show how morons like you can't give any proof
against
what he's saying aside from all the evidence that does prove he's not
a false prophet.

Like his prediction back on 12/31 that "Sollog says a large fall will occur
in stock markets by 1/16 in 2004. 1/16 or 116 is 911 upside down..."
that didn't come true either. Oh, wait...how can you predict something
when You're Dead?
.

User: "DaarkSyde"

Title: Re: Why does Sollog make it so hard? 18 Jan 2004 06:21:49 AM
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:53:28 GMT, Never anonymous Butt
<newskat@earthlink.net> wrote:

DaarkSyde wrote:


On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:52:02 GMT, Wally Angleseaâ„¢
<"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote:

Never anonymous Bud wrote:


While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',

(hermesnines)
scribbled:

1. April 1995 Sollog gives a clear fax warning to the US


*****. Just more of the standard lies by SlapDork and his followers.


No. You're bullshitting and lying as usual. I just read and saw that fax
that
anyone can verify if they want. He did warn about a blast occurring
which he
described as a big bang and said it would happen on april 19, 1995.
Pretty clear
to me. He clearly stated an actual year, month and day date for a major
blast. The odds of a major blast happening on the day he said and that
it was
the first biggest act of terror on US soil on that date proves his
prophecy
was beyond coincidence if you have some intelligence.

I know you lie about sollog all the time here and never give any
evidence to
support what you say, so watching you lie like a rug again is no
surprise.

I hope people with brains will look into this particular hit of his. Its
really
quite interesting and does lend validity to sollog in a big way making
liars
like anonymous bud looks like a fool.


Total ***** just like all of SlowFog's trash.


So why don't you prove its trash? Sollog can prove the above claims are
true.
I can prove its true. Anyone that looks into the claims above will see
that the above facts are indeed facts exactly as its stated.

Obviously you claim its trash as always, because you know you can't
disprove whats being said.

Loser. You can't see your evasive response doesn't disprove sollog at
all.
In fact, it helps to show how morons like you can't give any proof
against
what he's saying aside from all the evidence that does prove he's not
a false prophet.

We shall see after the 19th nimrod
SPLONK
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER